leisure   3288

« earlier    

Whats a good example of "Don't knock it till you try it"? : AskReddit
(1) Go see movies alone (2) Eat out and explore foods alone (3) Travel and Vacation alone.
7 days ago by aahan
Lik-op-stuk bij seksueel wangedrag jongeren in zwembaden Rotterdam - NRC
In Rotterdam gaat binnenkort een project van start om seksueel geweld en ander onoorbaar gedrag van vooral allochtone jongeren tegen meisjes en jonge…
immigration  leisure  sex  nl  islam 
17 days ago by geekzter
Opinion | How High School Ruined Leisure - The New York Times
"Summer is coming.

The season for school sports and activities is ending. For most high school seniors, it’s not just the season — it is, in some weird sense, their “career.” As a hockey, soccer, lacrosse player. A violinist, a debater, a singer in the a cappella choir. Unless they have professional aspirations or college commitments, whatever they’ve done outside of school — and for many kids, that thing has become a core piece of their identities — is shifting into a different gear.

It’s no longer going to help get them into college. They won’t step up to a better chair or make varsity. The conveyor belt of achievement has reached its end.

Now all that remains are the kinds of questions everyone comes to eventually: Do you still do your thing — whatever your thing is — when no one is watching? What do you do when it doesn’t matter any more?

“I’ve recently had to come to the realization that I won’t have a next year to prepare for as a member of this team,” said Sawyer Michaelson, a tennis player and senior at Southwest High School in Minneapolis. “This is the first time I haven’t had a future to look forward to. I hope to play tennis in college, but things aren’t set in stone like they were for me in high school.” This, he said, is “unnerving.”

“This is a real moment for a lot of kids,” said Christine VanDeVelde, an author of “College Admission: From Application to Acceptance, Step by Step.” “For some, who’ve had adults guide them all their lives, they don’t know what they want or what they like or what motivates them. For others, who’ve been competent or successful at a lot of things, it can be hard to know which one sustains them.”

In many ways, that challenge is amped up by the rigorous approach teenagers are encouraged to take to what used to be seen as hobbies, done outside of school and on a student’s own time. (Thus the term “extracurriculars.”) As the sports and activities kids once did “just for fun” sometimes led to prestigious academic opportunities, the grown-ups caught on and took over, and everything from baseball to math modeling was commercialized and turned into a means to an end.

The message was clear: These activities were important. What they weren’t was optional, at least beyond the initial decision to sign up. The season was mapped out, the schedule on the fridge.

It’s that structure that makes this shift more than just a standard rite of passage for new graduates. Teachers, coaches and parents strive to give students the best experiences in competing, performing or creating, but the more professionalized the process becomes, the more difficult it can be to return to an amateur approach. When your artwork has been given the gallery treatment and your entry into the final game was marked by fireworks and a sound system worthy of the Super Bowl, painting for yourself or playing a pickup game in the park might feel pointless.

Add in the college admission process, and even the most passionate teenagers say they feel as if things have reached an end rather than a turning point.

“There is definitely this sense that you are putting work into activities so you can get some sort of payback — admission to a top college — and afterward, your work is done,” said Ella Biehn, a senior and a songwriter and guitarist at DeKalb School of the Arts near Atlanta. She plans to keep performing in college, majoring in vocal music, and yet, “In a lot of cases I feel like a spent battery.”

Ironically, in placing so much value on activities that our children came to out of love or interest, we grown-ups replaced the intrinsic motivations we often claim to value with extrinsic ones. When you’ve been taught that every action has a purpose, it’s harder to find meaning in just doing something you enjoy, and much more difficult to persuade yourself to do it.

And so, with an anticlimactic awards ceremony and a round of applause and tears, we welcome our former student athletes and artists into the real world, where art and sport beckon alluringly in other people’s Instagram feeds, but leisure itself — the act of engaging in something merely because we enjoy it — is not much valued. The opportunities are there, but the will to take advantage of them, to make choices for reasons other than profit or productivity, has to be yours.

Maybe this is the most important lesson our new graduates can learn. “This is part of the human experience,” said Susan Avery, a college counselor at Harvest Collegiate High School in Manhattan. “These kids have spent 17 years listening to adults. Now they have to learn to listen to themselves.”

Ms. Avery’s daughter, a dedicated pre-med student who never pursued the arts in high school, signed up for theater club for fun at a freshman fair in college and will soon be graduating as a theater major. “When she first mentioned it, I was like, ‘Do it!’” Ms. Avery said. “‘I like it, I want to try it’ — that’s a good reason.”

The secret of adulthood, the one those high school seniors don’t know but soon will, is that there are some questions we never really resolve. Do you still do your thing — whatever your thing is — when no one is watching? Both the magic of that question and its existential angst lie in the freedom it presents. Maybe you do. Maybe you don’t.

It really only matters — really only has to matter — to you."
highschool  unschooling  deschooling  schooliness  education  parenting  kjdell’antonia  sports  leisure  artleisure  leisurearts  colleges  universities  admissions  performance  performative  music  art  arts  experience  life  living  adulthood  purpose  fun  play  freedom 
6 weeks ago by robertogreco
Panzer fahren - PANZER-POWER | Die Panzerfahrschule
Trucks, Militärfahrzeuge und Panzer selber fahren.
germany  military  leisure  tank 
7 weeks ago by keimlink
Traditions of the future, by Astra Taylor (Le Monde diplomatique - English edition, May 2019)
"If the dead do not exactly have power or rights, per se, they do still have a seat at the table—Thomas Jefferson among them. In ways obvious and subtle, constructive and destructive, the present is constrained and shaped by the decisions of past generations. A vivid example is the American Constitution, in which a small group of men ratified special kinds of promises intended to be perpetual. Sometimes I imagine the Electoral College, which was devised to increase the influence of the southern states in the new union, as the cold grip of plantation owners strangling the current day. Even Jefferson’s beloved Bill of Rights, intended as protections from government overreach, has had corrosive effects. The Second Amendment’s right to bear arms allows those who plundered native land and patrolled for runaway slaves, who saw themselves in the phrase “a well regulated Militia,” to haunt us. Yet plenty of our ancestors also bequeathed us remarkable gifts, the right to free speech, privacy, and public assembly among them.

Some theorists have framed the problematic sway of the deceased over the affairs of the living as an opposition between tradition and progress. The acerbic Christian critic G. K. Chesterton put it this way: “Tradition may be defined as an extension of the franchise. Tradition means giving votes to the most obscure of all classes, our ancestors. It is the democracy of the dead. Tradition refuses to submit to the small and arrogant oligarchy of those who merely happen to be walking about. All democrats object to men being disqualified by the accident of birth; tradition objects to their being disqualified by the accident of death.” Social progress, in Chesterton’s account, can thus be seen as a form of disenfranchisement, the deceased being stripped of their suffrage. Over half a century before Chesterton, Karl Marx expressed sublime horror at the persistent presence of political zombies: “Men make their own history, but they do not make it as they please; they do not make it under self-selected circumstances, but under circumstances existing already, given and transmitted from the past. The tradition of all dead generations weighs like a nightmare on the brains of the living.”

The most eloquent partisans in this trans-temporal power struggle said their piece at the end of the 18th century. Edmund Burke and Thomas Paine had a furious debate that articulated the dichotomy between past and future, dead and living, tradition and progress. A consummate conservative shaken by the post-revolutionary violence in France, Burke defended the inherited privilege and stability of aristocratic government that radical democrats sought to overthrow: “But one of the first and most leading principles on which the commonwealth and the laws are consecrated, is lest the temporary possessors and life-renters in it, unmindful of what they have received from their ancestors, or of what is due to their posterity, should act as if they were the entire masters; that they should not think it amongst their rights to cut off the entail, or commit waste on the inheritance, by destroying at their pleasure the whole original fabric of their society.” Any revolution, Burke warned, hazards leaving those who come after “a ruin instead of an habitation” in which men, disconnected from their forerunners, “would become little better than the flies of summer.”

The left-leaning Paine would have none of it. Better to be a buzzing fly than a feudal serf. “Whenever we are planning for posterity we ought to remember that virtue is not hereditary,” he quipped. His critique, forcefully expressed in Common Sense and The Rights of Man, was not just an attack on monarchy. Rather, it was addressed to revolutionaries who might exercise undue influence over time by establishing new systems of government. “There never did, there never will, and there never can, exist a Parliament, or any description of men, or any generation of men, in any country, possessed of the right or the power of binding and controlling posterity to the ‘end of time,’” he protested.

In his pithy style, Paine popularized a commitment both to revolution and to novelty. “A nation, though continually existing, is continually in the state of renewal and succession. It is never stationary. Every day produces new births, carries minors forward to maturity, and old persons from the stage. In this ever-running flood of generations there is no part superior in authority to another.” Given the onslaught of change, a constitution “must be a novelty, and that which is not a novelty must be defective.” Never one for moderation, Paine advocated a decisive break with tradition, rejecting lessons from the past, castigating those who scoured records of ancient Greece and Rome for models or insights. What could the dead teach the living that could possibly be worth knowing?

Every person, whether or not they have children, exists as both a successor and an ancestor. We are all born into a world we did not make, subject to customs and conditions established by prior generations, and then we leave a legacy for others to inherit. Nothing illustrates this duality more profoundly than the problem of climate change, which calls into question the very future of a habitable planet.

Today, I’d guess that most of us are more able to imagine an environmental apocalypse than a green utopia. Nuclear holocaust, cyber warfare, mass extinction, superbugs, fascism’s return, and artificial intelligence turned against its makers—these conclusions we can see, but our minds struggle to conjure an image of a desirable, credible alternative to such bleak finales, to envision habitation rather than ruin.

This incapacity to see the future takes a variety of forms: young people no longer believe their lives will be better than those of their parents and financial forecasts give credence to their gloomy view; political scientists warn that we are becoming squatters in the wreckage of the not-so-distant liberal-democratic past, coining terms such as dedemocratization and postdemocracy to describe the erosion of democratic institutions and norms alongside an ongoing concentration of economic power. Meanwhile, conservative leaders cheer on democratic regression under the cover of nostalgia—“Make America Great Again,” “Take Our Country Back”—and seek to rewind the clock to an imaginary and exclusive past that never really existed."

"Questions of labor and leisure—of free time—have been central to debates about self-government since peasant citizens flooded the Athenian Pnyx. Plato and Aristotle, unapologetic elitists, were aghast that smiths and shoemakers were permitted to rub shoulders with the Assembly’s wellborn. This offense to hierarchical sensibilities was possible only because commoners were compensated for their attendance. Payments sustained the participation of the poor—that’s what held them up—so they could miss a day’s work over hot flames or at the cobbler’s bench to exercise power on equal footing with would-be oligarchs.

For all their disdain, Plato’s and Aristotle’s conviction that leisure facilitates political participation isn’t wrong. Throughout the nineteenth and twentieth centuries, radical workers agreed. They organized and fought their bosses for more free time, making substantial inroads until a range of factors, including the cult of consumption and a corporate counterattack, overpowered their efforts. A more sustainable, substantive democracy means resuscitating their campaign. Free time is not just a reprieve from the grindstone; it’s an expansion of freedom and a prerequisite of self-rule.

A reduction of work hours would have salutary ecological effects as well, as environmentalists have noted. A fundamental reevaluation of labor would mean assessing which work is superfluous and which essential; which processes can be automated and which should be done by hand; what activities contribute to our alienation and subjugation and which integrate and nourish us. “The kind of work that we’ll need more of in a climate-stable future is work that’s oriented toward sustaining and improving human life as well as the lives of other species who share our world,” environmental journalist and political theorist Alyssa Battistoni has written. “That means teaching, gardening, cooking, and nursing: work that makes people’s lives better without consuming vast amounts of resources, generating significant carbon emissions, or producing huge amounts of stuff.” The time to experiment with more ecologically conscious, personally fulfilling, and democracy-enhancing modes of valuing labor and leisure is upon us, at precisely the moment that time is running out.

With climate calamity on the near horizon, liberal democracies are in a bind. The dominant economic system constrains our relationship to the future, sacrificing humanity’s well-being and the planet’s resources on the altar of endless growth while enriching and empowering the global 1 percent. Meanwhile, in America, the Constitution exacerbates this dynamic, preserving and even intensifying a system of minority rule and lashing the country’s citizens to an aristocratic past.

The fossil fuel and finance industries, alongside the officials they’ve bought off, will fight to the death to maintain the status quo, but our economic arrangements and political agreements don’t have to function the way they do. Should democratic movements manage to mount a successful challenge to the existing order, indigenous precolonial treaty-making processes provide an example of the sort of wisdom a new, sustainable consensus might contain. The Gdoonaaganinaa, or “Dish with One Spoon” treaty, outlines a relationship between the Haudenosaunee Confederacy and Nishnaabeg people. The dish symbolizes the shared land on which both groups depend and to which all are responsible; in keeping with the Haudenosaunee Great Law of peace, … [more]
astrataylor  ancesors  climatechange  history  2019  democracy  capitalism  patriarchy  whitesupremacy  borders  power  time  future  change  hannaharendt  ecology  sustainability  globalwarming  interconnected  interconnectedness  indigeneity  indigenous  leannebetasamosakesimpson  leisure  plato  aristotle  philosophy  participation  participatory  organizing  labor  work  marxism  karlmarx  socialism  freetime  longnow  bighere  longhere  bignow  annpettifor  economics  growth  degrowth  latecapitalism  neoliberalism  debt  tradition  gkchesterson  thomaspaine  thomasjefferson  us  governance  government  edmundburke  commonsense  postdemocracy  dedemocratization  institutions  artleisure  leisurearts  self-rule  collectivism  alyssanattistoni  legacy  emissions  carbonemissions  ethics  inheritance  technology  technosolutionism  canon  srg  peterthiel  elonmusk  liberalism  feminism  unions  democraticsocialism  pericles  speed  novelty  consumerism  consumption  obsolescence  capital  inequality 
9 weeks ago by robertogreco
Slow Down & Wander
Slowing down. That concept intrigued me. I was 23 at the time, a period when most folks try to hurry up.

Hurry up in career; hurry up in relationships…

…and when seen through the startup lens: hurry up in growth; hurry up in profit; hurry up in expansion….

Up until that point, I subscribed to that notion. And by hurrying up, I found I created stress. More friction. More unease. And it was all non-existent. I created it all by subscribing to hurry up.

The idea of slowing down …. No… make that – the permission to slow down, was a welcome wrinkle. Even coming from a fictional movie character.

And the moment I shifted my thought into that plane, I felt an initial release. Friction release.

By slowing down, I purged speed for persistence. Persistence lead to patience. Patience to empathy. And empathy lead to focused wandering. That wandering lead me to domain names.

Now, sitting here 22 years later, I recognize the importance of that small decision.
work  leisure 
12 weeks ago by ricky

« earlier    

related tags

-  1930s  1970s  1980s  1990s  2013  2015  2017  2018  2019  above  academia  acoustic  activism  activity  admissions  adulthood  adulting  advertising  affordability  age  alcohol  alexandralange  alienation  alyssanattistoni  america  american  amsterdam  amtrak  ancesors  annehelenpetersen  annpettifor  antiwork  anxiety  app  application  archaeology  architecture  argentina  aristotle  arnekalleberg  art  artifact  artleisure  arts  astrataylor  atari  atmosphere  attention  automation  balance  bartleyjonathan  behavior  belgium  benedictclouette  berrysian  bertrandrussell  bighere  bignow  blog  blogpost  boaredom  books  borders  bored  boredom  brooklynbridgepark  bullshit  burnout  business  canon  capital  capitalism  carbon  carbonemissions  career  careerism  careers  cash_transfers  cash_transfers labor  catchment  chairing  change  children  chores  cities  city  civics  class  climate  climatechange  clubbing  co2  coding  cognition  collectivism  colleges  comfort  commercialism  commonsense  company  competition  competitiveness  complexity  computer  congnitiveload  console  consumerism  consumption  context  control  convergence  coreyrobin  corporation  creativity  criticism  cult.of.work  cushion  cv  dancemusic  davidgraeber  dc:creator=harrisjohn  dc:creator=wutim  dctagged  debt  decisionmaking  decline  dedemocratization  degrowth  democracy  democraticsocialism  denmark  deschooling  design  development  digital  din  disability  disengagement  distance  distraction  documentation  dominopark  ecology  economics  edmundburke  education  efficiency  elonmusk  email  emissions  employment  emulation  engineering  english  enjoy  entertainment  environment  ethics  everdayness  everyday  excellence  exhaustion  experience  extension  facebook  family  feminism  fiction  flexibility  fragility  france  freedom  freetime  from:inoreader  fuedalism  fun  functionalism  future  games  generations  generationx  genius  gentrification  genx  genz  geography  germany  getrichslowly  gift  gigeconomy  gkchesterson  global  globalwarming  governance  government  greenparty  griffiths_paul  ground  growth  guardian  guide  hannaharendt  happiness  hart_david_bentley  harvard  health  healthcare  helicopterparenting  helicopterparents  henrilefebvre  highbrow  highschool  hiking  history  hobbies  hobby  home  homelessness  hotels  housing  hustle  hustling  hygge  ideas  idleness  ifttt  imagination  immigration  inclusion  indigeneity  indigenous  inequality  info  inground  inheritance  insecurity  instagram  institutions  interconnected  interconnectedness  interesting  interior  intimacy  islam  job  jobs  jornkonijn  joshcohen  karlmarx  katherinehayles  kids  killer  kinderen  kjdell’antonia  labor  labour  latecapitalism  laziness  leannebetasamosakesimpson  legacy  leisurearts  liberalism  life  lifestyle  linkedin  links  linux  living  livingroom  loitering  longhere  longnow  lowbrow  malcolmharris  management  maritime  markets  marxism  material  meaganday  measurement  media  mediocrity  meritocracy  metrics  military  millennials  mind  mit  money  monry  movies  mtb  multispecies  music  nature  neoliberalism  netflix  nl  noise  novelty  nyt  obsolescence  occasion  oligarchy  open-ended  open  openended  or  organizing  outdoor  overwork  parenting  paris  park  participation  participatory  passion  patriarchy  peaceofmind  perfectionism  performance  performative  pericles  personalbranding  personaldevelopment  peterthiel  philosophy  photography  physical  pinterest  place  plato  play  playingcards  pleasure  pocket  policy  politics  pollution  pool  porto  postdemocracy  postfordism  postwar  poverty  power  praise  precarity  preference  process  processing  procrastination  productivity  programming  pubic  publicspace  puritanism  purpose  pursuit  qualityoflife  quote  race  ralphbaer  read  reading  recreation  reenactment  reference  regressive  religion  responsibility  rest  restaurants  reverberation  risk  scandinavia  school  schooliness  search  security  self-care  self-optimization  self-rule  sex  sexism  shop  shopping  siliconvalley  sin  situationist  skate  skating  sloan  slow  snohomish  social  socialdemocracy  socialism  socialmedia  socialsafetynet  society  sociology  software  solidarity  soundconditioning  soundscape  source  space  spain  spanish  spare  speed  sport  sports  srg  stage  steadiness  stockholm  street  struggle  success  supplies  surveillance  sustainability  swimming  tacoma  tank  taxes  taylorism  technology  technosolutionism  teen  television  the  theater  theocracy  theology  thomasjefferson  thomaspaine  time  timwu  tips  tolearn  tones  toread  totry  tounderstand  tourism  tradition  train  transport  travel  trend  trump  trust  tutorial  uk  ultimate  uncertainty  unions  universities  unschooling  urban  urbanism  us  usa  uselessness  user  vacation  vacations  victorian  videogame  videogames  violence  virtue  voice  volume  vox  wa  war  warfare  warming  waterfront  web  welive  wellbeing  wework  whitesupremacy  wikientry  wikipedia  woods  work-lifebalance  work  workaholism  workplace  writing  youth  アウトドア  チェアリング 

Copy this bookmark: