progressives   707

« earlier    

Dream Interrupted – Boom California
"Kevin Starr at The San Francisco Examiner, 1976-83"



"Yet if the temporal gap in Starr’s series seems mysterious, we need not speculate about his views of that period. In fact, he wrote copiously about those decades—not as a historian, but as a columnist for The San Francisco Examiner. Churning out more than 5,000 words per week between 1976 and 1983, Starr made it perfectly clear where he stood on the issues of the day, especially in San Francisco. Indeed, his articles hint at, but do not definitively establish, his reason for avoiding that period in his series.

Starr’s path to the Examiner was unusual. He grew up in San Francisco, living from age ten to fifteen in the Potrero Hill Housing Project. He attended St. Boniface School in the Tenderloin and, for one year, Saint Ignatius High School. After majoring in English at the University of San Francisco and serving in the U.S. Army, he earned a Ph.D. in English and American Literature at Harvard University, which he recalled as “a magical and nurturing place.”[6] Widener Library’s vast California collection inspired him to write about his native state. “I thought, ‘There’s all kinds of wonderful books on California, but they don’t seem to have the point of view we’re encouraged to look at—the social drama of the imagination,’” he later told the Los Angeles Times.[7] In 1973, Oxford University Press published his critically acclaimed dissertation book, Americans and the California Dream, 1850-1915.

Instead of pursuing an academic career, Starr returned to San Francisco, wrote speeches for mayor Joseph Alioto, and was appointed city librarian in 1974. His decision to work for Alioto was consequential. The wealthy Catholic lawyer was a Democrat, but members of the so-called Burton machine—most notably Phillip and John Burton, Willie Brown and George Moscone—considered Alioto a threat to their progressive coalition. When the ILWU, the radical longshoremen’s union, endorsed Alioto’s 1967 mayoral bid, an angry Phil Burton threw his support behind Jack Morrison, Alioto’s opponent. “We’re going to shove Jack Morrison’s bald head up Alioto’s ass,” Burton told an ILWU representative.[8] In fact, Alioto sailed to victory and was reelected in 1971. He ran for governor in 1974, but lost to Jerry Brown in the Democratic Party primary. When Moscone edged out conservative supervisor John Barbagelata in the 1975 mayoral race, the Burton machine finally captured City Hall. By that time, the coalition included gay and environmental activists as well as labor unionists, racial and ethnic minorities, and white progressives.

Shortly after Moscone’s victory, Starr began writing for the Examiner, which had served as the Hearst Corporation’s flagship publication for decades. “The Monarch of the Dailies” was still a political force in the city, but its influence was shrinking along with its market share. In 1965, it signed a joint operating agreement with the more popular San Francisco Chronicle, whose executive editor, Scott Newhall, had regarded the Hearst newspapers as “something evil” designed to stupefy the masses. Newhall wanted to produce a very different kind of publication: “I figured the Chronicle had to be successful, and the city had to have a paper that would amuse, entertain and inform, and save people from the perdition of Hearstian ignorance.”[9] When it came to hard news, however, the Examiner considered itself the scrappy underdog. “We were the No. 2 paper in town with declining circulation,” recalled former editor Steve Cook. “But the spirit on the staff was sort of impressive—we actually thought of ourselves as the better paper in town, we thought we could show our morning rivals how to cover the news.”[10]

Soon Starr was writing six columns per week, including a Saturday article devoted to religion. Most of his columns featured the city’s cultural activities and personages, but Starr also took the opportunity to shape his public profile. He presented himself as a conservative Catholic intellectual, a San Francisco version of William F. Buckley Jr., whom he frequently praised. In one column, he described himself as “a conservative neo-Thomist Roman Catholic with Platonist leanings and occasional temptations towards anarchy.”[11] He also wrote about the challenges of that identity in San Francisco:
It’s not easy to be a conservative. It’s often lonely to be a thinking conservative. And to be a thinking conservative in San Francisco can frequently be an even more difficult and isolated condition…. Here in San Francisco such left-liberal opinions have coalesced into a rigid inquisitorial orthodoxy—an orthodoxy now reinforced by political power—that brooks no opposition whatsoever.[12]


The “political power” Starr had in mind was likely the Burton machine. With Moscone in City Hall, Willie Brown in the Assembly, and the Burton brothers in Congress, that machine was shifting into overdrive. Yet Starr clearly thought that San Francisco was moving in the wrong direction."



"After the failed 1984 campaign, Starr began to refashion himself, California style. Inventing the Dream, the second volume in what his publisher was already billing as a series, appeared in 1985. Four years later, he became a visiting professor at the School of Urban and Regional Planning at the University of Southern California. Five years after that, Republican governor Pete Wilson appointed him California State Librarian, a position he held for a decade. During that time, he encouraged countless projects devoted to California history, including my biography of Carey McWilliams, for which he also wrote a blurb. In 1998, Starr was promoted to University Professor and Professor of History at USC. Over the next twelve years, he produced the final five volumes of his series, a brief history of California, and a short book on the Golden Gate Bridge. Among his many awards was the National Humanities Medal, which President George W. Bush presented to him in 2006.

As Starr’s profile rose, the Examiner columns faded from view. One wonders how he squared that body of work with the dream series. Did his criticisms of Harvey Milk and George Moscone, his sympathy for Dan White, his arguments on behalf of Patricia Hearst, or his role in the Peoples Temple tragedy dissuade him from treating those topics in his books? Perhaps, but the evidence is more suggestive than dispositive. Certainly the tone and temper of his work evolved in concert with his new professional duties. As the dream series unfolded, it began to reflect his sponsorial role at the state library and his emergent academic persona. The result was a new and more expansive authorial self, one that appealed to the state’s aspirations rather than to partisanship or moral reaction. Despite this evolution, or perhaps because of it, Starr declined to revisit the years immediately before, during, and immediately after his stint at the Examiner.

Although Starr didn’t parlay his early journalism into a political career, it groomed him for the work to come, much as his experience at Harvard did. It seasoned him, taught him how to write on deadline for general audiences, and introduced him to public figures and issues he wouldn’t have encountered had he accepted an academic position straight out of graduate school. But there was nothing inevitable about Starr’s achievement. To become California’s foremost historian, he had to overcome setbacks and adapt to changing circumstances. Only by shedding his journalistic persona and adopting a new model of authorship could he become the ardent but politically tempered chronicler of California civilization."
kennethstarr  sanfrancisco  sfexaminer  2019  peterrichardson  1970s  1980s  california  forrestrobinson  violence  iniquity  history  davidtalbot  josephalioto  phillipburton  johnburton  williebrown  georgemoscone  democrats  progressives  politics  journalism  class  identitypolitics  identity  conflict 
21 days ago by robertogreco
Bernie Sanders Talks Reparations in Breakfast Club Appearance
“Reparations” can mean a lot of different things. Cash payouts of thousands if not hundreds of thousands to people who are not prepared will not improve their lives in the long run. You don’t fix poverty with financial payouts, there have to be long term institutional changes first.

As a black man living in the south, I think reparations should be a mix of higher minimum wages, college tuition credit, ending the drug war, creating increased opportunities for minority owned businesses (eg. legal marijuana companies and shops) and measures to reduce incarceration and increased job placements. The damage white supremacy has done to every level of black society must be addressed first, because pouring money into the community with no long term plan for wealth retention and creation will fail.

Giving money sounds great, but if it means that it gives a pass to every racist white person to say “see racism all over cause we gave you money” no thanks. Instead of solving problems it will open up new ones, and anyone who is given a lot of money without knowing how to handle it will soon be parted from it. And you’ll be right back where you started. For example take a look at lottery winners... https://www.cleveland.com/business/index.ssf/2016/01/why_do_70_percent_of_lottery_w.html

Direct payment would be a tiny bandage over the gaping wound of white supremacy, and I applaud Sanders for not being on board with it.

tl:dr Sanders position is nuanced and makes more sense then direct payouts.
berniesanders  politics  progressives  racerelations 
6 weeks ago by bobpeckiv
Ocasio-Cortez leaves parade in 17 mpg minivan — near the subway
US Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez made her getaway from a St. Patrick's Day parade in a for-hire minivan on Sunday — despite being just blocks from a Queens subway station.
progressives  hypocrites 
6 weeks ago by RichardDavies
I'm a 31-year-old Hispanic woman who backs Bernie Sanders — stop pretending that I don't exist | The Independent
I'm sick of being told that I'm a 'Bernie Bro' who doesn't understand her own oppression. I can be a feminist and still vote for the old white dude
berniesanders  politics  progressives 
7 weeks ago by bobpeckiv

« earlier    

related tags

1%  1858  1970s  1980s  2018  2019  abdul  abortion  abrahamlincoln  acting  activism  advice  alexandria  alexandriaocasiocortez  amazon  amendment  another  anti  antiamerican  aoc  apartment  apple  are  arizona  artists  at  backlash  be  bernie2020  bernie_sanders  berniesanders  biased  big  bill  blacklivesmatter  blue  bluesuncampaigns  boldnebraska  border  brucerauner  budget  ca  california  campaign  capital  capitalism  censorship  charlesmurray  chicago  cities  clairemccaskill  class  classism  conflict  congress  conservative  corporate  corporatism  corruption  cutgo  cutting  dancohen  danirodrik  davidtalbot  daytonmartindale  dccc  deal  deceptive  democracy  democraticparty  democrats  democrats:  development  dnc  dog  donald_trump  donaldtrump  education  el-sayed’s  election2018  elections  elitism  elizabeth_warren  empathy  essay  ethanol  fakenews  fbi  federal  fightfor15  florida  focus  for  forrestrobinson  fracking  from  fund_raising  funder  furious  gentrification  georgemoscone  glennbeck  globalwarming  government  governor  guncontrol  hatespeech  have  heidiheitkamp  heritage  hillaryclinton  history  hollywood  housing  hypocrites  identity  identitypolitics  ignore  il-sen  illinois  inequality  iniquity  intelligence_community  inthesetimes  is  italy  jacobin  janekleeb  johnburton  jontester  jordanpeterson  josephalioto  journalism  judges  justicedemocrats  kamala_harris  kennethstarr  keystonexl  labor  learn  left  lgbt  liars  liberalism  liberals  like  lincolndouglas  meaning  media  medicareforall  meritocracy  michaellind  michigan  migration  militarism  militarization  military  millenials  millennials  minorities  movies  nancy_pelosi  nebrasca  neoliberal  neoliberalism  neoliberals  next  nikolaifedak  nimbyism  north-carolina  nothing  nyc  nytimes  obama  obamacare  ocasio-cortez  occupywallstreet  on  oppose  organizations  ourrevolution  paygo?  paygo  pelosi’s  peterrichardson  phillipburton  policy  political-trends  politics  portland  primaries  progressive  psychology  race  racerelations  racism  radicals  realestate  redstates  reform  religion  republicans  ro_khanna  roytsao  rule  russia  russiagate  sanfrancisco  saudi_arabia  science  seanmcelwe  segregation  senate  sfexaminer  sirota  slavery  socialism  spending  spirituality  statistics  stephendouglas  target  taxes  theater  their  think-tank  thomasedsall  thomaspiketty  to  trump  unions  united_states  urban  urbanism  us  usa  victory  video  violence  virginia  voters  voting  want  war  wealth  what  why  willguzzardi  williebrown  xenophobia  yemen  yimby  “nationalist” 

Copy this bookmark:



description:


tags: