ownership   3034

« earlier    

How the Internet Travels Across Oceans - The New York Times
Hundreds of thousands of miles of cable connect continents to support our insatiable demand for communication and entertainment. Companies have typically pooled their resources. Now Google is going its own way.
undersea  cable  ownership  dataviz  datavisualisation  nyt  newyorktimes 
7 days ago by stevesong
Yes, Americans Owned Land Before Columbus | JSTOR Daily
"What you were taught in elementary school about Native Americans not owning land is a myth. The truth is much more complicated."

"There’s a myth that Europeans arrived in the Americas and divided the land up, mystifying Native Americans who had no concept of property rights. In reality, historian Allen Greer writes, various American societies had highly-developed systems of property ownership and use. Meanwhile, European colonists sometimes viewed land as a common resource, not just as individual property.

The mythic vision of clashing views of property goes back to John Locke. In 1689, the Enlightenment philosopher contrasted the “wild Indian” in America with the European property owner. Locke’s imaginary “Indian” had the right to the deer he kills but no claim on the forest itself. In contrast, Locke argued, white men could own property because they mixed their labor with the land, clearing, cultivating, and fencing it.

In reality, Greer writes, most people in the pre-Columbian Americas were primarily farmers, not hunter-gatherers. Around major Mesoamerican cities, cropland might be owned by households, temples, or urban nobles. As in Europe, less-cultivated areas like forests and deserts acted as a kind of regulated commons. They might belong to a person, family, or community, with legal provisions for local people to gather wood, berries, or game. In Iroquois and Algonquian nations, women in a particular family typically owned specific maize fields, although people of the area often farmed them, and distributed the harvest, collectively.

Even among North American hunter-gatherer nations, Greer writes, societies often allocated hunting grounds to specific families. And these people didn’t simply harvest nature’s bounty. They used techniques like diverting streams and burning underbrush to manage the land to ensure future harvests.

If the idea of pre-Columbian America as a universal commons is a myth, so is the story that Europeans immediately divided the land into individual plots of private property. Greer notes that in Mexico and other parts of the Americas, Spaniards established pastures and other common lands around their cities. Officials granted parts of this land to individual owners, but much of it remained a municipal commons owned by the town, with all residents entitled to share its bounty.

Similarly, in colonial New England, communal pastures were common. Some towns also used open-field tillage systems in which people owned plots of cropland individually but managed them collectively. It was only gradually, over the course of the seventeenth and early eighteenth centuries, that New Englanders divided most agricultural land into family farms.

When Native and colonial conceptions of property clashed, it was sometimes in the form of Europeans imposing their ideas of common land on territory that was already owned. Colonists often allowed their livestock to roam freely, disrupting the forest ecosystems and ownership systems that provided a livelihood for local people. As a Maryland Native leader named Mattagund explained to colonial authorities, “Your cattle and hogs injure us. You come too near to us to live and drive us from place to place.”

When individual private property did finally become the norm across the Americas, it was through the destruction of prior systems of property rights."
history  ownership  property  2019  land  rights  propertyrights  allengreer 
12 days ago by robertogreco

« earlier    

related tags

100  1988  2017  2018  2019  2read  acquisition  advertising  advice  affordability  ai  aiirline  airbnb  allengreer  amazon  ancestry.com  and  animation  answer  anxiaomina  api  art  artificialintelligence  artists  artrooney  asset  assets  auckland  australia  authoritarianism  authorship  automotive  autonomous  basic  bayarea  be  behaviour  beltandroad  bicycle  bill  bitcoin  blockchain  blogging  blogs  borrowing  botsmanrachel  brand  braun  brazil  brexit  burn.rates  business  businessmodels  buttondown  buying  cable  cables  capacity  capital  capitalism  car  carigmod  centralisation  change  chateau  chicago  china  city  co-operatives  community  companies  comparison  competition  computer  conglomerate  conglomerates  consensus  consumer_rights  consumerism  consumption  content  control  convergence  coolstuff  coop  cooperation  cooperative  cooperatives  coops  copyright  corbynjeremy  county  creativity  criticism  crowdfunding  cryptocurrency  culture  cycling  danielhertz  data  data_deluge  dataprotection  datavisualisation  dataviz  davidwojnarowicz  dc:creator=rushkoffdouglas  dc:creator=seymourrichard  dc:creator=zuboffshoshana  dctagged  december  decentralization  deed  delivery  democracy  deschooling  devices  digital  digital_rights_management  digitalidentity  discarded  disney  disruption  distribution  dna  dns  dominant  drake  driving  drones  east_bay_express  ebooks  ecj  economics  economy  education  ee  electronics  email  employee  employment  empowerment  england  escape  esports  estate  ethics  ethnonationalism  eu  europe  event  examples  exchanges  extraction  facebook  fandom  fashion  favorites  fibre  film  filmmaking  finance  football  founders  france  freedom  funding  gdpr  generations  genetics  genome  gigeconomy  gis  google  governance  government  gpl  gps  graphics  gun  health  healthcare  highereducation  hightech  history  home  homogeneity  housing  identity  in  inclusion  income  industries  industry  inequality  infrastructure  initiative  innovation  instagram  integration  intellectual  internet  intimacy  intro  investigativejournalism  investment  ip  iphone  journalism  keys:  kiwibuild  kodak  korea  labor  labourparty  land  landrights  law  leasing  legal  libraries  license  linked-data  loan  locke  london  lord&taylor  louisville  lyft  mailchimp  mainstream  manipulation  mapping  maps  marginalization  margins  markets  media  medical  memberful  memberships  memes  memory  merger  microsoft  midata  mining  mit  mobility  model  monetisation  money  monitoring  monkeys  monopolies  monopoly  multispecies  music  mutability  naas  nationalisation  nations  network  news  newsletters  newspaper  newspapers  newyorktimes  nfl  ngos  nintendo  nyt  nz  objects  obvious  of  offgrid  online  open-source  optic  othering  otherness  own  parcel  personaldata  personalisation  philosophy  photography  platforms  pod-people  pointofview  policy  power  pre-inventedworld  predictions  privacy  private  privatisation  proof  property  propertyrights  propriete  prove  provider  public  public_assets  publishing  purchase  queerculture  rail  rates  real  realestate  rebellion  records  redistribution  reference  reflection  registry  regulation  rental  renting  rents  research  resistance  rights  road  robbie-barrat  rust  said  sanfrancisco  scam  scooter  security  self-publishing  self  selfpublishing  several  shareholders  shares  sharing  sharing_economy  sharingeconomy  siliconvalley  silk  singlemarket  smartcampus  smartphone  social  social_dividend  socialmedia  software  south  sovereign_wealth  space  sports  stackoverflow  stake  stateaid  statistics  steelers  stock  streaming  study  subscriptions  substack  surveillance  surveillancecapitalism  sustainability  swap  tech-management  technology  technoutopianism  theft  thieves  tinyletter  to  tracking  transparency  transportation  trapped  trust  uber  ubi  uk  undersea  unicorns  universalbasicincome  universities  unschooling  urbanism  us  usa  venture.capital  vertical  viadanieldwilliam  violence  walking  wealth  wealth_gap  web  wework  worker  xkcd  “failing” 

Copy this bookmark: