monopoly   2947

« earlier    

Google’s Proprietary Fork of HTML Is Taking Over the Open Web — Pixel Envy

Consider this: Google owns the most popular search engine and the biggest video hosting platform in most countries, operates one of the most-used email services on Earth, has the greatest market share of any mobile operating system, makes the most popular web browser in many countries, serves the majority of the targeted advertising on the web, provides the most popular analytics software for websites, and is attempting to become a major internet service provider. And, to cap it all off, they’re subtly replacing HTML with their own version, and it requires a Google-hosted JavaScript file to correctly display.
google  internet  monopoly  privacy  business  web  amp 
3 days ago by jefframnani
Amazon selling illegal books
Amazon's 3rd party sellers don't say where their books come from.
Amazon  books  bullshit  monopoly  from iphone
7 days ago by raglan
“Google Is as Close to a Natural Monopoly as the Bell System Was in 1956" -
Right before he died, Google had Robert Bork write a paper that basically said consumers can switch from Google to Bing at no cost,2) but that’s not true. If I am really the average Google customer, I have Gmail, I have Google Calendar, Google Maps. I have all these applications that I invested data into which I can’t leave. All my contacts are in Gmail. It’s not costless, the cost of switch is quite expensive. That’s a fallacious argument, since it’s not just a search engine. It’s an ecosystem.
amazon  google  facebook  internet  economics  monopoly 
10 days ago by atbradley
Move Fast and Break Things review – Google, Facebook and Amazon exposed | Books | The Guardian
Good piece of skepticism regarding the current digital monopolies.

Taplin’s book ranges widely over the digital landscape and ventures where most commentators rarely go. He looks, for example, at the economic impact of the digital giants and argues convincingly that they are, basically, just engines for increasing inequality. Even as the tech sector booms, we have stagnant living standards, rising inequality and a growing “precariat” in the gig economy. The revenues of Google and Facebook are colossal, and yet they employ very few people in comparison to normal companies: tech firms represent 21% of the 500 largest American firms, but employ only 3% of the workforce.
google  amazon  facebook  business  monopoly  book  review 
13 days ago by jefframnani
Tech’s Frightful Five: They’ve Got Us - The New York Times
This is the most glaring and underappreciated fact of internet-age capitalism: We are, all of us, in inescapable thrall to one of the handful of American technology companies that now dominate much of the global economy. I speak, of course, of my old friends the Frightful Five: Amazon, Apple, Facebook, Microsoft and Alphabet, the parent company of Google.
Amazon  Alphabet  Google  Microsoft  Facebook  review  dominance  monopoly  consumer  NYTimes  2017 
16 days ago by inspiral
Playing like manages his business. Highly mortgaged. Out of cash. The only thing missing…
monopoly  from twitter_favs
20 days ago by sinned
Our Problem with Monopolies, and Why Everything Sucks – Talking Points Memo
My point in telling these stories is that they’re somewhat comical – except when they’re happening. But because they’re comical I think they help to illustrate a basic and not at all comical point. These businesses could not exist, they could not stay in business run as they are, if they did not function as monopolies or in monopoly settings where consumers have little ability to take their business elsewhere. Are these just examples of bad luck or bizarre stories? No, they’re just particularly amusing (now) examples. I could tell you literally a hundred more. They are examples of what I’ve seen change even over the last decade and a half. The industries we work with get more concentrated, the service gets worse and more expensive.

The telecom and banking industries are among the most concentrated and monopolistic in our economy. Our current Internet service provider is that rare exception that proves the rule. They provide really good service at a reasonable price – not because they’re nice or moral but because their business is not based on coerced consumption.

They’re not a monopoly.
monopoly  joshmarshall 
24 days ago by sampenrose
(479) Scott Galloway: This Is the Top of the Market - YouTube
2017 social media tops out.// one sign youtube adapocalypse. 2017 f8 that was weird at best. snapchat never making money. and Google Facebook capturing 99% of social media/internet ad growth in 2016
Snapchat  Twitter  Social  Media  Facebook  VR  AR  f8  Instagram  Mark  Zuckerberg  Oculus  Rift  Pinterest  YouTube  Google  Search  business  model  Monopoly  oligopol  oligopoly  Silicon  Valley  WeChat 
24 days ago by asterisk2a
Cape Horn - Wikipedia
The only facilities in the vicinity able to service or supply a ship, or provide medical care, were in the Falkland Islands. The businesses there were so notorious for price-gouging that damaged ships were sometimes abandoned at Port Stanley.
monopoly  price-discrimination 
29 days ago by avashevko
Not OK, Google – Stratechery by Ben Thompson
Indeed, that is why Google needs to be a whole lot more explicit about how it is ranking news. Perhaps the most unanticipated outcome of the unfettered nature of the Internet is that the sheer volume of information didn’t disperse influence, but rather concentrated it to a far greater degree than ever before, not to those companies that handle distribution (because distribution is free) but to those few that handle discovery. The result is an environment where what is best for the individual in the short-term is potentially at odds with what is best for a free society in the long-term; it would behoove Google to push off the resolution of this paradox by being more open, not less.

Sadly, it seems unlikely that my request for more transparency will get much support; Google’s announcement was widely applauded, and why not? It is the established media that will have a leg up when it comes to authority. That, it seems, is all they ever wanted, even if it means Google and Facebook taking all of the money.

Google  Facebook  webjournalism  fakenews  discovery  monopoly  Stratechery  2017 
4 weeks ago by inspiral

« earlier    

related tags

$1  ?  1%  10%  20%  2008  2017-04-19  2017-04-20  2017-04-21  2017-04-22  2017  a  ad-tech  adblockers  ads  adtech  advertising  ageing  airline  alg2  alphabet  alternativlos  amazon  america  amp  android  antitrust  antitrust_law  anxiety  apple  appnexus  ar  article  artificial  aufstocker  austerity  avoidance  bailout  bank  banking  banks  beer  being  benthompson  bibliometry  bigpharma  billion  biography  blockchain  blynn  board  book  books  brandeis  broadband  bubble  bullshit  burnout  business  business_strategy  cancer  capital  capitalism  care  cartel  change  chicago  child  choice  chronic  class  classwar  coefficient  collusion  competition  competitive  competitiveness  conglomerate  consumer  contract  contractor  control  corporate  corporate_welfare  cost  credit  creditcard  crony  culture  cyberpunk  dalek  data  dc:creator=evemartin  dctagged  de.beers  demand  democracy  demographic  diamond  digital  discovery  discretionary  disposable  distribution  dividends  do  dominance  driving  drugs  drwho  economic  economics  economicsasascience  economy  education  electricity  elsevier  emma  eric  ericschmidt  eu  evasion  exploitation  f8  facebook  fakenews  farage  farming  fcc  finance  financialcrisis  flying  for  for_friends  france  free  ftc  games  gdp  generic  germany  gesellschaft  gewinnspanne  gfc  gig  gini  globalisation  google  gov2.0  government  greed  grim_meathook_future  growth  health  health_insurance  healthcare  history  hour  html  ifttt  income  indie  industry  inequality  informationforthe  innovation  instagram  intelligence  internet  investing  investment  isp  it  jasonzweig  jisc  john_deere  joshmarshall  journals  kalanick  kartellamt  lag  lawsuit  leadership  leads  left  legal  leiharbeit  liberal  licensing  lobby  lohndumping  ludible  margaret  mark  mark_zuckerberg  market  market_failures  marketpower  markets  maximisation  media  mediaandsociety  mediasociety  mental  metafilter  microsoft  middle  minimum  mit  model  music  natural_monopoly  neoliberal  neoliberalism  network  newlabour  nhs  not-for-profit  nyt  nytimes  oculus  oecd  offshore  oil  oligarchy  oligopol  oligopoly  outsourcing  ovum  patent  peter  peterthiel  pharma  pharmaceutical  pinterest  platform  plutocracy  pocket  politics  poor  population  poverty  power  precariat  price-discrimination  privacy  privatisation  productivity  profit  programmatic  psychology  public  publiccompanies  publicservice  publishing  qualcomm  radar  rationing  recovery  reform  regulation  regulators  rent  rentier  rentseeking  review  rich  richardposner  ride-sharing  rift  riotgames  robertbork  scalability  scarcity  schmidt  scientific_publishing_complex  search  secrecy  secstag  secular  self-employment  self-regulation  self-restraint  seo  service  sharingeconomy  sick  silicon  siliconvalley  snapchat  social-network  social  socialmedia  socioeconomic  sociology  sociology_of_science  spending  squeezed  stagnation  standards  startups  status  steam  stop_the_cap  stories  stp  stratechery  strategy  stress  sues  super  supply.and.demand  tax  taxation  taxi  tech  technology  thatcher  theleft  theweek  thiel  timewarner  tina  top  transparency  transport  transportation  travis_kalanick  trump  twitter  uber  uk  usa  utility  valley  vc  veblen.good  venture_capital  videogames  vr  wage  wallstreet  web  web2.0  webjournalism  wechat  well  with  work  working  yourself  youtube  zeitarbeit  zero  zivilgesellschaft  zuckerberg 

Copy this bookmark: