language   197176

« earlier    

Progressive Labels for Regressive Practices: How Key Terms in Education Have Been Co-opted - Alfie Kohn

"So here's the cycle:

1. Educators create valid term for needed reform.
2. Corporate/political forces co-opt term to sell bullshit to schools.
3. Regressive educators equate needed reform with bullshit "reform."
4. Needed reform is defeated & forgotten.


1. Educators advocate for differentiated/personalized learning as humane, relationship-based alternative to standardization.
2. Corporations co-opt term to sell algorithm-based-ed-tech bullshit.
3. Popular bloggers equate 'personalized learning' with edtech bullshit.
4. Public impression is created that 'personalized learning' is a negative, corporate-driven, bullshit concept.
5. Standardization prevails."

[my reply]

"“a dark commentary on how capitalism absorbs its critiques”" (quoting ) ]

"“When I use a word,” Humpty Dumpty said, in rather a scornful tone, “it means just what I choose it to mean – neither more nor less.”

— Lewis Caroll, Through the Looking Glass

“Whole language” (WL), a collaborative, meaning-based approach to helping children learn to read and write, emerged a few decades ago as a grassroots movement. Until it was brought down by furious attacks from social conservatives, academic behaviorists, and others, many teachers were intrigued by this alternative to the phonics fetish and basal boom that defined the field. More than just an instructional technique, WL amounted to a declaration of independence from packaged reading programs. So how did the publishers of those programs respond? Some “absorbed the surface [features] of WL and sold them back to teachers.” Others just claimed that whatever was already in their commercial materials — bite-size chunks of literature and prefabricated lesson plans — was whole language.[1]

Until you can beat them, pretend to join them: WL is literally a textbook illustration of that strategy. But it’s hardly the only one. For example, experts talk about the importance of having kids do science rather than just learning about it, so many companies now sell kits for easy experimenting. It’s branded as “discovery learning,” except that much of the discovery has been done ahead of time.

A teacher-educator friend of mine, a leading student of constructivism, was once treated to dinner by a textbook publisher who sought his counsel about how kids can play an active role in the classroom and create meaning around scientific ideas. The publisher listened avidly, taking careful notes, which my friend found enormously gratifying until he suddenly realized that the publisher’s objective was just to appropriate key phrases that could be used in the company’s marketing materials and as chapter headings in its existing textbook.

Or consider cooperative learning. Having students spend much of their classroom time in pairs or small groups is a radical notion: Learning becomes a process of exchanging and reflecting on ideas with peers and planning projects together. When we learn with and from one another, schooling is about us, not just about me. But no sooner had the idea begun to catch on (in the 1980s) than it was diluted, reduced to a gimmick for enlivening a comfortably traditional curriculum. Teachers were told, in effect, that they didn’t have to question their underlying model of learning; students would memorize facts and practice skills more efficiently if they did it in groups. Some writers even recommended using grades, certificates, and elaborate point systems to reinforce students for cooperating appropriately.[2]

In short, the practice of “co-opting” potentially transformative movements in education[3] is nothing new. Neither, however, is it just a historical artifact. A number of labels that originally signified progressive ideas continue to be (mis)appropriated, their radical potential drained away, with the result that they’re now invoked by supporters of “bunch o’ facts” teaching or a corporate-styled, standards-and-testing model of school reform.[4]

A sample:

* Engaging doesn’t denote a specific pedagogical approach; it’s used as a general honorific, signifying a curriculum that the students themselves experience as worthwhile. But these days the word is often applied to tasks that may not be particularly interesting to most kids and that they had no role in choosing. In fact, the value of the tasks may simply be ignored, so we hear about student “engagement,” which seems to mean nothing more than prompt or sustained compliance. Such children have internalized the adults’ agenda and are (extrinsically) motivated to complete the assignment, whatever it is. If the point is to get them to stay “on task,” we’re spared having to think about what the task is — or who gets to decide — even as we talk earnestly about the value of having engaged students.[5]

* Developmental originally meant taking our cue from what children of a given age are capable of doing. But for some time now, the word has come to imply something rather different: letting children move at their own pace . . . up an adult-constructed ladder. Kids may have nothing to say about what, whether, or why — only about when. (This is similar to the idea of “mastery learning” — a phrase that hasn’t really been co-opted because it was never particularly progressive to begin with. Oddly, though, it’s still brandished proudly by people who seem to think it represents a forward-thinking approach to education.[6])

* Differentiated, individualized, or personalized learning all emerge from what would seem a perfectly reasonable premise: Kids have very different needs and interests, so we should think twice about making all of them do the same thing, let alone do it in the same way. But there’s a big difference between working with each student to create projects that reflect his or her preferences and strengths, on the one hand, and merely adjusting the difficulty level of skills-based exercises based on students’ test scores, on the other. The latter version has become more popular in recent years, driven in part by troubling programs such as “mass customized learning”[7] and by technology companies that peddle “individualized digital learning” products. (I have more to say about the differences between authentic personal learning and what might be called Personalized Learning, Inc. in this blog post.)

* Formative assessment was supposed to be the good kind — gauging students’ success while they’re still learning rather than evaluating them for the purpose of rating or ranking when it’s too late to make changes. But the concept “has been taken over — hijacked — by commercial test publishers and is used instead to refer to formal testing systems,” says assessment expert Lorrie Shepard.[8] Basically, an endless succession of crappy “benchmark” standardized tests — intended to refine preparation for the high-stakes tests that follow — are euphemistically described as “formative assessment.” Too often, in other words, the goal is just to see how well students will do on another test, not to provide feedback that will help them think deeply about questions that intrigue them. (The same is true of the phrase “assessment for learning,” which sounds nice but means little until we’ve asked “Learning what?”) The odds of an intellectually valuable outcome are slim to begin with if we’re relying on a test rather than on authentic forms of assessment.[9]

* A reminder to focus on the learning, not just the teaching seems refreshing and enlightened. After all, our actions as educators don’t matter nearly as much as how kids experience those actions. The best teachers (and parents) continually try to see what they do through the eyes of those to whom it’s done. But at some point I had the queasy realization that lots of consultants and administrators who insist that learning is more important than teaching actually have adopted a behaviorist version of learning, with an emphasis on discrete skills measured by test scores.

You see the pattern here. We need to ask what kids are being given to do, and to what end, and within what broader model of learning, and as decided by whom. If we allow ourselves to be distracted from those questions, then even labels with a proud progressive history can be co-opted to the point that they no longer provide reassurance about the practice to which the label refers."
alfiekohn  2015  progressive  education  schools  schooling  schooliness  lesicarroll  humptydumpty  wholelanguage  cooption  language  words  buzzwords  pedagogy  differentiation  teaching  business  capitalism  formativeassessment  assessment  learning  howweetach  howwelearn  development  engagement  grassroots 
11 hours ago by robertogreco
A Little Smalltalk is a non-standard implementation of the Smalltalk
Language. It was originally created by Timothy Budd and documented in
a book also called A Little Smalltalk.
programming  language  smalltalk 
13 hours ago by mwishek
I woke up unable to speak English - BBC News
I woke up unable to speak English
By Beth Rose
BBC News
17 October 2018
Share this with Facebook Share this with Messenger Share this with Twitter Share this with Email Share

Hannah Jenkins speaks English in the morning and German in the afternoon. It's not a routine she chose to adopt - but something her brain requires her to do. It all started with a cycling accident.

Her partner Andrew Wilde was halfway up a mountain in the US state of Montana when he received a baffling text from Hannah.

He understood only two words - "dog" and "hospital" - but knew instinctively something was wrong.

The text was in German, a language Hannah had grown up with, but Andrew didn't really understand. They only ever communicated in English.
bbc  news  health  disability  language  cycling  mental 
15 hours ago by ndf
Remnants of English dative and an alternate meaning of the verb "think"
german  english  language  linguistics  grammer  methinks  dative  tootme 
20 hours ago by nelson
Getting to know some pragmatic programming language features
I see learning programming languages as a chance to open up my horizon and learn some new concepts. It also encourage good habit like immutability, composition, modulation, … I’d like to review some…
programming  language  feature  comparison 
yesterday by gilberto5757
Will We Ever Get To Learn Nepali?
Not yet :-( But it includes links to many existing resources.
language  learning  nepali  nepal 
yesterday by pozorvlak
Words have soul: on the Romantic theory of language origin | Aeon Essays
"[L]anguage is one of those phenomena that arose when human beings engaged with life not so as to survive but so as to participate in the great rush of it that they felt teeming around them. Human beings do not live on bread alone."
evolution  language  poetics  linguistics  history  culture 
yesterday by aparrish

« earlier    

related tags

1013  2015  20171963  2018  a  academia  ad  advert  ai  alfiekohn  ambivalence  and  apprenticeships  art  article  articles  artifact  assessment  asynchronous  authority  baby  based  bbc  beginners  bias  blogs  books  boredom  brain  build_tool  business  buzzwords  c++  canada  canon  canonical  capitalism  catholic  check  children  chinese  chomsky  christibelcourt  civ  civ_v  civilwar  cli  climatechange  clojure  clowns  code  cognativepsychology  collaboration  colonial  colonialism  communication  communications  comparison  compatible  computing  concurrent  cooption  copyediting  creole  culture  cycling  data.journalism  data  dative  daughters  decode  decoder  deeplearning  demo  deschooling  development  dgni  dialect  differentiation  diggers  disability  diversity  document  dogs  domination  dynamic  editing  editorial  education  effect  embedded  empire  encyclopedia  engagement  english  englishlanguage  esoteric  etymology  evolution  experience  experientiallearning  fascism  favorites  feature  film  floss  fmri  food  formativeassessment  fun  functional  functionalprogramming  funny  gender  genration  german  gifted  girls  golang  grammar  grammargirl  grammer  grassroots  gs-week4  gs-week5  guardian  guide  hacking  hardtandnegri  hatespeech  hats  health  heterogeneity  hire  hiring  history  howweetach  howwelearn  humour  humptydumpty  hymnody  i18n  ibm  icao  iceland  ide  ifttt  indigeneity  indigenous  inequality  install  interdisciplinary  interesting  interpreter  italian  italy  jamie_jennings  japanese  javascript  job  jobs  johnball  joke  journalism  js  jvm  kids  knot  kokums  kotlin  land  landscape  languages  latin  learning  lesicarroll  lexicography  library  linguistics  lisp  literacy  localization  location  luiginono  map  mapping  maps  markup  marywallingblackburn  mask  mcwhorter  meaning  memes  mental  methinks  microcontroller  minimal  minimalism  moon  morethanhuman  moshoms  movies  multiple  multispecies  museum  music  names  naming  native-americans  native  ncpin  nct  negotiatedreality  nepal  nepali  neuroscience  new  news  next  nlp  numbers  nytimes  object  online  open-source  opensource  opera  p2p  package  parent’s  pdgin  pedagogy  peterson  pinker  playlist  plugin  podcast  poetics  poetry  politics  polyglots  ppl  productivity  profdev  proficiency  proglang  programming  progressive  project  pronunciation  psychology  q&a  race  reading  recruitment  reddit  redundancy  reference  regex  regexp  regular  religion  repl  research  resource  resources  rosie  russian  schooliness  schooling  schools  science  score  scripting  semiotics  service  shared  silence  smalltalk  socialization  software  sound  space  speech  spotify  strange_loop  straubhuillet  subjectivity  sublime  survey  teaching  test  that  the_onion  theory  thero  to  tool  toolkit  tools  tootme  traduction  trans  translate  translation  translator  trasnlator  truth  unicode  unschooling  version-control  video  warshanshire  watson  which  wholelanguage  wilfredpeltier  williammorris  women  wordplay  words  work  writing  youth  youtube 

Copy this bookmark: