massproduction   45

Pristine Quantum Light Source Created at the Edge of Silicon Chip - IEEE Spectrum
"Single photons, which are an example of quantum light, are more than just really dim light"
ieeespectrum  optronics  quantumphysics  warm  fabrication  massproduction  silicon 
october 2018 by danhon
Satellite Internet: meet the hip new investment for Richard Branson, Elon Musk | Ars Technica
why not just buy a bunch of [Zain, Bharti Airtel, MTN, Safaricom, Kenya Data Networks, Telenor]? also, the ghosts of Willow Run are strong with this "$350k mass produced satellite" thing
eriklund  leanproduction  massproduction  gsm  stl  satellite  to_blog 
january 2015 by yorksranter
Ed-Tech's Monsters #ALTC
[video here: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Kiotl4G6fMw ]

"No doubt, we have witnessed in the last few years an explosion in the ed-tech industry and a growing, a renewed interest in ed-tech. Those here at ALT-C know that ed-tech is not new by any means; but there is this sense from many of its newest proponents (particularly in the States) that ed-tech has no history; there is only now and the future.

Ed-tech now, particularly that which is intertwined with venture capital, is boosted by a powerful forms of storytelling: a disruptive innovation mythology, entrepreneurs' hagiography, design fiction, fantasy.

A fantasy that wants to extend its reach into the material world.

Society has been handed a map, if you will, by the technology industry in which we are shown how these brave ed-tech explorers have and will conquer and carve up virtual and physical space.

Fantasy.

We are warned of the dragons in dangerous places, the unexplored places, the over explored places, the stagnant, the lands of outmoded ideas — all the places where we should no longer venture. 

Hic Sunt Dracones. There be dragons.

Instead, I’d argue, we need to face our dragons. We need to face our monsters. We need to face the giants. They aren’t simply on the margins; they are, in many ways, central to the narrative."



"I’m in the middle of writing a book called Teaching Machines, a cultural history of the science and politics of ed-tech. An anthropology of ed-tech even, a book that looks at knowledge and power and practices, learning and politics and pedagogy. My book explores the push for efficiency and automation in education: “intelligent tutoring systems,” “artificially intelligent textbooks,” “robo-graders,” and “robo-readers.”

This involves, of course, a nod to “the father of computer science” Alan Turing, who worked at Bletchley Park of course, and his profoundly significant question “Can a machine think?”

I want to ask in turn, “Can a machine teach?”

Then too: What will happen to humans when (if) machines do “think"? What will happen to humans when (if) machines “teach”? What will happen to labor and what happens to learning?

And, what exactly do we mean by those verbs, “think” and “teach”? When we see signs of thinking or teaching in machines, what does that really signal? Is it that our machines are becoming more “intelligent,” more human? Or is it that humans are becoming more mechanical?

Rather than speculate about the future, I want to talk a bit about the past."



"To oppose technology or to fear automation, some like The Economist or venture capitalist Marc Andreessen argue, is to misunderstand how the economy works. (I’d suggest perhaps Luddites understand how the economy works quite well, thank you very much, particularly when it comes to questions of “who owns the machinery” we now must work on. And yes, the economy works well for Marc Andreessen, that’s for sure.)"



"But even without machines, Frankenstein is still read as a cautionary tale about science and about technology; and Shelley’s story has left an indelible impression on us. Its references are scattered throughout popular culture and popular discourse. We frequently use part of the title — “Franken” — to invoke a frightening image of scientific experimentation gone wrong. Frankenfood. Frankenfish. The monster, a monstrosity — a technological crime against nature.

It is telling, very telling, that we often confuse the scientist, Victor Frankenstein, with his creation. We often call the monster Frankenstein.

As the sociologist Bruno Latour has argued, we don’t merely mistake the identity of Frankenstein; we also mistake his crime. It "was not that he invented a creature through some combination of hubris and high technology,” writes Latour, "but rather that he abandoned the creature to itself.”

The creature — again, a giant — insists in the novel that he was not born a monster, but he became monstrous after Frankenstein fled the laboratory in horror when the creature opened his “dull yellow eye,” breathed hard, and convulsed to life.

"Remember that I am thy creature,” he says when he confronts Frankenstein, "I ought to be thy Adam; but I am rather the fallen angel, whom thou drivest from joy for no misdeed. Everywhere I see bliss, from which I alone am irrevocably excluded. I was benevolent and good— misery made me a fiend.”

As Latour observes, "Written at the dawn of the great technological revolutions that would define the 19th and 20th centuries, Frankenstein foresees that the gigantic sins that were to be committed would hide a much greater sin. It is not the case that we have failed to care for Creation, but that we have failed to care for our technological creations. We confuse the monster for its creator and blame our sins against Nature upon our creations. But our sin is not that we created technologies but that we failed to love and care for them. It is as if we decided that we were unable to follow through with the education of our children.”

Our “gigantic sin”: we failed to love and care for our technological creations. We must love and educate our children. We must love and care for our machines, lest they become monsters.

Indeed, Frankenstein is also a novel about education. The novel is structured as a series of narratives — Captain Watson’s story — a letter he sends to his sister as he explores the Arctic— which then tells Victor Frankenstein’s story through which we hear the creature tell his own story, along with that of the De Lacey family and the arrival of Safie, “the lovely Arabian." All of these are stories about education: some self-directed learning, some through formal schooling.

While typically Frankenstein is interpreted as a condemnation of science gone awry, the novel can also be read as a condemnation of education gone awry. The novel highlights the dangerous consequences of scientific knowledge, sure, but it also explores how knowledge — gained inadvertently, perhaps, gained surreptitiously, gained without guidance — might be disastrous. Victor Frankenstein, stumbling across the alchemists and then having their work dismissed outright by his father, stoking his curiosity. The creature, learning to speak by watching the De Lacey family, learning to read by watching Safie do the same, his finding and reading Volney's Ruins of Empires and Milton’s Paradise Lost."



"To be clear, my nod to the Luddites or to Frankenstein isn’t about rejecting technology; but it is about rejecting exploitation. It is about rejecting an uncritical and unexamined belief in progress. The problem isn’t that science gives us monsters, it's that we have pretended like it is truth and divorced from responsibility, from love, from politics, from care. The problem isn’t that science gives us monsters, it’s that it does not, despite its insistence, give us “the answer."

And that is problem with ed-tech’s monsters. That is the problem with teaching machines.

In order to automate education, must we see knowledge in a certain way, as certain: atomistic, programmable, deliverable, hierarchical, fixed, measurable, non-negotiable? In order to automate that knowledge, what happens to care?"



"I’ll leave you with one final quotation, from Hannah Arendt who wrote,
"Education is the point at which we decide whether we love the world enough to assume responsibility for it and by the same token save it from that ruin which, except for renewal, except for the coming of the new and young, would be inevitable. And education, too, is where we decide whether we love our children enough not to expel them from our world and leave them to their own devices, nor to strike from their hands their chance of undertaking something new, something unforeseen by us, but to prepare them in advance for the task of renewing a common world.”

Our task, I believe, is to tell the stories and build the society that would place education technology in that same light: “renewing a common world.”

We in ed-tech must face the monsters we have created, I think. These are the monsters in the technologies of war and surveillance a la Bletchley Park. These are the monsters in the technologies of mass production and standardization. These are the monsters in the technologies of behavior modification a la BF Skinner.

These are the monsters ed-tech must face. And we must all consider what we need to do so that we do not create more of them."
audreywatters  edtech  technology  education  schools  data  monsters  dragons  frankenstein  luddites  luddism  neoluddism  alanturing  thomaspynchon  society  bfskinner  standardization  surveillance  massproduction  labor  hannaharendt  brunolatour  work  kevinkelly  technosolutionism  erikbrynjolfsson  lordbyron  maryshelley  ethics  hierarchy  children  responsibility  love  howwelearn  howweteach  teaching  learning  politics  policy  democracy  exploitation  hierarchies  progress  science  scientism  markets  aynrand  liberarianism  projectpigeon  teachingmachines  personalization  individualization  behavior  behaviorism  economics  capitalism  siliconvalley 
september 2014 by robertogreco
Julian Baggini – The art of coffee
"Surely we appreciate the handmade in part because it is handmade. An object or a meal has different meaning and significance if we know it to be the product of a human being working skilfully with tools rather than a machine stamping out another clone. Even if in some ways a mass-produced object is superior in its physical properties, we have good reasons for preferring a less perfect, handcrafted one."

"Blindness, far from making tests fair, actually robs us of knowledge of what is most important, while perpetuating the illusion that all that really matters is how it feels or seems at the moment of consumption."

via Randall Szott (http://randallszott.org/2013/02/05/faith-in-the-human-touch-julian-baggini ) who adds:

"In a very roundabout way, this cuts to an important problem with "the critique" as commonly practiced in which students and instructors are asked in some way to talk about the work as if they were conducting a blind taste test. Forget that you know the person that made this painting, forget that you had dinner with them last night, cut all affective ties and speak solely of the work. Galleries perform a similar severing function, much like supermarket displays, turning the entire process of aesthetic experience into a branding exercise, with a carefully constructed history devoid of anything truly human."
handmade  glvo  coffee  human  small  slow  imperfection  imperfections  wabi-sabi  srg  art  creativity  leisurearts  julianbaggini  2013  food  ritual  technology  massproduction  artleisure  rituals 
february 2013 by robertogreco

related tags

#processing  1600s  1765  1840s  1854  1874  1875  1907  1920s  1970s  1989  1:1  1to1  2010  2011  2013  2014  2015  2018  2930s  activism  administration  adorno&horkheimer  advertising  agency  ageofinsight  agriculture  ai  airconditioning  alanturing  alfredchandler  america  answerphone  apple  archive  art  artificial  artleisure  astrology  astronomy  asus  audreywatters  automation  availabot  aving  avitalronell  aynrand  bakelite  banking  bar  bard  bayonet  bbc  behavior  behaviorism  bespoke  bfskinner  bigdata  blog  bodies  books  bradovenell-carter  bronzaage  brunolatour  business  businessstrategy  businessusers  cadbury  candy  cannedgoods  capitalism  capture  capturing  car  carbonemissions  cargo  cartesianmodeloflearning  cataloging  ceramics  chemicallandmark  children  china  chocolate  chocolatebox  christmas  circus  climatechange  clocks  cloud  coca  coffee  collaboration  colorless  combustion  comfit  commercial  commodities  communication  communities  community  computers  computing  concrete  confection  connection  constructivism  consumerism  conversation  cooperunion  copyright  corporations  creativity  credit  creditcards  culture  cv  cyberphysical  data  database  datamining  democracy  densityrequirements  depression  design  dice  digitaldivide  discovery  distribution  documentaries  donnaharraway  dragons  drawing  dystopia  dzigavertov  economic  economics  edtech  education  eeepc  egypt  embodiedenergy  empiricism  energy  erikbrynjolfsson  eriklund  ethics  ethnography  event  everyday  experimentation  exploitation  exploration  eyria  fabrication  facebook  factories  factory  fantasy  farming  fec  fieldwork  film&mediastudiesdept  film  finance  fire  flip-flop  fmcg  food  frankenstein  fullautomation  furniture  galileogalilei  gallery  games  gamification  gaming  gatekeeping  gb  gekiga  germany  gizmodo  glass  glassbeadgame  globalization  globalwarming  glvo  goods  greatdepression  green  growth  gsm  gun  gutenbergparenthesis  hacker  handmade  hannaharendt  hardware  hierarchies  hierarchy  history  holyfuck  housing  howwelearn  howweteach  human  ice  identity  ieeespectrum  illustration  image  imperfection  imperfections  individualization  industrial  industrialage  industrialrevolution  industrialspecialization  industry  infantry  influence  information  informationstructures  ingerstole  inquiry-basedlearning  inquiry  interaction  interactivity  internet  internetofservices  internetofthings  isolation  jeanbaudrillard  jimelliott  johnseelybrown  jorgeluisborges  josephfry  julianbaggini  kevinkelly  knights  knowledge  korea  kottke  kylebaxter  labor  landscape  language  large  leanproduction  learning  lego  leisurearts  lens  levmanovich  liberarianism  light  linearity  liquid  literacy  lordbyron  love  luddism  luddites  ludens  luxury  machine  machinetools  machinima  magic  making  manga  manufacturing  marbles  market  marketing  markets  marshallmcluhan  maryshelley  masscustomization  material  measurement  media  medicine  medium  memory  mercenaries  microsoft  mikeamante  minifigs  mobility  model  modern  monsters  moscow  movies  music  musket  neoluddism  netbook  netneutrality  network  networks  neutrality  newmedia  nikolailadovskii  noncrystalline  nonlinearity  notetaking  numbers  object  ohio  online  optronics  pamlins  pasturization  patent  pcenthusiasts  pedagogy  pencils  pendulum  performancegains  personalization  phase  photography  photos  pike  plannedobsolescence  plastic  policy  politics  polymer  popularculture  post  poster  postwar  prediction  presence  preserves  princeton  print  printing  privacy  problemsolving  process  production  productivity  progress  project  projectpigeon  propaganda  propoganda  public  publication  quantifiedself  quantumphysics  quotes  realtime  recycling  refract  refrigeration  regulation  reliability  remix  responsibility  ritual  rituals  rocketry  rolandbarthes  romanglass  rome  saitotakao  samsung  samsungelectronics  samsungsemiconductor  sand  satellite  scale  school  schools  schulzeandwebb  science  scientism  screw  semiconductorinc  semiotics  sensemaking  sensors  sethgodin  sf  sharing  sherryturkle  silica  silicon  siliconvalley  slow  small  social  socialmedia  society  solid  sphere  sponcon  sprawl  spreadsheets  srg  ssd  sstutsmansyllabi  stainedglass  standardization  steam  steel  stl  storagecapacity  storify  stormtroopers  storytelling  studio  sugarplum  supercooled  surface  surveillance  sweets  synthetic  tagging  taylorism  tcsnmy  teaching  teachingmachines  technologicaldeterminism  technology  technosolutionism  telecommunications  telephone  telephones  telescope  text  theoryofknowledge  thermos  theymightbegiants  thinglink  thomaspynchon  tightwind  time  timelapse  tmbg  to_blog  toaster  toasterproject  toys  trademark  transparent  travel  trope  twitter  ubi  undergraduate  unitedstates  urgent!  usability  use  useless  vannevarbush  vicepresident  video  vimeo  visualisation  visualization  volcano  volumeproduction  wabi-sabi  walterbenjamin  war  warm  weird  whatif  whitmans  windows  work  workinginpublic  workshop  writing  xbox  xbox360 

Copy this bookmark:



description:


tags: