intervention   2279

« earlier    

Real Solutions for Fake News? Measuring the Effectiveness of General Warnings and Fact-Check Tags in Reducing Belief in False Stories on Social Media | SpringerLink
Social media has increasingly enabled “fake news” to circulate widely, most notably during the 2016 U.S. presidential campaign. These intentionally false or misleading stories threaten the democratic goal of a well-informed electorate. This study evaluates the effectiveness of strategies that could be used by Facebook and other social media to counter false stories. Results from a pre-registered experiment indicate that false headlines are perceived as less accurate when people receive a general warning about misleading information on social media or when specific headlines are accompanied by a “Disputed” or “Rated false” tag. Though the magnitudes of these effects are relatively modest, they generally do not vary by whether headlines were congenial to respondents’ political views. In addition, we find that adding a “Rated false” tag to an article headline lowers its perceived accuracy more than adding a “Disputed” tag (Facebook’s original approach) relative to a control condition. Finally, though exposure to the “Disputed” or “Rated false” tags did not affect the perceived accuracy of unlabeled false or true headlines, exposure to a general warning decreased belief in the accuracy of true headlines, suggesting the need for further research into how to most effectively counter false news without distorting belief in true information.

--That Nyhan could get his seminar class to write a paper is applause worthy!
brendan.nyhan  misinformation  disinformation  intervention  political_psychology  networked_public_sphere  journalism 
yesterday by rvenkat
Uninformed - Hardcover - Arthur Lupia - Oxford University Press
Research polls, media interviews, and everyday conversations reveal an unsettling truth: citizens, while well-meaning and even passionate about current affairs, appear to know very little about politics. Hundreds of surveys document vast numbers of citizens answering even basic questions about government incorrectly. Given this unfortunate state of affairs, it is not surprising that more knowledgeable people often deride the public for its ignorance. Some experts even think that less informed citizens should stay out of politics altogether.

As Arthur Lupia shows in Uninformed, this is not constructive. At root, critics of public ignorance fundamentally misunderstand the problem. Many experts believe that simply providing people with more facts will make them more competent voters. However, these experts fail to understand how most people learn, and hence don't really know what types of information are even relevant to voters. Feeding them information they don't find relevant does not address the problem. In other words, before educating the public, we need to educate the educators.

Lupia offers not just a critique, though; he also has solutions. Drawing from a variety of areas of research on topics like attention span and political psychology, he shows how we can actually increase issue competence among voters in areas ranging from gun regulation to climate change. To attack the problem, he develops an arsenal of techniques to effectively convey to people information they actually care about.

Citizens sometimes lack the knowledge that they need to make competent political choices, and it is undeniable that greater knowledge can improve decision making. But we need to understand that voters either don't care about or pay attention to much of the information that experts think is important. Uninformed provides the keys to improving political knowledge and civic competence: understanding what information is important to and knowing how to best convey it to them.

-- based on the description, the overly optimistic conclusion that one could engineer interventions to improve *decision making* is a bit too much for me. *Some* political scientists seem to consider the author's work important. Also, his enthusiasm for open science based research is much appreciated. But I am literally judging his book by the cover!
book  political_science  political_psychology  collective_action  intervention  public_sphere  democracy 
2 days ago by rvenkat
Strict ID Laws Don't Stop Voters: Evidence from a U.S. Nationwide Panel, 2008-2016
U.S. states increasingly require identification to vote – an ostensive attempt to deter fraud that prompts complaints of selective disenfranchisement. Using a difference-in-differences design on a 1.3-billion-observations panel, we find the laws have no negative effect on registration or turnout, overall or for any group defined by race, gender, age, or party affiliation. These results hold through a large number of specifications and cannot be attributed to mobilization against the laws, measured by campaign contributions and self-reported political engagement. ID requirements have no effect on fraud either – actual or perceived. Overall, our results suggest that efforts to reform voter ID laws may not have much impact on elections.

--so the *real* problem is redistricting?
voter_supression_complex  political_economy  intervention  democracy  via:nyhan  for_friends 
4 days ago by rvenkat
Fighting misinformation on social media using crowdsourced judgments of news source quality | PNAS
Reducing the spread of misinformation, especially on social media, is a major challenge. We investigate one potential approach: having social media platform algorithms preferentially display content from news sources that users rate as trustworthy. To do so, we ask whether crowdsourced trust ratings can effectively differentiate more versus less reliable sources. We ran two preregistered experiments (n = 1,010 from Mechanical Turk and n = 970 from Lucid) where individuals rated familiarity with, and trust in, 60 news sources from three categories: (i) mainstream media outlets, (ii) hyperpartisan websites, and (iii) websites that produce blatantly false content (“fake news”). Despite substantial partisan differences, we find that laypeople across the political spectrum rated mainstream sources as far more trustworthy than either hyperpartisan or fake news sources. Although this difference was larger for Democrats than Republicans—mostly due to distrust of mainstream sources by Republicans—every mainstream source (with one exception) was rated as more trustworthy than every hyperpartisan or fake news source across both studies when equally weighting ratings of Democrats and Republicans. Furthermore, politically balanced layperson ratings were strongly correlated (r = 0.90) with ratings provided by professional fact-checkers. We also found that, particularly among liberals, individuals higher in cognitive reflection were better able to discern between low- and high-quality sources. Finally, we found that excluding ratings from participants who were not familiar with a given news source dramatically reduced the effectiveness of the crowd. Our findings indicate that having algorithms up-rank content from trusted media outlets may be a promising approach for fighting the spread of misinformation on social media.
misinformation  disinformation  fact_checking  intervention  crowd_sourcing  via:nyhan 
17 days ago by rvenkat

« earlier    

related tags

?  1960s  2  2000s  2010s  2018  2019  actif  action  activity  addiction  adrianneedwards  advertising  affleck  afghanistan  africa  africom  after  aid  alabama  america  american  americas  amnesty_international  analyse  anthrodesign  anthropology  apartness  art  artificialintelligence  artist  assemblage  bandits  bankofengland  barhamsalih  behavior  behavioral  bellingcat  ben  bias  body  book  books  brazil  brendan.nyhan  brutality  bâtiment  care  causal_inference  causality  cbt  celebration  censorship  central  central_america  china  cia  cities  civic  collective_action  colonialism  columbia  community  computaional_advertising  conference  cooking  corporations  corruption  counterculture  coup  couples  creepy  critique  crowd_sourcing  cuba  cx  data  debates  democracy  democrats  design  diabetes  diagnosis  dionysus  diplomacy  discrimination  disinformation  distressedstudents  donald_trump  dsma  dx  economic_geography  economics  education  el  elections  electons  embargo  empire  end  ethnography  exercise  existential  experimental_design  exploitation  extension  facebook  fact_checking  fallacies  fat  fear  feed  food  for_friends  foreign-policy  foreign_policy  foreignpolicy  funding  garner's  geek  gestion  glucose  google  grounding  guaidojuan  guatemala  guidance  hacking  haiti  hard  health  hegemony  helmand  hillary_clinton  history  honduras  housing  how  howto  human_rights  hysteria  immigration  immobilier  imperialism  inequality  inflation  information  infrastructure  institutionalcritique  institutions  intelligence_community  interference  intoxication  ippr  iran  iraq  is  is1_fa18  isis  it  ivresse  jamesluckett  jennifer  jm  john_bolton  john_mccain  josephbeuys  journalism  justice  k  kirtankriya  kriya  kundalini  labor  latin_america  leak  liberal  liberals  libya  life  location  loss  louisebourgeois  maduronicolas  management  manipulation  mar15  marines  markets  mc  mccainjohn  meddling  media  medication  meditation  memorial  meta-analysis  methodology  microeconomics  middle_east  miindfulness  military-industrial-complex  military  min_wage  misinformation  motion  multitude  natepyper  nato  ned  neoliberalism  networked_public_sphere  networks  ngo  nicaragua  nicolas_maduro  nidra  niger  nonprofits  norms  nourishment  nssi  nuclear_deal  oil  online_experiments  organization_of_american_states  oversight  painting  parade  pattern  pedagogy  people  performance  philosophy  photography  physique  plateforme  podemo  police  policy  political  political_economy  political_psychology  political_science  politics  poll  polygamy  pope_l  poverty  preparation  prevention  prices  privatization  problems  propaganda  property  protests  préventive  psychopharmacology  public_movement  public_opinion  public_policy  public_space  public_sphere  quds_force  questions  rape  re-enters  reading  reality  realtime  registre  rehab  republicans  research  resistance  resources  review  risk  risque  russia  russiagate  salvador  sanctions  saudi_arabia  self  selfcare  selfharm  selfinjury  shortage  shows  social  social_influence  social_media  social_networks  social_psychology  socialism  socialmedia  software  spirituality  starvation  success  suicide  surveillance  susan.dynarski  suspicion  symptoms  syria  systems  t2d  taichi  taz  teaching  technology  telesur  terrorism  the_intercept  therapeuticalliance  therapy  thoughtcrime  to  tomato  toread  toxicmasculinity  tragedy  training  treatment  troop  trump’s  truth  turkey  tx  type  uk  ukraine  united_nations  united_states  united_states_of_america  us  usa  usager  user  venezuela  video  vietnam  violence  voter_supression_complex  voting  war  wc  week_02  wellness  withdrawal  workbook  worksheets  writing  yoga  yoganidra  évaluer  évoluer 

Copy this bookmark: