ows   9292

« earlier    

OWS Protesters Score $142,500 Settlement From NYC: Gothamist
RT : protesters arrested for "displaying a banner" get $142,500 settlement from NYC via
OWS  from twitter
23 days ago by AramZS
The smartest cities rely on citizen cunning and unglamorous technology | Cities | The Guardian
"Ignore the futuristic visions of governments and developers, it’s humble urban communities who lead the way in showing how networked technologies can strengthen a city’s social fabric"

"We are lucky enough to live at a time in which a furious wave of innovation is breaking across the cities of the global south, spurred on both by the blistering pace of urbanisation, and by the rising popular demand for access to high-quality infrastructure that follows in its wake.

From Porto Alegre’s participatory budgeting and the literally destratifying cable cars of Caracas, to Nairobi’s “digital matatus” and the repurposed bus-ferries of Manila, the communities of the south are responsible for an ever-lengthening parade of social and technical innovations that rival anything the developed world has to offer for ingenuity and practical utility.

Nor is India an exception to this tendency. Transparent Chennai’s participatory maps and the work of the Mumbai-based practices CRIT and URBZ are better-known globally, but it is the tactics of daily survival devised by the unheralded multitude that really inspire urbanists. These techniques maximise the transactive capacity of the urban fabric, wrest the very last increment of value from the energy invested in the production of manufactured goods, and allow millions to eke a living, however precarious, from the most unpromising of circumstances. At a time of vertiginously spiralling economic and environmental stress globally, these are insights many of us in the developed north would be well advised to attend to – and by no means merely the poorest among us.

But, for whatever reason, this is not the face of urban innovation official India wants to share with the world – perhaps small-scale projects or the tactics of the poor simply aren’t dramatic enough to convey the magnitude and force of national ambition. We hear, instead, of schemes like Palava City, a nominally futuristic vision of digital technology minutely interwoven into the texture of everday urban life. Headlines were made around the planet this year when Narendra Modi’s government announced it had committed to building no fewer than 100 similarly “smart” cities.

Because definitions of the smart city remain so vague, I think it’s worth thinking carefully about what this might mean – beyond, that is, the 7,000 billion rupees (£70bn) in financing that India’s high powered expert committee on urban infrastructure believes the scheme will require over the next 20 years. It is one thing, after all, to reinforce the basic infrastructures that undergird the quality of urban life everywhere; quite another to propose saddling India’s cities with expensive, untested technology at a time when reliable access to electricity, clean drinking water or safe sanitary facilities remain beyond reach for too many.

We can take it as read that our networked technologies will continue to play some fairly considerable role in shaping the circumstances and possibilities experienced by billions of city-dwellers worldwide. So it’s only appropriate to consider the ways in which these technologies might inform decisions about urban land use, mobility and governance.

However, especially at a time of such enthusiasm for the notion in India, I think it’s vital to point out that “the smart city” is not the only way of bringing advanced information technology to bear on these questions of urban life. It’s but one selection from a sheaf of available possibilities, and not anywhere near the most responsive, equitable or fructifying among them.

We can see this most easily by considering just who it is the smart city is intended for – by seeking to discover what model of urban subjectivity is inscribed in the scenarios offered by the multinational IT vendors that developed the smart city concept in the first place, and who are heavily involved in sites like Palava. When you examine their internal documentation, marketing materials and extant interventions, it becomes evident there is a pronounced way of thinking about the civic that is bound up in all of them, with rather grim implications for the politics of participation.

A close reading leaves little room for doubt that vendors like Microsoft, IBM, Siemens, Cisco and Hitachi construct the resident of the smart city as someone without agency; merely a passive consumer of municipal services – at best, perhaps, a generator of data that can later be aggregated, mined for relevant inference, and acted upon. Should he or she attempt to practise democracy in any form that spills on to the public way, the smart city has no way of accounting for this activity other than interpreting it as an untoward disruption to the orderly flow of circulation. (This is explicit in Palava’s marketing materials, as well.) All in all, it’s a brutally reductive conception of civic life, and one with little to offer those of us whose notions of citizenhood are more robust."

"The true enablers of participation turn out to be nothing more exciting than cheap commodity devices, reliable access to sufficiently high- bandwidth connectivity, and generic cloud services. These implications should be carefully mulled over by developers, those responsible for crafting municipal and national policy, and funding bodies in the philanthropic sector.

In both these cases, ordinary people used technologies of connection to help them steer their own affairs, not merely managing complex domains to a minimal threshold of competence, but outperforming the official bodies formally entrusted with their stewardship. This presents us with the intriguing prospect that more of the circumstances of everyday urban life might be managed this way, on a participatory basis, by autonomous neighbourhood groups networked with one another in something amounting to a city-wide federation.

In order to understand how we might get there from here, we need to invoke a notion drawn from the study of dynamic systems. Metastability is the idea that there are multiple stable configurations a system can assume within a larger possibility space; the shape that system takes at the moment may simply be one among many that are potentially available to it. Seen in this light, it’s clear that all the paraphernalia we regard as the sign and substance of government may in fact merely constitute what a dynamicist would think of as a “local maximum”. There remain available to us other possible states, in which we might connect to one another in different ways, giving rise to different implications, different conceptions of urban citizenship, and profoundly different outcomes.

The sociologist Bruno Latour warns us not to speak airily of “potential”, reminding us that we have to actually do the work of bringing some state of affairs into being before we can know whether it was indeed a possible future state of the system – and also that work is never accomplished without some cost. I nevertheless believe, given the very substantial benefits we know people and communities enjoy when afforded real control over the conditions of their being, that whatever the cost incurred in this exploration, it would be one well worth bearing.

The evidence before us strongly suggests that investment in the unglamorous technologies, frameworks and infrastructures that are already known to underwrite citizen participation would result in better outcomes for tens of millions of ordinary Indians – and would shoulder the state with far-less onerous a financial burden – than investment in the high-tech chimeras of centralised control. The wisest course would be to plan technological interventions to come on the understanding that the true intelligence of the Indian city will continue to reside where it always has: in the people who live and work in it, who animate it and give it a voice."

[See also: http://boingboing.net/2014/12/24/why-smart-cities-should-be.html ]
2014  adamgreenfield  urban  urbanism  collectivism  cities  innovation  smartcities  chennai  caracas  nairobi  portoalegre  digitalmatatus  manila  infrastructure  palavacity  technology  power  control  democracy  ows  occupywallstreet  urbz  crit  transparency  occupysandy  nyc  elcampodecebada  madrid  zuloark  zuloarkcollective  collectives  twitter  facebook  troughofdisallusionment  darkweather  networks  internetofpeople  brunolatour  grassroots  systems  systemsthinking  metastability  dynamicsystems 
5 weeks ago by robertogreco
“We want democracy, but we don’t have the theory or skill to do it” | Grist
"A. People from older generations tried to step in and say, “Here’s what’s going to happen. A General Assembly can’t be that open because people are going to be walking in just off the streets. Here are some horizontal structures that you can use to limit the inevitable chaos.”

And then they were denounced. There was so much idealism. I actually just wrote this big prospectus for my next film, and the working title is, “What is Democracy?” I don’t know if it will talk about Occupy. But it will talk about how we want democracy, but we don’t have the political theory or skill to do it. People are so disappointed in the existing system that they want something more pure, something totally open and equal. And then of course it fails.

Like “consensus.” It actually has its origins in Quaker meetings. In that context it makes sense, because at a Quaker meeting you quiet yourself. And when you’re calm, then the spirit moves you. But if you’re a bunch of activists in a park, you don’t necessarily agree if there is a God up there, or if there’s a metaphysical spirit that you’re going to get in touch with. There’s something funny about how that technique has been adopted.

We take these tools and we don’t know where they come from. I want to say, “Where did we get these ideas? And are they helping us? Or are we going to just keep on having these beautiful moments that totally collapse under the weight of our structureless democracy?”"

Q. The tyranny of structurelessness.

A. Yeah. I want to make the movie that the kids in college can see and have better tools for their social movements. Other than “Let’s have a general assembly! The world is so corrupt that we can only be pure in opposition to it.” I think we need a more complicated understanding of political theory than that.

Q. When you think about democracy — are there certain groups you know that really have it? You mentioned the students in Montreal.

A. I did a piece for the Baffler about Chicago’s New Era Windows Cooperative. It’s the only worker-owned factory in the United States. In the piece I say that part of the problem of Occupy Wall Street was that it wanted to be a democracy but it didn’t have any resources. One of the tricks if you want a democracy is that something has to be at stake — you need an incentive to stick together.

You can’t just have a democracy of people debating abstract principles in a park. Because then you’re just going to fight. This group in Chicago — they wanted to have a job that gave them time to see their families. They put themselves in danger to get that. They built a factory when they could have been out there looking for other jobs. But do they give those rights that they fought for to a new hire who just comes walking in off the street? That’s what a democracy is about — it’s about who has rights. Who has responsibilities. How do we share resources?

This is the tricky thing about democracy: It’s both an ideal and an actuality. So when we say “democracy,” we also have to say what me mean by it. It’s an ideal, and it’s also the current corrupt system of elections and representations that we have.

In fact, the Founding Fathers went out of their way to make sure the president wasn’t directly elected and made sure to call it a republic and not a democracy. This tension between the ideal and the actual is always going to be there."
astrataylor  democracy  history  ows  occupywallstreet  2014  hierarchy  politics  us  horizontality  quakers  anarchism  anarchy  organizing  socialmovements  activism  protest  change  participatory  interviews  structurelessness 
7 weeks ago by robertogreco
Junot Diaz - Art, Race and Capitalism - YouTube
"Despite what we think, we're more isolated and atomized than ever before. […] The fact is that most poor people are more segregated and isolated than they've ever been. […] There's something really bewildering about the fact that we feel so rhizomatically interconnected to people, but we've never been more isolated. Classes no longer come into contact with each other in any way that's meaningful. I look at my mom and people are like “oh, she's that old generation.” My mom had more interclass contact than the average person has today. Because these great barriers — what we would call the networked society in which we live — hadn't been put into place yet. Think about how much public space my mother inhabited where she was going to encounter people from different cultures and different classes every day. There's almost no public space left at all. And any public space that we have is so patrolled and under so much surveillance and has been schematized and culturalized in certain ways that we're not really coming into contact with anyone who isn't like us. […] You basically encounter people in your network. So that if you are of a certain class, that's who you're encountering in the village. If you come from a certain educational background or from a certain privilege, that's who you're encountering in Williamsburg, these quote-unquote diverse spaces."

[via: http://botpoet.tumblr.com/post/103750710570/you-gotta-remember-and-im-sure-you-do-the

quoting these lines: “You gotta remember, and I’m sure you do, the forces that are arrayed against anyone trying to alter this sort of hammerlock on the human imagination. There are trillions of dollars out there demotivating people from imagining that a better tomorrow is possible. Utopian impulses and utopian horizons have been completely disfigured and everybody now is fluent in dystopia, you know. My young people’s vocabulary… their fluency is in dystopic futures. When young people think about the future, they don’t think about a better tomorrow, they think about horrors and end of the worlds and things or worse. Well, do you really think the lack of utopic imagination doesn’t play into demotivating people from imagining a transformation in the society?”]
junotdíaz  capitalism  race  class  segregation  dystopia  utopia  hope  faith  humans  2013  humanism  writing  literature  immigration  life  living  classism  activism  ows  occupywallstreet  punk  hiphop  compassion  identity  failure  guilt  imperfection  politics  self  work  labor  courage  howtobehuman  forgiveness  future  oppression  privilege  society  change  changemaking  futures  schools  education  business  funding  policy  resistance  subversion  radicalpedagogy  burnout  teaching  howweteach  systemschange  survival  self-care  masculinity  therapy  cultureofcare  neolithic  optimism  inventingthefuture  humanconstructs  civilization  evolution  networkedsociety  transcontextualism  paradigmshifts 
8 weeks ago by robertogreco
What’s next for messaging apps - Taipei Times
Until now, there have been two distinct classes of messaging apps: the big, mainstream ones, and the group focusing specifically on encryption and privacy, including TextSecure, Telegram, Hemlis, Threema, Wickr and others.
That may be changing, with the biggest signpost being WhatsApp’s recent addition of end-to-end encryption to its Android app with iOS to follow. It’s working with the company behind TextSecure, Open Whisper Systems, which described the partnership as “the largest deployment of end-to-end encrypted communication in history.”
otf  OWS  encryption  mobile 
9 weeks ago by lindsay
Hacker Lexicon: What Is End-to-End Encryption? | WIRED
Plenty of companies brag that their communications app is encrypted. But that marketing claim demands a followup question: Who has the key? In many cases, the company itself holds the cryptographic key data that lets it decrypt your messages—and so, therefore, does any hacker who compromises the company or government official standing over its shoulder.

But increasingly, privacy-conscious communications tools are rolling out a feature known as “end-to-end encryption.” That “end-to-end” promise means that messages are encrypted in a way that allows only the unique recipient of a message to decrypt it, and not anyone in between. In other words, only the endpoint computers hold the cryptographic keys, and the company’s server acts as an illiterate messenger, passing along messages that it can’t itself decipher.
share  privacy  f2c  encryption  security  ows  guardian  whatsapp  internetfreedom 
9 weeks ago by blah
Encryption Made More Accessible | Open Technology Fund
This week, WhatsApp, the world’s most popular mobile messaging platform, enabled its millions of users to communicate securely through an update incorporating technology using Open Whisper Systems’ TextSecure encryption protocol.

With more than 600 million users worldwide, WhatsApp continues to expand its user base with more than 100 million active users in Asia and 15 million users in the Middle East and North Africa. Since the recent uprisings both in East Asia as well as the Middle East and North Africa region, many people now depend on social media and messaging apps to access information and raise awareness regarding issues of importance. As citizens in repressive environments use Facebook and WhatsApp among other tools as channels of expression and awareness raising, many governments have adopted measures to counter these efforts by blocking access to information and closely monitoring user activities.
share  f2c  ows  textsecure  security  privacy  global  internetfreedom 
9 weeks ago by blah
JPMorgan's 'worst nightmare': Alayne Fleischmann on fraudsters getting off scot-free - YouTube
"Occupy made it possible" says JPMorgan whistleblower who helped leverage biggest fine in banking history
OWS  from twitter_favs
11 weeks ago by mathpunk

« earlier    

related tags

2013  2014  acculturation  aclu  acmerecords  activism  adamgreenfield  anarchism  anarchy  anarki  anon  anonfamily  anons  anonymiss  anonymous  anticapitalista  arabspring  arrest  astrataylor  atxfloods  austerity  austin  australia  banks  bikenyc  bitly  blackbloc  blacklivesmatter  bladerunner  brendanmartin  broadway  brunolatour  burnout  business  californiaideology  canon  canonefs1755mmf28isusm  canoneos7d  capital  capitalism  caracas  carrythenames  cecilymcmillan  chalkupy  change  changemaking  chennai  chicago  childrenofmen  chrishedges  cities  civilization  class  classism  climate  climatechange  collaboration  collapse  collectives  collectivism  colleges  commercialization  communitycolleges  compassion  consumerism  control  cooperatives  cooperunion  courage  crit  criticalthinking  criticism  cryptocat  culture  cultureofcare  cycles  dalestephens  darkweather  darpa-funded  death  debt  deepspringscollege  deindustrialization  democracy  democrats  demonstration  dhs  digitalmatatus  dougengelbart  dynamicsystems  dystopia  economics  economy  education  efficiency  elcampodecebada  elysium  employment  encryption  environment  ericgarner  escape  evolution  f2c  facebook  faculty  failure  faith  fbi  feminism  ferguson  ff  fifa  filmthepolice  finance  flickr  forgiveness  freeallpoliticalprisoners  freeanons  freejeremyhammond  freelorax  freethemall  freeusall  freew0rmer  freewormer  fuckchrishedges  funding  future  futures  gis  global  globalwarming  gop  government  grandcentral  grassroots  growth  guardian  guilt  hierarchies  hierarchy  highered  highereducation  hiphop  history  hope  horizontalism  horizontality  households  howtobehuman  howweteach  humanconstructs  humanism  humans  icantbreathe  identity  ifttt  immigration  imperfection  incomeinequality  indignados  inequality  informationtechnology  infowars  infrastructure  innovation  intellectualproperty  interesting  internetfreedom  internetofpeople  interviews  inventingthefuture  iplaw  ivorytower  jugaad  junotdíaz  justice  justice4cecily  justinetunney  kevinkelly  knowledge  kowloon  kowlooncity  kowloonwalledcity  kybernetisk  labor  latecapitalism  law  learning  legal  liberalarts  life  literature  living  losangeles  lr  lrad  lulzsec  madrid  manila  march  marinasitrin  masculinity  mcmillancecily  memex  mending  metastability  michigan  mikebrown  militarization  militia  mindfulness  ministry  mo  mobile  module  mondragon  money  mooc  moocs  mortality  mraw  mutualaid  my2k  mympn  mynypd  nairobi  naovaitercopa  nathanmyhrvold  neoliberalism  neolithic  networkedsociety  networks  newyork  nojustice  nyc  nypd  oatx  obama  obeyparty2014  occupy  occupycentral  occupydnc  occupyrnc  occupysandy  occupywallstreet  occupywallstreets15  ogc  ola  oped  opinion  oppression  opsec  optimism  organizing  otf  ownership  p2  p2b  palavacity  paradigmshifts  participatory  peterschiff  peterthiel  photobook  plants  police  policestate  policing  policy  politics  pollution  portoalegre  poverty  povertyday  power  precarity  prison  prisons  privacy  privatization  privilege  process  progress  propaganda  protest  proxy  publicfunding  punk  purpose  python  quakers  qualityoflife  race  radicalpedagogy  raykurzweil  reality  redcross  reform  rentseeking  repair  repairing  republicans  resilience  resiliency  resistance  response  rikers  riodejaneiro  ronpaul  rt  s15  s17  sabu  safetynet  schools  sebastianthrun  security  segregation  self-care  self  sentencing  sept11  share  singularity  smartcities  smartnews  snowden  social-dynamics  social-engineering  social-norms  socialmedia  socialmovements  socialsafetynet  society  solarpunk  solidarity  stlouis  structure  structurelessness  studentdebt  studentloands  subversion  survival  sustainability  sxsweco  systems  systemschange  systemsthinking  sãopaulo  tcot  teaching  teaparty  technology  technosolutionism  texas  textsecure  therapy  tips  tlot  torredavid  transcendence  transcontextualism  transparency  trial  troughofdisallusionment  truthdigsux  tweet  tweetboat  twitter  ubicomp  uncollege  unions  uniteblue  universities  uprising  urban  urbanism  urbanplanning  urbz  us  usa  utopia  vannevarbush  vegetarians  w0rmer  wallstreet  waronwomen  wcs  wealth  wearechange  weather  wfs  whatsapp  whatshisangle  wikileaks  wikipedia  williamderesiewicz  winnertakeall  wms  women  work  writing  yvessmith  zuccottipark  zuloark  zuloarkcollective 

Copy this bookmark: