palestine   10036

« earlier    

[no title]
Google Maps is Punishing Palestinians
google  map  palestine  politics  israel  babylon 
18 days ago by edmittance
ISRAEL IS ABOVE THE LAW ~ Justifying landgrab, Israel says it is ‘allowed to ignore international law’ anywhere it wants Israel/Palestine Jonathan Ofir on September 18, 2018
The Israeli government has recently claimed that it can “legislate anywhere in the world”, that it is “entitled to violate the sovereignty of foreign countries”, and that “is allowed to ignore the directives of international law in any field it desires”. This was written in an official response letter to the Supreme Court last month.

On the face of it, these are audacious claims. Is it really that bad? I would say that it’s even worse. The background to these statements is a new law from last year, which legalizes outright theft of Palestinian land.

Several Palestinian human rights organizations have challenged the law in court. The plaintiffs are Adalah, the Legal Center for Arab Minority Rights Jerusalem Legal Aid and Human Rights Center (JLAC), and Al Mezan Center for Human Rights (Gaza) on behalf of 17 local Palestinian authorities in the West Bank. The Israeli government was represented by a private lawyer, Harel Arnon, because Attorney General Avichai Mandelblit refused to defend the law in court, since he deemed it illegal by international law already when it was first passed.

The Settlement Regularization Law was passed in February last year, in order to retroactively legalize thousands of settler homes and structures built on Palestinian private land, to avert the possibility that the Supreme Court might one day sanction their removal. Before the law was passed, Israeli law still considered such structures illegal, even though under international law, absolutely all the settlements are a flagrant violation of international law, be they located on private land or not.

It was not only Haaretz that called the law a “theft law” – it was also longtime Likudniks such as lawmaker Benny Begin; Former Likud minister Dan Meridor called it “evil and dangerous”; even Prime Minister Netanyahu was warning that passing it may end up getting Israeli officials to the International Criminal Court in The Hague; attorney General Avichai Mandelblit’s stated refusal to defend the law in court was met with reassurance by Justice Minister Ayelet Shaked that the state could simply get a private attorney (which it did). The contentious matter was not only the theft itself – but the application of Israeli law enacted directly by the Knesset (rather than by the Military occupation authority), that was seen as a precedence leading to de-facto annexation. As Dan Meridor wrote in his Haaretz opinion piece just ahead of the final vote on the law:

“The Knesset has never enacted legislation regulating Arabs’ property ownership in Judea and Samaria. The Knesset was elected by Israelis and legislates for them. The Arabs of Judea and Samaria did not vote for the Knesset, and it has no authority to legislate for them. These are basic principles of democracy and Israeli law. As a rule, elected officials legislate for their constituents and those within the area of their jurisdiction, not others. No government in Israel has applied its sovereignty to the West Bank – not former Likud prime ministers Menachem Begin or Yitzhak Shamir. They understood the obvious: If you want to pass legislation for the West Bank, you have to extend your sovereignty and allow the residents of Judea and Samaria the right to become citizens and vote in Knesset elections. And the meaning is clear.”

I should add a critical note here about Meridor’s central claim – that it is in fact erroneous regarding the West Bank, in that East Jerusalem is by international law a part of the West Bank, and Israel has applied its sovereignty unilaterally upon it (de facto since 1967, and in quasi-constitutional basic law in 1980, in defiance of international law and UNSC resolutions). The fact that Meridor simply considers East Jerusalem a part of Israel, and now goes to admonish Israel for basically doing the same (de facto annexation) regarding the rest of the West Bank, only goes to show that this is a case of the blind leading the blind.

But let us now return to the recent ‘theft law’ legislation from last year: The pressure to legitimize Israel’s own crimes became too great to oppose even from the right. The looming ‘danger’ that Meridor mentioned, of enacting de-facto annexation and possibly having to extend Palestinians the right to become citizens, was overweighed by the greed for the land. Israel’s famous equation of “maximum Jews, maximum territory, minimum Palestinians” came this time to mean that Israel would risk enacting state legislation in an area where Jews were still generally not a majority, in the hope that it would help them become it. Thus the law was passed by 60-52, and the land-grab was made legal by the Israeli Knesset. It was estimated that the law would retroactively legalize about 4,000 settler homes.

In the recent court case, the plaintiffs challenging the law pointed to the obvious illegality:

“Adalah and fellow petitioners argued that the Knesset is not permitted to enact and impose laws on territory occupied by the State of Israel. Thus, the Knesset cannot enact laws that annex the West Bank or that violate the rights of Palestinian residents of the West Bank.”

The State of Israel, in the recent response letter (Hebrew) to the court (filed August 7th), claimed in its defense that:

[1] ‘The Knesset has no limitation which prevents it from legislating extra-territorially anywhere in the world, including the area [‘Judea and Samaria’]’.

Having made that statement, the Israeli government goes on to rebuff the plaintiffs’ claim that it cannot legislate there and goes further to suggest that it is not at all subject to the directives of international law:

[4] ‘…Although the Knesset can legislate [concerning] any place in the world, although it is entitled to violate the sovereignty of foreign countries through legislation that would be applied to events occurring in their territories […], although it is within the authority of the Government of Israel to annex any territory […], although the Knesset may ignore directives of international law in any area it pleases […] despite all these, the plaintiffs seek to define a “rule” by which precisely in Judea and Samaria the Knesset is prohibited from legislating anything, and that precisely there, and nowhere else in the world, it is subject to the directives of international law’.

Adalah Attorneys Suhad Bishara and Myssana Morany, were in disbelief:

“The Israeli government’s extremist response has no parallel anywhere in the world. It stands in gross violation of international law and of the United Nations Charter which obligates member states to refrain from threatening or using force against the territorial integrity of other states – including occupied territories. The Israeli government’s extremist position is, in fact, a declaration of its intention to proceed with its annexation of the West Bank.”

Adalah has posted about this and provided some quotes from the above. You would think that such proclamations by the Israeli government would really hit the mainstream news cycle, yet it seems to have so far gone relatively unnoticed.

Several of my contacts have responded to this little-reported news with a certain disbelief – could it really be that Israel is openly stating that it is above international law?

Indeed, as I had mentioned above, it is not exactly a secret that Israel is now acting in brazen defiance of international law. Its own highest legal authorities are completely aware of it. But what we also need to see is that it has been doing this for a very long time, in fact, since its inception. As I had mentioned at the time of the passing of the Regularization Law, legalizing the theft of Palestinian land has been Israeli policy since day 1. Attorney Harel Arnon was using this notion as precedence in defense of the recent law, noting (in pt. 4):

“The honourable court has never passed legal critique upon central legislation of the Knesset also in cases where it contradicted, by the method of the plaintiffs, the directives of international law in cases which were more clear (the enactment of Israeli legislation in the Golan Heights and East Jerusalem)”…

That’s a very valid point. Israel’s unilateral annexations of the Syrian Golan and East Jerusalem are direct violations of international law, and they are condemned very clearly in United Nations Security Council resolutions. If the Israeli court approved it then, why should it not approve it now?

Attorney Arnon used a Supreme Court quote from an earlier case (pt. 12), where the court opined that “the mere enactment of a random Israeli norm upon an anonymous place outside the country, does not necessarily make that anonymous place a part of Israel”. This was relating to the West Bank, where Israel indeed enacts Israeli law upon settlers, even in places where it has not annexed territory.

See, this is part of the basis by which Arnon claims that “Israel can legislate anywhere in the world”. The essence of this is “if we could do it before, why cant we do it now”?

This point should be taken very seriously. The Israeli Supreme Court has often been perceived as a tool of the Israeli occupation. Thus even in very clear cases such as the 2004 International Court of Justice Advisory Opinion on Israel’s ‘security barrier’, where the ICJ deemed it wholly illegal (because it was mostly built on Palestinian, not Israeli, territory), the Supreme Court still managed to deflect this and claim that international law did not apply to Israel in this way. The Supreme Court has repeatedly managed to avoid and deflect these bigger issues and allow for Israel’s continued creeping annexation. This is a current, ongoing issue. Israel is preparing to demolish the Palestinian West Bank village of Khan al Ahmar, with the approval and sanction of the Supreme Court. B’Tselem:

“On Thursday, 24 May 2018, three Israeli Supreme Court justices – Noam Sohlberg, Anat Baron … [more]
Israel  InternationalLaw  WarCrimes  Palestine 
4 weeks ago by juandante
Traces of a Revolution: In Search of the Palestinian Film Archive: Ingenta Connect
This paper analyzes two documentaries that examine the legacy of the Palestinian Film Unit: Azza El-Hassan’s Kings and Extras: Digging for a Palestinian Image (2004) and Off Frame AKA Revolution Until Victory by MohanadYaqubi (2015). Relying on recently found footage as well as interviews and personal accounts, the documentaries recount the importance of the collective’s archive and the impact it had on creating the image of the revolutionary Palestinian. I argue that rather than dwelling on the loss of a Palestinian image, the filmmakers move beyond the impulse to physically locate the archive, providing sites of regeneration that allow alternative narratives to emerge instead. Through the filmmakers’ dialectic disruption of their own attempt to restore the archive, both films pose highly complex questions about the meaning ofthe photographic image and its potential in effecting social or political change.
archives  films  palestine 
5 weeks ago by shannon_mattern

« earlier    

related tags

2018  abbasmahmoud  activism  aeip  aipac  america  ammar-campa-najjar  analysis  ancientworld  announces  anti-semitism  anti-zionism  antisemitism  antisemitismus  apartheid  arab_world  archaeology  archetypal  archives  arizona  arrest  artificialintelligence  assad  assassination  assholes  asylum  atlantic_council  attention  automation  autonomy  avigdorissuchahorrendousarsehole  babylon  bank  bbc  bds  benjamin-wittes  benjamin  bibi  biblicalstudies  biometrics  biotechnology  blackseptember  blockage  blog  blue-midterm-2018  book  booker  books  borders  boycott  brexit  california  cancer  catholic  censorship  centralisation  china  clippings  closure  coalition  colombia  conference  congress  conservatism  constituencies  control  cooperation  corbyn  corbynism  corbynjeremy  cory+booker  cory_booker  creativity  crickmichael  d.c.  data  dc:creator=corbynjeremy  dc:creator=freedlandjonathan  dc:creator=harariyuvalnoah  dc:creator=jonesowen  dc:creator=kettlemartin  dc:creator=sarkarash  dc:creator=segalovmichael  dc:creator=seymourrichard  dc:creator=youngegary  dctagged  debateclass  decentralisation  decisionmaking  delegitimisation  democracy  democrats  department  detain  detention  dictatorship  diplomacy  distribution  diversity  dna  documentary  dsa  duncan-hunter  education  elections  elimu  elizabeth_warren  emissions  ems  emt  environment  eu  exclusion  facebook  farright  federalism  films  forces  foreign+policy  foreign-affairs  foreign_policy  free+speech  free_speech  frompocket  funding  fury  gaza  germany  google  gop  greenwald  guardian  hamas  health  healthcare  hezbollah  history  holocaust  housing  human+rights  humanrights  hypocrisy  hysteria  idiots  ihra  immigration  in  industry  inequality  informationtechnology  internationallaw  internet  interview  iran  islamist  israel  israeli  isreal  jerusalem  jews  jobs  labour  labourparty  language  law  leftist  liberalism  liberation  liturgy  lobbying  longread  mandelanelson  manipulation  map  maps  maytheresa  media  medicine  membership  mexico  meyerhajo  middle+east  middle-east  middle_east  middleeast  momentum  munich  music  nationalism  nec  netanyahu  netroots  news  nodeal  noun  novels  occupation  occupied+territories  of  office  olympics  opinion  oppression  organization  oslo  ownership  palestinianauthority  photography  plans  plo  plpost  policing  policy  politicians  politics  polls  populism  post  power  privacy  racism  recognizes  referendum  refugees  regulation  remain  renewables  report  reporter  reselection  russia  san-diego  sanctions  sarkarash  saudi-arabia  shipping  shutter  siege  skills  social_media  socialism  socialmovements  southafrica  sparking  starmerkeir  state  surveillance  syria  terrorism  textiles  the  to  toread  toryparty  tradeunions  trump  trumpdonald  tunis  tunisia  tv  two-state-solution  twt  ugh  uk  un  unemployment  unhcr  unite  unrwa  unwra  usa  violence  voting  walls  war  warcrimes  washington  wendyewald  west  westbank  wikipedia  wikipediapage  wreath  writing  xinjiang  xjp  zionism 

Copy this bookmark: