thought   4134

« earlier    

Using Artificial Intelligence to Augment Human Intelligence
"As discussed earlier, in one common view of AI our computers will continue to get better at solving problems, but human beings will remain largely unchanged. In a second common view, human beings will be modified at the hardware level, perhaps directly through neural interfaces, or indirectly through whole brain emulation.

We’ve described a third view, in which AIs actually change humanity, helping us invent new cognitive technologies, which expand the range of human thought. Perhaps one day those cognitive technologies will, in turn, speed up the development of AI, in a virtuous feedback cycle: "
user  interface  design  machine  learning  future  computers  thought  people 
9 days ago by ssam
the bullet hole misconception
" The computer claims sovereignty over the whole range of human experience and supports its claim by showing that it thinks better than we can. The fundamental metaphorical message of the computer is that we become machines. Our nature, our biology, our emotions and our spirituality become subjects of second order.

For all this to work we assume that humans are in some ways like machines. From this we move to the proposition that humans are little else but machines. And finally we argue that human beings are machines. Thus it follows that machines become human beings. And from here the jump to a superintelligent artificial intelligence (AI) is trivial."

Another voice on this front in the spirit of Jaron Lanier, David Byrne and others. Lots of great links, well written.
technology-is-not-the-solution-for-everything  people  computers  future  life  ai  thought  quotes  research  innovation  society 
10 days ago by ssam
6 Years of Thoughts on Programming | Henrik Warne's blog
It is now more than 6 years since I started blogging about software development. It has been a great experience, and I thought I would reflect on what I have learnt. So here are my reasons for writing about programming, a bit on my process, and some statistics. Why Knowing what I think. Formulating or…
thought  programming  opinion  work  summary 
18 days ago by gilberto5757
Your company's Slack is probably sexist
Women tend to use conversation to maintain and build relationships, while men use it to exchange and display knowledge, says Deborah Tannen, a linguist, and the author of Talking from 9 to 5: Women and Men at Work. When Tannen implanted herself at various organizations, she noticed that men and women both use small talk to build friendships, but the topics differ: Women often discuss their personal lives, thoughts, and relationships, while men rely on playful insults and joking. The two tactics don’t always mix well.

“Women’s friendly, personal communication struck many men as a waste of time,” says Tannen. But what men miss is that such discourse isn’t just friendly—it’s strategic. “It keeps lines of communication open for women so they can call on colleagues for work when they need it,” says Tannen, “as it’s easier to receive help from someone you’re already friendly with.”

Meanwhile, women often took men’s insults and banter literally. “A man’s retorts were seen as evidence that he thought an idea was seriously flawed, or that he doesn’t like the person he’s arguing with,” she says. “But for many men, challenging ideas is sign of respect and playful insults are a sign of friendship.”
thought  gender  work 
4 weeks ago by bjr
(429) https://twitter.com/i/web/status/929151722697777155
RT : Call for Papers: Third Annual Conference
Theme: Matters
March 30-31, 2018,
Black  Thought  from twitter_favs
5 weeks ago by DocDre
Thinking Clearly With Alan Jacobs
And let me add to that something that W. H. Auden once wrote:
'In our culture, we have all accepted the notion that the right to know is absolute and unlimited. The gossip column is one side of the medal; the cobalt bomb is the other. We are quite prepared to admit that, while food and sex are good in themselves, an uncontrolled pursuit of either is not, but it is difficult for us to believe that intellectual curiosity is a desire like any other, and to recognize that correct knowledge and truth are not identical. To apply a categorical imperative to knowing, so that, instead of asking, “What can I know?” we ask, “What, at this moment, am I meant to know?” — to entertain the possibility that the only knowledge which can be true for us is the knowledge that we can live up to — that seems to all of us crazy and almost immoral.'

Bulverism is term coined by C. S. Lewis: it means simply assuming that people who disagree with you are wrong, and then speculating about why they are wrong (usually because they’re evil). Social media are the most fertile ground ever created for Bulverism.

This is why people who believe that thinking better is largely a matter of overcoming bias are mistaken: the real problem, as Hans-Georg Gadamer says, is distinguishing the true prejudices that help us to understand from the false ones that prevent us from understanding.

How do we make such distinctions? That question leads us back to almost everything we’ve been talking about here: becoming aware of the orientation of our will, noting the dangers of Inner Rings and the blessings of true membership, resisting the temptation to “talk for victory,” and so on. Follow those practices and you’ll gradually acquire a clearer understanding of which prejudices are reliable guides and which are impediments to thinking well.

Rebecca West once said that most people don’t have conversations, they have intersecting monologues. That’s what debate shows and social media are for: intersecting monologues.
thought 
7 weeks ago by bjr
CAN POLITICIANS THINK?
In How to Think I argue that there is no point in telling people to think for themselves, because that is neither possible nor desirable. We always think with and in relation to others — and often trim our thinking to meet the approval of others — so the real questions that face us involve the construction and maintenance of thought-environments. Some of those environments are cognitively healthy — they encourage serious reflection — and those tend to be ones in which we can become genuine members of a group; others strive to rule us through the stick of threatened exclusion and the carrot of promised insider status, and those profoundly discourage thinking. (You can read about the former in C. S. Lewis’s essay “Membership” and the latter in “The Inner Ring”; and the two kinds of belonging, true and false, are treated side-by-side in his novel That Hideous Strength.)
politics  thought 
8 weeks ago by bjr
Twitter
RT @THETCRGUY: #TheTCRGuy #TCRStation #TubeStation #LondonUnderground #NorthernLine #ThoughtOfTheDay #Thought #Hate #Problems…
Thought  TCRStation  Hate  TubeStation  LondonUnderground  Problems  TheTCRGuy  via:packrati.us  NorthernLine  ThoughtOfTheDay 
10 weeks ago by bytebot

« earlier    

related tags

*  139s  2010s  2012  2014  2015  2017-07-30  2017-08-01  2017-08-03  2017-08-10  2017-08-12  2017-08-14  2017-08-16  2017-09-03  abstract  academia  action  activism  adamu  advertising  aeon.co  against  ai  alumni  amazing  america  and  animals  anth  anthropology  anti-imperialist  apple  archive  arendt  argument  art  article  articles  artificial  audio  bad  bamboo  bci  be  beauty  behavior  bias  big  black  blockchain  blog  bob  body  book  books  brain  bs  buddhism  buddhist  bullshit  business  by  camp:  canada  cannot  capitalism  career  change  christ  christ39s  christianity  climate_change  cnc  coaching  cognition  cognitive  college  common  computers  computing  concepts  consciousness  consultancy  content  controlled  cool  creativity  crime  crisis  critique  culture  cutting  dartmouth  data  david  death  debate  delicious  depression  dere  design  desire  difficulty  discussion  disk  dkl  download  droit  east  eastern  economic  economics  editorial  education  effect  emot  emotion  england  enhancement  environment  espionage  essay  etudes  evolution  experiment  experiments  explain  exploitation  fail  fascism  fear  france  free  freedom  future  fuzzy  geao  gender  genius  greed  guardian  harrypotter  hate  hd  health  homme  howto  human  humanity  i-wish-i-could-show-this-to-everybody  idea  ideas  ifttt  immigration  improve  in  inboxing  innovation  inspiration  instapaper  institute  intellectual  intellectuals  intelligence  interesting  interface  internet  internet_age_act_2  iphone  ir40  john_berger  karl_marx  keynesian  knowledge  labor  language  lantern  latin  law  leader  leaders  leadership  learning  lecture  lesson  liberté  life  lifehacks  linear  londonunderground  long.read  love  ludilo  machine  management  margaret_paxson  marketing  material  math  meditation  memory  menstruation  metaphor  metrics  meyssan  mind  mindful  mindfulness  mises  mmm  modality  moneyforcontent  narratives  nature  negativity  nelson  neoliberal  neural  neuro  neuroesthetics  new  new_media  noam_chomsky  northernline  offline_read  op  opinion  organization  pain  paul  pcao  peace  penser  people  perception  perfect  personal  philosophy  pictures  police  politeness  political-correctness  politics  possess  power  pre-keynesian  presentation  prison  problems  product  programming  psychology  public  put  q&a  quo  quote  quotes  ram  recorder  recording  reference  refugee  religion  representation  republican  research  resilience  resist  right  safety  schedule  science  semirzeki  sense  showers  sight  singularity  sloth  society  software  soul  speaking  speech  splintered  spy  status  stories  subjectivity  summary  talih  tcrstation  teach  technology-is-not-the-solution-for-everything  technology  ted  the  theory  thetcrguy  thierry  thinking  thoughtoftheday  thoughts  time  to  tr**p  tracings  tubestation  typing  ui  uncle  university  used  user  video  violence  war  west  why  women  wordpress  work  wound  writer  writing  youtube 

Copy this bookmark:



description:


tags: