montessori   883

« earlier    

«­Wir haben jetzt schon ­Kinder mit Burn-out»
Remo Largo über die perfekte Schule, die Fehler der 68er-Bewegung und Alternativen zur Leistungsgesellschaft.
Montessori 
20 days ago by martinderm
Montessori Theory: Thoughts on Pretend Play
"One of the big “concerns” or “criticisms” of Montessori is that Pretend Play is not encouraged in the classroom. Generally, I believe that…"
instapaper  montessori  육아  몬테소리  Parenting 
february 2019 by andromedarabbit
Why Does Montessori Frown Upon Pretend Play?
"I read that Montessori frowns upon pretend play, why is that? My daughter LOVES pretend play, and I see nothing wrong with that. I think all…"
instapaper  montessori  육아  몬테소리  Parenting 
february 2019 by andromedarabbit
SVS/Unschooling Controversy - YouTube
"This is a commentary on the currently controversial article by Daniel Greenberg https://sudburyvalley.org/article/lets-be-clear-sudbury-valley-school-and-un-schooling-have-nothing-common . The article is not summarised during the commentary so it will be necessary to read it before listening. Further discussion is available to join on the forums at www.self-directed.org.

"Differences Between Self-Directed and Progressive Education" can be read here https://www.psychologytoday.com/us/comment/924407 . This commentary is offered by Jeanna L Clements in her private capacity and does not represent any other individual or collective. Please feel free to share. Thank you."
education  schools  schooling  sudburyschools  self-directed  self-directedlearning  progessive  petergray  je'annaclements  howwelearn  howweteach  teaching  learning  unschooling  homeschool  deschooling  montessori  northstar  agillearningcenters  agilelearning  tcsnmy  lcproject  openstudioproject  sfsh  jeannaclements  individualism  collective  collectivism  parenting  danielgreenberg  children  2018  johnholt  patfarenga  sudburyvalleyschool  agilelearningcenters 
january 2019 by robertogreco
Twitter
Some cheerful thoughts to ring in the new year in my parenting column today. Inspiration from Maria 's 1…
Montessori  from twitter_favs
december 2018 by andriak
What is programming-as-literacy, what does it look like, and what should we worry about? Alan Kay in Scientific American | Computing Education Research Blog
Two of the many important observations were:

(a) that “pretty much everything is different” for “literate” and non-literate populations (a number of the studies were able to compare members of the same African tribes who underwent (or didn’t undergo) schooling in Senegal, etc.).

(b) that just learning to read “didn’t do it” (i.e. effect the large transformation in epistemological outlook). It strongly seemed to be the case that what was required was *both* learning to read *and* schooling. They even thought that just the discipline of schooling might be as important than the knowledge gained in schooling.

(One way to interpret this is that a school looks like a culture (is kind of one) to human minds, and we have genetic drives to acclimate to things like cultures that surround us. Montessori used this idea as central to her designs for schooling. Most American schools don’t understand this and badly botch the environment.)

To me, if we try to characterize a small number of the most central ideas of computing, “effective procedures” (a better term than “algorithms”) might make the top five, but just barely. This is because computing is about relationships and representations (both analog and digital). It is about systems and processes (the making and understanding of things that do more than the individual parts, and whose largest interest are informational and representational).
alan-kay  mark-guzdial  computing-education  culture  montessori  literacy 
december 2018 by jbrennan
The Stories We Were Told about Education Technology (2018)
"It’s been quite a year for education news, not that you’d know that by listening to much of the ed-tech industry (press). Subsidized by the Chan Zuckerberg Initiative, some publications have repeatedly run overtly and covertly sponsored articles that hawk the future of learning as “personalized,” as focused on “the whole child.” Some of these attempt to stretch a contemporary high-tech vision of social emotional surveillance so it can map onto a strange vision of progressive education, overlooking no doubt how the history of progressive education has so often been intertwined with race science and eugenics.

Meanwhile this year, immigrant, refugee children at the United States border were separated from their parents and kept in cages, deprived of legal counsel, deprived of access to education, deprived in some cases of water.

“Whole child” and cages – it’s hardly the only jarring juxtaposition I could point to.

2018 was another year of #MeToo, when revelations about sexual assault and sexual harassment shook almost every section of society – the media and the tech industries, unsurprisingly, but the education sector as well – higher ed, K–12, and non-profits alike, as well school sports all saw major and devastating reports about cultures and patterns of sexual violence. These behaviors were, once again, part of the hearings and debates about a Supreme Court Justice nominee – a sickening deja vu not only for those of us that remember Anita Hill ’s testimony decades ago but for those of us who have experienced something similar at the hands of powerful people. And on and on and on.

And yet the education/technology industry (press) kept up with its rosy repetition that social equality is surely its priority, a product feature even – that VR, for example, a technology it has for so long promised is “on the horizon,” is poised to help everyone, particularly teachers and students, become more empathetic. Meanwhile, the founder of Oculus Rift is now selling surveillance technology for a virtual border wall between the US and Mexico.

2018 was a year in which public school teachers all over the US rose up in protest over pay, working conditions, and funding, striking in red states like West Virginia, Kentucky, and Oklahoma despite an anti-union ruling by the Supreme Court.

And yet the education/technology industry (press) was wowed by teacher influencers and teacher PD on Instagram, touting the promise for more income via a side-hustle like tutoring rather by structural or institutional agitation. Don’t worry, teachers. Robots won’t replace you, the press repeatedly said. Unsaid: robots will just de-professionalize, outsource, or privatize the work. Or, as the AI makers like to say, robots will make us all work harder (and no doubt, with no unions, cheaper).

2018 was a year of ongoing and increased hate speech and bullying – racism and anti-Semitism – on campuses and online.

And yet the education/technology industry (press) still maintained that blockchain would surely revolutionize the transcript and help insure that no one lies about who they are or what they know. Blockchain would enhance “smart spending” and teach financial literacy, the ed-tech industry (press) insisted, never once mentioning the deep entanglements between anti-Semitism and the alt-right and blockchain (specifically Bitcoin) backers.

2018 was a year in which hate and misinformation, magnified and spread by technology giants, continued to plague the world. Their algorithmic recommendation engines peddled conspiracy theories (to kids, to teens, to adults). “YouTube, the Great Radicalizer” as sociologist Zeynep Tufekci put it in a NYT op-ed.

And yet the education/technology industry (press) still talked about YouTube as the future of education, cheerfully highlighting (that is, spreading) its viral bullshit. Folks still retyped the press releases Google issued and retyped the press releases Facebook issued, lauding these companies’ (and their founders’) efforts to reshape the curriculum and reshape the classroom.

This is the ninth year that I’ve reviewed the stories we’re being told about education technology. Typically, this has been a ten (or more) part series. But I just can’t do it any more. Some people think it’s hilarious that I’m ed-tech’s Cassandra, but it’s not funny at all. It’s depressing, and it’s painful. And no one fucking listens.

If I look back at what I’ve written in previous years, I feel like I’ve already covered everything I could say about 2018. Hell, I’ve already written about the whole notion of the “zombie idea” in ed-tech – that bad ideas never seem to go away, that just get rebranded and repackaged. I’ve written about misinformation and ed-tech (and ed-tech as misinformation). I’ve written about the innovation gospel that makes people pitch dangerously bad ideas like “Uber for education” or “Alexa for babysitting.” I’ve written about the tech industry’s attempts to reshape the school system as its personal job training provider. I’ve written about the promise to “rethink the transcript” and to “revolutionize credentialing.” I’ve written about outsourcing and online education. I’ve written about coding bootcamps as the “new” for-profit higher ed, with all the exploitation that entails. I’ve written about the dangers of data collection and data analysis, about the loss of privacy and the lack of security.

And yet here we are, with Mark Zuckerberg – education philanthropist and investor – blinking before Congress, promising that AI will fix everything, while the biased algorithms keep churning out bias, while the education/technology industry (press) continues to be so blinded by “disruption” it doesn’t notice (or care) what’s happened to desegregation, and with so many data breaches and privacy gaffes that they barely make headlines anymore.

Folks. I’m done.

I’m also writing a book, and frankly that’s where my time and energy is going.

There is some delicious irony, I suppose, in the fact that there isn’t much that’s interesting or “innovative” to talk about in ed-tech, particularly since industry folks want to sell us on the story that tech is moving faster than it’s ever moved before, so fast in fact that the ol’ factory model school system simply cannot keep up.

I’ve always considered these year-in-review articles to be mini-histories of sorts – history of the very, very recent past. Now, instead, I plan to spend my time taking a longer, deeper look at the history of education technology, with particular attention for the next few months, as the title of my book suggests, to teaching machines – to the promises that machines will augment, automate, standardize, and individualize instruction. My focus is on the teaching machines of the mid-twentieth century, but clearly there are echoes – echoes of behaviorism and personalization, namely – still today.

In his 1954 book La Technique (published in English a decade later as The Technological Society), the sociologist Jacques Ellul observes how education had become oriented towards creating technicians, less interested in intellectual development than in personality development – a new “psychopedagogy” that he links to Maria Montessori. “The human brain must be made to conform to the much more advanced brain of the machine,” Ellul writes. “And education will no longer be an unpredictable and exciting adventure in human enlightenment , but an exercise in conformity and apprenticeship to whatever gadgetry is useful in a technical world.” I believe today we call this "social emotional learning" and once again (and so insistently by the ed-tech press and its billionaire backers), Montessori’s name is invoked as the key to preparing students for their place in the technological society.

Despite scant evidence in support of the psychopedagogies of mindsets, mindfulness, wellness, and grit, the ed-tech industry (press) markets these as solutions to racial and gender inequality (among other things), as the psychotechnologies of personalization are now increasingly intertwined not just with surveillance and with behavioral data analytics, but with genomics as well. “Why Progressives Should Embrace the Genetics of Education,” a NYT op-ed piece argued in July, perhaps forgetting that education’s progressives (including Montessori) have been down this path before.

This is the only good grit:

[image of Gritty]

If I were writing a lengthier series on the year in ed-tech, I’d spend much more time talking about the promises made about personalization and social emotional learning. I’ll just note here that the most important “innovator” in this area this year (other than Gritty) was surely the e-cigarette maker Juul, which offered a mindfulness curriculum to schools – offered them the curriculum and $20,000, that is – to talk about vaping. “‘The message: Our thoughts are powerful and can set action in motion,’ the lesson plan states.”

The most important event in ed-tech this year might have occurred on February 14, when a gunman opened fire on his former classmates at Marjory Stone Douglas High School in Parkland, Florida, killing 17 students and staff and injuring 17 others. (I chose this particular school shooting because of the student activism it unleashed.)

Oh, I know, I know – school shootings and school security aren’t ed-tech, ed-tech evangelists have long tried to insist, an argument I’ve heard far too often. But this year – the worst year on record for school shootings (according to some calculations) – I think that argument started to shift a bit. Perhaps because there’s clearly a lot of money to be made in selling schools “security” products and services: shooting simulation software, facial recognition technology, metal detectors, cameras, social media surveillance software, panic buttons, clear backpacks, bulletproof backpacks, … [more]
audreywatters  education  technology  edtech  2018  surveillance  privacy  personalization  progressive  schools  quantification  gamification  wholechild  montessori  mariamontessori  eugenics  psychology  siliconvalley  history  venturecapital  highereducation  highered  guns  gunviolence  children  youth  teens  shootings  money  influence  policy  politics  society  economics  capitalism  mindfulness  juul  marketing  gritty  innovation  genetics  psychotechnologies  gender  race  racism  sexism  research  socialemotional  psychopedagogy  pedagogy  teaching  howweteach  learning  howwelearn  teachingmachines  nonprofits  nonprofit  media  journalism  access  donaldtrump  bias  algorithms  facebook  amazon  disruption  data  bigdata  security  jacquesellul  sociology  activism  sel  socialemotionallearning 
december 2018 by robertogreco

« earlier    

related tags

'a  0-3  0-6  12-18  18-24  2.0':  2017  2018  24-36  36-48  48-60  6-12  a  academics  academy  access  activism  activities  agilelearning  agilelearningcenters  agillearningcenters  alan-kay  alan_kay  alankay  album  alexandre  algorithms  alternative  amazon  antifragility  apocalypses  apple  art  audio  audo  audreywatters  baby  bayarea  bettyhart  bias  bigdata  binary  bit  bitcoin  blocks  blog  bolt-holes  book  books  brettvictor  capitalism  casey-neistat  catastrophes  catholic  charities  childcare  childhood  children  christopheralexander  cities  cognition  cognitive  colegios  collective  collectivism  community  communitycenters  computing-education  computing  conorwilliams  consumerism  control  creativity  culture  curso  dalewalker  danielgreenberg  data  decentralization  deschooling  disaster_preparedness  disasters  disruption  donaldtrump  download  dynabook  dynamic-medium  economics  edtech  education  embodied-cognition  engaged_citizenry  environment  eoe  escuelas-alternativas  etoys  eugenics  experiment  facebook  filetype:pdf  finance  forestkindergartens  forests  france  freedom  french  furniture  gamification  gender  generosity  genetics  geography  gritty  guns  gunviolence  hard_work  health  high_net_worth  highered  highereducation  history  homeschool  homeschooling  howwelearn  howweteach  hundertwasser  hunters  ia  individualism  industrialism  influence  innovation  instapaper  intelligence  italian  jacquesellul  jaymathews  je'annaclements  jeannaclements  jeff_bezos  johnholt  joongbin  journalism  juul  khan  kids  kindergarten  lab  labor  labschools  language  lcproject  learning  leport  listen  literacy  longitudinal  lublin  mariamontessori  marimontessori  mark-guzdial  marketing  material  math  media  microschools  mindfulness  mission-driven  mit  moguls  money  nature  nclb  networks  new_zealand  nonprofit  nonprofits  northstar  of  off-grid  online  opens  opensource  openstudioproject  optimism  osterreich  outdoors  paloalto  papercraft  papert  parc  parenting  patfarenga  payments  pedagogia  pedagogy  pep  personalization  peter_thiel  petergray  philanthropy  philosophy  play  podcasts  polict  policy  politics  portuguese  preschool  princegeorge-kamloops  princegeorge  privacy  progessive  progressive  psychology  psychopedagogy  psychotechnologies  public_service  qi  quantification  questions  quora  race  racism  reading  reference  reggioemilia  religious  research  resources  richardlouv  rttt  sanfrancisco  scho  school  schooling  schools  science  science_experiments  security  sel  self-directed  self-directedlearning  self-improvement  sepkamvar  sexism  seymour-papert  sf  sfsh  shootings  siliconvalley  sleeping  small  smalltalk  socialemotional  socialemotionallearning  society  sociology  socrates  sophie  standardization  study  sudburyschools  sudburyvalleyschool  surveillance  survivalists  sustainability  taschen  tcsnmy  teaching  teachingmachines  technology  teens  texas  to-read  toddler  toddrisley  toys  tweet  tylerreinhard  unschooling  unstructured  urban  venturecapital  vi-hart  vygotsky  waldorf  wholechild  youth  éducation  교육  몬테소리  블로그  육아 

Copy this bookmark:



description:


tags: