leviathan   369

« earlier    

Jonv8tor_PS4 on Twitter: "#PS4share https://t.co/VicnMLFH7M https://t.co/zfA7XR5ZBq"
This video by Jonv8tor shows how to tether the dogs at Calus to make lots of orbs on each plate.
destiny2  leviathan  calus  walkthroughs  videos  friends 
29 days ago by darkwater
Surveil things, not people – The sideways view
Technology may reach a point where free use of one person’s share of humanity’s resources is enough to easily destroy the world. I think society needs to make significant changes to cope with that scenario.

Mass surveillance is a natural response, and sometimes people think of it as the only response. I find mass surveillance pretty unappealing, but I think we can capture almost all of the value by surveilling things rather than surveilling people. This approach avoids some of the worst problems of mass surveillance; while it still has unattractive features it’s my favorite option so far.


The idea
We’ll choose a set of artifacts to surveil and restrict. I’ll call these heavy technology and everything else light technology. Our goal is to restrict as few things as possible, but we want to make sure that someone can’t cause unacceptable destruction with only light technology. By default something is light technology if it can be easily acquired by an individual or small group in 2017, and heavy technology otherwise (though we may need to make some exceptions, e.g. certain biological materials or equipment).

Heavy technology is subject to two rules:

1. You can’t use heavy technology in a way that is unacceptably destructive.
2. You can’t use heavy technology to undermine the machinery that enforces these two rules.

To enforce these rules, all heavy technology is under surveillance, and is situated such that it cannot be unilaterally used by any individual or small group. That is, individuals can own heavy technology, but they cannot have unmonitored physical access to that technology.


This proposal does give states a de facto monopoly on heavy technology, and would eventually make armed resistance totally impossible. But it’s already the case that states have a massive advantage in armed conflict, and it seems almost inevitable that progress in AI will make this advantage larger (and enable states to do much more with it). Realistically I’m not convinced this proposal makes things much worse than the default.

This proposal definitely expands regulators’ nominal authority and seems prone to abuses. But amongst candidates for handling a future with cheap and destructive dual-use technology, I feel this is the best of many bad options with respect to the potential for abuse.
ratty  acmtariat  clever-rats  risk  existence  futurism  technology  policy  alt-inst  proposal  government  intel  authoritarianism  orwellian  tricks  leviathan  security  civilization  ai  ai-control  arms  defense  cybernetics  institutions  law  unintended-consequences  civil-liberty  volo-avolo  power  constraint-satisfaction  alignment 
4 weeks ago by nhaliday
Imagine there’s no Congress - The Washington Post
- Adrian Vermeule

In the spirit of John Lennon, let’s imagine, all starry-eyed, that there’s no U.S. Congress. In this thought experiment, the presidency and the Supreme Court would be the only federal institutions, along with whatever subordinate agencies the president chose to create. The court would hold judicial power, while the president would make and execute laws. The president would be bound by elections and individual constitutional rights, but there would be no separation of legislative from executive power.

Would such a system be better or worse than our current system? How different would it be, anyway?
news  org:rec  rhetoric  contrarianism  usa  government  elections  democracy  antidemos  alt-inst  proposal  institutions  axioms  law  leviathan  leadership  obama  nascent-state  counter-revolution  journos-pundits  douthatish  responsibility  the-founding  benevolence 
5 weeks ago by nhaliday
Finders, keepers - Wikipedia
Finders, keepers is an English adage with the premise that when something is unowned or abandoned, whoever finds it first can claim it. This idiom relates to an ancient Roman law of similar meaning and has been expressed in various ways over the centuries.[1] Of particular difficulty is how best to define when exactly something is unowned or abandoned, which can lead to legal or ethical disputes.


In the field of social simulation, Rosaria Conte and Cristiano Castelfranchi have used "finders, keepers" as a case study for simulating the evolution of norms in simple societies.[2]
concept  heuristic  law  leviathan  wiki  reference  aphorism  metabuch  philosophy  canon  history  iron-age  mediterranean  the-classics  anglosphere  conquest-empire  civil-liberty  social-norms  social-structure  universalism-particularism  axioms  ethics  simulation  egalitarianism-hierarchy  inequality  power  models  GT-101  EGT  new-religion  deep-materialism  parallax 
7 weeks ago by nhaliday
Mistakes happen for a reason | Bloody shovel
Which leads me to this article by Scott Alexander. He elaborates on an idea by one of his ingroup about their being two ways of looking at things, “mistake theory” and “conflict theory”. Mistake theory claims that political opposition comes from a different understanding of issues: if people had the same amount of knowledge and proper theories to explain it, they would necessarily agree. Conflict theory states that people disagree because their interests conflict, the conflict is zero-sum so there’s no reason to agree, the only question is how to resolve the conflict.

I was speechless. I am quite used to Mr. Alexander and his crowd missing the point on purpose, but this was just too much. Mistake theory and Conflict theory are not parallel things. “Mistake theory” is just the natural, tribalist way of thinking. It assumes an ingroup, it assumes the ingroup has a codified way of thinking about things, and it interprets all disagreement as a lack of understanding of the obviously objective and universal truths of the ingroup religion. There is a reason why liberals call “ignorant” all those who disagree with them. Christians used to be rather more charitable on this front and asked for “faith”, which they also assumed was difficult to achieve.

Conflict theory is one of the great achievements of the human intellect; it is an objective, useful and predictively powerful way of analyzing human disagreement. There is a reason why Marxist historiography revolutionized the world and is still with us: Marx made a strong point that human history was based on conflict. Which is true. It is tautologically true. If you understand evolution it stands to reason that all social life is about conflict. The fight for genetical survival is ultimately zero-sum, and even in those short periods of abundance when it is not, the fight for mating supremacy is very much zero-sum, and we are all very much aware of that today. Marx focused on class struggle for political reasons, which is wrong, but his focus on conflict was a gust of fresh air for those who enjoy objective analysis.

Incidentally the early Chinese thinkers understood conflict theory very well, which is why Chinese civilization is still around, the oldest on earth. A proper understanding of conflict does not come without its drawbacks, though. Mistakes happen for a reason. Pat Buchanan actually does understand why USG open the doors to trade with China. Yes, Whig history was part of it, but that’s just the rhetoric used to justify the idea. The actual motivation to trade with China was making money short term. Lots of money. Many in the Western elite have made huge amounts of money with the China trade. Money that conveniently was funneled to whichever political channels it had to do in order to keep the China trade going. Even without Whig history, even without the clueless idea that China would never become a political great power, the short-term profits to be made were big enough to capture the political process in the West and push for it. Countries don’t have interests: people do.

That is true, and should be obvious, but there are dangers to the realization. There’s a reason why people dislike cynics. People don’t want to know the truth. It’s hard to coordinate around the truth, especially when the truth is that humans are selfish assholes constantly in conflict. Mistakes happen because people find it convenient to hide the truth; and “mistake theory” happens because policing the ingroup patterns of thought, limiting the capability of people of knowing too much, is politically useful. The early Chinese kingdoms developed a very sophisticated way of analyzing objective reality. The early kingdoms were also full of constant warfare, rebellions and elite betrayals; all of which went on until the introduction in the 13th century of a state ideology (neoconfucianism) based on complete humbug and a massively unrealistic theory on human nature. Roman literature is refreshingly objective and to the point. Romans were also murderous bastards who assassinated each other all the time. It took the massive pile of nonsense which we call the Christian canon to get Europeans to cooperate in a semi-stable basis.

But guess what? Conflict theory also exists for a reason. And the reason is to extricate oneself from the ingroup, to see things how they actually are, and to undermine the state religion from the outside. Marxists came up with conflict theory because they knew they had little to expect from fighting from within the system. Those low-status workers who still regarded their mainstream society as being the ingroup they very sharply called “alienated”, and by using conflict theory they showed what the ingroup ideology was actually made of. Pat Buchanan and his cuck friends should take the message and stop assuming that the elite is playing for the same team as they are. The global elite, of America and its vassals, is not mistaken. They are playing for themselves: to raise their status above yours, to drop their potential rivals into eternal misery and to rule forever over them. China, Syria, and everything else, is about that.

Heh heh. It’s a lost art. The Greeks and Romans were realists about it (except Cicero, that idealistic bastard). They knew language, being the birthright of man, was just another way (and a damn powerful one) to gain status, make war, and steal each other’s women. Better be good at wielding it.
gnon  right-wing  commentary  china  asia  current-events  politics  ideology  coalitions  government  statesmen  leviathan  law  axioms  authoritarianism  usa  democracy  antidemos  trade  nationalism-globalism  elite  error  whiggish-hegelian  left-wing  paleocon  history  mostly-modern  world-war  impetus  incentives  interests  self-interest  signaling  homo-hetero  hypocrisy  meta:rhetoric  debate  language  universalism-particularism  tribalism  us-them  zero-positive-sum  absolute-relative  class  class-warfare  communism  polanyi-marx  westminster  realness  cynicism-idealism  truth  coordination  cooperate-defect  medieval  confucian  iron-age  mediterranean  the-classics  literature  canon  europe  the-great-west-whale  occident  sinosphere  orient  nl-and-so-can-you  world  conquest-empire  malthus  status  egalitarianism-hierarchy  evolution  conceptual-vocab  christianity  society  anthropology  metabuch  hidden-motives  X-not-about-Y  dark-arts  illusion  martial  war  cohesion  military  correlation  causation  roots  japan  comparison  long-short-run  mul 
9 weeks ago by nhaliday

« earlier    

related tags

2013  3stars  ability-competence  absolute-relative  acmtariat  advice  africa  age-of-discovery  agriculture  ai-control  ai  alien-character  alignment  allodium  alt-inst  altruism  analysis  analytical-holistic  anarcho-tyranny  anglo  anglosphere  anthropology  antidemos  antiquity  aphorism  archaeology  armor  arms  art  article  asia  attaq  authoritarianism  axelrod  axioms  backup  bare-hands  benevolence  biases  big-peeps  bio  bitcoin  blog  books  bostrom  branches  britain  broad-econ  business  calus  canada  canon  capitalism  carries  causation  checklists  china  christianity  civic  civil-liberty  civilization  class-warfare  class  clever-rats  coalitions  cog-psych  cohesion  cold-war  comics  commentary  communism  community  comparison  compensation  competition  composition-decomposition  concept  conceptual-vocab  confidence  confluence  confucian  conquest-empire  constraint-satisfaction  context  contracts  contrarianism  controversy  cooperate-defect  coordination  corporation  correlation  corruption  cost-benefit  counter-revolution  courage  cracker-econ  crime  criminal-justice  criminology  critique  crooked  crypto-anarchy  crypto  cryptocurrency  cultural-dynamics  culture  current-events  cybernetics  cynicism-idealism  dark-arts  data  datto  debate  decentralized  decision-making  deep-materialism  defense  degrees-of-freedom  democracy  demographics  dennett  density  destiny  destiny2  developing-world  dignity  dimensionality  direct-indirect  direction  discipline  discrimination  discussion  douthatish  dps  draft  drugs  duty  early-modern  eastern-europe  econ-productivity  econometrics  economics  econotariat  eden-heaven  eden  eea  egalitarianism-hierarchy  egt  elections  elite  embodied  empirical  endo-exo  endogenous-exogenous  enlightenment-renaissance-restoration-reformation  equilibrium  error  essay  estimate  ethical-algorithms  ethics  ethnocentrism  ethnography  eu  europe  evidence-based  evolution  evopsych  existence  exit-voice  expansionism  experiment  expert-experience  explanans  exploits  exploratory  farmers-and-foragers  fashun  feats  feudal  fiction  film  filmmaking  finance  flexibility  flux-stasis  foreign-lang  foreign-policy  formal-values  forms-instances  friends  frontier  futurism  gallic  garett-jones  gedanken  gender  gene-flow  genetics  geography  germanic  gibbon  gnon  gnxp  good-evil  government  group-selection  growth-econ  gt-101  guilt-shame  hacker  hanson  hari-seldon  health  heterodox  heuristic  hi-order-bits  hidden-motives  history  homo-hetero  honor  human-capital  hypocrisy  ideas  ideology  illusion  impetus  impro  incentives  increase-decrease  india  individualism-collectivism  industrial-org  inequality  info-dynamics  info-econ  innovation  insight  instinct  institutions  insurance  integrity  intel  interests  internet  intervention  interviews  intricacy  iron-age  is-ought  islam  israel  janus  japan  jargon  journos-pundits  judaism  kinship  labor  language  latin-america  law  leadership  learning  left-wing  legacy  letters  liner-notes  links  list  literature  lived-experience  long-short-run  longitudinal  luciencastaing-taylor  machiavelli  madisonian  malthus  management  managerial-state  maps  marginal-rev  market-power  markets  martial  me  measurement  media  medicine  medieval  mediterranean  mena  meta:rhetoric  metabuch  micro  microfoundations  migration  military  mobility  models  modernity  moloch  monetary-fiscal  money  morality  mostly-modern  multi  my-essays  myth  n-factor  nascent-state  nationalism-globalism  natural-experiment  nature  new-religion  news  nibble  nietzschean  nl-and-so-can-you  noble-lie  noblesse-oblige  nordic  north-weingast-like  number  obama  occident  offense-defense  open-closed  openai  opsec  order-disorder  orfe  org:edu  org:junk  org:lite  org:mag  org:mat  org:popup  org:rec  organizing  orient  orwellian  paleocon  papers  paradox  parallax  patience  pdf  peace-violence  personality  persuasion  phalanges  philosophy  piracy  planning  poast  poetry  polanyi-marx  polarization  policy  polis  polisci  political-econ  politics  poll  pop-structure  population-genetics  populism  power  pragmatic  pre-ww2  prejudice  prepping  preprint  prestige  privacy  pro-rata  propaganda  property-rights  proposal  prudence  psychiatry  psychology  public-goodish  questions  quotes  race  random  randy-ayndy  rant  ratty  realness  realpolitik  reason  reddit  redistribution  reference  reflection  religion  rent-seeking  reputation  research  responsibility  review  revolution  rhetoric  right-wing  risk  ritual  roots  rot  russia  sanctity-degradation  sapiens  scale  schelling  scholar  science  scitariat  security  self-control  self-interest  sensoryethnography  sensoryethnographylab  sequential  sga  shift  signaling  simulation  singularity  sinosphere  social-capital  social-choice  social-norms  social-psych  social-structure  social  society  sociology  socs-and-mops  solo  space  speedometer  ssc  statesmen  status  stereotypes  strategy  stream  study  studying  stylized-facts  sulla  summary  supply-demand  survey  symmetry  systematic-ad-hoc  tactics  taxes  technology  telos-atelos  temperance  terrorism  the-basilisk  the-classics  the-devil  the-founding  the-great-west-whale  the-trenches  the-watchers  theos  things  threat-modeling  time-series  time  tips  to-do  to-read  top-n  trade  tradecraft  tradeoffs  tradition  trends  tribalism  tricks  trump  trust  truth  turchin  twitter  unaffiliated  underbelly  unintended-consequences  universalism-particularism  us-them  usa  utopia-dystopia  values  vampire-squid  videos  virtu  visualization  vitality  vocab  volo-avolo  vérénaparavel  walkthroughs  war  weapons  westminster  whiggish-hegelian  white-paper  whole-partial-many  wiki  wisdom  within-without  world-war  world  x-not-about-y  yvain  zeitgeist  zero-positive-sum  🎩 

Copy this bookmark: