polis   220

« earlier    

Fortifications and Democracy in the Ancient Greek World by Josiah Ober, Barry Weingast :: SSRN
- Joshiah Ober, Barry Weingast

In the modern world, access-limiting fortification walls are not typically regarded as promoting democracy. But in Greek antiquity, increased investment in fortifications was correlated with the prevalence and stability of democracy. This paper sketches the background conditions of the Greek city-state ecology, analyzes a passage in Aristotle’s Politics, and assesses the choices of Hellenistic kings, Greek citizens, and urban elites, as modeled in a simple game. The paper explains how city walls promoted democracy and helps to explain several other puzzles: why Hellenistic kings taxed Greek cities at lower than expected rates; why elites in Greek cities supported democracy; and why elites were not more heavily taxed by democratic majorities. The relationship between walls, democracy, and taxes promoted continued economic growth into the late classical and Hellenistic period (4th-2nd centuries BCE), and ultimately contributed to the survival of Greek culture into the Roman era, and thus modernity. We conclude with a consideration of whether the walls-democracy relationship holds in modernity.

'Rulers Ruled by Women': An Economic Analysis of the Rise and Fall of Women's Rights in Ancient Sparta by Robert K. Fleck, F. Andrew Hanssen: https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=788106
Throughout most of history, women as a class have possessed relatively few formal rights. The women of ancient Sparta were a striking exception. Although they could not vote, Spartan women reportedly owned 40 percent of Sparta's agricultural land and enjoyed other rights that were equally extraordinary. We offer a simple economic explanation for the Spartan anomaly. The defining moment for Sparta was its conquest of a neighboring land and people, which fundamentally changed the marginal products of Spartan men's and Spartan women's labor. To exploit the potential gains from a reallocation of labor - specifically, to provide the appropriate incentives and the proper human capital formation - men granted women property (and other) rights. Consistent with our explanation for the rise of women's rights, when Sparta lost the conquered land several centuries later, the rights for women disappeared. Two conclusions emerge that may help explain why women's rights have been so rare for most of history. First, in contrast to the rest of the world, the optimal (from the men's perspective) division of labor among Spartans involved women in work that was not easily monitored by men. Second, the rights held by Spartan women may have been part of an unstable equilibrium, which contained the seeds of its own destruction.
study  broad-econ  economics  polisci  political-econ  institutions  government  north-weingast-like  democracy  walls  correlation  polis  history  mediterranean  iron-age  the-classics  microfoundations  modernity  comparison  architecture  military  public-goodish  elite  civic  taxes  redistribution  canon  literature  big-peeps  conquest-empire  rent-seeking  defense  models  GT-101  incentives  urban  urban-rural  speculation  interdisciplinary  cliometrics  multi  civil-liberty  gender  gender-diff  equilibrium  cycles  branches  labor  interests  property-rights  unintended-consequences  explanation  explanans  analysis  econ-productivity  context  arrows  micro  natural-experiment 
november 2017 by nhaliday
It’s not my consensus: Motivated reasoning and the sources of scientific illiteracyPublic Understanding of Science - Josh Pasek, 2017
Individuals who provide incorrect answers to scientific knowledge questions have long been considered scientifically illiterate. Yet, increasing evidence sugges...
science  polis  politics 
october 2017 by brsma
Being rich wrecks your soul. We used to know that. - The Washington Post
"The point is not necessarily that wealth is intrinsically and everywhere evil, but that it is dangerous — that it should be eyed with caution and suspicion, and definitely not pursued as an end in itself; that great riches pose great risks to their owners; and that societies are right to stigmatize the storing up of untold wealth. That’s why Aristotle, for instance, argued that wealth should be sought only for the sake of living virtuously — to manage a household, say, or to participate in the life of the polis. Here wealth is useful but not inherently good; indeed, Aristotle specifically warned that the accumulation of wealth for its own sake corrupts virtue instead of enabling it. For Hindus, working hard to earn money is a duty (dharma), but only when done through honest means and used for good ends. The function of money is not to satiate greed but to support oneself and one’s family. The Koran, too, warns against hoarding money and enjoins Muslims to disperse it to the needy.

Some contemporary voices join this ancient chorus, perhaps none more enthusiastically than Pope Francis. He’s proclaimed that unless wealth is used for the good of society, and above all for the good of the poor, it is an instrument “of corruption and death.” And Francis lives what he teaches: Despite access to some of the sweetest real estate imaginable — the palatial papal apartments are the sort of thing that President Trump’s gold-plated extravagance is a parody of — the pope bunks in a small suite in what is effectively the Vatican’s hostel. In his official state visit to Washington, he pulled up to the White House in a Fiat so sensible that a denizen of Northwest D.C. would be almost embarrassed to drive it. When Francis entered the Jesuit order 59 years ago, he took a vow of poverty, and he’s kept it.

According to many philosophies and faiths, then, wealth should serve only as a steppingstone to some further good and is always fraught with moral danger. We all used to recognize this; it was a commonplace. And this intuition, shared by various cultures across history, stands on firm empirical ground.

Over the past few years, a pile of studies from the behavioral sciences has appeared, and they all say, more or less, “Being rich is really bad for you.” Wealth, it turns out, leads to behavioral and psychological maladies. The rich act and think in misdirected ways.

When it comes to a broad range of vices, the rich outperform everybody else. They are much more likely than the rest of humanity to shoplift and cheat , for example, and they are more apt to be adulterers and to drink a great deal . They are even more likely to take candy that is meant for children. So whatever you think about the moral nastiness of the rich, take that, multiply it by the number of Mercedes and Lexuses that cut you off, and you’re still short of the mark. In fact, those Mercedes and Lexuses are more likely to cut you off than Hondas or Fords: Studies have shown that people who drive expensive cars are more prone to run stop signs and cut off other motorists .

The rich are the worst tax evaders, and, as The Washington Post has detailed, they are hiding vast sums from public scrutiny in secret overseas bank accounts.

They also give proportionally less to charity — not surprising, since they exhibit significantly less compassion and empathy toward suffering people. Studies also find that members of the upper class are worse than ordinary folks at “reading” people’ s emotions and are far more likely to be disengaged from the people with whom they are interacting — instead absorbed in doodling, checking their phones or what have you. Some studies go even further, suggesting that rich people, especially stockbrokers and their ilk (such as venture capitalists, whom we once called “robber barons”), are more competitive, impulsive and reckless than medically diagnosed psychopaths. And by the way, those vices do not make them better entrepreneurs; they just have Mommy and Daddy’s bank accounts (in New York or the Cayman Islands) to fall back on when they fail."



"Some will say that we have not entirely forgotten it and that we do complain about wealth today, at least occasionally. Think, they’ll say, about Occupy Wall Street; the blowback after Mitt Romney’s comment about the “47 percent”; how George W. Bush painted John Kerry as out of touch. But think again: By and large, those complaints were not about wealth per se but about corrupt wealth — about wealth “gone wrong” and about unfairness. The idea that there is no way for the vast accumulation of money to “go right” is hardly anywhere to be seen.

Getting here wasn’t straightforward. Wealth has arguably been seen as less threatening to one’s moral health since the Reformation, after which material success was sometimes taken as evidence of divine election. But extreme wealth remained morally suspect, with the rich bearing particular scrutiny and stigmatization during periods like the Gilded Age. This stigma persisted until relatively recently; only in the 1970s did political shifts cause executive salaries skyrocket, and the current effectively unprecedented inequality in income (and wealth) begin to appear, without any significant public complaint or lament.

The story of how a stigma fades is always murky, but contributing factors are not hard to identify. For one, think tanks have become increasingly partisan over the past several decades, particularly on the right: Certain conservative institutions, enjoying the backing of billionaires such as the Koch brothers, have thrown a ton of money at pseudo-academics and “thought leaders” to normalize and legitimate obscene piles of lucre. They produced arguments that suggest that high salaries naturally flowed from extreme talent and merit, thus baptizing wealth as simply some excellent people’s wholly legitimate rewards. These arguments were happily regurgitated by conservative media figures and politicians, eventually seeping into the broader public and replacing the folk wisdom of yore. But it is hard to argue that a company’s top earners are literally hundreds of times more talented than the lowest-paid employees.

As stratospheric salaries became increasingly common, and as the stigma of wildly disproportionate pay faded, the moral hazards of wealth were largely forgotten. But it’s time to put the apologists for plutocracy back on the defensive, where they belong — not least for their own sake. After all, the Buddha, Aristotle, Jesus, the Koran, Jimmy Stewart, Pope Francis and now even science all agree: If you are wealthy and are reading this, give away your money as fast as you can."
charlesmathewes  evansandsmark  2017  wealth  inequality  behavior  psychology  buddha  aristotle  jesus  koran  jimmystewart  popefrancis  ethics  generosity  vices  fscottfitzgerald  ernesthemingway  tonystark  confucius  austerity  tacitus  opulence  christ  virtue  caution  suspicion  polis  poverty  donaldtrump  jesuits  morality  humanism  cheating  taxevasion  charity  empathy  compassion  disengagement  competition  competitiveness  psychopaths  capitalism  luxury  politics  simplicity  well-being  suicide  ows  occupywallstreet  geogewbush  johnkerry  mittromney  gildedage  kochbrothers 
august 2017 by robertogreco
The Internet Doesn’t Have to Be Bad for Democracy
In 2016, that information helped the government of Taiwan break a six-year deadlock over how to regulate online alcohol sales, caused by entrenched, opposing views among citizens on what rules should apply.
polis  tech  democracy  survey 
june 2017 by asilvao

« earlier    

related tags

2015  2017  :/  abd  absence  academia  africa  age-generation  albion  alignment  allodium  alt-inst  altruism  ambiguity  america  analysis  analytical-holistic  anarcho-tyranny  anglo  anglosphere  anthropology  antidemos  aphorism  appropriateness  arbitrage  architecture  aristos  aristotle  arrows  article  asia  austerity  austin  authoritarianism  backup  barons  becomes  behavior  benevolence  big-peeps  big-picture  biophysical-econ  books  branches  britain  broad-econ  buddha  business  california  canada  canon  capital  capitalism  career  caution  censorship  charity  charlesmathewes  chart  cheating  china  christ  christianity  christopher-lasch  civic  civil-liberty  civilization  class  clinton  cliometrics  coalitions  cocktail  collective  coming-apart  commentary  communism  community  comparison  compassion  compensation  competition  competitiveness  complexity  concept  confucius  conquest-empire  context  contrarianism  cool  coordination  correlation  correspondence  cost-benefit  counter-revolution  counterfactual  cracker-econ  critique  culture  current-events  cycles  cynicism-idealism  data  database  debatt  decentralized  deep-materialism  defense  definite-planning  democracy  demographic-transition  demographics  density  depiction  depth  deterrence  developing-world  difference  dignity  dimension  diogenes  discourse  discussion  disengagement  distance  distribution  diversity  divide  donaldtrump  douthatish  drama  dysgenics  early-modern  econ-metrics  econ-productivity  econometrics  economics  econotariat  education  effect-size  efficiency  egalitarianism-hierarchy  elected  elections  elite  empathy  enclosing  enclosure  envy  equilibrium  ernesthemingway  error  erwinpanofsky  essay  ethics  eu  europe  evansandsmark  evidence-based  exit-voice  expansionism  explanans  explanation  expressen  farmers-and-foragers  fertility  feudal  finance  first  foreign-lang  foreign-policy  from:facebook  fscottfitzgerald  gallic  garett-jones  gay  gedanken  gender-diff  gender  general-survey  generosity  genre  geogewbush  geopolitics  germanic  germany  gibbon  gildedage  gnon  government  governor  great-powers  greece  growth-econ  gt-101  haidt  hanson  hari-seldon  harvard  health  healthcare  hidden-motives  higher-ed  history  hive-mind  hmm  housing  humanism  hypocrisy  identity-politics  ideology  ij  image  impetus  in  incentives  increase-decrease  india  individual  individualism-collectivism  inequality  infinite  info-dynamics  info-econ  infrastructure  insight  institutions  insurance  interdisciplinary  interests  internet  intervention  interview  iron-age  is-ought  islam  israel  japan  jared  jesuits  jesus  jimmystewart  johnkerry  journos-pundits  kinder  kochbrothers  koran  korea  kumbaya-kult  labor  labyrinth  landscape  language  latin-america  law  leadership  learning  lee-kuan-yew  left-wing  len:long  len:short  let-me-see  letters  links  list  lit  literature  liveblogging  lived-experience  lmao  logos  lol  long-short-run  longevity  longform  luxury  macro  madisonian  magic  malaise  management  managerial-state  maps  marginal-rev  markets  media  medicine  medieval  mediterranean  mena  meta:rhetoric  micro  microfoundations  migration  military  millionsmarch  mittromney  models  modernity  moloch  monetary-fiscal  money  morality  mostly-modern  mu  multi  murray  mythos  nascent-state  nationalism-globalism  natural-experiment  neue-rechte  new-religion  news  nietzschean  nihil  nikolausdietrich  nitty-gritty  nl-and-so-can-you  noble-lie  noblesse-oblige  nordic  north-weingast-like  northeast  nuclear  null-result  nyc  nyt  object  objektbuch  occident  occupywallstreet  oceans  online_deliberation  openly  operational  optimate  opulence  order-disorder  org:anglo  org:biz  org:data  org:davos  org:econlib  org:edu  org:foreign  org:lite  org:mag  org:med  org:nat  org:ngo  org:popup  org:rec  org:sci  organizing  orient  other-xtian  outside  ows  painting  paleocon  parenting  paul-romer  paying-rent  pdf  peace-violence  people  person  perspective  pessimism  philosophy  pinoy  piracy  planning  plots  podcast  podcasts  polarization  policy  polisci  polisövergrepp  political-econ  politics  politik  politis  poll  popefrancis  population  populism  poverty  power  pre-ww2  prediction-markets  prediction  preference-falsification  presentation  privacy  profile  project  propaganda  property-rights  proposal  prudence  psychology  psychopaths  public-goodish  pust  putnam-like  questions  quixotic  quotes  race  randy-ayndy  ranking  rant  ratty  reading  realpolitik  recommendations  redistribution  reference  reflection  regulation  religion  renaissance  rent-seeking  rep.  report  research  retention  review  rhetoric  right-wing  rome  roots  rot  scale  scepticism  schelling  science  scitariat  scott-sumner  se  security  self-interest  selfrepresentation  sexwork  siebel  signaling  simler  simplicity  sinosphere  skunkworks  skyddsombud  social-capital  social-choice  social-psych  social-science  social-structure  social  society  space  speaking  spearhead  speculation  sports  ssc  stagnation  state  statesmen  steel-man  stories  strategy  study  studying  stylized-facts  subculture  suicide  sulla  sum  summary  supply-demand  surface  survey  suspicion  sv  svpol  tacitus  taiwan  taxes  taxevasion  tech  techmacro  technocracy  temperance  texas  the-basilisk  the-bones  the-classics  the-great-west-whale  the-south  the-watchers  the-west  theos  thiel  thucydides  time-preference  time-series  time  tonioholscher  tonystark  top-n  track-record  trade  tradeoffs  trends  tribalism  trust  truth  twitter  unaffiliated  unintended-consequences  universalism-particularism  unreality  urban-rural  urban  us  usa  value  values  vampire-squid  vapen  vase  vessel  vices  video  violence  virtue  visualization  vtaiwan  wall  walls  war  washington  wealth-of-nations  wealth  welfare-state  well-being  westminster  whiggish-hegelian  wiki  within-group  without  wonkish  world  x-not-about-y  yvain  zeitgeist  zero-positive-sum  ❤️  🎩 

Copy this bookmark:



description:


tags: