lexit   49

Stop trying to make Lexit happen - Owen Jones - Medium
For those of who proposed a soft Brexit, it was always damage limitation. Dealing with the electoral dilemma of Brexit is one thing — and it’s a legitimate argument to fear that Labour will alienate some communities it needs to win to form a government if it adopts a full Remain position. I think this position has collapsed — the middle ground on Brexit has collapsed, Labour is losing far more Remainers than Leavers, most Leave voters now think that ‘No Deal’ is the only genuine Brexit and believe a soft Brexit is ‘Brexit In Name Only’. But in any case, the ideological case for Lexit makes no sense.
UK  EU  Brexit  politics  Lexit  xenophobia  freedomOfMovement  immigration  customs  trade  regulation  reform  softBrexit  dctagged  dc:creator=JonesOwen 
august 2019 by petej
One of the most damaging fallouts of Brexit has been the media creation of the Leave/Remain dichotomy as an identity of two extremes, when opinion on the EU is a spectrum. It’s easier to shift views on a spectrum: but when you cast it as a war of identi
One of the most damaging fallouts of Brexit has been the media creation of the Leave/Remain dichotomy as an identity of two extremes, when opinion on the EU is a spectrum. It’s easier to shift views on a spectrum: but when you cast it as a war of identities, people hunker down.



I have lots of problems w/ EU, but voted Remain, and think the biggest problems within the EU are right wing govts, & Britain itself. I’m dead against Lexit cos Brexit is a far right project & leaving the EU will do nothing but harm the UK. But I get called a Lexiter constantly.
UK  EU  Brexit  division  polarisation  Leave  Remain  identity  Lexit  politics  dctagged  dc:creator=FosterDawn 
march 2019 by petej
Twitter
RT : There is no part of environmental or social justice that is served by or . If Labour is serious about…
Lexit  Brexit  from twitter
february 2019 by tonys
Dreams of a No-Deal Nation | Red Pepper
Just like the original vote to Leave, the strength of the ‘no deal’ story is not its facts but its feelings, not its statistics but its sentiments. What is the story of ‘no deal nation’? No deal nation is strong, steeled for the disruption of ‘no deal’. It is powerful to the point of petulance, defiant of the demands from Brussels. But above all, it is in control, unchained from European rules, whether a customs union or the backstop. It might be materially bad, but it damn well feels good. It offers hope of a future of pride and dignity. Fighting the idea of no deal nation with facts will not work: ‘hope that is seen is not hope: for who hopes for what he sees?’

The more that ‘no deal’ demands sacrifice, the more its popularity will grow: the higher the price, the greater the prize. No deal nation is bolstered by a fuzzy reading of history, self-soothing with stories of its past. It reassures itself: the last time we stood alone, Britain emerged in triumph and the Europeans in tragedy; we prospered before 1972 and will do so again. Do not imagine that the reality of a ‘no deal’ Brexit will change this: confirmation bias will kick in. The Brexit faithful will conclude that they have been punished by devious elites who never wanted to Leave and by European opponents who never had our interests at heart. Rather than undermining Brexit, the ‘no deal’ disaster would merely confirm their suspicion they were right to vote to Leave.
UK  EU  Brexit  noDeal  BBCQT  nationalism  AndersonBenedict  storytelling  deindustrialisation  dignity  emotion  defiance  sacrifice  delusion  Lexit  stateAid  politics  dctagged  dc:creator=KibasiTom 
january 2019 by petej
Only a rupture with the EU will alter the failed status quo | Larry Elliott | Opinion | The Guardian
Brexit, the gilets jaunes protesters in France, the terrible pain inflicted on Greece and the support for the League/Five Star government in Italy all tell their own story. Europe is alive with political discontent that reflects the demand for deep and urgent reform, but the chances of getting it are less likely if the status quo prevails.

Why? Because the forces of conservatism are strong. Change comes about only when the pressure for it becomes too great to resist. The financial crisis provided one such opportunity to reform an economic system that for many people clearly wasn’t working; Brexit was a second. The left’s case for Brexit has always been based on the following notions: the current economic model is failing; socialism is needed to fix it; and the free-market ideology hardwired into the EU via the European Central Bank, judgments of the European court of justice and treaty changes will make that process all but impossible without a break with the status quo.

It is theoretically possible that in the event of a “Brexit in name only” or no Brexit at all, policymakers will push ahead with what’s needed in order to make a reality of the slogan “a reformed Britain in a reformed Europe”. Possible but not all that plausible, given that it would require breaking up the euro, more autonomy for individual countries to intervene in the running of their economies, and a simultaneous philosophical U-turn in the big member states.

Much more likely is that the pressure for change will dissipate and the real grievances of those who voted for Brexit will be quietly forgotten. The softer the Brexit, the more convinced the EU will be that it has been doing the right thing all along. Britain will not go up in flames, but there will still be consequences. Leave voters will feel they have been victims of an establishment stitch-up. The anger will not go away and will eventually resurface.

The risk is that the losers will be the biggest supporters of the EU – the liberal left. And the biggest winners will be the extreme right.
UK  EU  Brexit  TheLeft  Lexit  Leave  finance  crisis  economy  productivity  ECB  Euro  reform  farRight  politics  dctagged  dc:creator=ElliottLarry 
january 2019 by petej
For the sake of working people, the left must back remain | Aditya Chakrabortty | Opinion | The Guardian
If there is a second referendum, Labour will back remain. How it campaigns will matter as never before. Remain’s chances will rest squarely on winning back Labour leave voters – making a case both for staying in the EU and for upending the status quo at home. That means Tory remainers somehow agreeing to let Corbyn get some of his policies on the statute books. And the beached whales of the remain campaign – the likes of Tony Blair – will need to be cleared away.

It will also mean Labour squarely making the case for the EU being better for working people than Brexit. Without the EU’s working time directive, they could say, British workers wouldn’t have the legal right to paid holidays. Indeed, Michael Gove and Boris Johnson have reportedly plotted to repeal such rights as soon as Britain leaves. Equal pay for women, protection for agency workers: such basics have come from the EU, often despite resistance from the British government.

Some on the left will ask, but what about those EU state aid rules that get in the way of building a new economy? Yet research by two EU competition law experts found that of the 26 economic proposals in Labour’s 2017 manifesto, all but two would not require any state aid notification. And researchers concluded that Brussels would allow the other two to pass. Besides, under Labour’s current proposal for a customs union, the UK would still be subject to state-aid rules.

While I understand the sentiments of those who want a leftwing Brexit, many of their positions sound like flights of fantasy, by those who will never have to suffer the worst consequences. Against them, I’d weigh up the consequences that await low-paid migrant workers – and I know which side deserves the most support from the left.
UK  EU  Brexit  referendum  withdrawalAgreement  CorbynJeremy  LabourParty  constructiveAmbiguity  opposition  noDeal  ERG  NorwayPlus  BolesNick  MayTheresa  softBrexit  freedomOfMovement  PeoplesVote  farRight  RobinsonTommy  FarageNigel  Remain  Lexit  TheLeft  dctagged  dc:creator=ChakraborttyAditya 
january 2019 by petej

related tags

2017  7  accountability  aeip  age  alexanderheidi  andersonbenedict  anti-imperialists  article50  audio  austerity  banksarron  bastaniaaron  bbcqt  bennism  benntony  blairtony  blakeleygrace  blockchain  bluelabour  bolesnick  bookmarks_bar  borders  brexit  brexitparty  budget  cablevince  campbellalastair  class  climatechange  competition  conference  constructiveambiguity  cooperation  corbynjeremy  corruption  crisis  currency  curticejohn  customs  customsunion  dc:contributor=bastaniaaron  dc:contributor=butlerjames  dc:contributor=varoufakisyanis  dc:creator=barnettanthony  dc:creator=chakraborttyaditya  dc:creator=chessummichael  dc:creator=elliottlarry  dc:creator=fosterdawn  dc:creator=gourevitchalex  dc:creator=jonesowen  dc:creator=kibasitom  dc:creator=kouvelakisstathis  dc:creator=masonpaul  dc:creator=ramsayadam  dc:creator=sarkarash  dc:creator=seymourrichard  dc:creator=smithowen  dc:creator=williamszoe  dctagged  defiance  deindustrialisation  delusion  democracy  diem25  dignity  discussion  division  ec  ecb  echr  economics  economy  eea  eib  election  emotion  erg  eu  euref  euro  europe  european  europeanparliament  europeanunion  eurozone  exceptionalism  exclusion  extension  fairness  faragenigel  farright  finance  for  freedomofmovement  freetradearea  generalelection  globalisation  gourevitchalex  govemichael  greece  housing  ico  identity  ifttt  immigration  inclusion  inequality  integration  internationalism  interview  ireland  italy  jacobin  johnsonboris  junckerjean-claude  kibasitom  labour  labourparty  larry_elliott  leave  left  lepenmarine  lewisclive  lisbontreaty  lovesocialismhatebrexit  macfarlanelaurie  mandelsonpeter  marxism  mason  maytheresa  mccluskeylen  melechonjean-luc  migration  morningstar  movie  nandylisa  nationalisation  nationalism  nato  neoliberalism  nodeal  norwayplus  novara  opposition  oxi  parliament  paul  peoplesvote  pes  polarisation  politics  poverty  productivity  property  protest  publicservices  racialisation  racism  reasons  redbrexit  referendum  reform  refugees  regions  regulation  remain  robinsontommy  sacrifice  salvinimatteo  schaeublewolfgang  secrecy  should  simon_wren-lewis  singlemarket  socialism  socialjustice  softbrexit  sovereignty  stalin  standards  starmerkeir  stateaid  storytelling  syria  syriza  tactics  talkreal  tariffs  thatcherism  the  theleft  toryparty  trade  tradeunions  trotsky  turnout  tweetit  uk  union  usa  varoufakisyanis  video  vote  withdrawalagreement  workingclass  xenophobia  youtube 

Copy this bookmark:



description:


tags: