rigor   110

« earlier    

REMS (Rigorous Engineering for Mainstream Systems), is a 6-year EPSRC-funded Programme Grant (2013-2019, £5.6M, Cambridge, Imperial, and Edinburgh) to explore how we can use rigorous mathematics to improve engineering practice for mainstream computer systems, to make them more robust and secure: broadly, to “create the intellectual and software tools to apply semantics and verification at the heart of mainstream system engineering”.
arm  trust  research  rigor  engineering  verification  coq  research_program  l3 
december 2018 by jbkcc
Beyond Rigor - Hybrid Pedagogy
Excellent intervention in the discourse around "rigor" in pedagogical practice.
pedagogy  rigor 
april 2018 by kevingannon
self study - Looking for a good and complete probability and statistics book - Cross Validated
I never had the opportunity to visit a stats course from a math faculty. I am looking for a probability theory and statistics book that is complete and self-sufficient. By complete I mean that it contains all the proofs and not just states results.
nibble  q-n-a  overflow  data-science  stats  methodology  books  recommendations  list  top-n  confluence  proofs  rigor  reference  accretion 
october 2017 by nhaliday
Hire a Top Performer Every Time with These Interview Questions
1. Grit
2. Rigor
3. Impact
4. Teamwork
5. Ownership
6. Curiosity
7. Polish
hiring  interview  questions  grit  rigor  teamwork  impact  ownership  curiosity  polish  recruitment 
june 2017 by drmeme
Saying ‘No’ to Best Practices – OFFICE OF DIGITAL LEARNING
"The worst best practice is to adhere to, or go searching for, best practices. I have been in countless rooms with teachers, technologists, instructional designers, and administrators calling for recommendations or a list of tools they should use, strategies that work, practices that cannot fail to produce results in the classroom. But digital tools, strategies, and best practices are a red herring in digital learning. Learning always starts with people. Instead of asking “What tool will we need?” ask “What behaviors will need to be in place?”

I emphasize and encourage a critical digital pedagogy—an approach to learning that grows from the work of writers and teachers like bell hooks and Paulo Freire, and that recognizes that in today’s world all learning is hybrid. But that approach never starts with the digital. It starts with the human. And I find that the most effective application of Critical Digital Pedagogy arises from a place of kindness, trust, and belief in students. With student (and teacher) agency as its aim, Critical Digital Pedagogy asks its practitioners to always, first and foremost, acknowledge that we are all in this room together—whether that room is a classroom or the whole wide web—and to act accordingly.

At a teaching workshop I was facilitating recently, I was pressed to offer a list of best practices. This is what I came up with. I offer these 10 best practices with what should seem like an obvious caveat. No best practices should ever go untested. I personally have tested each of these, but because learning and teaching are not homogenous experiences for everyone, I don’t encourage anyone to follow a best practice that doesn’t suit them.

Sean’s 10 Best Practices

Be yourself

While working with a group at the University of Delaware, I spoke to a graduate teacher whose upbringing in a Southern Baptist tradition sometimes leads her to present in her “preaching voice.” This is an authentic voice, and one that she’s very comfortable using; however, other teachers joke about it, or malign this aspect of her embodiment as un-academic. In digital spaces, she edits herself, creating a teacherly presence much more normative, almost unidentifiable as her.

In digital spaces, we tend to adopt mannerisms and a personality that are not entirely true to who we are. Be suspect of that, and watchful for it. In a classroom, we may perform ourselves in certain ways, but we are fallible, unedited, and vulnerable. These qualities make us better teachers. Don’t be afraid to be who you are in a digital environment as much as you are in your classroom.

Create trust / Be trusting

Jesse Stommel, Executive Director of the Division of Teaching and Learning Technologies at the University of Mary Washington says,
Learning is always a risk. It means, quite literally, opening ourselves to new ideas, new ways of thinking. It means challenging ourselves to engage the world differently. It means taking a leap, which is always done better from a sturdy foundation. This foundation depends on trust — trust that the ground will not give way beneath us, trust for teachers, and trust for our fellow learners in a learning community.

Critical pedagogy assumes that students want and are motivated to learn. Only about 75% of teachers I’ve talked to feel this way. We need to change that for ourselves. Teaching is not only more effective when we trust students to learn (which I distinguish from following instructions or passing a test), but it’s also more fun, more satisfying, and less exhausting.

Grade less / Grade differently

Peter Elbow writes, “Grading tends to undermine the climate for teaching and learning. Once we start grading their work, students are tempted to study or work for the grade rather than for learning.” We all know this is true. Working for a grade undermines not only a lifelong attitude toward learning, but also student agency. A critical pedagogy asks us to reconsider grading entirely; and if we can’t abandon it whole-hog, then we must revise how and why we grade. Consider allowing students to grade themselves. Offer personal feedback on work instead of a letter, number, or percentage. There are lots of options to evaluating work without artificial markers.

Question deadlines

When pressed, most teachers have told me that they enforce deadlines because students will need to meet deadlines in the “real world.” There are no students in higher education who got there without meeting deadlines. Education need not be militaristic about deadlines. Ideas and creation are more important than timeliness. I wrote, in my post called “Late Work,”

We are put in the most unique spot of coaching learners into a world of knowledge. What we need to remember is that their world of knowledge may not align perfectly with our own, their process may not fit our schedules, their ideas may not synch with our own.

Think about what you are actually teaching and question whether you need deadlines, whether students need deadlines, and whether either of you benefit from them.

Collaborate with students

Learners are pedagogues in their own right. Chris Friend, Director of the Hybrid Pedagogy journal, writes:
If we give students the freedom to choose their own path, they might choose poorly or make mistakes on our watch. But we must be willing to allow them the challenge of this authority, the dignity of this risk, and the opportunity to err and learn from their mistakes. They learn and gain expertise through experimentation.

If pedagogy is the sole purview of the instructor in the room, students are asked to follow along a path predetermined by that instructor’s best (we hope) intentions. However, because students bring different levels of expertise to any material or discussion—and because their lives, identities, and intersectionality inform their learning—students should be as involved in their own learning as possible. From syllabus creation to grading, building rubric and assignments to self-assessment. As Daniel Ginsberg writes, “my students are the most central members of the community in which I learn critical pedagogy.”

Inspire dialogue

Very little can be accomplished through direct instruction. Bloom’s Taxonomy makes a show of positioning knowledge-level learning as the foundation of any learning experience. But learning is more chaotic, messier, and more confounding than taxonomies provide for. In “Beyond Rigor,” Jesse Stommel, Pete Rorabaugh, and I argue that:
Intellectually rigorous work lives, thrives, and teems proudly outside conventional notions of academic rigor. Although institutions of higher education only recognize rigor when it mimics mastery of content, when it creates a hierarchy of expertise, when it maps clearly to pre-determined outcomes, there are works of exception — multimodal, collaborative, and playful — that push the boundaries of disciplinary allegiances, and don’t always wear their brains on their sleeves, so to speak.

Simply put, learning happens outside the lines. It’s perfectly acceptable for instructors to provide lines, but whenever we do so, we must just as diligently encourage learners to leave those lines—to question, to redraw, to imagine, to refuse, to explore. When we do this, we inspire dialogue, not just between students, but between ourselves and students, between ideas, between the act of learning and the act of instruction themselves.

Be quiet

Generally speaking, teachers fear dead air. Silence in the classroom, or few to no responses on a discussion forum, can stir all kinds of thoughts and emotions—from “they’re not getting it” to “I’ve done something wrong” to “they’re bored,” and worse. But in truth, thoughtfulness and thoroughness takes time.

Janine DeBaise writes that: “Every student has something valuable to teach the rest of us. I’ve made that assumption for over thirty years now, and so far, I’ve never been proven wrong.” If at the core of critical pedagogy we believe that learners are their own best teachers—and if we have spent any time at all as teachers ourselves preparing lesson plans and discussions—then we can acknowledge that teaching takes time.

Filling silence may come out of a desperation to keep the class moving and to ensure that all ideas are understood, but it also reinforces the teacher’s voice as primary. When we are silent, we can hear what students have to say (even when they’re not saying it), and listen for the swell of understanding as it builds.

Be honest and transparent about pedagogy

Teaching isn’t magic. In fact, there are very good reasons for teachers to reveal their “tricks” to learners. I have, numerous times, sat on the desk at the front of the classroom and called attention to how that’s different to standing behind a podium, sitting in a circle with the class, or lecturing from notes. Not to qualify one over the other, but to reveal something about the performativity of learning and teaching.

Similarly, we should invite students into a discussion about the syllabus, the 15- or 10-week structure of a course, the usefulness or uselessness of grades, etc. Kris Shaffer, in “An Open Letter to My Students,” brings students in close to his teaching process:
I am not perfect. Nor are any of your other professors. We are experts in the fields we teach, and some of us are experts in the art of teaching. However, we make mistakes … and each pass through the material brings new students with different experiences, backgrounds, skills, sensitivities, prejudices, loves, career goals, life goals, financial situations, etc. There is no one way — often not even a best way — to teach a topic to a student.

There is power in secrecy, as any magician knows. But for a collaborative, critical pedagogy to work, that power must be shared.

Keep expectations clear

In digital learning, instructions are vital. If … [more]
bestpractices  education  pedagogy  teaching  howweteach  2017  seanmorris  learning  edtech  digitalliteracy  jessestommel  criticalpedagogy  sfsh  grade  grading  howwelearn  deadlines  collaboration  chrisfriend  hybridpedagogy  dialogue  peterorabaugh  rigor  janinedebaise  silence  quiet  listening  performativity  expectations  adamheidebring-bruno  change  thomaskasulis  maggiemaclure  krisshaffer  amycollier  jenross 
june 2017 by robertogreco
Practice, Reading, and Fake News - Behind The Stacks​
All that is going to help recognize and resist fake news is the practice that humanity has used for generations to help understand, model, and navigate the messy, complicated world that we live in: wide, extensive, intensive, difficult reading.

It is often argued that “difficult” texts are elitist, that simplified texts with no barriers to comprehension are therefore more democratic. I would argue that since the active engagement with difficult texts creates citizens more able to think critically and be active participants in society (as in their reading), the reading of “difficult” texts is more democratic, less elitist than the position that maintains that citizens are too stupid to read anything more than what journalists and governments deign to make available to them. Simplified texts are used to facilitate the dissemination and absorption of propaganda (“fake news”). Difficult texts require the active participation of the reader. Describing how language can become easily-digestible through over-familiarity, Jameson writes that

Style resembles the Red Queen, developing ever more complicated mechanisms in order to sustain the power to say the same thing; and in the commercial universe of late capitalism the serious writer is obliged to reawaken the reader’s numbed sense of the concrete through the administration of linguistic shocks, by restructuring the overfamiliar. [7]

Journalistic texts rely on the overfamiliar, indeed it is a hallmark of their style. This is not to say, however, that simplified texts don’t have their place: Twitter, for example, has been used to manage and organize protests in various countries. But this has to be a complement, not an alternative, to the practice of sustained, intensive reading with active work on the part of the reader. Promoting this practice – not checklists and LibGuides – is how librarians should be addressing the phenomena of fake news.  
reading  libraries  information_literacy  rigor 
february 2017 by jfbeatty

« earlier    

related tags

10pl  2011  2012  2014  2015  2016  2017  21stcenturyskills  aaronson  ability  absolute-relative  abstraction  academia  academic  academics  access  accretion  achievement  achievementgap  acm  acmtariat  adamheidebring-bruno  adaptability  advertising  aesthetics  agility  aging  ai  algebra  algorithms  amateur  amt  amycollier  analysis  analytical-holistic  andrewsullivan  anthropology  ap  aphorism  applications  approximation  arguing  argument  arm  ascd  assessment  assumptions  atoms  audience  author  authoritarianvsdemocractic  automation  aversion  avolition  axiomatic-method  bayesian  ben-recht  bestpractices  biases  big-list  big-peeps  big-picture  big-surf  bio  bits  blog  bloom  books  boredom  borel-cantelli  boring  brief  brightworks  cambrianmoment  cartoons  ccsr  ccss  change  characterization  charlieloyd  cheating  cheatsheet  chicago  chrisfriend  christianity  clarity  class  classroom  cog-psych  cognitive  collaboration  collection_development  college  collegeprep  commoncore  communication  community  complex-systems  complexity  composition-decomposition  comprehension  computation  concept  conceptual-vocab  conference  confluence  confusion  content  contrarianism  conversation  cool  coq  counterexample  courage  course  creative  creativity  criticalpedagogy  criticalthinking  criticism  critique  critped  cs  culture  curiosity  curriculum  cybernetics  dark-arts  data-science  data  database  davidtheogoldberg  deadlines  debate  debating  deception  decision-theory  deep-learning  deepgoog  definition  dennett  depth  depthofknowledge  deschooling  descriptive  design  detail-architecture  development  dialogue  dianarhoten  diff  digitalliteracy  diigo  dijkstra  dilution  dimensionality  discipline  discovery  discussion  dml  dml2012  dok  draft  dropoutrates  dropouts  edtech  education  edutopia  efl  elearning  embodiedlearning  empathy  empirical  encyclopedic  engagement  engineering  entrepreneurialism  entrepreneurship  epiphenomena  epistemic  equity  error  essay  estimate  ethics  ethnography  evolution  examples  expectations  experiment  expert  expertise  explanans  explanation  exploration-exploitation  exploratory  exposition  extrema  fanfiction  farmers-and-foragers  featurecreep  feminism  fiction  fields  finance  firstimpressions  fivethirtyeight  flexibility  florida  flow  flux-stasis  flux  focus  formal-methods  fourier  frontier  fun  future  games  gaming  generalization  genius_hour  geny  georgia  geraldaungst  gevertulley  gladwell  gowers  grade  gradient-descent  grading  gradreqs  graduationrates  graph-theory  graphs  grit  habit  hanson  har  hard  hari-seldon  harrypotter  hcds  heuristic  hi-order-bits  hierarchy  highered  highereducation  highschool  hiring  history-of-ideas  history  homo-hetero  honesty  hope  howto  howwelearn  howweteach  howwetech  hsu  humanity  humility  humor  hybridpedagogy  hypocrisy  hypothesis-testing  ideas  identity  idle  ieee  ifttt  illinois  imagination  impact  impetus  implementation  india  info-dynamics  informal-economy  information-theory  information  information_literacy  initiative  insight  instruction  integral  intelligence  interdisciplinary  internet  interview  intricacy  intuition  iteration-recursion  iterestedness  itrt  james  janinedebaise  jeffrey_j_williams  jenross  jessestommel  johndewey  johnrendon  johnseelybrown  journalism  justinemacauley  kernels  kevingannon  knowledge  knowledgeecologies  krisshaffer  l3  lancan  language  large-factor  lazy  leadership  learning-theory  learning  learningecologies  learningoutcomes  leisure  lens  lessonplans  levers  libraries  linear-algebra  liner-notes  links  list  listening  literacy  local-global  logic  long-term  low-hanging  luisdelrosario  machine-independant-programming  machine-learning  maggiemaclure  making  manifestos  mariamontessori  matching  math.ca  math.co  math.ds  math.fa  math.nt  math  mathematics  mathtariat  measurement  merc  meritocracy  meta  meta:math  meta:rhetoric  metabuch  metacognition  metameta  method  methodology  methods  michael-jordan  mikado  mindchanges  mindchanging  mobilelearning  model-class  models  montessori  motivation  multi  multiplicative  nate  ncea  networkage  neuro  neurons  news  nibble  nitty-gritty  no-go  nonaspiration  nuance  numerics  occam  off-convex  oly  open-problems  openmindedness  optimate  optimism  optimization  order-disorder  orders  orfe  org:bleg  org:inst  org:mag  org:mat  org:sci  overflow  ownership  papers  parents  parsimony  patriarchy  pbl  pdf  pedagogy  peer-review  performance  performativity  persistence  perturbation  peterorabaugh  philosophy  photoshop  physics  picture  piper  play  pln  plt  policy  polish  politics  popsci  postrat  postsecondary  poverty  powerpoint  practice  pragmatic  prbl  preprint  pressure  princeton  principals  probability  problem-solving  problem  problemsolving  process  professionaldevelopment  program  programming  progressive  progressivism  proof  proofs  propaganda  properties  proving-programming  psychology  psychometrics  publishing  q-n-a  qra  qualitative  quality  quantum-info  quantum  questions  quiet  quotes  race  racism  radicalism  random  ranking  rat-pack  rationality  ratty  reading  realness  reason  recommendations  recruitment  reduction  refactoring  reference  reflection  regularizer  reinforcement  relevance  replication  reporting  requirements  research-program  research  research_ethics  research_program  retrofit  rigidity  rigour  robriordin  robust  rounding  russellrumberger  s:***  sanantonio  scalability  scale  scaling  scholar  school2.0  schools  science  scientific  scitariat  seanmorris  search  self-assessment  sfsh  shaming  shrequest1  signaling  silence  siliconvalley  silver  skeleton  smart  social  soft-question  software  solving  speaking  speculation  spock  ssc  standardizedtesting  standards  statistics  stats  stochastic-processes  stories  strategy  street-fighting  structure  subculture  success  summary  survey  synthesis  systematic-ad-hoc  systemsthinking  taking  talks  tcs  tcsnmy  tcstariat  teacherprep  teaching  teamwork  technology  telos-atelos  testing  testprep  the-enlightenment  the-self  the-trenches  theology  theory-of-mind  theory  thewhy  thick-thin  things  thinking  thomaskasulis  thunderblog  tidbits  tightness  tiheblog  time  timel-hady  to-read  tonywagner  tools  top-n  tosend  toshare  trend  tricks  trump  trust  truth  turing  unit  universalism-particularism  unschooling  unstructuredtime  unsupervised  usa  vague  values  vazirani  verification  video  videos  vigor  volo-avolo  watereddown  waterin  wateringdown  web  web2.0  westminster  whitepaper  whole_child  why  whyweteach  wiki  willrich  within-without  wow  writing  yoga  yvain  🎓  👳  🤖  🦉 

Copy this bookmark: