greennewdeal   395

« earlier    

They finally got us! The is a plan to solve climate change AND reverse wealth inequality by proactive…
GreenNewDeal  from twitter_favs
5 days ago by misc
I like a candidate who has their priorities in order. 👏🏾👏🏾👏🏾

GreenNewDeal  from twitter_favs
7 days ago by jstenner
OMG I literally could not love this 2030 vision from more 😍👌⭐️✊
SO EXCITING!! Check it o…
GreenNewDeal  from twitter_favs
12 days ago by mrchrisadams
RT : Climate change is here + we’ve got a deadline: 12 years left to cut emissions in half.

A is our plan…
GreenNewDeal  from twitter_favs
16 days ago by rubywhite
The Green New Deal could boost regenerative agriculture
Last year, Patagonia, Dr. Bronner’s, and a host of other prominent environmentally conscious brands debuted the Regenerative Organic Certification, which will be bestowed on companies that advance both carbon capture farming and fair labor practices. Earlier this year, General Mills announced that it will work with farmers it sources from to convert their farms to regenerative operations.
carbon  economy  greennewdeal  foodproduction  cattle  regenerative  ranching  soil  climatechange  environment  agriculture 
18 days ago by Felicity
This is why we need a in the UK

People are getting ripped off by big private companies whose only mo…
GreenNewDeal  from twitter_favs
20 days ago by adie_codes
How the Green New Deal will transform the building industry
It’s easy to miss just how destructive and inefficient land development is, given its ubiquity. Existing buildings hoover up about 40% of energy consumed in the U.S. and emit about 29% of greenhouse gases. The Green New Deal calls for retrofitting all of them—every last skyscraper, McDonald’s, and suburban ranch home—for energy efficiency within the next 10 years. It also addresses the role of the construction industry, which accounts for about 11% of all emissions globally, by recommending investment in community-led building projects oriented around decarbonization issues like resiliency, transit, and land preservation. And crucially, it demands family-sustaining wages, the right to organize, and a “just transition” for everyone affected by the transition to this decarbonized world.

House Republicans quickly declared the resolution a “boondoggle” in an official statement. It was an ironic choice of words. Whether the GOP realized it or not, that term emerged in the 1930s, when critics of the New Deal used it to characterize the project of putting broke Americans to work on hundreds of thousands of projects. It’s true that the Green New Deal’s goals—to reshape the country’s homes, workplaces, and economy, and provide equity for all—sound radical in a country ravaged by the housing crisis, worker exploitation, and stagnating wages, but from a technical, structural, and architectural standpoint, they’re entirely feasible. Despite what politicians would have you believe, we’ve done it before, and we have the tools to do it again.

And if we choose to do nothing, reasoning, as some have, that the Green New Deal is just too big? America will be transformed anyway—but by devastating environmental disasters. Whichever path we choose, life in 2019 will probably seem like an outlandish, fading dream to Americans of the next century. What remains to be done now is decide what life will look like for them.
by:KelseyCampbellDollaghan  from:FastCompany  long-read  GreenNewDeal  ClimateChange  geo:UnitedStates  AlexandriaOcasioCortez 
22 days ago by owenblacker
Feminist cyborg scholar Donna Haraway: ‘The disorder of our era isn’t necessary’ | World news | The Guardian
"The history of philosophy is also a story about real estate.

Driving into Santa Cruz to visit Donna Haraway, I can’t help feeling that I was born too late. The metal sculpture of a donkey standing on Haraway’s front porch, the dogs that scramble to her front door barking when we ring the bell, and the big black rooster strutting in the coop out back – the entire setting evokes an era of freedom and creativity that postwar wealth made possible in northern California.

Here was a counterculture whose language and sensibility the tech industry sometimes adopts, but whose practitioners it has mostly priced out. Haraway, who came to the University of Santa Cruz in 1980 to take up the first tenured professorship in feminist theory in the US, still conveys the sense of a wide-open world.

Haraway was part of an influential cohort of feminist scholars who trained as scientists before turning to the philosophy of science in order to investigate how beliefs about gender shaped the production of knowledge about nature. Her most famous text remains The Cyborg Manifesto, published in 1985. It began with an assignment on feminist strategy for the Socialist Review after the election of Ronald Reagan and grew into an oracular meditation on how cybernetics and digitization had changed what it meant to be male or female – or, really, any kind of person. It gained such a cult following that Hari Kunzru, profiling her for Wired magazine years later, wrote: “To boho twentysomethings, her name has the kind of cachet usually reserved for techno acts or new phenethylamines.”

The cyborg vision of gender as changing and changeable was radically new. Her map of how information technology linked people around the world into new chains of affiliation, exploitation and solidarity feels prescient at a time when an Instagram influencer in Berlin can line the pockets of Silicon Valley executives by using a phone assembled in China that contains cobalt mined in Congo to access a platform moderated by Filipinas.

Haraway’s other most influential text may be an essay that appeared a few years later, on what she called “situated knowledges”. The idea, developed in conversation with feminist philosophers and activists such as Nancy Hartsock, concerns how truth is made. Concrete practices of particular people make truth, Haraway argued. The scientists in a laboratory don’t simply observe or conduct experiments on a cell, for instance, but co-create what a cell is by seeing, measuring, naming and manipulating it. Ideas like these have a long history in American pragmatism. But they became politically explosive during the so-called science wars of the 1990s – a series of public debates among “scientific realists” and “postmodernists” with echoes in controversies about bias and objectivity in academia today.

Haraway’s more recent work has turned to human-animal relations and the climate crisis. She is a capacious yes, and thinker, the kind of leftist feminist who believes that the best thinking is done collectively. She is constantly citing other people, including graduate students, and giving credit to them. A recent documentary about her life and work by the Italian film-maker Fabrizio Terranova, Storytelling for Earthly Survival, captures this sense of commitment, as well as her extraordinary intellectual agility and inventiveness.

At her home in Santa Cruz, we talked about her memories of the science wars and how they speak to our current “post-truth” moment, her views on contemporary climate activism and the Green New Deal, and why play is essential for politics.

We are often told we are living in a time of “post-truth”. Some critics have blamed philosophers like yourself for creating the environment of “relativism” in which “post-truth” flourishes. How do you respond to that?

Our view was never that truth is just a question of which perspective you see it from.

[The philosopher] Bruno [Latour] and I were at a conference together in Brazil once. (Which reminds me: if people want to criticize us, it ought to be for the amount of jet fuel involved in making and spreading these ideas! Not for leading the way to post-truth.)

Anyhow. We were at this conference. It was a bunch of primate field biologists, plus me and Bruno. And Stephen Glickman, a really cool biologist, took us apart privately. He said: “Now, I don’t want to embarrass you. But do you believe in reality?”

We were both kind of shocked by the question. First, we were shocked that it was a question of belief, which is a Protestant question. A confessional question. The idea that reality is a question of belief is a barely secularized legacy of the religious wars. In fact, reality is a matter of worlding and inhabiting. It is a matter of testing the holdingness of things. Do things hold or not?

Take evolution. The notion that you would or would not “believe” in evolution already gives away the game. If you say, “Of course I believe in evolution,” you have lost, because you have entered the semiotics of representationalism – and post-truth, frankly. You have entered an arena where these are all just matters of internal conviction and have nothing to do with the world. You have left the domain of worlding.

The science warriors who attacked us during the science wars were determined to paint us as social constructionists – that all truth is purely socially constructed. And I think we walked into that. We invited those misreadings in a range of ways. We could have been more careful about listening and engaging more slowly. It was all too easy to read us in the way the science warriors did. Then the rightwing took the science wars and ran with it, which eventually helped nourish the whole fake-news discourse.

Your PhD is in biology. How do your scientist colleagues feel about your approach to science?

To this day I know only one or two scientists who like talking this way. And there are good reasons why scientists remain very wary of this kind of language. I belong to the Defend Science movement and in most public circumstances I will speak softly about my own ontological and epistemological commitments. I will use representational language. I will defend less-than-strong objectivity because I think we have to, situationally.

Is that bad faith? Not exactly. It’s related to [what the postcolonial theorist Gayatri Chakravorty Spivak has called] “strategic essentialism”. There is a strategic use to speaking the same idiom as the people that you are sharing the room with. You craft a good-enough idiom so you can work on something together. I go with what we can make happen in the room together. And then we go further tomorrow.

In the struggles around climate change, for example, you have to join with your allies to block the cynical, well-funded, exterminationist machine that is rampant on the Earth. I think my colleagues and I are doing that. We have not shut up, or given up on the apparatus that we developed. But one can foreground and background what is most salient depending on the historical conjuncture.

What do you find most salient at the moment?

What is at the center of my attention are land and water sovereignty struggles, such as those over the Dakota Access pipeline, over coal mining on the Black Mesa plateau, over extractionism everywhere. My attention is centered on the extermination and extinction crises happening at a worldwide level, on human and non-human displacement and homelessness. That’s where my energies are. My feminism is in these other places and corridors.

What kind of political tactics do you see as being most important – for young climate activists, the Green New Deal, etc?

The degree to which people in these occupations play is a crucial part of how they generate a new political imagination, which in turn points to the kind of work that needs to be done. They open up the imagination of something that is not what [the ethnographer] Deborah Bird Rose calls “double death” – extermination, extraction, genocide.

Now, we are facing a world with all three of those things. We are facing the production of systemic homelessness. The way that flowers aren’t blooming at the right time, and so insects can’t feed their babies and can’t travel because the timing is all screwed up, is a kind of forced homelessness. It’s a kind of forced migration, in time and space.

This is also happening in the human world in spades. In regions like the Middle East and Central America, we are seeing forced displacement, some of which is climate migration. The drought in the Northern Triangle countries of Central America [Honduras, Guatemala and El Salvador] is driving people off their land.

So it’s not a humanist question. It’s a multi-kind and multi-species question.

What’s so important about play?

Play captures a lot of what goes on in the world. There is a kind of raw opportunism in biology and chemistry, where things work stochastically to form emergent systematicities. It’s not a matter of direct functionality. We need to develop practices for thinking about those forms of activity that are not caught by functionality, those which propose the possible-but-not-yet, or that which is not-yet but still open.

It seems to me that our politics these days require us to give each other the heart to do just that. To figure out how, with each other, we can open up possibilities for what can still be. And we can’t do that in a negative mood. We can’t do that if we do nothing but critique. We need critique; we absolutely need it. But it’s not going to open up the sense of what might yet be. It’s not going to open up the sense of that which is not yet possible but profoundly needed.

The established disorder of our present era is not necessary. It exists. But it’s not necessary."
donnaharaway  2019  anthropocene  climatechange  science  scientism  disorder  greennewdeal  politics  interdependence  families  critique  humanism  multispecies  morethanhuman  displacement  globalwarming  extermination  extinction  extraction  capitalism  genocide  deborahbirdrose  doubledeath  feminism  postmodernism  harikunzru  cyborgmanifesto  philosophy  philosophyofscience  santacruz  technology  affiliation  exploitation  solidarity  situatedknowledge  nancyhartstock  objectivity  human-animalrelations  human-animalrelationships 
24 days ago by robertogreco
“Check out my website for policy positions like , and a national single payer healt…
GreenNewDeal  StudentDebtRelief  from twitter_favs
25 days ago by coslinks
My biggest beef with Bernie is that he wants to actually implement the .

Strategically it makes more…
GreenNewDeal  from twitter_favs
26 days ago by jstenner
The problem with billionaires fighting climate change is the billionaires
For every Michael Bloomberg there are dozens of Koch brothers and Rebekah Mercers, who have poured tens of millions of dollars into spreading climate denial and blocking decarbonization efforts at the local, state and national level. None of them should have as much money as they do.

The climate crisis isn’t going to be solved with the benevolence of a couple of billionaires, and their outsized control over our politics and economy stands in contradiction to our hopes for a livable future. With rightwing populism on the rise around the world, having elites like Bloomberg as the public face of the climate fight is also risky politics. We don’t need their money to fund the Green New Deal – the US has more than enough for that – but we should take it anyway, with a far more progressive tax system than the one we’ve got.
by:KateAronoff  from:CommentIsFree  inequality  capitalism  tax  ClimateChange  GreenNewDeal  geo:UnitedStates  politics  RonaldReagan 
4 weeks ago by owenblacker
Resolutions in support of and both just passed at the . Glad to be part of…
GreenNewDeal  MedicareForAll  from twitter_favs
5 weeks ago by andriak

« earlier    

related tags

1988  2019  201906  aaronbastani  abolishice  action  affiliation  agenda21  agricultura/industrial  agriculture  alexandriaocasio-cortez  alexandriaocasiocortez  americorps  ancestry  annpettifor  anthropocene  aoc  apathy  appalachia  art  artists  autonomy  avilewis  awesome  basavsen  bbc  bernie2020  breakupbigtech  business  by:josephstiglitz  by:katearonoff  by:kelseycampbelldollaghan  capitalism  carbon  care  caring  cattle  centrism  change  childcare  china  chomsky  climate  climatechange  climatecrisis  climateemergency  climatejustice  climatestrike  collapse  collectivism  colonialism  comedy  communitydevelopment  consumerism  consumption  cooperation  cooperationjackson  corruption  costarica  crisis  critique  currentaffairs  cyborgmanifesto  davidattenborough  dc:creator=lucascaroline  dc:creator=milibanded  dc:creator=sandyslaura  dctagged  deborahbirdrose  debt  democrats  despair  diannefeinstein  diem25  disorder  displacement  domesticwork  donaldtrump  donnaharaway  doom  doubledeath  ecologia  economics  economy  edmarkey  education  elections  elitism  emergency  emissions  endtheelectoralcollege  energy  environment  environmentalism  ericholt-giménez  exploitation  extermination  extinction  extinctionrebellion  extraction  fact_check  families  farming  fdr  feminism  financialcrisis  food  foodproduction  forests  fossilfuels  from:commentisfree  from:fastcompany  future  garalperovitz  gdp  genocide  geo:unitedstates  georgemonbiot  global_warming  globalization  globalwarming  gnd  goaoc  grade_a  grade_aa  great  greatdepression  greatrecession  green  greenjobs  greenparty  gretathunberg  growth  harikunzru  health  healthcare  history  human-animalrelations  human-animalrelationships  humanism  humanity  humanwelfare  ideology  illustration  imagination  impeachtrump  imperialism  inaction  indigeneity  indigenous  industrialpolicy  inequality  inertia  influence  infrastructure  inheritance  innovation  interdependence  isthiswatergettingwarmeraskedthefrog  jeremybrecher  johannabozywa  journalism  kaliakuno  katearonoff  labor  left  legacy  libertarianism  livingwages  local  long-read  louisiana  mainstreammedia  masstransit  media  medicare4all  medicareforall  mitigation  mollycrabapple  money  moonshots  morethanhuman  multispecies  nancyhartstock  nancypelosi  naomiklein  narrative  nationalism  needs  newdeal  nihilism  nomorewars  nowarwithiran  objectivity  oil/gas  oil  ojlj  opposition  oppositionism  optimism  organic/agriculture  paulmason  pesticides  petroleum  philosophy  philosophyofscience  podcast  policy  politics  postmodernism  power  production  progressive  protest  publictransit  puertorico  ranching  redevelopment  regenerative  republicans  right  ronaldreagan  santacruz  science  scientism  self-sufficiency  sheep  sittingbullplan  situatedknowledge  skepticism  socialdemocracy  socialism  society  soil  solidarity  southafrica  sovietunion  speculativefiction  statusquo  studentdebtrelief  sustainability  swpa  systemschange  tax  taxation  taxes  teaching  technology  theadvocate  thinktanks  trains  transportation  uk  unions  universalrights  us  usa  wants  waste  westmoreland  winonaladuke  work  worldbank  wpa  zero-carbon 

Copy this bookmark: