rms   1002

« earlier    

thoughts on rms and gnu -- wingolog
I can hear you saying it. RMS started GNU so RMS decides what it is and what it can be. But I don't accept that. GNU is about practical software freedom, not about RMS. GNU has long outgrown any individual contributor. I don't think RMS has the legitimacy to tell this group of largely volunteers what we should build or how we should organize ourselves. Or rather, he can say what he thinks, but he has no dominion over GNU; he does not have majority sweat equity in the project. If RMS actually wants the project to outlive him -- something that by his actions is not clear -- the best thing that he could do for GNU is to stop pretending to run things, to instead declare victory and retire to an emeritus role.

Note, however, that my personal perspective here is not a consensus position of the GNU project. There are many (most?) GNU developers that still consider RMS to be GNU's rightful leader. I think they are mistaken, but I do not repudiate them for this reason; we can work together while differing on this and other matters. I simply state that I, personally, do not serve RMS.
rms  gnu  leadership  open-source  foss  free-software  organisations  emeritus 
12 days ago by jm
A reflection on the departure of RMS - Thomas Bushnell, BSG - Medium
Oped that is most similar to my views with some exceptions.

Richard Stallman has always been a creep.
It's deeply unfortunate that he was protected and abetted rather than helped to be a better, less toxic person.
And who knows?
It's quite likely that many people tried to socialize him.
But ultimately "don't be a jerk" continues to be an insufficient measure of conduct.

Unfortunately Stallman's own hubris goes unmentioned.
Bushnell even speculates that Stallman considers himself a failure.
While this suggests a sympathetic figure, this is both irrelevant and misleading; anyone who has ever crossed words with Stallman knows that he can be profoundly strident, arrogant, and condescending.
This has often alienated as many, if not more, than he has persuaded.
It has crippled projects that could have flourished.
His intransigence, once thought a gift, is shown to be a profound curse.

To many he will remain a hero.
And quite a few now understand him to be a villain.
If there is a real tragedy here, it isn't that he has been brought low by his own hand.
It is that he still really doesn't understand what he's done wrong.
And without that understanding there will never be contrition.
A lack of penitence will forever keep forgiveness of those whom he has wronged out of his reach.
And those who he has harmed will forever mistrust the institutions, the culture, and the technology that protected such a creep.
This is a tremendous price the free software community continues to pay.

Most of Stallman's defenders, even now, don't understand this.
And among those that do understand this, his remaining enablers, they are more keen than ever to take advantage of him.
The fact that he does not comprehend the sheer amount of damage he has done to the community he professes to love and desires to protect, that is indeed tragic.
rms  fsf  failure  mit  opensores  gnu  politics  academia  stallman  hubris 
13 days ago by po
thoughts on rms and gnu -- wingolog
«One could describe GNU as a set of software packages that have been designated by RMS as forming part, in some way, of GNU. But this artifact-centered description does not capture movement: software does not, by itself, change the world; it lacks agency. It is the people that maintain, grow, adapt, and build the software that are the heart of the GNU project -- the maintainers of and contributors to the GNU packages. They are the GNU of whom I speak and of whom I form a part.»
gnu  rms  fsf  free-software  free-culture  2019 
14 days ago by brennen

« earlier    

related tags

2019  2drms  abuse  academia  accuracy  advice  ai  analog-multiplier  apologist  arpanet  assault  assualt  blog  bushnell  calibration  cams  capitalism  cep  child  clause  coc  code  codeofconduct  codes-of-conduct  common  computing  confidence  contrasts  conversion  copyleft  cryptocurrency  current-measurement  db  defamation  departure  dhh  diversity  eipstein_scandal  electronics  emacs  emeritus  engineering  environment  epistein  episten  epstein  error  essays  ethics  facts  failure  fascinating  feminism  floss  foss  foundation  free-culture  free-software  free-speech  free  freedome  freesoftware  fsf  gender  geodesy  gnss  gnu  governance  gpl  gps  guilde  guile  guix  harvard  history  hubris  hurd  idealogging  important  internet  interval  interviews  lab  laboratory  leadership  licence  license  licenses  licensing  lisp  mailing-list  manifesto  mean  measurement  median  medium  memory  metoo  minsky  mit  mmm  natalism  news  nonprofits  ogg  onparenting  open-source  open  opensores  opinion  optimization  organisations  osnews  parenting  pedophile  pedophilia  plot  policy  politics  position  predict  privacy  probability  professor  programming  r95  racism  rape  readlater  remove  resign  resignations  resigned  resigns  rest  richard  richard_stallman  rpackages  rstudio  scandals  scheme  sexism  sexual  sexualabuse  shrinkage  signal-generator  socialism  society  software-freedom-conservancy  software  sound  source  spotify  stallman  stalmann  statistics  stevenlevy  strength  stuff  survival  tech  theregister  thomas  thomasbushnell  timesharing  tirefire  titanic:  travel  trump  twitter  validation  via-cwebber  via-hackernews  via-mastodon  vice  why  wired  women 

Copy this bookmark: