ows   9337

« earlier    

“We want democracy, but we don’t have the theory or skill to do it” | Grist
"A. People from older generations tried to step in and say, “Here’s what’s going to happen. A General Assembly can’t be that open because people are going to be walking in just off the streets. Here are some horizontal structures that you can use to limit the inevitable chaos.”

And then they were denounced. There was so much idealism. I actually just wrote this big prospectus for my next film, and the working title is, “What is Democracy?” I don’t know if it will talk about Occupy. But it will talk about how we want democracy, but we don’t have the political theory or skill to do it. People are so disappointed in the existing system that they want something more pure, something totally open and equal. And then of course it fails.

Like “consensus.” It actually has its origins in Quaker meetings. In that context it makes sense, because at a Quaker meeting you quiet yourself. And when you’re calm, then the spirit moves you. But if you’re a bunch of activists in a park, you don’t necessarily agree if there is a God up there, or if there’s a metaphysical spirit that you’re going to get in touch with. There’s something funny about how that technique has been adopted.

We take these tools and we don’t know where they come from. I want to say, “Where did we get these ideas? And are they helping us? Or are we going to just keep on having these beautiful moments that totally collapse under the weight of our structureless democracy?”"

Q. The tyranny of structurelessness.

A. Yeah. I want to make the movie that the kids in college can see and have better tools for their social movements. Other than “Let’s have a general assembly! The world is so corrupt that we can only be pure in opposition to it.” I think we need a more complicated understanding of political theory than that.



Q. When you think about democracy — are there certain groups you know that really have it? You mentioned the students in Montreal.

A. I did a piece for the Baffler about Chicago’s New Era Windows Cooperative. It’s the only worker-owned factory in the United States. In the piece I say that part of the problem of Occupy Wall Street was that it wanted to be a democracy but it didn’t have any resources. One of the tricks if you want a democracy is that something has to be at stake — you need an incentive to stick together.

You can’t just have a democracy of people debating abstract principles in a park. Because then you’re just going to fight. This group in Chicago — they wanted to have a job that gave them time to see their families. They put themselves in danger to get that. They built a factory when they could have been out there looking for other jobs. But do they give those rights that they fought for to a new hire who just comes walking in off the street? That’s what a democracy is about — it’s about who has rights. Who has responsibilities. How do we share resources?

This is the tricky thing about democracy: It’s both an ideal and an actuality. So when we say “democracy,” we also have to say what me mean by it. It’s an ideal, and it’s also the current corrupt system of elections and representations that we have.

In fact, the Founding Fathers went out of their way to make sure the president wasn’t directly elected and made sure to call it a republic and not a democracy. This tension between the ideal and the actual is always going to be there."
astrataylor  democracy  history  ows  occupywallstreet  2014  hierarchy  politics  us  horizontality  quakers  anarchism  anarchy  organizing  socialmovements  activism  protest  change  participatory  interviews  structurelessness 
12 days ago by robertogreco
Junot Diaz - Art, Race and Capitalism - YouTube
"Despite what we think, we're more isolated and atomized than ever before. […] The fact is that most poor people are more segregated and isolated than they've ever been. […] There's something really bewildering about the fact that we feel so rhizomatically interconnected to people, but we've never been more isolated. Classes no longer come into contact with each other in any way that's meaningful. I look at my mom and people are like “oh, she's that old generation.” My mom had more interclass contact than the average person has today. Because these great barriers — what we would call the networked society in which we live — hadn't been put into place yet. Think about how much public space my mother inhabited where she was going to encounter people from different cultures and different classes every day. There's almost no public space left at all. And any public space that we have is so patrolled and under so much surveillance and has been schematized and culturalized in certain ways that we're not really coming into contact with anyone who isn't like us. […] You basically encounter people in your network. So that if you are of a certain class, that's who you're encountering in the village. If you come from a certain educational background or from a certain privilege, that's who you're encountering in Williamsburg, these quote-unquote diverse spaces."

[via: http://botpoet.tumblr.com/post/103750710570/you-gotta-remember-and-im-sure-you-do-the

quoting these lines: “You gotta remember, and I’m sure you do, the forces that are arrayed against anyone trying to alter this sort of hammerlock on the human imagination. There are trillions of dollars out there demotivating people from imagining that a better tomorrow is possible. Utopian impulses and utopian horizons have been completely disfigured and everybody now is fluent in dystopia, you know. My young people’s vocabulary… their fluency is in dystopic futures. When young people think about the future, they don’t think about a better tomorrow, they think about horrors and end of the worlds and things or worse. Well, do you really think the lack of utopic imagination doesn’t play into demotivating people from imagining a transformation in the society?”]
junotdíaz  capitalism  race  class  segregation  dystopia  utopia  hope  faith  humans  2013  humanism  writing  literature  immigration  life  living  classism  activism  ows  occupywallstreet  punk  hiphop  compassion  identity  failure  guilt  imperfection  politics  self  work  labor  courage  howtobehuman  forgiveness  future  oppression  privilege  society  change  changemaking  futures  schools  education  business  funding  policy  resistance  subversion  radicalpedagogy  burnout  teaching  howweteach  systemschange  survival  self-care  masculinity  therapy  cultureofcare  neolithic  optimism  inventingthefuture  humanconstructs  civilization  evolution  networkedsociety  transcontextualism  paradigmshifts 
22 days ago by robertogreco
What’s next for messaging apps - Taipei Times
Until now, there have been two distinct classes of messaging apps: the big, mainstream ones, and the group focusing specifically on encryption and privacy, including TextSecure, Telegram, Hemlis, Threema, Wickr and others.
That may be changing, with the biggest signpost being WhatsApp’s recent addition of end-to-end encryption to its Android app with iOS to follow. It’s working with the company behind TextSecure, Open Whisper Systems, which described the partnership as “the largest deployment of end-to-end encrypted communication in history.”
otf  OWS  encryption  mobile 
25 days ago by lindsay
Hacker Lexicon: What Is End-to-End Encryption? | WIRED
Plenty of companies brag that their communications app is encrypted. But that marketing claim demands a followup question: Who has the key? In many cases, the company itself holds the cryptographic key data that lets it decrypt your messages—and so, therefore, does any hacker who compromises the company or government official standing over its shoulder.

But increasingly, privacy-conscious communications tools are rolling out a feature known as “end-to-end encryption.” That “end-to-end” promise means that messages are encrypted in a way that allows only the unique recipient of a message to decrypt it, and not anyone in between. In other words, only the endpoint computers hold the cryptographic keys, and the company’s server acts as an illiterate messenger, passing along messages that it can’t itself decipher.
share  privacy  f2c  encryption  security  ows  guardian  whatsapp  internetfreedom 
25 days ago by blah
Encryption Made More Accessible | Open Technology Fund
This week, WhatsApp, the world’s most popular mobile messaging platform, enabled its millions of users to communicate securely through an update incorporating technology using Open Whisper Systems’ TextSecure encryption protocol.

With more than 600 million users worldwide, WhatsApp continues to expand its user base with more than 100 million active users in Asia and 15 million users in the Middle East and North Africa. Since the recent uprisings both in East Asia as well as the Middle East and North Africa region, many people now depend on social media and messaging apps to access information and raise awareness regarding issues of importance. As citizens in repressive environments use Facebook and WhatsApp among other tools as channels of expression and awareness raising, many governments have adopted measures to counter these efforts by blocking access to information and closely monitoring user activities.
share  f2c  ows  textsecure  security  privacy  global  internetfreedom 
29 days ago by blah
JPMorgan's 'worst nightmare': Alayne Fleischmann on fraudsters getting off scot-free - YouTube
"Occupy made it possible" says JPMorgan whistleblower who helped leverage biggest fine in banking history
OWS  from twitter_favs
5 weeks ago by mathpunk
sleep on, dream on « acme records
you're dream that we're all free- we can end poverty> theCCC play 'sleep on, dream on' > On
occupy  ows  acmerecords  from twitter_favs
5 weeks ago by kitoconnell
Hope and Ka-ching - The Baffler
"There are at least 150 million members of cooperatives in the United States, if you include retail, housing, agricultural, electrical, insurance, and most other types of co-ops. Eleven thousand American companies are owned wholly or in part by their workers through employee stock-ownership plans. Where these two groups intersect and go even further is in the four hundred worker cooperatives that exist in this country, enterprises that are owned by members and democratically run. As for cooperative factories, New Era is a rarity, among the only operations of its kind in the United States."



"Horizontalism is not simply about being fair to old friends. Nor is it about passing a political litmus test or pretending everyone has identical abilities. Instead, it is a practical matter, a way of mitigating the uncertainty and sacrifice the task requires of all involved, even if it means supporting those who are less proficient or those who are unable to work as hard as others due to unforeseen circumstances. Toward this end, the group recently affirmed their commitment to “solidarity economics,” specifically assuring that all future workers will be members. Despite the disproportionate role played by the founders, every worker, present and future, must be given a “buy-in” that will make them all legitimate owners of capital and make it harder for the business to demutualize, as some cooperatives have in the past. Essentially, they want to be blocked from someday becoming the bosses they deplore.

Starting New Era, one worker told me, was a “survival strategy” pure and simple, a way to “stop the abuse” they had suffered. Making windows for Republic, Robles said, was “a type of modern slavery,” with every minute logged and monitored through a complicated tracking system. Now they move freely, working and breaking when they need to, with a sense of purpose that Robles says gets him happily out of bed at dawn without the help of an alarm clock. Arizona Stingley, who was a nanny for white families in Mississippi in her younger days, told me there was simply no comparison between Republic and New Era. “It was divide and conquer by the boss. They were always pitting Mexicans against blacks,” she recalled. “And it worked. People wouldn’t want to teach you anything because they were afraid you’d take their job.” The groups sat at different tables at lunch and rarely mingled across race lines. Now they share skills instead of regarding each other as threats.

Experiences like these have convinced the New Era crew that cooperatives are the wave of the future. “Bosses, at any minute they can close the plant and just destroy your life. They say it’s your job, but really it’s their job to take away,” said Maclin, whose fluency in English is a resource for the predominantly Spanish-speaking crew. He likened his awakening over the last few years to the movie Star Wars: “You know how it says, the power is with you, the force is with you? Well the power is with us. The force is with us. We are the work force. We’re taking back the power we already have.”



"History abounds with examples of cooperative ambitions; unfortunately, it also contains an almost equal number of failures.

The stumbling block, nearly every time, has been lack of access to capital. Workers are more than capable of managing things on their own—work, after all, goes on whether the bosses are in their offices or out on the putting green. But the money to purchase equipment and pay for space and materials has always been hard to come by for the proletariat. After owners shut down the Youngstown Sheet and Tube steel mill in the late 1970s, a landmark event in the history of deindustrialization, workers made plans to run it themselves; they were stopped when the Carter administration failed to come up with the $100 million in financing it had promised. In 1996 the CEO of Republic Windows and Doors was able to secure nearly $10 million in financing through a public program that diverted property-tax revenue from schools and parks to expand his private company. In 2012 the workers needed just a petty sum to buy the business, but for them there was no public investment to be found.

Finance, as Martin sees it, is the key to getting significant control of wealth into workers’ hands. “There is this myth of capitalism that says that the 1 percent invest productively, but the fact is, we don’t need them,” Martin explains. “They said, ‘If you don’t bail us out, there won’t be jobs.’ But their aim isn’t to make jobs; it’s to make money for themselves. Finance, as it is currently set up, is parasitic. It’s extractive. But what if it was productive instead? What if it actually invested in the community instead of always sucking money out?” The Working World, which has lent out over $4 million in less than ten years, is Martin’s answer to that question."



"Karl Marx wrote approvingly of cooperatives, insisting that the “value of these great social experiments cannot be overrated.” Nonetheless, he probably would have scorned the “small is beautiful” attitude of those cooperators who are content to stay on the fringe, who lack the oppositional spirit necessary to take on capitalism directly. He would also have scoffed at activists who believe they can practice and prefigure democracy without building institutions, accumulating resources, or holding power.

The cooperative activists themselves often recognize the problem. Marina Sitrin, the author of several books about horizontalism, never believed that the large assemblies that characterized the early days of Occupy Wall Street would be sustainable for a prolonged period. She told me that horizontalism needs to be grounded in a specific place and have a well-defined purpose in order to function. A hundred people debating abstract principles in a public forum will likely drive each other bonkers, but the same hundred people may be able to run a school or a health center or a factory if their community and lives depend on it. In other words, for consensus decision-making to be practicable, there has to be something at stake, something to stick to and stick with. You need a school or a health center or a factory."



"What remains to be seen is whether the current crop of cooperators and activists—the New Era window builders, Occupy and its post-disaster rebuilding efforts, and the USW with its plans for union-cooperative hybrids—will actually be able to change things. They look at Mondragon and the substantial cooperative networks in other countries, as well as the factory takeovers in Argentina and Greece, and believe we may be entering a cooperative renaissance spurred on by an endless economic slump. And maybe that is so. But cooperative momentum will flag if the movement doesn’t take the problem of finance seriously. Until we create loan funds or build banks that are committed to non-extractive economic growth, cooperatives will remain marginal phenomena, nice places to shop for organic food and get your bicycle repaired, but not much more.

One thing the cooperators can count on is self-interest. People will pursue worker control because it is more appealing than being exploited and then disposed of by employers whose only allegiance is to the bottom line. They will be drawn to structures that can help them support their families and communities, and these real, urgent needs will in turn encourage them to endure the vexations of direct democracy, to stick with it even though the meetings last for hours and comrades inevitably chafe. It’s still better than having a boss."
collectives  work  chicago  finance  astrataylor  2014  labor  horizontality  hierarchy  hierarchies  horizontalism  deindustrialization  via:Taryn  capital  mondragon  marinasitrin  brendanmartin  collectivism  anarchism  cooperatives  ows  occupywallstreet 
9 weeks ago by robertogreco

« earlier    

related tags

2013  2014  acculturation  aclu  acmerecords  activism  adamgreenfield  anarchism  anarchy  anarki  anon  anonfamily  anons  anonymiss  anonymous  anticapitalista  arabspring  arrest  astrataylor  atxfloods  austerity  austin  australia  banks  bikenyc  bitly  blackbloc  bladerunner  brendanmartin  broadway  brutality  burnout  business  californiaideology  canon  canonefs1755mmf28isusm  canoneos7d  capital  capitalism  cecilymcmillan  chalkupy  change  changemaking  chicago  childrenofmen  chrishedges  civilization  class  classism  climate  climatechange  collaboration  collapse  collectives  collectivism  colleges  commercialization  communitycolleges  compassion  consumerism  cooperatives  cooperunion  courage  criticalthinking  criticism  cryptocat  cultureofcare  cycles  dalestephens  darpa-funded  death  debt  deepspringscollege  deindustrialization  democracy  demonstration  dougengelbart  dystopia  economics  economy  education  efficiency  elysium  employment  encryption  environment  ericgarner  escape  evolution  f2c  faculty  failure  faith  fbi  feminism  ferguson  fifa  filmthepolice  finance  flickr  forgiveness  freeallpoliticalprisoners  freeanons  freejeremyhammond  freelorax  freethemall  freeusall  freew0rmer  freewormer  fuckchrishedges  funding  future  futures  gis  global  globalwarming  government  growth  guardian  guilt  hierarchies  hierarchy  highered  highereducation  hiphop  history  hope  horizontalism  horizontality  households  howtobehuman  howweteach  humanconstructs  humanism  humans  icantbreathe  identity  ifttt  immigration  imperfection  incomeinequality  indignados  inequality  informationtechnology  infowars  intellectualproperty  interesting  internetfreedom  interviews  inventingthefuture  iplaw  ivorytower  jugaad  junotdíaz  justice  justice4cecily  justinetunney  kevinkelly  knowledge  kowloon  kowlooncity  kowloonwalledcity  kybernetisk  labor  latecapitalism  law  learning  legal  liberalarts  life  lightbrigade  literature  living  losangeles  lr  lrad  lulzsec  march  marinasitrin  masculinity  mcmillancecily  memex  mending  michigan  mikebrown  militarization  militia  mindfulness  mo  mobile  module  mondragon  money  mooc  moocs  mortality  mraw  mutualaid  my2k  mympn  mynypd  naovaitercopa  nathanmyhrvold  neoliberalism  neolithic  networkedsociety  networks  newyork  nojustice  nyc  nyclightbrigade  nypd  oatx  obeyparty2014  occupy  occupycentral  occupydnc  occupyrnc  occupysandy  occupywallstreet  occupywallstreets15  ogc  ola  oped  oppression  opsec  optimism  organizing  otf  ownership  p2  paradigmshifts  participatory  peterschiff  peterthiel  photobook  plants  police  policestate  policing  policy  politics  pollution  poverty  povertyday  precarity  prison  prisons  privacy  privatization  privilege  process  progress  propaganda  protest  protests  proxy  publicfunding  punk  purpose  python  quakers  qualityoflife  race  radicalpedagogy  raykurzweil  reality  redcross  reform  rentseeking  repairing  resilience  resiliency  resistance  response  rikers  riodejaneiro  ronpaul  rt  s15  s17  sabu  safetynet  schools  sebastianthrun  security  segregation  self-care  self  sentencing  sept11  share  singularity  snowden  social-dynamics  social-engineering  social-norms  socialmedia  socialmovements  society  solarpunk  solidarity  stlouis  structure  structurelessness  studentdebt  studentloands  subversion  survival  sustainability  sxsweco  systemschange  sãopaulo  tcot  teaching  technology  technosolutionism  texas  textsecure  therapy  tips  tlot  torredavid  transcendence  transcontextualism  trial  truthdigsux  tweet  tweetboat  ubicomp  uncollege  unions  uniteblue  universities  uprising  urbanplanning  us  usa  utopia  vannevarbush  vegetarians  violence  w0rmer  waronwomen  wcs  wealth  wearechange  weather  wfs  whatsapp  whatshisangle  wikileaks  wikipedia  williamderesiewicz  winnertakeall  wms  women  work  writing  yvessmith  zuccottipark 

Copy this bookmark:



description:


tags: