labor   15858

« earlier    

Individuals in Science and Engineering Occupations as a Percentage of All Occupations |- National Science Foundation
Policymakers and scholars consistently emphasize innovation based on S&E research and development as a vehicle for economic growth and competitiveness. In the increasingly interconnected 21st-century world, workers with S&E expertise are integral to a nation’s innovative capacity because of their high skill level, their creative ideas, and their ability not only to advance basic scientific knowledge but also to transform advances in fundamental knowledge into tangible and useful products and services.
STEM-workforce  demographics  maps  labor  workforce-data  Around-the-web  this-week-439 
1 hour ago by areadevelopment
Is Your New Economy Workforce Hiding Where You Least Expect It? - Area Development
To get a complete picture of a location’s workforce, site selectors need to look beyond costs to educational attributes and quality of life among other factors.
area-development-features  Matt  economic-development  site-selection  manufacturing  workforce  skilled-labor  labor  education 
yesterday by areadevelopment
Non-compete abuse
Janitors, dog walkers, fast food employees being told to sign their right to future work away
abuse  labor  via:hackernews  noncompete 
yesterday by nelson
What will be left of the people who make our games? - Polygon
Damning evaluation of the lack of union protections in the video game industry.
emotions  labor  videogames  polygon  opinion 
2 days ago by UltraNurd
Here's Fresh Evidence Student Loans Are a Massive, Generational Scam - VICE
"Over the centuries, America has bestowed generous, state-sponsored privileges upon select classes of its citizens. Veterans and old people get free socialized healthcare—and, for the most part, they love it. Corporations (who count as people, look it up) get sweet tax breaks and, in the case of defense contractors, no-bid deals to build extremely expensive weapons unlikely to be used in the near future. And young people get thousands and thousands of dollars of student loans to pay for college, putting them in a hole they might spend the rest of their lives digging out of.

Obviously, one of these things is not like the others—the United States has put many students in the position of making decisions that can determine their financial futures when they're teenagers. This has nightmarish consequences: Some 44 million people have $1.5 trillion in student loan debt on the books. And even when young people do get through college and find a decent job, many can't fathom possibly buying a home or taking on other trappings of adulthood when faced with decades of monthly loan bills.

The worst part is that those who sought an elite education on the widely accepted notion that it would help them later in life were basically sold a bad bill of goods.

All that debt provides awfully little payoff in terms of boosted wages, even as it ensnares more and more people and hits youth of color especially hard, according to a new paper released Tuesday by two researchers at the left-leaning Roosevelt Institute. Research fellows Julie Margetta Morgan and Marshall Steinbaum concluded that more and more debt hasn't significantly boosted income for college grads—it just seems that way because high school grads without BAs are making less than they once did. They also found that looking at decent rates of repayment by student debtors is a misleading way to look at the scale of this crisis. And thanks to workers lacking the power they once enjoyed in an increasingly skill-obsessed economy, young people are often being pressured into getting extra degrees on their own dime (which is to say by taking on more debt) for minimal payoff.

For some perspective on how America let student loans get so out of control, why taking on debt is so often a mistake, and what we can do about it, I called co-author Julie Margetta Morgan for a chat.

VICE: Why do you think this has been allowed to get so bad, to the point not only that it's widely known as a crisis, but one that gets worse and worse?

[A] Julie Margetta Morgan: We have seen the overall amount of student debt grow and we've seen some of the industries around repayment get worse over time, although default rates recently got a little bit better. But I think that the reason why it's sort of been allowed to exist as this quiet crisis is that there's not a lot of agreement among experts that, on the whole, student debt is getting worse. I think that's because experts primarily look at measures around successful repayment of the loan as the target. And in this paper we try to take a slightly different look. First of all we interrogate those questions around repayments themselves—so we have a section around, like, experts have said that student debt is not a bigger burden now than it was a generation ago. And yet if you delve into the figures a little bit deeper you can see that, in fact, it is worse—the burden is worse but the repayment plans are slightly better, which masks the burden on students.

So part of what we're trying to do here is combat some of the common wisdom in the higher education policy world—what we tend to hear is: Yeah, students are taking on a lot of debt but ultimately that debt is worth it because their degrees are paying off in the long run. And we're finding that that's not necessarily true.

[Q] Is the most radical conclusion you reached here that the increased debt burden people are bearing is not paying off in terms of boosted income? Or is that already well known?

[A] That higher education is not paying off in terms of overall changes in the distribution of income is definitely apparent to labor economists but not necessarily apparent to higher education policy experts and those who advocate on behalf of students, because we are so often fed the college earnings premium as the single measure of whether college pays off over time. Yes of course college still pays off, but it pays off because it's becoming less and less viable for someone to make a living with just a high-school diploma. It's no longer this thing of, I'd like to earn a higher income, I guess I'll go to college. It's like, I have to go to college in order to not end up in poverty—and I'm also forced to take on debt to get there.

[Q] Is there any evidence that, thanks to income growth in the last year or two, college debt is paying off more than it did?

[A] It remains to be seen, but I'm not sure that it's a good idea for us to tie higher education policy—how we fund college—to the swings of the labor market. Our focus should be on taking the risk off of the individual and spreading it across the public, because the public is getting a lot of the benefit of college degrees.

[Q] Have you seen any indicators that people—including the communities hit hardest by college debt—might actively be avoiding college because of the specter of endless debt?

[A] We have lower levels of college attainment already among African American and Latino populations and we do see polls that suggest people are more and more skeptical of the value of college. And that's exactly the result we don't want to see. We don't want to see the people already discriminated against in the labor market avoiding going to college.

The other trend that comes to mind is this trend of programs that we would have previously considered trade programs, whether they're now being offered at for-profit colleges or as industry credentials that are trying to become part of the mainstream higher education system and get access to the loans. So there's a world in which people are trying to avoid getting the loans but the loans are actually following them to these trade programs.

[Q] But given that discrimination, is it not rational to—in some cases—calculate against attending college given the massive debt burden and how it hits some communities extra hard?

[A] I think it's absolutely at an individual level a rational decision that we're seeing people make. And at a national level we ought to be concerned about that and looking to change policies so people don't have to make that decision.

[Q] I know one of your aims here was to reinforce that this is a worse crisis than people think, but isn't the problem that Republicans just don't care?

[A] There's obviously a group of policymakers who don't want to deal with it. But I think there's another subset of policymakers who are looking at the student debt crisis through the lens of repayment—that the goal is to ensure that people can repay their loans. Keeping people out of default shouldn't be the biggest goal we set for ourselves.

If student debt is a crisis, is the answer that we should have less student debt? Or just that people are able to make their monthly payments? Our answer is that we should have less debt overall.

[Q] Part of your paper is about how workers keep getting pressured to gain new degrees and credentials that load them up with debt—all because they have no power. Is this about unions disappearing, or what would help there?

[A] Certainly the declining power of unions is one part of it. The lack of say for average workers in the decision-making at the companies they work for, the increase in corporate concentration within the economy—the rise of monopoly power makes it harder for workers to have a say, because there are fewer employers. And back during the recession, the scarcity of jobs made it harder for employees to have power and negotiate for themselves.

[Q] It's hard not to read the paper and feel like taking on student loans is maybe (very often) a mistake or even that the larger system is a scam. Even when students are not being preyed upon by for-profit schools or predatory lenders, the whole seems flimsy or even fraudulent. Is that unreasonable?

[A] I don't think it's unreasonable. I think of it as a failed social experiment that young people are caught in the middle of. It wasn't intentionally sold like a scam, but the way young people experience this is they were told: You go to college, you study, don't worry so much about how much it costs, it's going to be worth it in the end. And they get out on the other side, they have a ton of debt, they are working as hard as they can, but they're not getting ahead—they're treading water. They're making payments on their debt, but not able to buy a house, they're not able to save for retirement. You were sold on a promise, you come out on the other hand that that promise was false, and everybody looks at you like, What's wrong?

One of the things I thought was so exciting about writing this paper is it puts data to that deep frustration that we see in younger generations right now.

[Q] It doesn't seem likely that we'll see a major overhaul of the system in DC right now, with unified Republican control. But what can and should be done, the next time Democrats have control of the government, or in the meantime?

[A] There are things we can do right now. it's encouraging to see what's happening in the courts—some great student advocates and lawyers have taken action to make sure the [Education Secretary Betsy] DeVos administration at least enforces rules on the books to help get student loan cancellation for a smaller group of borrowers and limit predatory practices at for-profit schools.

As we look to the future, we have to think a lot bigger. We should be looking at both free and debt-free options for college. Free college at public universities and more debt-free options for students. That's how we take care of generations… [more]
studentloans  health  healthcare  inequality  2018  economics  socialsafetynet  society  us  education  highered  highereducation  colleges  universities  juliemargettamorgan  marshallsteinbaum  debt  income  policy  politics  labor  markets  capitalism  work  unions 
2 days ago by robertogreco
How Employers Track Their Workers - The Atlantic
for the no.fucking.shit file:

In general, studies of surveillance suggest that it can increase workplace stress, promote worker alienation, lower job satisfaction, and convey the perception that the quantity of work one generates is more important than its quality. In an analysis aptly titled “Watching Me Watching You,” the British anthropologists Michael Fischer and Sally Applin conclude that workplace surveillance creates “a culture where … people more often alter their behavior to suit machines and work with them, rather than the other way around,” and that this tends to erode their sense of “agency.” That is, the constant surveillance of employees diminishes their capacity to operate as independent thinkers and actors.
surveillance.capitalism  corporate.surveillance  privacy  management  labor  inelasticity  time  no.fucking.shit 
2 days ago by po
Opinion | We’re Measuring the Economy All Wrong - The New York Times
cui bono.
The skewed statistics aren't wrong to those parties intended to benefit.
economics  inequality  fail  metrics  law  statistics  income  labor  no.fucking.shit 
2 days ago by po

« earlier    

related tags

1770s  1880s  1960s  1965  1975  2013  2017  2018  3193  a  abuse  academia  accumulaltion  activism  actuarial  actuary  agency  ai  algorithms  altermodern  amazon  america  americanlabor  analysis  antitrust  antiuniversity  app  area-development-features  arizona  around-the-web  art  article  artificial-intelligence  artificialintelligence  artist  artists  automation  automaton  automotive-industry  awards  bayarea  biases  blackbox  blinkers  books  business_cycles  calculator  capitalism  career  charts  china  circus  clothes  codetermination  collective  colleges  colonization  compensation  competition  compliance  confirmation.bias  consequence  construction  consultants  content  control  convenience  convention  conventions  corporate.surveillance  corruption  cost  creativity  culture  currency  customerservice  data  data_source  dataviz  debt  deception  decolonization  defensecontracting  defensecontracts  democracy  democratization  demographics  deportation  development  digestingduck  digihum  digital-humanities  discipline  discrimination  disease  dispossession  diversity  eastbay  ecommerce  econ  economic-development  economics  economy  education  elasticity  emotional  emotions  empathy  employees  employment  entertainment  ethics  europe  events  evernote  excellent  factory  fail  failure  family  fashion  fatigue  fauxtomation  fees  feminism  film  films  fire  football  foreign  form  frankpasquale  free  future  gdp  gender  georgecaffentzis  gig-economy  gig_economy  gigo  gildedage  google  graphs  growth  health  healthcare  high-tech  highered  highereducation  hiring  history  holacracy  household  human.rights  humancloud  humiliation  identity  ideology  ifttt  immigration  income  indigeneity  industrial  industry  inelasticity  inequality  inflation  innovation  inquality  institutions  interface  invisible  is  issue  italy  itinerant  iww  jakobjakobsen  japan  jobs  jonathanrosa  juliemargettamorgan  kiosk  knoweldgeproduction  labor-costs  labor.mobility  labor_force  labor_market  labor_market_power  labor_relations  laborfest  labour  ladder  law  lillyirani  lists  living  logic  logistics  luxury  machine.learning  machine  management  manufacturing  maps  markets  marshallsteinbaum  matt  mechanicalturk  media  medicine  method  metrics  microsoft  miners  mitigration  mobile  moderation  monopoly  monopsony  movie  movies  mustread  neighborhoods  news  newyork  nfl  no.fucking.shit  noncompete  nonprofits  norms  nyt  of  open.plans.suck  opinion  organizing  oscars  pay  perception  performance  philipastley  platform  pocket  policy  politics  polygon  postwar  potemkin  poverty  power  prestige  privacy  productivity  programming  protest  pseudoscience  ptsd  publication  race  radicals  railroad  recruiting  reference  reproduction  resumes  retail  review  righttowork  sanfrancisco  sedentary  sequence  service  sexism  shadow  shadoweconomy  siliconvalley  silviafederici  simulation  site-selection  skilled-labor  skills  slack  smart  socialmedia  socialsafetynet  society  soft.skills  softskills  software  south-atlantic  stagnation  startups  statistics  stem-workforce  stockyards  strikes  studentloans  students  supply_and_demand  supplychain  surveillance.capitalism  sustainability  sweden  tech  techindustry  technology  tent  the  theft  this-week-438  this-week-439  this  time  to-read  togo  travel  tuberculosis  tuition  uber  unemployment  union  unionbusting  unions  universities  us  users  value  videogames  virginia  virtualreality  visualization  wage  wages  walmart  waymo  wholefoods  why  women’s  work  workers  workforce-data  workforce-development  workforce-training  workforce  workplace  workshops  world  writing  ww2 

Copy this bookmark: