flying   8729

« earlier    

Swedish Pilot Becomes Instagram Sensation With Her Yoga Selfies From All Over The World
30 year-old commercial pilot Maria Pettersson is taking Instagram by storm by sharing incredible photos of her practicing yoga all over the world. She originally started her Instagram page when she moved to Italy. The purpose of her Instagram account was to keep her family back home informed. Now she is living in Palermo, Sicily and has a 200k+ following on Instagram.
Maria takes advantage of the perks of her job and uses her free time to practice her yoga and stay in shape in every new place she visits. She shares photos of not only her doing yoga but also silly selfies, here and there.
If I had a job like hers, I would be more motivated to work out and maintain a healthy body. Take a look at these photos and maybe they will motivate you to stay in shape, or even just to travel the world. Leave your thoughts in the comments section and head over to Maria’s Instagram and show her some love.
airplane  flying  women  uniform  travel  instagram 
yesterday by rgl7194
The Pilot's Lounge #26: Scud Running -- Discussing a Delicate Subject
It’s a bit disconcerting when it happens. Every once in a great while someone says something that causes your jaw to drop in utter amazement. You stare at the person who just made the statement because you can’t comprehend its magnitude. Meanwhile, your tonsils are attracting flies.

It happened to me recently, here in the Pilot’s Lounge at the virtual airport, when old Hack walked up, took me aside and said he wanted to get his instrument rating. I think he said something else but my brain locked up. I was busy trying to digest the concept that this guy, in his 70s, who had spent his flying life defiantly operating under VFR and a great portion of that time ridiculing the pantywaists who had to use instruments to fly, who was always able to get back to our airport by scud running because he knew every landmark for a 20-mile radius, had just said that he wanted to get an instrument rating. Of the people that I thought would never go for an instrument ticket, Hack was the name on the list in large, gold-plated letters.
aviation  flying 
2 days ago by base10
Avion, climat et fiscalité : petit manuel d'auto-défense intellectuelle | The Shift Project
2019-05-31_Avion-climat-et-fiscalité-Petit-manuel-dauto-défense-intellectuelle_V3.pdf
plane  flying  co2  ghg 
3 days ago by gui11aume
The Skyway Code | UK Civil Aviation Authority
Guide to private flying rules, regulations and best practice
flying 
5 days ago by tkelliott
If Seeing the World Helps Ruin It, Should We Stay Home? - The New York Times
"In the age of global warming, traveling — by plane, boat or car — is a fraught choice. And yet the world beckons."



"The glaciers are melting, the coral reefs are dying, Miami Beach is slowly going under.

Quick, says a voice in your head, go see them before they disappear! You are evil, says another voice. For you are hastening their destruction.

To a lot of people who like to travel, these are morally bewildering times. Something that seemed like pure escape and adventure has become double-edged, harmful, the epitome of selfish consumption. Going someplace far away, we now know, is the biggest single action a private citizen can take to worsen climate change. One seat on a flight from New York to Los Angeles effectively adds months worth of human-generated carbon emissions to the atmosphere.

And yet we fly more and more.

The number of airline passengers worldwide has more than doubled since 2003, and unlike with some other pollution sources, there’s not a ton that can be done right now to make flying significantly greener — electrified jets are not coming to an airport near you anytime soon.

Still, we wonder: How much is that one vacation really hurting anyone, or anything?

It is hard to think about climate change in relation to our own behavior. We are small, our effects are microscopically incremental and we mean no harm. The effects of climate change are inconceivably enormous and awful — and for the most part still unrealized. You can’t see the face of the unnamed future person whose coastal village you will have helped submerge.

But it turns out there are ways to quantify your impact on the planet, at least roughly. In 2016, two climatologists published a paper in the prestigious journal Science showing a direct relationship between carbon emissions and the melting of Arctic sea ice.

32 = The square feet of Arctic summer sea ice cover that one passenger’s share of emissions melts on a 2,500-mile flight.

Each additional metric ton of carbon dioxide or its equivalent — your share of the emissions on a cross-country flight one-way from New York to Los Angeles — shrinks the summer sea ice cover by 3 square meters, or 32 square feet, the authors, Dirk Notz and Julienne Stroeve, found.

In February, my family of three flew from New York to Miami for what seemed like a pretty modest winter vacation. An online carbon calculator tells me that our seats generated the equivalent of 2.4 metric tons of carbon dioxide.

Throw in another quarter-ton for the 600 miles of driving we squeezed in and a bit for the snorkeling trip and the heated pool at the funky trailer-park Airbnb, and the bill comes to about 90 square feet of Arctic ice, an area about the size of a pickup truck.

When I did that calculation, I pictured myself standing on a pickup-truck-sized sheet of ice as it broke apart and plunged me into frigid waters. A polar bear glared hungrily at me.

Calculating the harm

And what of my vacation’s impact on my fellow man? Actually, academics have attempted to calculate that, too. Philosophers, not climatologists. But still.

In 2005, a Dartmouth professor, Walter Sinnott-Armstrong, wrote in a journal article provocatively titled “It’s Not My Fault: Global Warming and Individual Moral Obligations” that he was under no moral obligation to refrain from taking a gas-guzzling S.U.V. for a Sunday afternoon joy ride if he felt like doing so.

“No storms or floods or droughts or heat waves can be traced to my individual act of driving,” he wrote. Conversely, “If I refrain from driving for fun on this one Sunday, there is no individual who will be helped in the least.”

Other philosophers questioned his reasoning.

Professor John Nolt of the University of Tennessee took a stab at measuring the damage done by one average American’s lifetime emissions. (The average American generates about 16 metric tons of carbon dioxide-equivalent a year, more than triple the global average.)

Noting that carbon stays in the atmosphere for centuries, at least, and that a United Nations panel found in 2007 that climate change is “likely to adversely affect hundreds of millions of people through increased coastal flooding, reductions in water supplies, increased malnutrition and increased health impacts” in the next 100 years, Professor Nolt did a lot of division and multiplication and arrived at a stark conclusion:

“The average American causes through his/her greenhouse gas emissions the serious suffering and/or deaths of two future people.”

Then Avram Hiller of Portland State University used Professor Nolt’s approach to derive the impact of Professor Sinnott-Armstrong’s hypothetical 25-mile ride.

“At a ratio of one life’s causal activities per one life’s detrimental effects, it causes the equivalent of a quarter of a day’s severe harm,” he wrote.

“In other words, going for a Sunday drive has the expected effect of ruining someone’s afternoon.”

Multiply that joy ride by a three-person Florida vacation and you’ve ruined someone’s month. Something to ponder while soaking up UV-drenched rays on a tropical beach.

Ships? Even worse

There are alternatives to flying, of course. Perhaps a cruise? After all, there’s more ocean than there’s been in thousands of years. With the Northwest Passage now mostly ice-free in the summer, new vistas have opened. One cruise company runs polar bear tours to check out “the Arctic’s ‘poster boy.’”

Perhaps not. Bryan Comer, a researcher at the International Council on Clean Transportation, a nonprofit research group, told me that even the most efficient cruise ships emit 3 to 4 times more carbon dioxide per passenger-mile than a jet.

And that’s just greenhouse gas. Last year, an assistant professor at the Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health found that the air onboard cruise ships was many times dirtier than the air nearby onshore.

3x to 4x = The amount of carbon dioxide the most efficient cruise ship emits per passenger mile when compared with a jet.

“Some of the particulate counts were comparable to or worse than a bad day in some of the world’s most polluted cities like Beijing and Santiago,” said Kendra Ulrich of Stand.earth, the advocacy group that commissioned the study.

While most cruise ships run on highly polluting heavy fuel oil, many have begun using “scrubbers” to remove toxic sulfur oxides from their exhaust. But the scrubbers discharge these and other pollutants into the ocean instead, and they’ve been banned by seven countries and several U.S. states.

A spokeswoman for Cruise Lines International Association, a trade group, said that the scrubbers comply with the new 2020 standards for air and water quality set by the International Maritime Organization, a U.N. agency. The spokeswoman, Megan King, added that it was not fair to compare emissions from ships and jets because a jet is just a transportation vehicle while a cruise ship is a floating resort and amusement park.

There’s always driving, which is less carbon intensive than flying, especially if there are multiple passengers. But “less” is relative, and most long trips are out of practical driving range anyway.

Considering carbon offsets

Maybe there is a justification out there somewhere: Personal decisions alone won’t stop global warming — that will take policy changes by governments on a worldwide scale. Tourism creates millions of jobs in places starved for economic development. Carbon offsets can effectively cancel out our footprint, can’t they?

Carbon offsets do seem to offer the most direct way to assuage traveler’s guilt. In theory, they magically expiate your sins. You give a broker some money (not a lot of money either — carbon offsets can be bought for $10 per metric ton). They give it to someone to plant trees, or capture the methane from a landfill or a cattle operation, or help build a wind farm, or subsidize clean cookstoves for people in the developing world who cook on open fires. All these things help cut greenhouse gas.

But nothing is that simple in practice. Carbon-offset people talk about concerns with things called additionality, leakage and permanence.

Additionality: How do you know the utility would not have built the wind farm but for the money you gave them?

Permanence: How do you know the timber company that planted those trees won’t just cut them down in a few years?

Leakage: How do you know the landowner you just paid not to cut down an acre of rain forest won’t use the money to buy a different acre and clear that?

While certifying organizations go to great lengths to verify carbon offset projects, verification has limits.

“Whether someone would have planted trees anyway, or taken some other action like building a housing development, is ultimately unknowable and something you have to construct,” said Peter Miller, a policy director for the Natural Resources Defense Council and a board member of the Climate Action Reserve, the country’s biggest carbon offset registry. “It’s an endless debate.”

Some carbon offsets are surer bets than others. “With methane capture,” Mr. Miller said, “once you capture that methane and you burn it — you’re done. It’s not in the atmosphere, it’s not going in the atmosphere. You’ve got a credit that’s achieved and you’ve avoided those emissions forever.”

Not flying at all would be better, Mr. Miller said, “but the reality is that there’s lots of folks that are going to do what they’re going to do.” For them, offsets are a lot better than nothing.

But some climate experts call offsets a cop-out.

“It’s like paying someone else to diet for you,” said Alice Larkin of the University of Manchester’s Tyndall Centre for Climate Change Research, who has not flown since 2008.

She said that while governments do need to take tough action, they derive their courage to do so from the … [more]
flight  flights  travel  climatechange  globalwarming  2019  andynewman  emissions  carbonemissions  offets  carbonoffsets  flying  leakage  permanence  additionality  ayramhiller  johnnolt  waltersinnott-armstrong  dirknotz  juliennestroeve 
8 days ago by robertogreco
Flying Freddie Flintoff GIF by Top Gear - Find & Share on GIPHY
GIF cars, racing, flying, machine, top gear, lotus, topgear, freddie flintoff, series 27 Giphy http://bit.ly/2F1GNt9 ______ http://goo.gl/3oHDPV
cars  racing  flying  machine  top  gear  lotus  topgear  freddie  flintoff  series  27  wynajem  samochody  auta 
9 days ago by architektura
Understanding The Aerodynamics Of Slow Flight | Boldmethod
These aerodynamic principles affect you on every flight.
flying 
11 days ago by tkelliott
KLM and TU Delft join forces to make aviation more sustainable
Looks sorta like a Barnes Swallow SST airliner without the swingwing
EU  europe  research  aerodynamics  BWB  flying  wing  aircraft  airplane  aerodyamics 
15 days ago by asteroza

« earlier    

related tags

2019  27  737  737max  a  abu  additionality  aerodyamics  aerodynamics  aerostat  ai  air  aircraft  airlines  airplane  airplanes  airtravel  ajith  alien  amazing  andynewman  anniversary  anxiety  asia  astronauts  auta  automotive  autonomous  aviation  away  ayramhiller  b747  bars  base  basestation  be  blade  boeing  brexit  businesstravel  bwb  candourist  car  carbon  carbonemissions  carbonoffsets  career  cars  cellphone  cellular  checklist  class?  climate  climatechange  co2  cocktails  codes  communication  communications  comparo  could  ct  culture  cwt  daring_fireball  decade  deployable  dhabi.  dirknotz  dopost  driverless  driving  drone  drones  ducted  efficiency  electric  emergency  emissions  energy  engineering  environment  eu  europe  experiment  faa  fail  failure  falcon  fan  fare  fashion  fields  first  flight  flights  flintoff  flyingless  foreflight  fpv  france  freddie  from  full  funny  futurism  gear  generator  geography  ghg  globalwarming  good  gov2.0  hale  handbook  happy  haps  headphones  helicopters  hellfire  high  howto  humor  imbibe  in  information-technology  instagram  interesting-things  international  it’s  johnnolt  jp  juliennestroeve  just  kickstarter  kids  knife  law  leakage  lifeimitatessf  location  long  lotus  machine  manual  map  mcas  metafly  meteorology-and-weather  military  missile  multiplier  nasa  navy  nytimes  objects  of  offets  offset  oil  outage  pacific  patreon  pdf  performance  permanence  photography  photos  plane  power  propeller  propulsion  psychology  racing  rail  range  regulation  research  review  roadable  safety  samochody  search  series  skies  social_media  softbank  software  solar  space  startup  startups  station  stewardess  style  sword  technology  telecommunications  tethered  tickets  tire  to  tootme  top  topgear  tower  train  trains  transportation  travel  traveltrends  trends  trump  turbine  uav  ufo  ufos  unidentified  uniform  united  usnavy  vehicle  video  vision  voltage  vtol  waltersinnott-armstrong  we  weater  wheel  wikipedia  wind  wing  wirecutter  with  women  wow  wynajem  youtube 

Copy this bookmark:



description:


tags: