matttaibbi   245

« earlier    

The Fury and Failure of Donald Trump - Rolling Stone
"That such a small man would have such an awesome impact on our nation's history is terrible."

A sign of our brokenness.
matttaibbi  2016election  donaldtrump  rollingstone  gop 
october 2016 by UltraNurd
R.I.P., GOP: How Trump Is Killing the Republican Party | Rolling Stone
This isn't up to his usual caliber, especially mostly ignoring the racial component. It is a good overview of how the party is dealing with the seemingly inexplicable rise of Trump.
matttaibbi  gop  rollingstone  2016election  donaldtrump  tedcruz 
june 2016 by UltraNurd
How America Made Donald Trump Unstoppable | Rolling Stone
I have a lot of complaints about Taibbi's style, but the core points of the press abdicating and private fortune allowing Trump to go full populist are interesting.
donaldtrump  rollingstone  2016election  matttaibbi 
february 2016 by UltraNurd
America Is Too Dumb for TV News | Rolling Stone
I get the point but I'd appreciate it without the couch potato metaphor.
matttaibbi  foxnews  television  2016election  rollingstone  9/11  donaldtrump 
december 2015 by UltraNurd
Inside the GOP Clown Car by Matt Taibbi (Rolling Stone, 8/12/2015)
On the campaign trail in Iowa, Donald Trump's antics have forced the other candidates to get crazy or go home
matttaibbi  gopclowncar  gop  2016election  donaldtrump 
august 2015 by davidkoren
The Charlie Hebdo attacks show that not all blasphemies are equal
"After the murder of Charlie Hebdo's cartoonists, pundits have tried to suss out where blasphemy fits into the social life of the West. Is it a necessary project for shocking Bronze Age fanatics into modernity? Is it a way of defending a free-wheeling liberal culture from the censorship of violent men? Or is it abusively uncivil? When directed at a minority religion, is it racist? Is it an abuse of freedom of speech, the equivalent of a constant harassment that invites a punch in the nose?

We have been told that Charlie Hebdo is an "equal opportunity offender." And in one sense that is obviously true. It drew unflattering pictures of Jesus, of Jews, and of the Prophet Muhammad. The spirit of the magazine was anarchic, atheistic, and left-wing. As Pascal-Emmanuel Gobry points out, it was a very French thing, anti-clerical and Rabelaisian.

But not all blasphemies are equal, because religions are not analogous. A gesture aimed at one can cause an eruption of outrage, but when offered to another it produces a shrug. The intensity of reaction may be determined by the religion's comfort with modernity, or by the history of its adherents. Western Christians are raised in pluralist, tolerant, and diverse cultures, and in powerful nations. Muslims experience the bad side of discrimination as immigrants, and come from cultures that have been humiliated by colonialism, autocracy, and Western incursion. But that doesn't explain all of it.

Pissing on a Bible is similar to pissing on a Koran only as a chemical reaction of urea and pulp. As gestures of desecration they mean entirely different things. The challah bread eaten in Jewish homes on the Sabbath and the Catholic Eucharist both have a symbolic relation to the manna from heaven in the book of Exodus, but trampling on one is not the same as the other, and would inspire very different reactions. Likewise, Charlie Hebdo's images are offered from an anarchic and particularly French anti-clerical spirit, but they are received entirely differently as blasphemies by Christianity and Islam.

After the Charlie Hebdo massacre, I tried to think of what kind of blasphemy aimed at my own faith would bring out illiberal reactions in me. The infamous Piss Christ of Andres Serrano barely raises my pulse. Although the pictured crucifix reminds me of one I would kiss in worship on Good Friday, I agree with the artist Maureen Mullarkey that it is trivially easy to avoid taking the publicity-and-money-and-status-generating offense it so desperately sought.

But a Black Mass — a satanic parody of the Catholic Mass, in which a consecrated host stolen from a Catholic Church is ritually desecrated — would touch something else in me. I followed the news about proposed Black Masses at Harvard and Oklahoma City intensely in 2014. I monitored the reactions of local bishops. And I thought more highly of Tulsa's Bishop Slattery for his tougher posture. I admired even more the renegade Traditionalist Society of St. Pius X, which organized a march and produced a beautiful video explaining the offense of a Black Mass, and why Catholics would seek to make reparation before God for the offense given by others.

Freddie deBoer says that those defending the practice of blasphemy are arguing against a shadow and doing brave poses against a null threat: "None of them think that, in response to this attack, we or France or any other industrialized nation is going to pass a bill declaring criticism of Islam illegal."

Not only does this ignore the chilling effect violence has on free speech, it is also just wrong. In 2006, the British government of Tony Blair asked for a vote on a law "against incitement to religious hatred." It was a law whose political support came overwhelmingly from Muslims.

Labour MP Khalid Mahmood argued that one of the virtues of the law was that it would have allowed the government to edit Salman Rushdie's work. Luckily, the House of Lords insisted on a revision that would exempt "discussion, criticism, or expressions of antipathy, dislike, ridicule, insult, or abuse of particular religions or the beliefs or practices of their adherents" from the law, rendering it toothless.

But if I thought about it, I understood the MP's reaction. He hoped that a law against incitement could function as a de facto blasphemy law. I hoped last year that laws against the petty theft of "bread" from a Church could be enforced to prevent the Black Masses.

It often seems the debate over the value of blasphemy is determined by what people fear the most. Do they fear the growth of an Islamic sub-culture within the West that threatens the gains of secularism, religious toleration, feminism, and gay rights? Then blast away. Or do they fear that the majority culture, like Western imperialism itself, is driving Muslims into poverty, despair, and a cultural isolation that encourages fundamentalism? Well, then be careful, circumspect, and polite.

Last week, I suggested that Europe's secularism was aimed at Christianity, and that in some respects secularism was a kind of genetic mutation within the body of Christendom. Charlie Hebdo's kind of blasphemy was a Christian kind of blasphemy. Christianity makes icons, and Hebdo draws mustaches and testicles across them. It pokes at the pretension of religious leaders. This is a kind of blasphemy that Matt Taibbi identifies with "our way of life."

But what if drawing a cartoon of Muhammad is not, theologically speaking, like drawing a parody of Jesus? What if it is more like desecrating the Eucharist, something I think Charlie Hebdo's editors would never do?

Obviously there are debates within Islam about what God demands from believers, unbelievers, and earthly authorities. Just as there are debates about what the Eucharist is within Christianity. And, yes, sometimes state pressure can effect a religious revolution. (Look to the Mormon church and the United States). But Western pressure seems to push Muslims away from liberality.

Fazlur Rahman and other Islamic scholars point out that when Islam was an ascendant and powerful world force it often found the intellectual resources to "Islamicize" the philosophies and cultures it encountered outside its Arabian cradle. But once Islam was humiliated and reduced on the geopolitical stage, these more daring and expansive medieval projects were abandoned. Other modernizing and liberal efforts of jurists like Muhammad Abduh have proven unpopular. Instead, the great modernist projects of Wahhabist and Salafist fundamentalism is what colors movements from the Taliban to the Islamic State.

When Westerners read the editorial from radical cleric Anjem Choudary, they are tempted to think he is stupid for asking why "why in this case did the French government allow the magazine Charlie Hebdo to continue to provoke Muslims...?"

"That's not how it works here," we want to reply. But Choudary's view that the state authority is responsible for the moral and spiritual condition of the nation is quintessentially Islamic. It is a reflection of the fact that Islam's great debates are centered on jurisprudence, on the right order of the ummah. This is very different from Christianity where the primary debates center around orthodox faith and morals withing the Church. In an odd way, Choudary's complaint against France is a sign of assimilation. He expects France to assimilate to this vision of Islam. He offers France's leaders the same complaint radical Muslim reformers always offer to lax Sultans and Caliphs.

To ask Muslims to respond peacefully to Charlie Hebdo's provocations makes absolute sense to me, because I want to continue to live by the norms set by a detente between secularism and Christian churches. I suspect many (perhaps most) Muslims want the same. But those Muslims who are faithful to a religious tradition concerned primarily with restoring fidelity to sources from the first three centuries of Islam were not a party to the secularist bargain. And we ought to be aware that we are asking them to live as Christians, and to be insulted like them, too."
michaelbrendandougherty  #JeSuisCharlieHebdo  #JeSuisCharlie  charliehebdo  freedom  freespeech  2015  france  religion  freedomofspeech  racism  islamophobia  extremism  journalism  christianity  andresserrano  maureenmullakey  blackmass  freddiedeboer  blasphemy  islam  khalidmahmood  salmanrushdie  via:ayjay  secularism  fundamentalism  fazlurrahman  anjemchoudary  jurisprudence  assimilation  matttaibbi 
january 2015 by robertogreco
www.rollingstone.com
A good breakdown of how "Broken Windows" policing unfairly targets non-whites.
racism  rollingstone  ericgarner  matttaibbi  nyc  police 
december 2014 by UltraNurd
Outrageous HSBC Settlement Proves the Drug War is a Joke | | Rolling Stone
"The institutional bias in the crack sentencing guidelines was a racist outrage, but this HSBC settlement blows even that away. By eschewing criminal prosecutions of major drug launderers on the grounds (the patently absurd grounds, incidentally) that their prosecution might imperil the world financial system, the government has now formalized the double standard.

They're now saying that if you're not an important cog in the global financial system, you can't get away with anything, not even simple possession. You will be jailed and whatever cash they find on you they'll seize on the spot, and convert into new cruisers or toys for your local SWAT team, which will be deployed to kick in the doors of houses where more such inessential economic cogs as you live. If you don't have a systemically important job, in other words, the government's position is that your assets may be used to finance your own political disenfranchisement.

On the other hand, if you are an important person, and you work for a big international bank, you won't be prosecuted even if you launder nine billion dollars. Even if you actively collude with the people at the very top of the international narcotics trade, your punishment will be far smaller than that of the person at the very bottom of the world drug pyramid. You will be treated with more deference and sympathy than a junkie passing out on a subway car in Manhattan (using two seats of a subway car is a common prosecutable offense in this city). An international drug trafficker is a criminal and usually a murderer; the drug addict walking the street is one of his victims. But thanks to Breuer, we're now in the business, officially, of jailing the victims and enabling the criminals.

This is the disgrace to end all disgraces. It doesn't even make any sense. There is no reason why the Justice Department couldn't have snatched up everybody at HSBC involved with the trafficking, prosecuted them criminally, and worked with banking regulators to make sure that the bank survived the transition to new management. As it is, HSBC has had to replace virtually all of its senior management. The guilty parties were apparently not so important to the stability of the world economy that they all had to be left at their desks.

So there is absolutely no reason they couldn't all face criminal penalties. That they are not being prosecuted is cowardice and pure corruption, nothing else. And by approving this settlement, Breuer removed the government's moral authority to prosecute anyone for any other drug offense. Not that most people didn't already know that the drug war is a joke, but this makes it official."
matttaibbi  drugs  economics  law  politics  policy  drugwar  warondrugs  2013  banking  hsbc  moneylaundering 
december 2013 by robertogreco
The Last Mystery of the Financial Crisis
"We have no historical data, so we'll just accept your reasoning for the time being, even though you have every incentive in the world to lie about the quality of your product." So many perverse incentives screwed us all.
mortgagecrisis  matttaibbi  rollingstone 
june 2013 by UltraNurd

« earlier    

related tags

!read  #jesuischarlie  #jesuischarliehebdo  1869  1936  1977  1991  2000  2004  2007  2008  2011  2012  2012election  2012presidentialelection  2013  2015  2016  2016election  9/11  99percent  aaronswartz  adolphreed  agriculture  aig  aldunlap  america  americaneconomy  americanenterpririchardrahn  americanidiots  andresserrano  angelomozilo  anjemchoudary  anncoulter  arjunmurti  article  artsamberg  assimilation  bahrain  bailout  bailouts  baincapital  bank  banker  bankers  banking  bankofamerica  banks  barackobama  barryritholz  basiscapital  bearstearns  benbernanke  berniemadoff  berniesanders  billclinton  blackmass  blag  blasphemy  blog  blueridgecorp  bobherbert  bofa  booklists  books  bp  breitbart  brooksleyborn  bubbles  business  camels  campaignfinance  campaigns  cap-and-trade  capitalism  carbon  carboncredits  carbonoffsets  carllevin  carmenortiz  catoinstitute  cdo  cdos  cds  cfma  cftc  change  charliehebdo  chase  chrischristie  christianity  christymack  chuckgrassley  chuckschumer  citigroup  citizenship  coffeeparty  collapse  college  commentary  commodities  complexity  congress  cooperunion  cornelwest  corporations  corporatism  corruption  coslinks  countrywide  court  cra  creditdefaultswaps  crime  criminaljustice  crisis  culture  danielsparks  darrellissa  davidgraeber  davidlehman  davidscott  davidviniar  davidvitter  debates  debt  deficitreduction  deficits  delicious  departmentofjustice  derivatives  deutschebank  dickfuld  discrimination  disparity  dissent  doj  donaldtrump  dotcomboom  drugs  drugwar  ecb  economics  economy  education  egypt  elijahcummings  eliotspitzer  energy  ericdinallo  ericgarner  ericlewis  essay  europe  extremism  fabricetourre  fanniemae  favoritism  fazlurrahman  fbi  fdic  federalreserve  finance  finances  financialcollapse  financialcorruption  financialcrisis  foreclosure  foreclosuregate  foreclosures  foxnews  france  fraud  freddiedeboer  freddiemac  freedom  freedomofspeech  freespeech  friedman  fundamentalism  funny  gamechanging  garyaguirre  garycrittenden  gasoline  gaymarriage  georgemaltezos  glass-steagall  glenngreenwald  goldman  goldmansachs  gop  gopclowncar  gopfail  government  greatdepression  greatestdepression  greatrecession  greece  griftopia  guillotine  hamp  hankgreenberg  hankpaulson  havesandhavenots  hellerfinancial  henrypaulson  henrywaxman  history  housing  housingbubble  housingcrisis  hsbc  huntersthompson  imf  immigrants  immigration  incomegap  indefenseoffood  inequality  influence  insidertrading  interesting  interestrateswap  internet  investigation  iowa  ipo  iran  iraq  islam  islamophobia  italy  jamesinhofe  jamiedimon  jebbush  jedrakoff  jimcramer  joecassano  johannhari  johndurgan  johnkennethgalbraith  johnmack  johnmccain  joncorzine  jontester  josephcassano  josephstdenis  josephstiglitz  joshuabirnbaum  journalism  jpmorganchase  jstor  jurisprudence  justice  khalidmahmood  klausschaeck  kleptocracy  kochbrothers  koreadevelopmentbank  kpmg  land  lannybreuer  larrysummers  law  laweekly  lawsuit  leefarkas  legal  legislation  lehmanbrothers  leveragedbuyout  libor  libya  lies  lindseygraham  lloydblankfein  loans  lobbying  lynnturner  manipulation  marcorubio  marcusgoldman  markbegich  markets  maryjowhite  matt  mattyglesias  maureenmullakey  media  mediabias  metafilter_posts  mexicans  michaelbrendandougherty  michaelduvally  michaelgreenberger  michaelpollan  michaelswenson  michelebachmann  middleeast  mikehuckabee  milan  military  mit  mittromney  money  moneylaundering  monopoly  morganstanley  mortgage  mortgagecrisis  mortgages  myblog-posted  naacp  naomiklein  neelkashkari  neilbarofsky  news  nicholasmaier  nyc  obama  occupy  occupywallstreet  officeofthriftsupervision  oil  oligarchy  oligopol  oliverbudde  opinion  orangecounty-ca  ows  paulberger  paulengelmayer  perjury  peterwallison  piigs  plutocracy  police  policestate  policy  politicaljournalism  politics  pollitics  polls  ponzi  power  preetbharara  primaries  privatequity  prosecutions  protest  racialissues  racism  randpaul  reggiemiddleton  regulation  religion  republicans  review  revolution  rich  richardheinberg  rickperry  ricksantelli  ricksantorum  riteaid  robertkhuzami  robertmorgenthau  robertrubin  rocketdocket  rockwellcity-ia  rogerclemens  rollingstone  rolllingstone  romney  royalty  roysingham  rudygiuliani  ruleoflaw  sachs  salmanrushdie  samnunberg  samuelsachs  scottwalker  sec  secularism  senate  sheilablair  shenandoahcorp  sherrodbrown  shockdoctrine  snark  socialmedia  society  sovereign  speculation  starred  stephenheymann  steveking  stevenhsieh  stocks  studentloans  subjectivelaw  subprime  subsidies  suicide  sunbeam  susankarches  taibbi  tarp  taxcode  taxes  teaparty  technology  tedcruz  television  theamericandream  thomasfriedman  thomasmontag  threestrikeslaw  timgeithner  tippingpoint  tomcoburn  toobigtofail  towatch  trading  transparency  travismcarthur  ubs  unionbusting  unions  uptonsinclair  us-pres  us  usa  ustreasury  vampires  vampiresquid  videos  vikrampandit  wallstreet  wallstreetjournal  war  warondrugs  washingtonmutual  washingtontimes  waterfalltalf  wealth  wealthy  williamblack  wisconsin  women  yahoo  youtube  yvessmith  zuccottipark 

Copy this bookmark:



description:


tags: