libel   1102

« earlier    

Award-winning reporter to counter-sue man who bankrolled Brexit for ‘harassment’ • Daily Beast
Nico Hines:
<p>The award-winning journalist whose investigations led to the collapse of Donald Trump’s campaign data gurus Cambridge Analytica and a record $5bn fine for Facebook has launched a lawsuit for harassment against the man who bankrolled Brexit.

Carole Cadwalladr, a freelance investigative reporter, served the papers Monday against Arron Banks, the largest Brexit campaign donor. Solicitors acting on her behalf say a campaign of harassment, trolling and threats of violence culminated Friday with a libel suit filed at the High Court against Cadwalladr for remarks she made during a TED talk, at a convention in London, and in a tweet.

“This is such an abuse of the law by Arron Banks. He’s not suing TED. He’s not suing the Observer or the Guardian. He’s a bully who’s targeting me as an individual to harass and intimidate me and prevent me from doing journalism, a course of behavior that has been going on for more than two years,” Cadwalladr told The Daily Beast.</p>

I hope Carole wins this, and the libel case, and gets gigantic personal damages for both. She deserves it, and Banks's behaviour deserves to be spotlighted for what it is.
brexit  banks  libel 
4 weeks ago by charlesarthur
Media companies liable for Facebook comments made by others, court finds
Mr Voller said the comments, on 10 Facebook posts published in 2016 and 2017, carried a series of false and defamatory imputations including that he attacked a Salvation Army officer who visited him in detention and left the man blind in one eye.

He did not ask for the comments to be taken down by the media outlets but launched defamation proceedings against them in the Supreme Court, arguing that they had "published" the comments of third parties.
law  Defamation  libel  Australia  comments  fb 
7 weeks ago by paulbradshaw
Think Like a Libel Lawyer
March 9, 2019 | The New York Times | By David McCraw, deputy general counsel of The New York Times.

It's the best way to keep an open mind in our “pick your side and stay on it” era.

My job, when I am doing it right, is to please no one. I’m a press lawyer. I’m paid by this newspaper to vet stories before publication.

Think of me as a story’s first and worst reader: doubtful, questioning, blind to subtlety, skeptical of the facts, regularly prodding editors and reporters to do something more or different. And if I have done my job well, many of the subjects of those same stories will be unhappy as well, but for all the reasons we want them to be: We got it right.

The basic idea of libel law is simple. A publisher can get sued for making a factual statement that proves to be false and hurts a person’s reputation.......I am all about the villains in many pieces — the doctor who botched the surgery, the insurance company that shafted its customers, the professor who hit on the student, the greedy industrialist who ground up workers to make a fortune. I try to look for the counternarrative that they could (and their lawyers will) build from the same set of facts. It’s a counterintuitive form of reading. It’s looking for the innocent explanation or the possibility that what appears to all the rest of the world to be nefarious may in fact just be a mistake made in good faith. It’s a tricky skill to take into the real world....for a libel lawyer, a little sympathy for the villain is almost an occupational requirement. And maybe it wouldn’t be a bad idea for all of us in the tribalized “pick your side and stay on it” era we are living in......Libel lawyers don’t serve as the fairness police. If anything, they are more like fact cops. Coverage can be wildly unfair and still be true. .....Over the past half-decade, The Times and others had reoriented themselves to reader-centered journalism. The shift in attitude has been like opening a window after a long winter. Journalism should be done as if the readers mattered.

But in a divided America there was a risk, too — the risk that we would set our compass by what people wanted rather than giving them the journalism they needed.......It was discouraging that so many people apparently believed that the time-honored journalistic act of telling a story straight had become a problem and that The Times needed instead to take sides and coach readers on what to think.

Journalism is hard when people feel the failure to take sides is in and of itself a surrender....The great risk we face comes not in giving them (the alt-right) voice but in taking their worst instincts and making them our own.

The First Amendment gives a lot of protection to even nasty speakers.....we write about people in the news, not just the people we agree with.....that is how the First Amendment works — thanks to our “profound national commitment to the principle that debate on public issues should be uninhibited, robust and wide open,......Speakers are allowed to be provocative, colorful, contradictory and wrong.

counternarratives  counterintuitive  dark_side  facts  First_Amendment  free-press  journalism  lawyers  libel  NYT  skepticism  open_mind  villains 
march 2019 by jerryking
Reforming England's libel law
See this LSE research which promoted balanced reform of libel law and emphasised the sheer cost of proceedings as the central problem.
government  politics  economics  legislation  censorship  journalism  english  law  libel  media  activism  reform  debate  university  london 
september 2018 by asaltydog

« earlier    

related tags

#gamergate  &  1978  1984  1st-amendment  2.0  201  2016  abuse  academia  academies  aclu  activism  advertising  after  against  algorithm  alt-right  amazon  and  anxiety  ariellealexander  arpahet  arrest  assault  auschwitz  australia  author:stuartkarle  authoritarianism  ayyadurai  badbizreport  bail  bakery  banks  bbc  being  big-data  bigotry  blackpool  bloodlines  book  bookmarks_bar  bradleyben  branding  brexit  bribery  bullying  business  by  case  casestudies  caves  celebrity  censorship  charge  charles-murray  charlesharder  cijss  civilrights  claim  clickbait  coastsider  comedy  comments  communication  communicationsdecencyact  complaint  condemns  confidentiality  conservatives  conspiracy  controversial  copyright  copywriting  corbynjeremy  correctness  corruption  cost  counterintuitive  counternarratives  court  courts  cpj  crime  criminal  cringe  critic  critique  cultural  culture  cyber  cyberbullying  czechoslovakia  daily  dark_side  davidgingas  dc:creator=masonpaul  dctagged  debate  deen  defamation  defemation  delicious  democracy  dennissaylor  diffamierung  digital.  digital  disabled  discrimination  dishonesty  diving  dmca  donaldtrump  drugs  duterte  economics  egypt  elections2016  elonmusk  email  english  ericgoldman  espionage  ethics  eu  europe  example  expression  extremism  face  facebook  facts  fail  failure  fakenews  fame  farright  fat  fb  files  first_amendment  floor64  football  for  forcedmarriage  fraud  free-press  free-speech  free  free_press  free_speech  freed  freedom  freespeech  freespeechabuse  from:popbitch  funny  gawker  geo:unitedstates  george-galloway  germany  gesellschaft  gizmodo  globalwarming  glossy  google  gorsuch  gossip  government  grantshapps  greenparty  guidofawkes  hacker  half-sister  hannahlupian  harassment  harmful  hate.speech  hate  hater  haters  hatred  he-who-cannot-be-named  healthcare  high-court  hijazijamal  his  history  homophobia  homophobic  hopkinskatie  huddersfield  hulkhogan  humanrights  identity  image  immigration  incitement  independent  injunctions  instagram  internet  internetshaming  intimidation  ireland  islamophobia  james  jobs  john  journalism  journalist  judgement  justice  korean  korena  ktp  lang:en  law  laws  lawsuit  lawsuits  lawyers  legal  legislation  leighbeadon  lesson  letters  lies  life  lifehacker  lifelesson  linkbait  linkedin  litigation  london  lügenpresse  magazine  map  maria  massachusetts  media-news  media  melania  mentality  mers  misinformation  misogynie  misogyny  mobbing  mollierosenblum  monikaglennon  monroejack  mother  mps  mugabe  mumsnet  national  nationalism  news  nickdenton  nikrichie  noise  northernireland  novara  nukes  nyt  oberlin  of  offencive  ohio  omgwtfbbq  on  online  open_mind  oyston  paedophilia  paradisepapers  parliament  party  pdf  persönlichkeitsrecht  petersinger  peterthiel  philosophy  photo  photos  platforming  police  policy  polish  political  politics  pollution  porn  pornography  power  pr  prejudice  president  press  pressefreiheit  pressfreedom  privacy  propaganda  protest  pseudonymity  psychology  public  publica  publishing  racism  rape  rappler's  realestate  rechtsstaat  reform  refugees  regulation  relations  relicagency  reportmyex  reproductiverights  reputation  rescue  responsibility  ressa  review  right-to-be-forgotten  robinsontommy  ruling  ryanbaxter  s  safety  scientology  scotland  security  selbstdarstellung  selbstfürsorge  self-censorship  selfie  sensationalism  sex  sexabuse  sexual  sexwork  shame  shaming  shappsgrant  shesahomewrecker  shitstorm  shivaayyadurai  singh  skepticism  slander  social  socialmedia  society  socioeconomic  sociology  sophie  soziologie  speech  splc  status  submarines  sued  supplements  symbol  syria  system  tabloid  tabloids  tax  techdirt  thailand  thedirty  theregister  torture  toryparty  trade  transphobia  transphobic  troll  trolling  trolls  trump  trust  truth  tv  twitter  uk  unitedstates  university  unrechtsstaat  usa  uselection2016  ussct  vacancy  verleumdung  video  villains  viral  vulnerable  washingtonpost  web  wertegesellschaft  whnt  wtf  xxxtentacion’s  you  youtube 

Copy this bookmark: