new_media   2122

« earlier    

Free Speech in the Algorithmic Society: Big Data, Private Governance, and New School Speech Regulation by Jack M. Balkin :: SSRN
We have now moved from the early days of the Internet to the Algorithmic Society. The Algorithmic Society features the use of algorithms, artificial intelligence agents, and Big Data to govern populations. It also features digital infrastructure companies, large multi-national social media platforms, and search engines that sit between traditional nation states and ordinary individuals, and serve as special-purpose governors of speech.

The Algorithmic Society presents two central problems for freedom of expression. First, Big Data allows new forms of manipulation and control, which private companies will attempt to legitimate and insulate from regulation by invoking free speech principles. Here First Amendment arguments will likely be employed to forestall digital privacy guarantees and prevent consumer protection regulation. Second, privately owned digital infrastructure companies and online platforms govern speech much as nation states once did. Here the First Amendment, as normally construed, is simply inadequate to protect the practical ability to speak.

The first part of the essay describes how to regulate online businesses that employ Big Data and algorithmic decision making consistent with free speech principles. Some of these businesses are "information fiduciaries" toward their end-users; they must exercise duties of good faith and non-manipulation. Other businesses who are not information fiduciaries have a duty not to engage in "algorithmic nuisance": they may not externalize the costs of their analysis and use of Big Data onto innocent third parties.

The second part of the essay turns to the emerging pluralist model of online speech regulation. This pluralist model contrasts with the traditional dyadic model in which nation states regulated the speech of their citizens.

In the pluralist model, territorial governments continue to regulate the speech directly. But they also attempt to coerce or co-opt owners of digital infrastructure to regulate the speech of others. This is "new school" speech regulation. Digital infrastructure owners, and especially social media companies, now act as private governors of speech communities, creating and enforcing various rules and norms of the communities they govern. Finally, end users, civil society organizations, hackers, and other private actors repeatedly put pressure on digital infrastructure companies to regulate speech in certain ways and not to regulate it in others. This triangular tug of war -- rather than the traditional dyadic model of states regulating the speech of private parties -- characterizes the practical ability to speak in the algorithmic society.

The essay uses the examples of the right to be forgotten and the problem of fake news to illustrate the emerging pluralist model -- and new school speech regulation -- in action.

As private governance becomes central to freedom of speech, both end-users and nation states put pressure on private governance. Nation states attempt to co-opt private companies into becoming bureaucracies for the enforcement of hate speech regulation and new doctrines like the right to be forgotten. Conversely, end users increasingly demand procedural guarantees, due process, transparency, and equal protection from private online companies.

The more that end-users view businesses as governors, or as special-purpose sovereigns, the more end-users will expect -- and demand -- that these companies should conform to the basic obligations of governors towards those they govern. These obligations include procedural fairness in handling complaints and applying sanctions, notice, transparency, reasoned explanations, consistency, and conformity to rule of law values -- the “law” in this case being the publicly stated norms and policies of the company. Digital infrastructure companies, in turn, will find that they must take on new social obligations to meet these growing threats and expectations from nation states and end-users alike.
freedom_of_speech  internet  regulation  governance  administrative_state  big_data  algorithms  privacy  data  artificial_intelligence  machine_learning  ethics  philosophy_of_technology  new_media  social_media  networked_public_sphere  public_sphere  GAFA 
september 2017 by rvenkat
Jon Taffer RP (@JonTafferRP) | Twitter
Fake Jon Taffer account (of "Bar Rescue" fame). Creator of account joins various role plays ("RP") on Twitter and then makes them about fixing the bar.
twitter  satire  fake  fakeaccounts  comedy  new_media  internet_culture  meme_culture 
april 2017 by chritter
The Conversation
At the inferface of scientific blogging and science journalism
new_media  magazine  journalism 
march 2017 by rvenkat
MU Artspace | Eindhoven NL
Public gallery / museum focused on contemporary art, design, and new media.
art_gallery  art_museum  contemporary_art  design  new_media  Eindhoven  Netherlands 
march 2017 by brian.maniere

« earlier    

related tags

-  3d_printing  academia  accelerationism  administrative_state  africa  ais  algorithms  alt-right  amazing_kyle_and_lauren  archive  art+technology  art  art_gallery  art_museum  artificial_intelligence  artist  artworld  asia  attention_economy  authorship  bc  big_data  biometrics  bloggers  blogs  bookmarks_bar  bots  buzzfeed  celebrities  citizen  comedy  commonplace  computaional_advertising  conspiracy_theories  contemporary_art  critical_media  critique  cultural_history  culture  cybernetics  data  data_visualization  design  development_economics  dh  digital_communities  digital_content  digital_culture  digital_humanities  digital_media  disinformation  disruption  dmce  duties  economics  education  eindhoven  electronic_literature  essay  ethics  fake  fakeaccounts  fan_fiction  feminist  for_friends  freedom_of_expression  freedom_of_speech  futurism  gafa  gaming  genetics  geography  glossary  governance  henry_jenkins  history  illustrations  india  indigeneity  indigenous  infrastructure  installation_art  internet  internet_culture  journal  journalism  journalists  judgment_decision-making  lab  labor  lacan  law  literature  machine_learning  magazine  making  market_microstructure  media  media_studies  meme_culture  misinformation  modernism  multichannel_sound  museum  nationalism  ndn  net_art  netherlands  networked_life  networked_public_sphere  networks  new  news  news_media  newspaper  nyc  nytimes  observational_studies  online_experiments  participatory_media  pedagogy  people  performance  philosophy_of_technology  physics  podcasting  podcasts  political_economy  political_theory  preservation  privacy  productivity  public_sphere  regulation  research  resources  right-wing_populism  satire  settler_colonialism  social_media  social_networks  social_science  sociology_of_science  sociology_of_technology  space  speculative_realism  starred  storytelling  surveillance  systems  teaching  teaching_tech  tech  television  thought  tim.wu  transmedia  twitter  united_states_of_america  urbanism  us_elections  us_politics  us_supreme_court  vancouver  world_trends  zeynep.tufekci 

Copy this bookmark: