johndewey   96

« earlier    

Inside and Outside the Cage – spottedtoad
"School, as I’ve said a number of times, serves this purpose already. I’ll sometimes encounter people who treat the idea that kids learn relatively little in school, that it’s a pointless hamster wheel that doesn’t get anyone anywhere, as some kind of scandal or shock. Maybe, but have you seen adult life lately? Is what kids do on an average school day so much more pointless and lonely and anomic than what you did yesterday- not than your ideal of what a ten year old or thirty year old should be doing, but what you actually, personally did? American parents are insanely competitive and push their kids and their kids’ schools to do all kinds of pointless shit, because we literally don’t have any other idea how to fill their and our days. They’re already staring at screens for nine hours a day. It could get worse. Four times as many young women 25-34 years old overdosed last year as in 1999. I don’t think school is the problem.

Maybe it’s a Tragedy of the (Missing) Commons. Maybe if you, and you, and you, and you, all pulled your kid out of school, tuned in, turned on (to Jesus or Allah or John Dewey or whoever), and dropped out, let them run around and build forts and make out or read Dante or whatever, maybe they can reinvent society on better grounds. The Benedict Option, like Rod Dreher says.  I’m not saying it’s impossible, and maybe we all need to be more utopian on our home turf even while being less so on other people’s. The ideal- or at least our own ideals- might be more within our grasp than we think. Maybe.

Or maybe what limited store of self-reliance we have is going to be destroyed, utterly, by the next wave of technology, or the next, and the best we can hope for is a benevolently paternalist technostate, the FitBit vibrating on our wrist to tell us to stop being inert, urging us to less self-destruction than we’d otherwise tend, telling us, whether we’re ten or fifty, to turn in our homework next time they see us and to remember to put our names on our papers if we want to get credit on the test."
education  homeschool  2017  unschooling  deschooling  commons  johndewey  benedictoption  roddreher  utopia  self-reliance  individualism  schools  schooling  freedom  technology  via:ayjay 
11 weeks ago by robertogreco
Ah the wisdom of strikes a fresh chord.
JohnDewey  from twitter_favs
december 2018 by DocDre
Nick Kaufmann on Twitter: "Civic tech needs to study history and explore the "usable past". Everyone in #civictech / @codeforamerica network should read Professor Light's upcoming book States of Childhood, ill attempt to summarize her talk below, although
[this is the event: ]

[thread contains many images]

"Civic tech needs to study history and explore the "usable past". Everyone in #civictech / @codeforamerica network should read Professor Light's upcoming book States of Childhood, ill attempt to summarize her talk below, although it's only what i could grasp in an hour or so.
At @mitsap tonight tweeting about Jennifer Light's lecture "playing at city building" #urbanism #education #civictech

Light opened the talk with the observation that more disciplines are looking to study history to "look forward by looking backward" #civicfutures #usablepast

In #civictech we know this isnt the first government reform movement with a "techie spin" in the world or us. At the last turn of the century, anxieties about cities birthed the "good government movement" the "googoos" were reformers kinda like #civichackers of today

Like @codeforamerica and also #smartcities boosters, the goo-goos believed scientific models and tech tools were a source of progress. They were worried about "boss rule" and wanted to "rationalize government" compare to cfa's mottos today

After discussing the good govt movement, Lights set the historical context of shifting expectations around young people's behavior. Child labor laws did not stop children from working however, it was just framed as "play" now

In this context early models of vocational education and educational simulations emerged, including William R. George's "model republic" movement. @Erie @pahlkadot model republics were all over the usa, not as franchised like #cfabrigade but more grassroots diffusion of the idea

There were miniature republics run by children in boston(Cottage Row), Cleveland (Progress City) Philadelphia (Playground City), etc, where children worked as real pretend public servants

media coverage of the time hailed these civic simulations as educational opportunity/chance for a "second life" for youth. Some of the tenement kids that George put into his program ended up in ivy league schools, and as lawyers, Pub. Servants and admins of their own model cities

The educational theories at the time of the model republics were very similar to today's trends of "gamification" "experiential learning" etc. Light referenced Stanley Hall (imitation/impersonation) and 'identity play'

Long before Bateson and Goffman were muddling the boundary between seriousness/play, model republics were also using that ambiguity to educate and also cut costs of programs literally built and maintained by children. Imagine 1000 kids and 3 admins

John Dewey's philosophy of learning by doing was also heavily referenced in the talk, as George took great inspiration from him and Dewey was a supporter of the model republics.

Light stressed just how much model republic citizens did in their pretend-real jobs, building housing, policing, data collection, safety inspections, and they did it so well that they often circumvented the adult systems. Why send some1 to adult court when junior court works?

This dynamic reminded me so much of #civichackers today with our pretend jobs and weekly hack night play that quickly turns into real jobs for our cities

Another point Light made was that the model republics were very much about assimilation of immigrants into a certain set of white american middleclass values. But before rise of consumerism those values heavily emphasized DIY/activecitizenship/production.

One reason for the decline of the model republics might have been the rise of consumerism and passive consumption valued over production. But we still have things like model U.N. and vocational programs, vestiges of this time.

Again today we have a perceived need to train people for the "new economy", so what can #civictech #civicinnovation #smartcities learn from looking back to historical examples? For one thing, we learn that youth contribution to civic innovation is important and undervalued

When model republics were introduced into schools the educational outcomes were not the only advantage, they saved schools gobs of money through "user generated" labor. Again think about civictech volunteerism today...

At Emerson School, Light said, kids were even repairing the electrical system. And in some cities kids would stand in for the mayor at real events.

Heres a page describing the establishment of a self-governing body of newsboys in Milwaukee

Light closed the talk by remarking on the "vast story of children's unacknowledged labor in the creation of urban America". slide shows how their labor was hidden behind play. Although they couldnt work in factories,can you call it "play" if it involved *building* the playground?

Although Light's upcoming book focuses on America, she said there were civic simulations like this in many countries including the Phillipines, China, England, France...

Model republics were not however a well connected, branded international civic movement like modern #civictech. Light said that while they were promoted at national educational conferences on education or public housing, George lamented not having control of the brand/vision

The result of George's lack of guidelines and a organizational network of model republic practiciorners was many different, idiosyncratic models run by different ppl in different places. @pahlkadot George really needed a "National Advisory Council" it seems!

For example an Indiana model republic the kids put on their own circuses! George thought some model republics werent following his original values/vision but couldnt do much about it...another theme in #civictech now Fortunately @Open_Maine is allowed to be weirdos too @elburnett

Light emphasized that although the model republics were a tool to assimilate children into a set of values (presumably including colonial, racist, patriarchal, capitalist ones) they were also a site of agency where kids experimented and innovated.

For example, girls in coeducational model republics held public offices and launched voting rights campaigns before the women' suffrage movement gained the rights in the "real" world. Given the power of the republics to do real work this wasnt just a symbolic achievement.

George for his part believed that the kids should figure out model republics for themselves, even if it meant dystopian civics. One model republic kept prisoners in a literal iron cage before eventually abolishing the prison.

Light's talk held huge lessons for the #civictech movement, and the model republic movement is just one of many pieces of history that can be a "usable past" for us. every civic tech brigade should have a "historian" role!

At @Open_Maine weve always been looking back to look forward although I didnt have the "usable past" vocabulary until I saw professor Light's talk today. @ajawitz @elburnett and I have consciously explored history in promoting civic tech in Maine.Other brigades are doing this too

For example, early @Open_Maine (code for maine) posters consciously referenced civilian conservation corps aesthetic #usablepast

We also made a 100y link w/ charitable mechanics movement @MaineMechanics makerspace never happened but @semateos became president and aligned org. with modern #makermovement. we host civichackathons there. #mainekidscode class is in same room that held free drawingclass 100y ago

So you can see why Light's talk has my brain totally buzzing. After all, @Open_Maine has been dreaming of #civicisland, an experiential #civictech summer camp! Were currently applying to @MozOpenLeaders to develop open source experiential civictech curricula we could use for it.

Next steps here: I want to write an article about the "usable past" concept for #civictech. So if your brigade is engaged with history I wanna talk to you. @JBStephens1 was it you talking about the rotary club model on slack? @CodeForPhilly didnt you make a history timeline?"
nickkaufmann  urbanism  urban  cities  jenniferlight  children  lcproject  openstudioproject  sfsh  tcsnmy  civics  civictech  technology  history  codeforamerica  smartcities  boston  cleveland  philadelphia  williamgeorge  modelrepublics  simulations  simulation  gregorybateson  play  seriousplay  seriousness  education  johndewey  milaukee  labor  work  colinward  thechildinthecity  housing  governance  policy  activism  participatory  participation  experimentation  experience  experientiallearning  volunteerism  makerspaces  openmaine  maine  learning  howwelearn  ervinggoffman 
december 2018 by robertogreco
26 | Black Mountain College — Do Not Touch
"We're going back to school and learning about an arts college in the mountains of Asheville, North Carolina. For 24 years the college attracted famous teachers and produced students who would go on to achieve their own fame. I have two guests speaking to me about Black Mountain - Kate Averett from the Black Mountain College Museum + Arts Center and Professor Eva Diaz from Pratt Institute."
bmc  2018  blackmountaincollege  bauhaus  annialbers  johndewey  art  arts  education  highered  highereducation  alternative  experimental  unschooling  deschooling  democracy  horizontality  evadiaz  kateaverett  history  arthistory  pedagogy  lcproject  openstudioproject  form  exploration  liberalarts  roberrauschenberg  willemdekooning  abstractexpressionism  howwework  discipline  self  identity  johncage  mercecunningham  self-directedlearning  self-directed  learning  howwelearn  howweteach  teaching  vision  cognition  expressionism  expression  music  dance  buckminsterfuller  technique  chance  happenings  anarchism  ego  spontaneity  unknown  improvisation  radicalism  transilience  northcarolina  transience  hippies  communes  integration  jacoblawrence  almastonewilliams  outsiders  refugees  inclusion  inclusivity  openness  gender  rayjohnson  elainedekooining  karenkarnes  dorothearockburn  hazellarsenarcher  blackmountaincollegemuseum  susanweil  maryparkswashington  josefalbers  charlesolson  poetry  johnandrewrice 
october 2018 by robertogreco
Black Mountain College: "The Grass-Roots of Democracy" - Open Source with Christopher Lydon
"Our guest, the literary historian Louis Menand, explains that B.M.C. was a philosophical experiment intent on putting the progressive philosopher John Dewey‘s ideas to work in higher education. The college curriculum was unbelievably permissive — but it did ask that students undertake their own formation as citizens of the world by means of creative expression, and hard work, in a community of likeminded people.

The college may not have lived up to its utopian self-image — the scene was frequently riven by interpersonal conflict — but it did serve as a stage-set to some of modern culture’s most interesting personalities and partnerships."
bmc  blackmountaincollege  rutherickson  louismenand  teddreier  theodoredreier  sebastiansmee  taylordavis  williamdavis  2016  robertcreeley  jacoblawrence  josefalbers  robertrauschenberg  annialbers  davidtudor  franzkline  mercecunningham  johncage  charlesolson  buckminsterfuller  johndewey  democracy  art  music  film  poetry  cytwombly  bauhaus  experientiallearning  howwelearn  education  johnandrewrice  unschooling  deschooling  schools  schooling  learning  howelearn  howweteach  pedagogy  christopherlydon  abstractexpressionism  popart  jacksonpollock  arthistory  history  arts  purpose  lcproject  openstudioproject  leapbeforeyoulook  canon  discovery  conflict  artists  happenings  openness  rural  community  highered  highereducation  curriculum  willemdekooning  small  control  conversation  interdisciplinary  transdisciplinary  mitmedialab  medialab  chaos  utopia  dicklyons  artschools  davidbowie  experimentation  exploration  humanity  humanism  humility  politics 
october 2018 by robertogreco
School is Literally a Hellhole – Medium
"By continually privileging and training our eyes on a horizon “beyond the walls of the school” — whether that be achievement, authentic audiences, the real world, the future, even buzz or fame — have we inadvertently impoverished school of its value and meaning, turning it into a wind-swept platform where we do nothing but gaze into another world or brace ourselves for the inevitable? Here we have less and less patience for the platform itself, for learning to live with others who will be nothing more than competitors in that future marketplace."

"What would be possible if we instead were to wall ourselves up with one another, fostering community and care among this unlikely confluence of souls? Does privileging the proximate, present world render any critique of or contribution to the larger world impossible?

I don’t think so. Learning to protect, foster, and value the humans in our care will often automatically put us in direct conflict with the many forces that disrupt or diminish those values. More than reflecting the real world or the future or some outside standard or imperative, kids need to see themselves reflected and recognized in these rooms. This is true even in the most privileged of environments. Providing recognition means valuing students' perspectives and experiences, but also helping them gain critical consciousness of themselves and their world, which they often intuit.

These tasks aren’t disconnected from the outside world, but often need a smaller, more human-sized community in which to flourish. The impulse to test and measure continually intrudes upon this process. But so do other prying eyes, ones that cast our students as entrepreneurial, capitalistic, future-ready, self-motivated, passionate individuals — and that often shame those who can’t or won’t conform to this ideal.

We should ask ourselves to what extent those outside standards and ideals are antithetical to the values of education — civic discourse, collectivity, cooperation, care. I realize this post is short on specifics, but let’s be more cautious about always forcing one another out into unforgiving gaze of others, commending the merits of a world beyond this one."
arthurchiaravalli  schools  schooling  schooliness  presence  unschooling  deschooling  education  learning  highschool  competition  coexistence  community  benjamindoxtdator  engagement  blogging  teaching  howweteach  howwelearn  personalbranding  innovation  johndewey  work  labor  nietzsche  collectivism  collectivity  cooperation  care  caring  merit  entrepreneurship  passion  2018  foucault  michelfoucault 
june 2018 by robertogreco
The Misguided Drive to Measure ‘Learning Outcomes’ - The New York Times
"It seems that the pressure to assess student learning outcomes has grown most quickly at poorly funded regional universities that have absorbed a large proportion of financially disadvantaged students, where profound deficits in preparation and resources hamper achievement. Research indicates that the more selective a university, the less likely it is to embrace assessment. Learning outcomes assessment has become one way to answer the question, “If you get unprepared students in your class and they don’t do well, how does that get explained?” Mr. Eubanks at Furman University told me.

When Erik Gilbert, a professor of history at Arkansas State University, reached the end of his World Civilization course last fall, he dutifully imposed the required assessment: an extra question on the final exam that asked students to read a document about Samurai culture and answer questions using knowledge of Japanese history. Yet his course focused on “cross-cultural connections, trade, travel, empire, migration and bigger-scale questions, rather than area studies,” Mr. Gilbert told me. His students had not studied Japanese domestic history. “We do it this way because it satisfies what the assessment office wants, not because it addresses concerns that we as a department have.”

Mr. Gilbert became an outspoken assessment skeptic after years of watching the process fail to capture what happens in his classes — and seeing it miss the real reasons students struggle. “Maybe all your students have full-time jobs, but that’s something you can’t fix, even though that’s really the core problem,” he said. “Instead, you’re expected to find some small problem, like students don’t understand historical chronology, so you might add a reading to address that. You’re supposed to make something up every semester, then write up a narrative” explaining your solution to administrators.

Here is the second irony: Learning assessment has not spurred discussion of the deep structural problems that send so many students to college unprepared to succeed. Instead, it lets politicians and accreditors ignore these problems as long as bureaucratic mechanisms appear to be holding someone — usually a professor — accountable for student performance.

All professors could benefit from serious conversations about what is and is not working in their classes. But instead they end up preoccupied with feeding the bureaucratic beast. “It’s a bit like the old Soviet Union. You speak two languages,” said Frank Furedi, an emeritus professor of sociology at the University of Kent in Britain, which has a booming assessment culture. “You do a performance for the sake of the auditors, but in reality, you carry on.”

Yet bureaucratic jargon subtly shapes the expectations of students and teachers alike. On the first day of class, my colleagues and I — especially in the humanities, where professors are perpetually anxious about falling enrollment — find ourselves rattling off the skills our courses offer (“Critical thinking! Clear writing!”), hyping our products like Apple Store clerks.

I teach intellectual history. Of course that includes skills: learning to read a historical source, interpret evidence and build an argument. But cultivating historical consciousness is more than that: It means helping students immerse themselves in a body of knowledge, question assumptions about memory and orient themselves toward current events in a new way.

If we describe college courses as mainly delivery mechanisms for skills to please a future employer, if we imply that history, literature and linguistics are more or less interchangeable “content” that convey the same mental tools, we oversimplify the intellectual complexity that makes a university education worthwhile in the first place. We end up using the language of the capitalist marketplace and speak to our students as customers rather than fellow thinkers. They deserve better.

“When kids come from backgrounds where they’re the first in their families to go to college, we have to take them seriously, and not flatter them and give them third-rate ideas,” Mr. Furedi told me. “They need to be challenged and inspired by the idea of our disciplines.” Assessment culture is dumbing down universities, he said: “One of the horrible things is that many universities think that giving access to nontraditional students means turning a university into a high school. That’s not giving them access to higher education.”

Here is the third irony: The value of universities to a capitalist society depends on their ability to resist capitalism, to carve out space for intellectual endeavors that don’t have obvious metrics or market value.

Consider that holy grail of learning outcomes, critical thinking — what the philosopher John Dewey called the ability “to maintain the state of doubt and to carry on systematic and protracted inquiry.” Teaching it is not a cheap or efficient process. It does not come from trying to educate the most students at the lowest possible cost or from emphasizing short, quantifiable, standardized assignments at the expense of meandering, creative and difficult investigation.

Producing thoughtful, talented graduates is not a matter of focusing on market-ready skills. It’s about giving students an opportunity that most of them will never have again in their lives: the chance for serious exploration of complicated intellectual problems, the gift of time in an institution where curiosity and discovery are the source of meaning.

That’s how we produce the critical thinkers American employers want to hire. And there’s just no app for that."
learning  learningoutcomes  outcomes  academia  assessment  evaluation  quantification  measurement  accountability  highered  highereducation  2018  mollywhorthen  criticalthinking  johndewey  metrics  inquiry  efficiency  standardization  standardizedtesting  capitalism  content  complexity  howwelearn  howwethink  knowledge  education  lcproject  openstudioproject  unschooling  deschooling  schools  pedagogy  teaching  skepticism  bureaucracy  corporatism  corporatization  inequality 
february 2018 by robertogreco
The Perils of PBL’s Popularity | Blog | Project Based Learning | BIE
"As readers of this blog well know, Project Based Learning is a hot topic in education these days. The progressive teaching method is being touted as one of the best ways to engage 21st-century students and develop a deeper understanding of content as well as build success skills such as critical thinking/problem-solving, collaboration, communication, and self-management.

At the Buck Institute for Education, we think PBL is even more than that; it can be absolutely transformative for students who experience enough high-quality PBL in their K-12 years. They gain not only understanding and success skills but also confidence in their ability as independent learners and a greater sense of their own efficacy and power.

PBL is transformative for teachers and schools, too, as they create real-world connections to learning, change school culture, and guide students to successfully complete high-quality projects. And teachers who use PBL regularly can experience “the joy of teaching,” which they may not – make that likely will not – in a test-prep, drill-and-kill environment.

You’ll notice I use the term “high-quality” twice in the above, which points to a real concern we have at BIE. We don’t want PBL to become yesterday’s news, another education fad for which much is promised and little delivered. This is why BIE developed and promotes the Gold Standard PBL model: to help ensure PBL’s place as a permanent, regular feature of 21st century education for all students.

If it’s not done well, I see PBL facing three dangers:

1. Unprepared Teachers & Lack of Support
Teachers who are not prepared to design and implement projects effectively will see lackluster student performance and face daunting classroom management challenges. Shifting from traditional practice to PBL is not a simple matter of adding another tool to a teacher’s toolbox. PBL is not just another way to “cover standards” that’s a little more engaging for students. PBL represents a different philosophy about what and how students should learn in school, and many teachers and school leaders do not yet realize its implications. It was born in the progressive education movement associated with John Dewey, with more recent ties to constructivism and the work of Jean Piaget. Adding to this situation is the fact that most teachers teach the way they were taught, and did not experience PBL when they were students – so they don’t have a vision for what it can be.

Schools and districts need to provide teachers with opportunites for extensive and ongoing professional development, from workshops provided by experts (like BIE’s) to follow-up coaching, to work in their professional learning communities. Policies around grading, pacing guides, benchmark assessments, and more will need to be re-examined. It also means having longer class periods or blocks of time for project work, and rearranging how students are assigned to classrooms to allow for shared students for secondary-level multi-subject projects. And – I can’t stress this enough – teachers will need LOTS of time to plan projects and reflect on their practice. This means changing school schedules to create collaborative planning time, re-purposing staff meetings, perhaps providing (paid) time in the summer, and finding other creative solutions. All of this is a tall order, I realize, but these are the kinds of changes it will take for PBL to stick.

2. PBL-Lite
Many teachers and schools will create (or purchase from commercial vendors) lessons or activities that are called “project-based” and think they’re checking the box that says “we do PBL” – but find little change in student engagement or achievement, and certainly not a transformation. I’ve been seeing curriculum materials offered online and in catalogs that tout “inquiry” and “hands-on learning” that, while better than many traditional materials, are not really authentic and do not go very deep; they do not have the power of Gold Standard PBL. (For example, I've seen social studies "projects" from publishers that have kids writing pretend letters to government officials - instead of actually taking action to address a real-world issue - and math "projects" where students go through a set of worksheets to imagine themselves running a small business, instead of actually creating a business or at least an authentic proposal for one.)

With materials that are PBL-lite, we might see some gains in student engagement, and perhaps to some extent deeper learning; many of these materials are in fact better than the traditional alternatives for teaching the content. But the effects will be limited.

3. PBL Only for Special Occasions or Some Students
PBL might be relegated to special niches, instead of being used as a primary vehicle for teaching the curriculum - or being provided equitably for all students. I’ve heard about really cool projects that were done in “genius hours” or “maker spaces” or Gifted and Talented programs, or by A.P. students in May after the exams are over… but most students in the “regular program” did not experience PBL. Or schools might do powerful school-wide projects that do involve all students once a year or so, but the teaching of traditional academic subject matter remains unchanged. If this happens, the promise of PBL to build deeper understanding, build 21st century success skills, and transform the lives of all students, especially those furthest from educational opportunity, will remain unfulfilled."
projectbasedlearning  via:lukeneff  2016  johnlarmer  sfsh  progressive  education  learning  howwelearn  schools  teaching  collaboration  communication  self-management  efficacy  power  confidence  constructivism  johndewey  jeanpiaget 
february 2018 by robertogreco
The History of Ed-Tech: What Went Wrong?
"There’s a popular origin story about education technology: that, it was first developed and adopted by progressive educators, those interested in “learning by doing” and committed to schools as democratic institutions. Then, something changed in the 1980s (or so): computers became commonplace, and ed-tech became commodified – built and sold by corporations, not by professors or by universities. Thus the responsibility for acquiring classroom technology and for determining how it would be used shifted from a handful of innovative educators (often buying hardware and software with their own money) to school administration; once computers were networked, the responsibility shifted to IT. The purpose of ed-tech shifted as well – from creative computing to keyboarding, from projects to “productivity.” (And I’ll admit. I’m guilty of having repeated some form of this narrative myself.)

[tweet: "What if the decentralized, open web was a historical aberration, an accident between broadcast models, not an ideal that was won then lost?" ]

But what if, to borrow from Ian Bogost, “progressive education technology” – the work of Seymour Papert, for example – was a historical aberration, an accident between broadcast models, not an ideal that was won then lost?

There’s always a danger in nostalgia, when one invents a romanticized past – in this case, a once-upon-a-time when education technology was oriented towards justice and inquiry before it was re-oriented towards test scores and flash cards. But rather than think about “what went wrong,” it might be useful to think about what was wrong all along.

Although Papert was no doubt a pioneer, he wasn’t the first person to recognize the potential for computers in education. And he was hardly alone in the 1960s and 1970s in theorizing or developing educational technologies. There was Patrick Suppes at Stanford, for example, who developed math instruction software for IBM mainframes and who popularized what became known as “computer-assisted instruction.” (Arguably, Papert refers to Suppes’ work in Mindstorms when he refers to “the computer being used to program the child” rather than his own vision of the child programming the computer.)

Indeed, as I’ve argued repeatedly, the history of ed-tech dates at least as far back as the turn of the twentieth century and the foundation of the field of educational psychology. Much of we see in ed-tech today reflects those origins – the work of psychologist Sidney Pressey, the work of psychologist B. F. Skinner, the work of psychologist Edward Thorndike. It reflects those origins because, as historian Ellen Condliffe Lagemann has astutely observed, “One cannot understand the history of education in the United States during the twentieth century unless one realizes that Edward L. Thorndike won and John Dewey lost.”

Ed-tech has always been more Thorndike than Dewey because education has been more Thorndike than Dewey. That means more instructivism than constructionism. That means more multiple choice tests than projects. That means more surveillance than justice.
(How Thorndike's ed-tech is now being rebranded as “personalization” (and by extension, as progressive education) – now that's an interesting story..."

[via: ""Edward L. Thorndike won and John Dewey lost" is pretty much the perfect tl;dr version of the history of education."

See also: "Or David Snedden won. People forget about him." ]
audreywatters  ianbogost  johndewey  seymourpapert  edtech  computers  technology  education  ellencondliffe  edwardthorndike  bfskinner  sidneypressey  psychology  management  administration  it  patricksuppes  constructivism  constructionism  progressive  mindstorms  progressiveeducation  standardization  personalization  instructivism  testing  davidsnedden  history 
july 2017 by robertogreco
Models of growth — towards fundamental change in learning environments, by David Cavallo [.pdf]
[See also: ]

"This paper proposes that a major reason for the lack of change in education is not due to lack of ideas about learning on a micro or individual level, but rather is due to a lack of models for growth and change at a macro or systemic level. We critique existing models of growth and provide examples of broad social change in other fields. We look at their properties and use those as a guide to thinking about change in learning environments. We propose that there exists a grammar of school reform. We provide examples of attempts to facilitate fundamental change at a large scale, and attempt to synthesise their properties, leading to thinking about new models for growth."

"The challenge is to devise ways of implementing new educational practice on a large scale."

"The terms replication and scaling are themselves problematic and misleading."

"We cannot simply tell a school system that it is wrong, and then expect everything to fall into place."

"Real change is inherently a kind of learning."

"Rather than merely copying the ‘best practices’, they studied the underlying principles."

"More important than any particular set of activities, they built a process for continuous learning."

"Rather than re-assessing their own assumptions, they attempted to justify their own mindset."

"One is not encumbered by pre-existing mindsets about what one must and must not do."

"We intentionally did not tell the schools exactly how to implement the project."

"The goal is to build an understanding of the underlying design choices."

"Technologies can be generators when they are designed for appropriation and adoption."

[via: ]
davidcavallo  change  education  scale  growth  democracy  johndewey  reform  schools  learning  sfsh  systemsthinking  systemschange  systems  howwelearn  principles  2004  edtech  technology 
july 2017 by robertogreco
A Field Guide to 'jobs that don't exist yet' - Long View on Education
"Perhaps most importantly, the Future of Jobs relies on the perspective of CEOs to suggest that Capital has lacked input into the shape and direction of education. Ironically, the first person I found to make the claim about the future of jobs – Devereux C. Josephs – was both Businessman of the Year (1958) and the chair of Eisenhower’s President’s Committee on Education Beyond High School. More tellingly, in his historical context, Josephs was able to imagine a more equitable future where we shared in prosperity rather than competed against the world’s underprivileged on a ‘flat’ field.

The Political Shift that Happened

While the claim is often presented as a new and alarming fact or prediction about the future, Devereux C. Josephs said much the same in 1957 during a Conference on the American High School at the University of Chicago on October 28, less than a month after the Soviets launched Sputnik. If Friedman and his ‘flat’ earth followers were writing then, they would have been up in arms about the technological superiority of the Soviets, just like they now raise the alarm about the rise of India and China. Josephs was a past president of the Carnegie Corporation, and at the time served as Chairman of the Board of the New York Life Insurance Company.

While critics of the American education system erupted after the launch of Sputnik with calls to go back to basics, much as they would again decades later with A Nation at Risk (1983), Josephs was instead a “besieged defender” of education according to Okhee Lee and Michael Salwen. Here’s how Joseph’s talked about the future of work:
“We are too much inclined to think of careers and opportunities as if the oncoming generations were growing up to fill the jobs that are now held by their seniors. This is not true. Our young people will fill many jobs that do not now exist. They will invent products that will need new skills. Old-fashioned mercantilism and the nineteenth-century theory in which one man’s gain was another man’s loss, are being replaced by a dynamism in which the new ideas of a lot of people become the gains for many, many more.”4

Josephs’ claim brims with optimism about a new future, striking a tone which contrasts sharply with the Shift Happens video and its competitive fear of The Other and decline of Empire. We must recognize this shift that happens between then and now as an erasure of politics – a deletion of the opportunity to make a choice about how the abundant wealth created by automation – and perhaps more often by offshoring to cheap labor – would be shared.

The agentless construction in the Shift Happens version – “technologies that haven’t been invented yet” – contrasts with Josephs’ vision where today’s youth invent those technologies. More importantly, Josephs imagines a more equitable socio-technical future, marked not by competition, but where gains are shared. It should go without saying that this has not come to pass. As productivity shot up since the 1950’s, worker compensation has stagnated since around 1973.

In other words, the problem is not that Capital lacks a say in education, but that corporations and the 0.1% are reaping all the rewards and need to explain why. Too often, this explanation comes in the form of the zombie idea of a ‘skills gap’, which persists though it keeps being debunked. What else are CEOs going to say – and the skills gap is almost always based on an opinion survey  – when they are asked to explain stagnating wages?5

Josephs’ essay echoes John Maynard Keynes’ (1930) in his hope that the “average family” by 1977 “may take some of the [economic] gain in the form of leisure”; the dynamism of new ideas should have created gains for ‘many, many more’ people. Instead, the compensation for CEOs soared as the profit was privatized even though most of the risk for innovation was socialized by US government investment through programs such as DARPA.6"

"Audrey Watters has written about how futurists and gurus have figured out that “The best way to invent the future is to issue a press release.” Proponents of the ‘skills agenda’ like the OECD have essentially figured out how to make “the political more pedagogical”, to borrow a phrase from Henry Giroux. In their book, Most Likely to Succeed, Tony Wagner and billionaire Ted Dintersmith warn us that “if you can’t invent (and reinvent) your own job and distinctive competencies, you risk chronic underemployment.” Their movie, of the same title, repeats the hollow claim about ‘jobs that haven’t been invented yet’. Ironically, though Wagner tells us that “knowledge today is a free commodity”, you can only see the film in private screenings.

I don’t want to idealize Josephs, but revisiting his context helps us understand something about the debate about education and the future, not because he was a radical in his times, but because our times are radical.

In an interview at CUNY (2015), Gillian Tett asks Jeffrey Sachs and Paul Krugman what policy initiatives they would propose to deal with globalization, technology, and inequality.9 After Sachs and Krugman propose regulating finance, expanding aid to disadvantaged children, creating a robust social safety net, reforming the tax system to eliminate privilege for the 0.1%, redistributing profits, raising wages, and strengthening the position of labor, Tett recounts a story:
“Back in January I actually moderated quite a similar event in Davos with a group of CEOs and general luminaries very much not just the 1% but probably the 0.1% and I asked them the same question. And what they came back with was education, education, and a bit of digital inclusion.”

Krugman, slightly lost for words, replies: “Arguing that education is the thing is … Gosh… That’s so 1990s… even then it wasn’t really true.”

For CEOs and futurists who say that disruption is the answer to practically everything, arguing that the answer lies in education and skills is actually the least disruptive response to the problems we face. Krugman argues that education emerges as the popular answer because “It’s not intrusive. It doesn’t require that we have higher taxes. It doesn’t require that CEOs have to deal with unions again.” Sachs adds, “Obviously, it’s the easy answer for that group [the 0.1%].”

The kind of complex thinking we deserve about education won’t come in factoids or bullet-point lists of skills of the future. In fact, that kind of complex thinking is already out there, waiting."

"Stay tuned for the tangled history of the claim if you're into that sort of thing..."
benjamindoxtdator  2017  inequality  education  credentialing  productivity  economics  society  statistics  audreywatters  billclinton  democrats  neoliberalism  latecapitalism  capitalism  johndewey  andreasschleicher  kerifacer  lindadarling-hammond  worldeconomicforum  oecd  labor  work  futurism  future  scottmcleod  karlfisch  richardriley  ianjukes  freetrade  competition  andrewold  michaelberman  thomasfriedman  devereuxjosephs  anationatrisk  sputnik  coldwar  okheelee  michaelsalwen  ussr  sovietunion  fear  india  china  russia  johnmaynardkeynes  leisure  robots  robotics  rodneybrooks  doughenwood  jobs  cwrightmills  henrygiroux  paulkrugman  gilliantett  jeffreysachs  policy  politics  globalization  technology  schools  curriculum  teddintersmith  tonywagner  mostlikelytosuccess  success  pedagogy  cathydavidson  jimcarroll  edtech 
july 2017 by robertogreco

« earlier    

related tags

1859  1893  1933  1950  1960s  1964  1968  1970s  2003  2004  2006  2010  2011  2012  2013  2014  2015  2016  2017  2018  abstractexpressionism  abstraction  academia  accessibility  accountability  acquisitiveness  activism  adjustment  administration  adolescence  aesthetics  agesegregation  alankaprow  alexandralange  alfredojaar  alicedewey  alienation  alissawalker  allover  almastonewilliams  alternative  alternativeartcollege  alternativeeducation  altgdp  altschool  alvintoffler  amartyasen  amateurism  amateurs  america  americandream  americanmyths  anarchism  anationatrisk  andreasschleicher  andreessenhorowitz  andrewhartman  andrewold  anisshivani  annialbers  anthonyfyson  ap  apprenticeships  appropriation  arashdaneshzadeh  architecture  arneduncan  art  artandthemind  arteducation  arthistory  arthurchiaravalli  arthurpenn  artistry  artists  arts  artschool  artschoolconfidential  artschools  artworld  assessment  assimilation  assistivetechnology  atribecalledquest  audience  audrelorde  audreywatters  authenticity  author  authoritarianism  authority  autodidacts  autonomy  avantgarde  aynrand  backtobasics  barackobama  barrier  bauhaus  behavior  behavioraleconomics  bellhooks  belonging  benedictoption  benjamindoxtdator  benrubin  benshahn  beyondtheclassroom  bfa  bfamfaphd  bfskinner  bhqfu  bias  bibliographies  bibliography  billclinton  billgates  biography  blackmountaincollege  blackmountaincollegemuseum  bldgblog  blogging  bmc  body  booklists  books  boston  boyceupholt  briangreenberg  brucemau  buckminsterfuller  buddhism  bureaucracy  californianideology  calvinism  cambrianmoment  canon  canons  capitalism  care  careers  caring  carljung  carloricci  carlwilson  carnegiemellon  cathydavidson  chance  change  chaos  charlesolson  charlesweingartner  cheating  chetbowers  chicago  children  china  choreography  chrisargyris  chrislehmann  christianmackauer  christopherbedford  christopheremdin  christopherlydon  chrisweller  cicero  cities  citizenship  cityasclassroom  civiceducation  civics  civictech  civilization  clairebishop  clairepentecost  class  classideas  classsize  cleveland  clivethomson  cloud  codeforamerica  coding  coercion  coexistence  cognition  coldwar  colinward  collaboration  collectivism  collectivity  collegeprep  colleges  colombia  colonialism  color  commas  comments  commission  committeeoften  commoncore  commons  communes  communication  community  communitybuilding  competition  complexity  comprehension  compulsory  compulsoryschooling  computers  confidence  conflict  connoisseurship  consciousness  constancesteinkuehler  constructionism  constructivism  consumerism  contemporary  content  context  control  controversy  conversation  conviviality  cooperation  coritakent  corporateculture  corporatism  corporatization  cosmopolitanism  courage  craft  creativegeneralists  creativity  credentialing  credentialism  criticalcare  criticality  criticaltheory  criticalthinking  criticism  critique  culturalimperialism  culture  culturewars  curriculum  curriculumisdead  cv  cwrightmills  cytwombly  cytwompbly  dabbling  dadaism  dance  danclowes  danielboone  danielsinker  danieltanner  danielwillingham  danmeyer  data  davidboud  davidbowie  davidcavallo  davidgetsy  davidkirp  davidkolb  davidlabaree  davidrobbins  davidsnedden  davidtheogoldberg  davidtudor  davidtyack  debate  deborahmeier  deborhmeier  decontextualization  degrees  democracy  democraticeducation  democraticschools  democrats  departments  deschooling  design  desmos  development  devereuxjosephs  dewey  dianarhoten  dianelevin  dianeravitch  dicklyons  differentiation  digital  digitalstorytelling  dinka  disabilities  disability  disagreement  discipline  disconnect  discourse  discovery  disenfranchisement  disparity  diversity  diy  dml  dml2012  doctorseuss  documenta  dominance  donaldschön  dorothearockburn  dorothearockburne  doubleloopinglearning  doughenwood  dougnoon  drip  dumbquotes  earlyliteracy  ecology  economics  edg  edhirsch  edreform  edtech  education  edwardsaid  edwardthorndike  efficacy  efficiency  egalitarianism  ego  elainedekooining  elainedekooning  eliascanetti  elitism  ellaflagyoung  ellencondliffe  ellenlagemann  ellioteisner  ellwoodcubberley  email  embodiedlearning  empathy  engagement  engineering  entanglement  entrepreneurship  environment  equality  equity  erasure  ericheiman  ernestoschiefelbein  ervinggoffman  escuelanueva  esthergerz  ethics  europe  evadiaz  evahesse  evaluation  everyday  everydaylife  evetuck  example  expectations  experience  experientiallearning  experimental  experimentation  exploration  expression  expressionism  factoryschools  facts  failure  fallacies  fallacy  familiarity  fanfiction  fear  fiction  fielddaylab  film  finland  flexibility  flow  flux  fluxus  folklore  forcedfamiliarity  form  formality  foucault  frame  francineduplessixgray  francisparker  frantzfanon  franzkline  free  freedom  freeinternationaluniversity  freeschools  freetrade  freewill  fritzhaeg  frivolity  funding  future  futurism  galleries  gamechanging  games  gaming  garden  gardnercampbell  garnercampbell  gellius  gender  generalists  geoffmanaugh  germany  gertbiesta  gilliantett  globalization  glvo  google  governance  government  grahamgibbs  graphicdesign  gregorybateson  gregorypappas  growth  guershonharel  gules  gutai  hannaharendt  hannahgerber  hansweil  happenings  harlondalton  harrypotter  hazellarsenarcher  heinrichblücher  helsinki  henrybarnard  henrygiroux  herbertkohl  hierarchy  highered  highereducation  highschool  hiphop  hiphoped  hippies  history  holistic  holisticapproach  homeschool  hope  hopefulness  horacemann  horizontality  housing  howardgardner  howelearn  howwelearn  howweread  howweteach  howwethink  howwework  howwewrite  humanism  humanistmanifesto  humanities  humanity  humanness  humanpotential  humility  humor  hybridity  ianbogost  ianjukes  ic-98  identity  identitypolitics  ideology  immersion  immigrant  immigration  implementation  improvisation  inclusion  inclusivity  independence  independent  india  individual  individualism  individuals  indoctrination  industrial  inequality  inequity  informal  informality  information  innovation  inquiry  institutionalization  institutions  instruction  instructivism  instrumentality  integatededucation  integratedcurriculum  integratedstudies  integration  interdependence  interdisciplinary  interest-basedlearning  interest-drivenlearning  interest  interests  internet  interviews  invention  invisiblecollege  irasocol  irrelevance  isitdiferentthistime  isolation  iste2012  it  ivanillich  jacksonpollock  jacobklein  jacoblawrence  jacquelynnbaas  jacquesrancière  jalfredprufrock  jamesbeane  jamesconant  jameselkins  janetmiller  janetsobel  jansteward  japan  jaquestati  jarrettfuller  jasonbrenner  jaymathews  jeanlave  jeanpiaget  jeffreysachs  jendelosreyes  jenniferlight  jeromebruner  jerrymintz  jimcarroll  joboaler  jobs  jochengerz  johannesitten  john_dewey  johnandrewrice  johnbaldessari  johncage  johnchamberlain  johnholt  johnlarmer  johnmaynardkeynes  johnrendon  johnseelybrown  johntaylorgatto  jonathankozol  jonathanwilliams  jonothankozol  josefalbers  josephbeuys  josephstiglitz  josieholford  journalism  justice  justinreich  karenkarnes  karlfisch  kateaverett  kellierolstad  kenlum  kennethnoland  kenrobinson  kerifacer  kerryjamesmarshall  kertlewin  khanacademy  khanlabschool  khanlabschools  kinect  knowledge  knowledgeecologies  kurtwolff  labor  labschools  laguage  landscape  language  larrycuban  larryshiner  latecapitalism  lcproject  leadership  leapbeforeyoulook  learning  learningbydoing  learningcommunities  learningecologies  learningmeshes  learningnetworks  learningoutcomes  legacy  legenda  leighblackall  leisure  leonbostein  leostrauss  libbynelson  liberalarts  liberals  liberation  libertarians  life  lindadarling-hammond  line  lisawainwright  listening  literacy  literature  local  louharrison  louismenand  love  lászlómoholy-nagy  maine  makerspaces  making  maladjustment  management  manifesta6  manualofstyle  maozedong  marcelduchamp  marginalization  mariamontessori  marinaabramoviç  markdion  markets  markhansen  markrothko  markzuckerberg  martinduberman  maryannestaniszewski  maryannreilly  marycarolinerichards  maryjanejacob  maryparkswashington  materials  math  mathematics  matthewdavis  maxernst  maxventilla  meaning  measurement  medialab  meltingpot  melvinhaggerty  memory  mentoring  mentorship  mercecunningham  merit  meritpay  methodology  metrics  mfa  michaelapple  michaelberman  michaelbrenson  michaelknoll  michaelrock  michaelsalwen  michaelwesch  michelfoucault  michellerhee  microschools  mikahannula  mikekonczal  milaukee  mindstorms  minecraft  mistakes  mitmedialab  mobilelearning  modeling  modelrepublics  modern  mollywhorthen  monetization  money  montessori  morality  morphosis  mostlikelytosuccess  motivation  mountainschoolofarts  movement  movements  multiculti  multiculturalism  multidisciplinary  multiliteracies  museum  museums  music  myleshorton  nancycarlsson-paige  nataliailyin  nataliejeremijenko  nclb  ncm  neilpostman  neo-colonialism  neoliberalism  networkage  networkedlearning  networking  networks  neweconomy  newjersey  newlearningecologies  newyork  ngugi  ngugiwathiong’o  ngũgĩ  ngũgĩwathiong'o  nicholasbourriaud  nicholastampio  nickkaufmann  nicolatwilley  nietzsche  niklasluhmann  nilsnorman  noamchomsky  normalization  northcarolina  nuance  nyc  observation  oecd  okheelee  olderself  olincollege  oliversacks  olpc  omission  openmaine  openness  openschools  openstudioproject  opinion  oppression  options  order  organization  organizations  originality  outcomes  outsiderart  outsiders  oxford  oxfordcomma  pablohelguera  painting  paradigmshifts  parentheses  parenting  participation  participatory  participatoryart  pasisahlberg  passion  past  patfarenga  paticipation  patriciajohanson  patricksuppes  pattern  paulford  paulgoodman  paulkrugman  paulofreire  paulofriere  pbl  pedagogy  peggyguggenheim  people  perception  performance  performanceart  personalbranding  personalization  perspective  petergray  peterthiel  phenomenology  philadelphia  philosopher  philosophy  piaget  pielab  place  play  poetry  policy  politics  popart  poverty  power  practice  pragmatism  prediction  presence  present  principles  privateschools  privatization  problemsolving  process  productivity  professionalization  progress  progressive  progressiveeducation  progressiveschools  progressivism  projectbasedlearning  psychogeography  psychology  ptsd  public  publicaction  publicgood  publicopinon  publicschools  pumagallery  punctuation  purpose  qualification  quantification  quotationmarks  quotes  quotidian  race  racism  radicalism  radicals  randallszott  rayjohnson  readiness  reading  readinglists  reality  realworld  reflection  reflectivepractice  reform  refugees  relevance  religion  rematriation  remkoolhaas  renaming  renewal  repatriation  reproduction  research  researchmethods  resistance  respect  revolution  rhicrdshusterman  richardriley  rights  rigo23  rigor  riotgirl  rirkrittiravanija  ritual  roberrauschenberg  robertcreeley  robertduncan  robertgreenway  robertirwin  robertmaynardhutchins  robertmotherwell  robertrauschenberg  robertsmithson  robotics  robots  roddreher  rodneybrooks  ronmiller  ronscapp  rote  rotelearning  rousseau  rttt  rudolfsteiner  rudyardkipling  rural  russia  ruthasawa  rutherickson  salkhan  sallyraspberry  salmankhan  salrandolph  sarahendren  saturepo  saulbellow  scalability  scale  scaling  school2.0  schooliness  schooling  schoolreform  schools  schooltoprisonpipeline  schoolwithoutwalls  science  scottmcleod  scratchingthesurface  search  sebastiansmee  self-assessment  self-determination  self-directed  self-directedlearning  self-education  self-interest  self-management  self-reliance  self  sense  serialcomma  seriousness  seriousplay  service  servicelearning  seymourpapert  sfmoma  sfsh  sharing  shimonattie  shojihamada  shrequest1  sidneyjanis  sidneypressey  siliconvalley  simulation  simulations  sistercorita  situatedlearning  situation  situationist  skepticism  skills  small  smartcities  social  socialarchitectures  socialcapital  socialdemocracy  socialism  socialjustice  sociallyendgagedart  socialmedia  socialnetworking  socialnetworks  socialpractice  socialpracticeart  socialprogress  socialrevolution  society  sociology  sollewitt  solsobel  soma  somatics  soul  sovietunion  specialization  spontaneity  sputnik  srg  standardization  standardizedtesting  standards  statistics  stem  stevenhenrymadoff  storify  stringfellowbarr  structure  student-centered  studentdirected  studentvoice  style  styleguides  subjects  success  sugatamitra  surveillance  susanweil  sustainability  suzigablik  sxswedu2017  sylviawynter  systems  systemschange  systemsthinking  tapestry  taylordavis  tcsnmy  teachforamerica  teaching  teachingasaconservingactivity  teachingasasubversiveactivity  teachingwriting  technique  technology  technosolutionism  teddintersmith  teddreier  tedsizer  teens  terryeagleton  testing  tfa  thechildinthecity  theodoredreier  theory  theshoppingmallhighschool  thichnhathahn  thinking  thomasfriedman  thomashopkins  thomassteele-maley  tiborkalman  timcarmody  time  timel-hady  timmaly  tinderboxed  tinosehgal  tomhoffman  tomlittle  tonywagner  toolsforconviviality  toshare  tradeschool  traditional  traditionalism  traditionalschools  traditions  training  transatlanticcable  transcontextualism  transdisciplinary  transience  transilience  translation  trauma  trayvonmartin  trungle  truth  tryggvithayer  tseliot  understanding  unions  universities  unknown  unlearning  unreality  unschooling  unstructured  urban  urbanism  us  ussr  utemetabauer  utopia  utopianthinking  values  vaughnjfeatherstone  vickycolbert  victormaldonado  video  videogames  violence  vision  visualempathy  vitoperrone  vocational  voice  voltaire  volunteerism  vouchers  vygostgy  vygotsky  washingtonstate  wavesofthesame  we'vebeenherebefore  webdubois  wendyjacob  wernerjaeger  whatsoldisnew  whatsoldisnewagain  whitesupremacy  wholechild  wikipedia  wilhelmvonhumboldt  willemdekooning  williamdavis  williamgeorge  williamheardkilpatrick  williamjames  williamschubert  willrichardson  wisdom  wittgenstein  woodrowwilson  work  workingwithinthesystem  worldeconomicforum  wow  writing  yoga  youngerself  youth  youthculture  youtube  zpd  étiennewenger 

Copy this bookmark: