governance   7022

« earlier    

Why law firms can’t compete | Canadian Lawyer Mag
While fixing law firm capital structures is entirely within a firm’s control, extending ownership to non-legal talent is not. The list of potential key players is long: business and HR executives, technology professionals, project managers, accountants, business process specialists, design-thinkers and administrative professionals, to name a few. Our competitors are winning the battle for this talent because they can attract, retain and align key talent (irrespective of specialty or background) around a common goal through ownership in the enterprise. Unfortunately, law firms do not currently have this option. Even if we can set aside our egos and admit that non-lawyers play a meaningful role in firm success, we are prevented by regulation from opening our capital structures to attract and retain this talent. Without this important tool, we are giving our competition a head-start in the race towards improved access to legal services and better client service — the foundations of our professional mandate.
clementi  governance 
4 days ago by JordanFurlong
Moving Beyond The Hierarchy – Clay Forsberg
We assume our way of life in 2018; one of governments and states, and the endless media coverage of their every detail are the pinnacle of civilized existence. We depend on these hierarchies to delivery us from evil or whatever else ails us. via Pocket
IFTTT  Pocket  altruism  cooperation  evolution  governance  society 
7 days ago by ChristopherA
Rethinking the Peace Culture [The Pearl Magazine]
"Last September, our university made significant progress by moving from the 39th to the 22nd position in the US News Ranking of the Best Liberal Art Colleges in the country. Soka also lands at #1 in Study Abroad and #2 in Faculty Resources. However, statistics alone cannot tell the whole story. When evaluating a college, we should also take into consideration the extent to which it achieves its mission statement. Does a national ranking mean that the university succeeds in achieving its goal to “foster a steady stream of global citizens who committed to living a contributive life”?

The core value of Soka—pursuing a peaceful culture—somehow contributes to a lack of engagement in the community. This issue was reflected in the First-Year Class Senate election this year. In comparison to the rising tension in the US political climate, our election could not have been more “peaceful.” Candidates weren’t required to give speeches about their plans. No campaigns or lobbies were launched. The process only required an application that was put in a booklet and sent to all the first-year students. Students were given one week for online voting—and then the new officers were announced.

The silence of the process surprised me. In my high school in Vietnam, to run for student council, we had to run campaigns and give presentations about our plans to win votes from students and teachers. Here, an election for the most critical student organization was unexpectedly quiet.

I’d argue that one of the unexpected results of the peace culture is that students become silent and passive when it becomes necessary to speak personal opinions. As we do not want to be excluded from the community or be seen as “too aggressive,” we easily come to an agreement even if it is not what we really think. The pressure to please other people and maintain a peaceful atmosphere makes us hesitant to express ourselves and fight for what we believe. We want to be “global citizens,” but we stop at the border of disagreement because we are afraid that we will cause trouble if we cross that boundary. How can multi-cultural understanding be developed without the clash of ideas and interactive debates? How can truth and progress can be achieved if everyone is not willing to speak up?

From the bottom of my heart, I do not regret choosing Soka as my college. I understand the importance of pacifism to the world. However, we cannot have a “happy peace” on campus without encouraging freedom of idea-exchanging and structural discourses. As life goes on, conflicts are unavoidable. The best way to solve them is not by ignoring them, but by seriously discussing them to find a solution that works for the community."

[Goes well with:
"The Biden Fallacy: Struggle against the powerful, not accommodation of their interests, is how America produced the conditions for its greatest social reforms." by

"There’s something odd about the self-described moderates and centrists considering a run for president. If “moderation” or “centrism” means holding broadly popular positions otherwise marginalized by extremists in either party, then these prospective candidates don’t quite fit the bill.

Senator Elizabeth Warren’s proposed wealth tax on the nation’s largest fortunes is very popular, according to recent polling by Morning Consult, with huge support from Democrats and considerable backing from Republicans. But Michael Bloomberg, the former mayor of New York who has flirted with running for president as a moderate Democrat, rejects the plan as an extreme policy that would put the United States on the path to economic ruin. “If you want to look at a system that’s noncapitalistic, just take a look at what was once, perhaps, the wealthiest country in the world, and today people are starving to death. It’s called Venezuela,” he said during a January trip to New Hampshire. He is similarly dismissive of the idea of “Medicare for all,” warning that it would “bankrupt us for a very long time.”

Likewise, Terry McAuliffe, the former governor of Virginia, has staked out ground as a moderate politician, even as he opposes similarly popular ideas. A substantial majority of the public favors proposals to greatly expand college access or make it free outright. In a January op-ed for The Washington Post, McAuliffe dismissed “universal free college” as a misuse of tax dollars. “Spending limited taxpayer money on a free college education for the children of rich parents badly misses the mark for most families.”

And let’s not forget Howard Schultz, the former Starbucks chief executive who might run for president as an independent, who characterizes himself as a “centrist” despite holding positions that have little traction among the public as a whole. “We have to go after entitlements,” he has said, referring to the unpopular idea of cutting Social Security and Medicare to shrink the federal deficit.

In each case, these moderate politicians have positioned themselves against broad public preference. What then makes a moderate, if not policies that appeal to the middle?

You’ll find the answer in two comments from Joe Biden, who served two terms as vice president under President Barack Obama and is mulling a third run for the Democratic nomination. The first is from a speech in 2018, the second from more recent remarks to the United States Conference of Mayors. Speaking last May at the Brookings Institution, Biden rejected the confrontational language of some other Democrats. “I love Bernie, but I’m not Bernie Sanders,” he said. “I don’t think 500 billionaires are the reason we’re in trouble. I get into a lot of trouble with my party when I say that wealthy Americans are just as patriotic as poor folks.”

Speaking a month ago, Biden defended his praise for Fred Upton, the electorally embattled Republican congressman from Michigan whom he commended in a paid speech last year. Republicans used these comments to bolster Upton in campaign advertising, helping him win a narrow victory over his Democratic challenger. Biden’s response to critics was defiant. “I read in The New York Times today that I — that one of my problems is if I ever run for president, I like Republicans,” he said. “O.K., well, bless me, Father, for I have sinned.”

Biden hasn’t endorsed a “Medicare for all” plan, but if he runs, he won’t be running on deficit reduction or modest tweaks to existing programs. He supports free college and a $15-per-hour minimum wage. He wants to triple the earned-income tax credit, give workers more leverage and raise taxes on the rich. This is a liberal agenda. And yet Biden is understood as a “moderate” like Bloomberg, McAuliffe and Schultz.

What connects them (and similar politicians) is a belief that meaningful progress is possible without a fundamental challenge to those who hold most of the wealth and power in our society. For Biden, you don’t need to demonize the richest Americans or their Republican supporters to reduce income inequality; you can find a mutually beneficial solution. Bloomberg, a billionaire, may have a personal reason for rejecting wealth taxes, but he may also see them as unnecessary and antagonistic if the goal is winning powerful interests over to your side. McAuliffe governed Virginia with an eye toward the business community. Sweeping social programs might be popular, but they might alienate that powerful constituency. And Schultz wants a Democratic Party less hostile to those he calls “people of means,” who otherwise back goals like gun control.

But this is a faulty view of how progress happens. Struggle against the powerful, not accommodation of their interests, is how Americans produced the conditions for its greatest social accomplishments like the creation of the welfare state and the toppling of Jim Crow. Without radical labor activism that identifies capitalism — and the bosses — as the vector for oppression and disadvantage, there is no New Deal. Without a confrontational (and at times militant) black freedom movement, there is no Civil Rights Act. If one of the central problems of the present is an elite economic class that hoards resources and opportunity at the expense of the public as a whole, then it’s naïve and ahistoric to believe the beneficiaries of that arrangement will willingly relinquish their power and privilege.

If there’s a major division within Democratic politics, it’s between those who confront and those who seek to accommodate. Because we lack a varied vocabulary in mainstream political discourse, we call the latter “moderates” or “centrists,” which doesn’t capture the dynamic at work.

Anna Julia Cooper was an author, activist and public intellectual, a prominent voice in the struggle for black liberation. In her 1892 book, “A Voice From the South,” she ruminates on what’s necessary for “proper equilibrium” in society:
Progressive peace in a nation is the result of conflict; and conflict, such as is healthy, stimulating, and progressive, is produced through the coexistence of radically opposing or racially different elements.

Antagonism, indignation, anger — these qualities don’t diminish democracy or impede progress. Each is an inescapable part of political life in a diverse, pluralistic society. And each is necessary for challenging our profound inequalities of power, wealth and opportunity.

“The child can never gain strength save by resistance,” Cooper wrote, a little later in that volume, “and there can be no resistance if all movement is in one direction and all opposition made forever an impossibility.”]
2018  peace  hongthuy  democracy  community  governance  government  silence  passivity  jamellebouie  us  politics  progressive  progress  change  michaelbloomberg  terrymcauliffe  howardschultz  juliacooper  antagonism  indignation  anger  pluralism  society  conflict  conflictavoidance  diversity  resistance  joebiden  elizabethwarren  democrats  2019  barackobama  fredupton  moderates  centrists  accommodation  statusquo  inequality  civilrights  power  privilege  discourse  civility  race  wealth  opportunity  sokauniversityofamerica  thepearl  soka 
8 days ago by robertogreco
Romanian hospital uses posters to send anti-bribery message to patients
The Emergency Hospital in Slatina, in Olt county, thought that anti-bribery posters would convince patients to stop giving bribes to the medical staff.

“Our salaries have increased, we don’t need bribe!,” read the posters, which the patients can see when entering the hospital, but also at the entrance of each department, local Gazeta de Sud reported.

Trying to make the message even more convincing, the hospital management also listed the salaries of the doctors, nurses and other employees on the posters. For example, a doctors has a gross salary of between RON 16,000 and RON 30,000 while a nurse earns between RON 4,800 and RON 11,000.
CEE  Romania  governance  politics  corruption  policy.making  behavioural 
9 days ago by ondrejr
Competition between GPs ‘helps to save lives of cancer patients’
Telling GPs they are sending fewer patients for cancer tests than their colleagues can save lives by boosting referrals by up to 20%, an NHS trial suggests.

The study in Manchester involved sending letters to 244 GP surgeries with below-average referral rates.

While the effect was limited among surgeries just below average, those in the bottom 30% increased referrals by 20% compared with similar surgeries not sent letters. Below-average prescribers increased referrals by 10% overall.

According to The Times, health chiefs are considering whether to adopt the plan more widely in response to calculations that 2,500 cancers could be spotted a year earlier as a result.

Felicity Algate of the Behavioural Insights Team, a social-purpose company spun out of Whitehall, said the idea came about after letters sent to GPs who prescribed large amounts of antibiotics led to the number of prescriptions falling by 3%.
behavioural  governance  UK  policy.making 
15 days ago by ondrejr
New IDSN strategy presented at the General Assembly 2018 (IDSN News)
IDSN members and associates from across the globe met in Geneva in November for the IDSN General Assembly. The assembly spread over two days brimming with energy, new ideas, and a determination to strengthen the fight for human rights, justice and equality for all, irrespective of caste.
IDSN  idsnnews  2018  organisation  strategy  governance  caste  Dalit 
15 days ago by idsn

« earlier    

related tags

++++-  1930s  1940s  1950s  1960s  1970s  1u  2014  2015  2016  2018  2019  21cready  accenture  access  accommodation  accountability  advertising  affordance  africa  ageism  agile  agreement  ai  algorithm  alphabet  altruism  ambivalence  anarchism  anger  antagonism  antioch  apartheid  api_lifecycle  apolitical  apple  architecture  art  associations  austerity  authoritarianism  authority  automation  awareness  aws  bad  banking  banks  barackobama  bayarea  behavioural  bias  bjp  blockchain  board  borders  budgeting  bureaucracy  burningman  business  california  californianideology  cambridge  canon  capitalism  carbonfootprint  caste  cee  centrism  centrists  certification  cfr  change  charism  childhood  children  china  cities  citizenship  city  citybuilding  cityplanning  civics  civility  civilrights  clangelessness  classism  clementi  climatechange  cloud  coconut  codes-of-conduct  cognitive  collaboration  collective  college  collusion  commons  communalism  communes  communism  community  computer  computers  computing  concept  configuration-management  conflict  conflictavoidance  constitution  contract  contradiction  cooperation  corporate  corruption  cost  counterculture  creativity  credentialization  credentials  criticism  crypto  cryptocurrency  cultofpersonality  culture  curriculum  dalit  dao  daostack  data-governance  data-policy  data-regulation  data-rights  data-trusts  data  dc:creator=doddsleigh  dctagged  debt  decentralization  decision  declaration  deloitte  democracy  democrats  deschooling  design  development  digitalsociety  directdemocracy  director  discourse  disruption  dissonance  distributed  diversity  document  documentation  doubling  dream  drupal  economics  editorial  edtech  education  egalitarianism  elizabethwarren  emergency  empowerment  england  enterprise  entrepreneurial  entrepreneurship  equity  eu  europe  evolution  examples  exclusion  extraction  facebook  fakenews  faultiness  finance  firstamendment  flow  ford  formal_verification  fraud  fredturner  fredupton  free-software  freedom  fuck-everything  future  futurism  gamification  gaming  gds  generations  ghosncarlos  gigeconomy  global  globalization  google  government  growth  hallucination  henryford  hierarchy  highereducation  hippies  history  hn  holacracy  hongthuy  howardschultz  ibm  identifiers  ideology  idsn  idsnnews  ifttt  ig  imf  implementation  inclusion  inclusivity  india  indicator  indignation  individualism  individuality  inequality  informal  infrastructure  insufficient  integrator  integrators  interface  international-affairs  international.economics  international  internet  interpretation  ipen  iran  it  jamellebouie  james_higgenbotham  japan  javascript  jenniferlight  joebiden  juliacooper  juri  justice  karenbarad  kobesteel  kpmg  kubernetes  kustomize  labor  land  law  leadership  legal  leighannnaidoo  leo  liberalism  libertarianism  lobbying  lobbying_complex  local  location  lsd  lsepi  mad  majority  making  management  manufacturing  markets  mckenziewark  metrics  michaelbloomberg  microsoft  mikepepi  military  modeling  moderates  monetarypolicy  money  music  must-read  myth  naijecon  natural_language_processing  negotiations  neoliberalism  netapinotes  networkedsociety  newsletter  nissan  node  nonprofit  nonsense  not  npm  occupation  occupywallstreet  olympus  online  open-source  open  opensource  opportunity  organic  organisation  organization  organizationaldevelopment  ork  otf  ows  paperwork  paraprofessionals  participation  participatory  passivity  peace  peerproduction  persistence  personal-data  philosophy  picture  planning  platform  play  pluralism  pocket  podcast  podemo  police  policy.making  policy  political_economy  politics  portfolio  poverty  power  precarity  prejudice  present  presentation  presidency  president  privacy  private  privatization  privilege  procedure  process  product  production  productivity  progress  progressive  project  project_management  projectmanagemement  protest  psychology  public  publishing  purpose  python  race  racism  radical  realm  recommendations  reduction  registers  regulation  reporting  research  residents  resistance  resources  responsibility  revolution  risk  roadmap  roleplaying  romania  rules  rust  sanfrancisco  schooliness  schools  secrecy  security  sensors  sharedconsciousness  sharingeconomy  sidewalk  silence  siliconvalley  simulations  smart-cities  smart  sociability  social  socialchange  socialism  socialjustice  society  sociology  softare  software  soka  sokauniversityofamerica  source  southaftrica  sox  space  standards  stanford  startups  statusquo  stock  strategy  street  structure  study  style  subbu_allamaraju  surveillance  sustainability  system  tax  team  teams  techculture  technology  technosolutionism  teens  templates  terrymcauliffe  thepearl  time  timetravel  tools  toronto  toshiba  training  transformation  transparency  transport  travel  trump  trust  trusts  tutorial  twitter  uk  umich  union  unlearning  unschooling  urban  urbanism  us  usa  utopia  utopianism  values  vectorial  violence  virtualworlds  virtue  vision  visualization  voting  wealth  web  whistleblowing  whiteness  wiki  wikimedia  wml  work  workflow  worldbank  worldbuilding  worldhistory  writing  youth 

Copy this bookmark: