publicgood   187

« earlier    

eScience Institute - Data Science for Social Good
The program brings together data and domain researchers to work on focused, collaborative projects for societal benefit.
data  uw  publicgood  engagedresearch 
5 weeks ago by laurenpressley
It’s been a blast and working across to make more of for the . Have led a fab tea…
data  government  publicgood  from twitter_favs
8 weeks ago by dhilton
Roman roads and persistence in development | VOX, CEPR Policy Portal
Although spatial differences in economic development tend to be highly persistent over time, this is not always the case. This column combines novel data on Roman Empire road networks with data on night-time light intensity to explore the persistence and non-persistence of a key proximate source of growth – public goods provision. Several empirical strategies all point to the
development  history  infrastructure  roads  rome  public  publicgood 
april 2019 by stevesong
Public goods are REALLY good: thousands of years later, the Roman roads are still paying dividends / Boing Boing
Social scientists often promote the value of public provision of infrastructure as a sound, long-term investment in development and prosperity, pushing back against the neoliberal tendency to abandon public goods in favor of private development. Researchers at the Centre for Economic Policy Research examined the amount of light emitted in territories adjacent to network of…
publicgood  roads  rome  publicgoods 
april 2019 by stevesong
San Francisco; or, How to Destroy a City | Public Books
"As New York City and Greater Washington, DC, prepared for the arrival of Amazon’s new secondary headquarters, Torontonians opened a section of their waterfront to Alphabet’s Sidewalk Labs, which plans to prototype a new neighborhood “from the internet up.” Fervent resistance arose in all three locations, particularly as citizens and even some elected officials discovered that many of the terms of these public-private partnerships were hashed out in closed-door deals, secreted by nondisclosure agreements. Critics raised questions about the generous tax incentives and other subsidies granted to these multibillion-dollar corporations, their plans for data privacy and digital governance, what kind of jobs they’d create and housing they’d provide, and how their arrival could impact local infrastructures, economies, and cultures. While such questioning led Amazon to cancel their plans for Long Island City in mid-February, other initiatives press forward. What does it mean when Silicon Valley—a geographic region that’s become shorthand for an integrated ideology and management style usually equated with libertarian techno-utopianism—serves as landlord, utility provider, urban developer, (unelected) city official, and employer, all rolled into one?1

We can look to Alphabet’s and Amazon’s home cities for clues. Both the San Francisco Bay Area and Seattle have been dramatically remade by their local tech powerhouses: Amazon and Microsoft in Seattle; and Google, Facebook, and Apple (along with countless other firms) around the Bay. As Jennifer Light, Louise Mozingo, Margaret O’Mara, and Fred Turner have demonstrated, technology companies have been reprogramming urban and suburban landscapes for decades.2 And “company towns” have long sprung up around mills, mines, and factories.3 But over the past few years, as development has boomed and income inequality has dramatically increased in the Bay Area, we’ve witnessed the arrival of several new books reflecting on the region’s transformation.

These titles, while focusing on the Bay, offer lessons to New York, DC, Toronto, and the countless other cities around the globe hoping to spur growth and economic development by hosting and ingesting tech—by fostering the growth of technology companies, boosting STEM education, and integrating new sensors and screens into their streetscapes and city halls. For years, other municipalities, fashioning themselves as “the Silicon Valley of [elsewhere],” have sought to reverse-engineer the Bay’s blueprint for success. As we’ll see, that blueprint, drafted to optimize the habits and habitats of a privileged few, commonly elides the material needs of marginalized populations and fragile ecosystems. It prioritizes efficiency and growth over the maintenance of community and the messiness of public life. Yet perhaps we can still redraw those plans, modeling cities that aren’t only made by powerbrokers, and that thrive when they prioritize the stewardship of civic resources over the relentless pursuit of innovation and growth."

"We must also recognize the ferment and diversity inherent in Bay Area urban historiography, even in the chronicles of its large-scale development projects. Isenberg reminds us that even within the institutions and companies responsible for redevelopment, which are often vilified for exacerbating urban ills, we find pockets of heterogeneity and progressivism. Isenberg seeks to supplement the dominant East Coast narratives, which tend to frame urban renewal as a battle between development and preservation.

In surveying a variety of Bay Area projects, from Ghirardelli Square to The Sea Ranch to the Transamerica Pyramid, Isenberg shifts our attention from star architects and planners to less prominent, but no less important, contributors in allied design fields: architectural illustration, model-making, publicity, journalism, property management, retail planning, the arts, and activism. “People who are elsewhere peripheral and invisible in the history of urban design are,” in her book, “networked through the center”; they play critical roles in shaping not only the urban landscape, but also the discourses and processes through which that landscape takes shape.

For instance, debates over public art in Ghirardelli Square—particularly Ruth Asawa’s mermaid sculpture, which featured breastfeeding lesbian mermaids—“provoked debates about gender, sexuality, and the role of urban open space in San Francisco.” Property manager Caree Rose, who worked alongside her husband, Stuart, coordinated with designers to master-plan the Square, acknowledging that retail, restaurants, and parking are also vital ingredients of successful public space. Publicist Marion Conrad and graphic designer Bobbie Stauffacher were key members of many San Francisco design teams, including that for The Sea Ranch community, in Sonoma County. Illustrators and model-makers, many of them women, created objects that mediated design concepts for clients and typically sat at the center of public debates.

These creative collaborators “had the capacity to swing urban design decisions, structure competition for land, and generally set in motion the fate of neighborhoods.” We see the rhetorical power of diverse visualization strategies reflected across these four books, too: Solnit’s offers dozens of photographs, by Susan Schwartzenberg—of renovations, construction sites, protests, dot-com workplaces, SRO hotels, artists’ studios—while Walker’s dense text is supplemented with charts, graphs, and clinical maps. McClelland’s book, with its relatively large typeface and extra-wide leading, makes space for his interviewees’ words to resonate, while Isenberg generously illustrates her pages with archival photos, plans, and design renderings, many reproduced in evocative technicolor.

By decentering the star designer and master planner, Isenberg reframes urban (re)development as a collaborative enterprise involving participants with diverse identities, skills, and values. And in elevating the work of “allied” practitioners, Isenberg also aims to shift the focus from design to land: public awareness of land ownership and commitment to responsible public land stewardship. She introduces us to several mid-century alternative publications—weekly newspapers, Black periodicals, activists’ manuals, and books that never made it to the best-seller list … or never even made it to press—that advocated for a focus on land ownership and politics. Yet the discursive power of Jacobs and Caro, which framed the debate in terms of urban development vs. preservation, pushed these other texts off the shelf—and, along with them, the “moral questions of land stewardship” they highlighted.

These alternative tales and supporting casts serve as reminders that the modern city need not succumb to Haussmannization or Moses-ification or, now, Googlization. Mid-century urban development wasn’t necessarily the monolithic, patriarchal, hegemonic force we imagined it to be—a realization that should steel us to expect more and better of our contemporary city-building projects. Today, New York, Washington, DC, and Toronto—and other cities around the world—are being reshaped not only by architects, planners, and municipal administrators, but also by technologists, programmers, data scientists, “user experience” experts and logistics engineers. These are urbanism’s new “allied” professions, and their work deals not only with land and buildings, but also, increasingly, with data and algorithms.

Some critics have argued that the real reason behind Amazon’s nationwide HQ2 search was to gather data from hundreds of cities—both quantitative and qualitative data that “could guide it in its expansion of the physical footprint, in the kinds of services it rolls out next, and in future negotiations and lobbying with states and municipalities.”5 This “trove of information” could ultimately be much more valuable than all those tax incentives and grants. If this is the future of urban development, our city officials and citizens must attend to the ownership and stewardship not only of their public land, but also of their public data. The mismanagement of either could—to paraphrase our four books’ titles—elongate the dark shadows cast by growing inequality, abet the siege of exploitation and displacement, “hollow out” our already homogenizing neighborhoods, and expedite the departure of an already “gone” city.

As Beat poet Lawrence Ferlinghetti muses in his “Pictures of the Gone World 11,” which inspired Walker’s title: “The world is a beautiful place / to be born into / if you don’t mind some people dying / all the time / or maybe only starving / some of the time / which isn’t half so bad / if it isn’t you.” This is precisely the sort of solipsism and stratification that tech-libertarianism and capitalist development promotes—and that responsible planning, design, and public stewardship must prevent."
cities  shannonmattern  2019  sanfrancisco  siliconvalley  nyc  washingtondc  seattle  amazon  google  apple  facebook  technology  inequality  governance  libertarianism  urban  urbanism  microsoft  jenniferlight  louisemozingo  margareto'mara  fredturner  efficiency  growth  marginalization  publicgood  civics  innovation  rebeccasolnit  gentrification  privatization  homogenization  susanschwartzenberg  carymcclelland  economics  policy  politics  richardwalker  bayarea  lisonisenberg  janejacobs  robertmoses  diversity  society  inclusivity  inclusion  exclusion  counterculture  cybercultue  culture  progressive  progressivism  wealth  corporatism  labor  alexkaufman  imperialism  colonization  californianideology  california  neoliberalism  privacy  technosolutionism  urbanization  socialjustice  environment  history  historiography  redevelopment  urbanplanning  design  activism  landscape  ruthasawa  gender  sexuality  openspace  publicspace  searanch  toronto  larenceferlinghetti  susanschartzenberg  bobbiestauffacher  careerose  stuartrose  ghirardellisqure  marionconrad  illustration  a 
march 2019 by robertogreco
Meet the man behind a third of what's on Wikipedia - YouTube
"Wikipedia now boasts more than 5.7 million articles in English and millions more translated into other languages, all written by online volunteers. Errol Barnett talks to one editor who was named among Time Magazine’s most influential people on the internet."

[See also:

"Steven Pruitt has made nearly 3 million edits on Wikipedia and written 35,000 original articles. It's earned him not only accolades but almost legendary status on the internet.

The online encyclopedia now boasts more than 5.7 million articles in English and millions more translated into other languages – all written by online volunteers. Pruitt was named one of the most influential people on the internet by Time magazine in part because one-third of all English language articles on Wikipedia have been edited by Steven. An incredible feat, ignited by a fascination with his own history.

Pruitt is deeply obsessed with history, and his love of opera inspired his Wikipedia username: Ser Amantio Di Nicolao, his favorite opera character.

"My first article was about Peter Francisco, who was my great great great great great great grandfather … and if we had an hour I could probably go into the full story," Pruitt said. "He was a sergeant in arms in the Virginia Senate and there's kidnapping, potential piracy. If you read the story you would not believe any of it happened."

Still living with his parents in the home he grew up in, Pruitt has always remained true to his interests.

"I think for a long time there was an attitude of, 'That's nice, dear. The boy's crazy. I don't know why he wastes his time, the boy's crazy,'" Pruitt said of what his parents think of his volunteer gig.

That may have changed when Time magazine named him one of the top 25 most influential people on the internet, alongside President Trump, J.K. Rowling and Kim Kardashian West.

How much money does he make from his work? None.

"The idea of making it all free fascinates me. My mother grew up in the Soviet Union ... So I'm very conscious of what, what it can mean to make knowledge free, to make information free," he said.

Pulling from books, academic journals and other sources, he spends more than three hours a day researching, editing and writing.

Even his day job is research, working in records and information at U.S. Customs and Border Protection. He joked that his colleagues probably think he's nuts.

"Because I edit Wikipedia all the damn time, I think that one sort of goes without saying," Pruitt said.

Wikipedia's Kui Kinyanjui said the site would not exist without the dedication of its volunteers. It is now one of the top five most visited in the world, among Google, YouTube and Facebook.

"People like Steven are incredibly important to platforms like Wikipedia, simply because they are the ones that are the lifeblood," said Kui Kinyanjui, WikiMedia's vice president of communications.

Six-thousand people visit the site every second, bringing a responsibility for the editors to present a diverse and fair platform.

"We know there's a lot more to be done. That's why we're very excited about projects like Women in Red, which seeks to identify and place more content on women on our platform ... Steven has been a large contributor to that project," Kinyanjui said.

"The last statistic I saw was that 17.6 percent of the biographical articles on Wikipedia area about women, on the English Wikipedia I should say," Pruitt said. "It was under 15 percent a couple of years ago which shows you how much we have been able to move the needle."

How does he celebrate that victory? "Write another article, make another edit."

To put in to perspective what it took for Pruitt to become the top editor, he's been dedicating his free time to the site for 13 years. The second-place editor is roughly 900,000 edits behind him, so his first place status seems safe, for now."]
2019  wikipedia  online  internet  web  stevenpruitt  publicgood  influence  power  gender 
january 2019 by robertogreco
The Ubiquitous Collectivism that Enables America’s Fierce Individualism
"Forbes recently released their 2019 “30 Under 30” list of “the brashest entrepreneurs across the United States and Canada” who are also under 30 years old. A persistent criticism of the list is that many of the people on it are there because of family or other social advantages. As Helen Rosner tweeted of last year’s list:
My take is: all 30 Under 30 lists should include disclosure of parental assets

In a piece for Vox, Aditi Juneja, creator of the Resistance Manual and who was on the 30 Under 30 list last year, writes that Forbes does ask finalists a few questions about their background and finances but also notes they don’t publish those results. Juneja goes on to assert that no one in America is entirely self-made:
Most of us receive government support, for one thing. When asked, 71 percent of Americans say that they are part of a household that has used one of the six most commonly known government benefits — Social Security, Medicare, Medicaid, food stamps, welfare, or unemployment benefits.

And many people who benefit from government largesse fail to realize it: Sixty percent of Americans who claim the mortgage-interest deduction, which applies to homeowners, say they have never used a government program. If you’ve driven on public roads, gone to public school, or used the postal service as part of your business — well, we all rely on collective infrastructure to get ahead.

And then she lists some of the ways in which she has specifically benefitted from things like government programs, having what sounds like a stable home environment, and her parents having sufficient income to save money for her higher education.
I went to public schools through eighth grade. My parents were able to save for some of my college costs through a plan that provides tax relief for those savings. I stayed on my parent’s health insurance until I was 26 under the Affordable Care Act. I have received the earned income tax credit, targeted at those with low or moderate income. I took out federal student loans to go to law school.

Juneja’s piece reminds me of this old post about how conservatives often gloss over all of the things that the government does for its citizens:
At the appropriate time as regulated by the US congress and kept accurate by the national institute of standards and technology and the US naval observatory, I get into my national highway traffic safety administration approved automobile and set out to work on the roads build by the local, state, and federal departments of transportation, possibly stopping to purchase additional fuel of a quality level determined by the environmental protection agency, using legal tender issed by the federal reserve bank. On the way out the door I deposit any mail I have to be sent out via the US postal service and drop the kids off at the public school.

And also of mayor Pete Buttigieg’s idea of a more progressive definition of freedom:
Or think about the idea of family, in the context of everyday life. It’s one thing to talk about family values as a theme, or a wedge — but what’s it actually like to have a family? Your family does better if you get a fair wage, if there’s good public education, if there’s good health care when you need it. These things intuitively make sense, but we’re out of practice talking about them.

I also think we need to talk about a different kind of patriotism: a fidelity to American greatness in its truest sense. You think about this as a local official, of course, but a truly great country is made of great communities. What makes a country great isn’t chauvinism. It’s the kinds of lives you enable people to lead. I think about wastewater management as freedom. If a resident of our city doesn’t have to give it a second thought, she’s freer.

Lists like 30 Under 30 reinforce the idea of American individualism at the expense of the deep spirit & practice of collectivism that pervades daily American life. America’s fierce individuals need each other. Let’s celebrate and enable that."
kottke  us  individualism  collectivism  aditijuneja  resistance  culture  government  publicgood  helenrosner  petebuttigieg  politics  30under30  class  society  delusions  myths  entrepreneurship  privilege  infrastructure 
november 2018 by robertogreco

« earlier    

related tags

#pid  2014  2015  2016  2017  2018  2019  30under30  access  accessibility  acquisition  activism  aditijuneja  alexkaufman  alfiekohn  algorithms  allisonarieff  amazon  americandream  angeladuckworth  annanorth  apple  aprilglaser  architecture  archives  arthurporopat  arts  ater  audreywatters  automotive  autonomy  awesome  bayarea  bbc  bigdata  bildung:oeffentlich  bobbiestauffacher  books  bottledwater  brexit  broadband  business  businessschools  california  californianideology  canon  capitalism  careerose  carymcclelland  census  center  character  charitableindustrialcomplex  charities  charity  chicago  childhood  children  christianmackauer  cities  citizenship  civics  civicworkshop  clairebishop  class  claytarver  claytonchristensen  code  collectivism  colleges  colonization  comfort  commercialization  commongood  commoninterests  commons  communication  community  company  competency  competition  conscientiousness  content  control  copyright  corinthiancollege  corporation  corporatism  corruption  counterculture  creativity  criticalthinking  critique  ctsp  culture  culturemaking  curiosity  curriculum  cv  cybercultue  cyberspace  data  datascience  dc:creator=hanleylynsey  dctagged  debate  deborahmeier  delusions  democracy  deschooling  design  destruction  development  digitalcommons  digitalpublicspace  digitalsocialism  diligence  disagreement  discourse  disruption  diversity  dns  domain  donaldborenstein  drinkingfountains  duty  economics  economy  edtech  educacation  education  efficiency  egalitarianism  eliascanetti  elitisim  elitism  elonmusk  engagedresearch  entrepreneurship  environment  equality  ethics  europe  everyday  exclusion  exclusions  facebook  facebooks  facts  fakenews  fakenewss  fcc  federalism  fellowship  finance  fitzpatrick  forests  formality  forprofit  freddiedeboer  fredturner  freedom  freeriders  freespeech  funding  gemeinwohl  gender  generalists  gentrification  gf&s  ghirardellisqure  globalelite  google  governance  government  grit  growth  haaretz  hacking  hannaharendt  hansweil  hardbound  hardin  health  healthcare  heinrichblücher  helenrosner  hierarchy  highered  highereducation  highschool  historiography  history  homeless  homogenization  horizontality  howwelearn  howweteach  howwewrite  illustration  immigration  imperialism  inclusion  inclusivity  incomeinequality  independence  individualism  inequality  influence  informality  information  infrastructure  innovation  instantgratification  institute  institutions  integration  intellectualproperty  interconnected  interdependence  internet  internetasutiity  internship  invention  isolation  israel  ivyleague  jacobklein  janejacobs  jemimakiss  jenniferlight  jessamynwest  jessicahelfand  johncassidy  johndewey  johnperrybarlow  johnwarner  journalism  justice  kendrabischoff  kickstarter  kipp  kottke  kurtwolff  labor  landscape  language  larenceferlinghetti  latecapitalism  lcproject  learning  leonbostein  leostrauss  libertarianism  libery  librarians  libraries  libtech  licencefee  lisonisenberg  listening  literature  livablecities  loc  local  louisemozingo  malcolmharris  management  managerialism  marcandreessen  margareto'mara  marginalization  mariabustilllos  marionconrad  market  markets  markzuckerberg  martinparker  mba  media  methodology  michaelhorn  microsoft  mikrobuch:uni20:buch  money  monopoly  moralcompass  morality  morethanhuman  motivationjeffreyaaronsnyder  multispecies  museums  myth  mythmaking  mythology  myths  naomiklein  narcissism  nathanbashaw  nature  ndl301  neoliberalism  networking  newcourse  newdeal  news  nikolehannah-jones  novato  nyc  nypl  obedience  oligarchy  online  onlineabuse  opendata  opengov  opensource  openspace  openstudioproject  opentech  opioid  organization  parenting  participation  pedagogy  persistence  personality  petebuttigieg  philanthrocapitalism  philanthropicindustrialcomplex  philanthropy  plants  play  playdates  policy  politics  power  pr  priorities  priscillachan  privacy  privateschools  privatization  privilege  problemsolving  process  progressive  progressivism  proprietaryspaces  psychology  publibs  public  publicdiscourse  publicgoods  publicinterest  publiclibraries  publicpolicy  publicresources  publicschools  publicservices  publicspace  publictransit  purpose  race  racism  radlib  reading  rebeccasolnit  redevelopment  regulation  research  resistance  review  richardwalker  roads  robertmaynardhutchins  robertmoses  rolinmoe  rome  ruthasawa  sanctuary  sanfrancisco  schooliness  schooling  schools  science  seanreardon  searanch  seattle  security  seedlibraries  segregation  service  services  sexuality  shannonmattern  siliconvalley  socialcontact  socialdesign  socialgood  socialinfrastructure  socialism  socialjustice  socialmedia  socialresponsibility  society  soylent  spacex  specialization  sputnik  standardization  standards  stevenpruitt  stories  storytelling  stringfellowbarr  stuartrose  surveillancecapitalism  susanschartzenberg  susanschwartzenberg  susiecagle  sustainability  tamaramose  taxevasion  teaching  tech&society  techculture  technology  technosolutionism  telecoms  television  theranos  thoreau  tomaschamorro-premuzic  tomsullivan  tonyageh  toronto  traffic  training  transactioncosts  trust  truth  tv  twitter  udacity  uk  unbundling  uncertainty  universities  unknowing  unschooling  urban  urbanism  urbanization  urbanplanning  us  usergrowth  uw  values  vanishing  venturecapitalism  walking  walledgardens  wandering  washingtondc  waze  wealth  wealthinequality  web  wernerjaeger  wikipedia  wildlife  woods  writing  youtube 

Copy this bookmark: