rebeccatraister   10

Hillary Clinton Didn’t Shatter the Glass Ceiling
Hillary Clinton aimed at the highest glass ceiling. What broke instead was the coalition she thought would pierce it — and faith that it will happen.
2016election  hillaryclinton  politics  rebeccatraister  toread 
november 2016 by laurenipsum
Marriage Equality Is a Win for Single People Too -- The Cut
"For those Americans who are not married — by choice or by circumstance — or for those who simply do not regard the institution as the apotheosis of adult existence, Kennedy’s flowery prose in this otherwise stirring context, which unlocked matrimony to millions who have been barred from it, was jarring and more than a little depressing.

“Marriage,” Kennedy writes, “responds to the universal fear that a lonely person might call out only to find no one there.” It’s one of several sentences in his decision that sound really lovely and warm, but is in fact both cruel and inaccurate, what with its implication that marriage is a cure for loneliness and that those who have not found conjugal recourse are howling into an abyss of solitude that brings to mind Alien and its single heroine, Ripley: In [unmarried] space, no one can hear you scream! Kennedy’s vision of unmarried life is apparently absent friends, lovers, siblings, children; contra the experiences of millions, there is no satisfaction, relief, or fulfillment in independence.

He builds further on this in the decision’s ultimate paragraph, one that is destined to be read at gay and straight weddings for decades, but which Nation editor Richard Kim fairly described on Twitter as a “barfy, single-shaming kicker.”

“No union is more profound than marriage,” Kennedy writes, “for it embodies the highest ideals of love, fidelity, devotion, sacrifice and family.” This will come as news to the millions of people who aim their love, fidelity, sacrifice, and devotion high, but in directions other than at a spouse. “In forming a marital union, two people become something greater than they once were,” Kennedy continues, just hammering it home: Married partnership, according to the Supreme Court, is not only a terrific institution into which we rightly should welcome all loving and willing entrants, it is an arrangement that apparently improves the individuals who enter it, that makes them greater than they were on their own. Those who have previously not been allowed to marry, Kennedy avers, should not be “condemned to live in loneliness,” as if the opposite of marriage must surely be a life sentence of abject misery."



"Kennedy’s framing seems to bolster McArdle’s prediction of a return to Victorian social constriction. But because of the growing number of single people in America, it brings up the possibility of something worse: the cutting off of rights and benefits to an ever-expanding population of independent adults. It corresponds to the worst fears of single advocate Bella DePaulo, who has written that even when gay and lesbian people gain true marriage equality, “all those people who are single — whether gay or straight or any other status — will still remain second class citizens,” wanting for the tax breaks and legal dispensations and next-of-kin rights enjoyed by their married peers.

What’s extra galling about Kennedy’s wording is that it makes the glorious same-sex marriage victory a cramped thing, when in fact the social progress it represents is expansive in ways that should redound positively to many Americans, not just those who have already or who aspire to walk down an aisle or into a judge’s chambers. In reality, the right for gay people to marry each other represents a victory not only for gay-marrying people and their straight-marrying brethren but also for non-marrying Americans."



"Here is what we should not be doing: adding one narrow, institutionally defined expectation of adult life to another narrow, institutionally defined expectation for adult life. The freedom to marry someone of the same sex is the freedom to not have to marry someone of the opposite sex, which in an ideal universe should be tied to the freedom not to have to marry, period."
marriage  marriageequality  2015  scotus  singles  legal  law  rebeccatraister 
july 2015 by robertogreco

related tags

08election  2010  2012  2015  2016election  2020  adamserwer  affirmativeaction  andreashepard  arizona  bencarson  berniesanders  best  brucemann  buzzfeed  capitalism  captaincrunch  cfpb  corettamckinney  corettascottking  culture  damorememo  danielbernstein  defcon  democracy  democrats  donaldtrump  election2016  elizabethwarren  ellenpao  essay  family  feminism  gender  glenngreenwald  google  hackers  harvard  harveyweinstein  hillaryclinton  https  infosec  itsawonderfullife  jakeappelbaum  jeffreyrosen  jeffsessions  johndraper  journalism  kellydittmar  law  legal  lexgill  ma-sen  marriage  marriageequality  marthacoakley  massachusetts  media  men  mikabrzezinski  miramax  missingstair  mitchmcconnell  morganmarquisboire  natick-ma  nymag  palin  persistence  politics  popculture  privacy  race  rape  regulation  rutgers  salon  sarahjeong  scottbrown  scotus  senate  sexism  sexualassault  sha256  siliconvalley  singles  susanfowler  tanjalange  tarp  teaching  tech  theverge  tnr  tor  toread  twitter  us-pres  venturecapital  women  wonkette 

Copy this bookmark:



description:


tags: