fairness   1602

« earlier    

American Economic Association
"We analyze how separations responded to arbitrary differences in own and peer wages at a large US retailer. Regression-discontinuity estimates imply large causal effects of own-wages on separations, and on quits in particular. However, this own-wage response could reflect comparisons either to market wages or to peer wages. Estimates using peer-wage discontinuities show large peer-wage effects and imply the own-wage separation response mostly reflects peer comparisons. The peer effect is driven by comparisons with higher-paid peers—suggesting concerns about fairness. Separations appear fairly insensitive when raises are similar across peers—suggesting search frictions and monopsony are relevant in this low-wage sector. "
fairness  wages  AER 
3 days ago by MarcK
Putting the J(ustice) in FAT – Berkman Klein Center Collection – Medium
> ... because much of what we intuitively conceive of as “unfair” is actually “unjust,” FAT researchers need to more deeply consider social justice as an essential component of their work. Put another way, many of the concerns about biased algorithms are actually concerns about the impacts of predictions and the systems that those algorithms enhance. A predictive policing algorithm might perfectly forecast where crime will occur (hence satisfying notions of fairness), but if those predictions are used by police departments to harass and oppress communities of color, then the algorithm is unjust.
FATML  fairness  justice  fairml 
17 days ago by tarakc02
Risk Assessment: Explained - The Appeal
overview of pretrial risk assessments -- debates, criticisms, controversies, etc.
pretrial-detention  risk-assessment  algorithmic-bias  fairness 
23 days ago by tarakc02
[1705.10239] Fair Division of a Graph
We consider fair allocation of indivisible items under an additional constraint: there is an undirected graph describing the relationship between the items, and each agent's share must form a connected subgraph of this graph. This framework captures, e.g., fair allocation of land plots, where the graph describes the accessibility relation among the plots. We focus on agents that have additive utilities for the items, and consider several common fair division solution concepts, such as proportionality, envy-freeness and maximin share guarantee. While finding good allocations according to these solution concepts is computationally hard in general, we design efficient algorithms for special cases where the underlying graph has simple structure, and/or the number of agents -or, less restrictively, the number of agent types- is small. In particular, despite non-existence results in the general case, we prove that for acyclic graphs a maximin share allocation always exists and can be found efficiently.
assignment-problems  fairness  operations-research  planning  collective-behavior  cake-cutting  game-theory  constraint-satisfaction  rather-interesting  variant-problems  mathematical-recreations  to-write-about  to-simulate 
23 days ago by Vaguery
Camera Above the Classroom
"Since discovering that photo on Weibo, Jason’s been observing the cameras installed in the classroom, trying to guess their functions. The smaller one at the front is used for facial recognition, he deduces from the picture on Weibo. The bigger one at the back of the classroom is used for livestreaming, judging from the angle of the video he previously spotted on his teacher’s laptop. He’s not sure about the third camera on the window side of the classroom, though he thinks it’s a backup."
surveillance  classroom  doom  China  ComputerVision  ethics  fairness  MachineLearning 
24 days ago by csantos
Equality of opportunity in supervised learning | the morning paper
> Equalized odds requires both the fraction of non-defaulters that qualify for loans and the fraction of defaulters that qualify for loans to be constant across groups. This cannot be achieved with a single threshold for each group, but requires randomization. There are many ways to do it; here we pick two thresholds for each group, so above both thresholds people always qualify, and between the thresholds people qualify with some probability.

> Equalized odds enforces that the accuracy is equally high in all demographics, punishing models that perform well only on the majority.

> In some situations… the equalized odds predictor can be thought of as introducing some sort of affirmative action: the optimally predictive score R* is shifted based on A. This shift compensates for the fact that, due to uncertainty, the score is in a sense more biased than the target label (roughly, R* is more correlated with A than Y is correlated with A). Informally speaking, our approach transfers the burden of uncertainty from the protected class to the decision maker.
fairness  affirmative-action  algorithmic-bias  bias  FATML 
4 weeks ago by tarakc02
Delayed impact of fair machine learning | the morning paper
In the larger universe of papers looking at threshold-based metrics of fairness, this one starts with the idea that the goal of fairness is to "promote the long-term well-being" of protected groups. They then introduce a feedback loop between decisions that get made with the help of algorithms and the probability scores output by those algorithms (in the given example, if someone is approved for a loan and then pays it off, that increases their credit score, while if they default, that will decrease their credit score). Then, defining well-being in terms of group change in mean credit score, the authors go on to show that various fairness metrics may in fact make protected groups worse off under specific conditions, and more generally show how to use the feedback model framework to evaluate different fairness criteria. The tool they introduce to do this is the "Outcome Curve," a concave curve whose x-axis is the "selection rate" given by various decision-making thresholds, and the y-axis is the expected change in mean (credit) score. Important points on this curve include the point that maximizes the firm's profit, the point that maximizes the group's well-being, regions where groups are made worse off than if the firm had just maximized profit, and regions where the group is made worse off in an absolute sense. There is a brief section describing "measurement error," in particular where scores systematically underestimate a group's repayment probabilities, and I am only mentioning this because that section, and the accompanying analysis using the outcome curve framework, so echoes the debates about affirmative action that were going on when I was growing up in the '90s. Finally, there is an empirical section using the framework along with historical credit data. The results are all conditional on the assumed costs and benefits to both parties of a repaid loan and a defaulted loan, which I guess points to a challenging part of using this framework. The paper did not answer all of my questions, but the focus on group-level outcomes over time, and the focus on the feedback loop of decision making systems, were helpful.
fairness  FATML  algorithmic-bias  fairml  affirmative-action 
4 weeks ago by tarakc02

« earlier    

related tags

2017  a11y  abbottdiane  abstraction  abudhabi  academia  access  accessibility  accountability  admissions  advertising  aer  affirmative-action  affirmative_action  africa  ai-ethics  ai-fairness  ai  algorithmic-bias  algorithms  allocation-problems  amazon  analysis  art  assignment-problems  asylum  auctions  audience  australia  basic  bayesian  bbc  bbcqt  bias  bloomberg  bluelabour  book  borders  brexit  bribes  brucefiona  by:andrewgelman  cake-cutting  canada  careers  causal-inference  causality  china  choice  civilliberties  class  classification  classroom  climate_change  climatechange  cloaking  collective-behavior  college  computerscience  computervision  consider:looking-to-see  constraint-satisfaction  course  criminaljustice  dalmore  data-quality  data  dataandsociety  datascience  dc:creator=kibasitom  dctagged  deeplearning  democracy  derspiegel  design  differentialprivacy  digital-pedagogy  digital_ethics  disclosure  discrimination  diveresity  doom  echr  econometrics  economics  economy  education  employment  end_of_year_2018  environment  equality  equity  ethics  ethics_of_algorithms  eu  eurozone  evaluation-measures  explainable_ai  facebook  facialrecognition  fairml  fatml  ffp  finance  football  fossilfuels  foundation  fox.news  france  freedomofmovement  freetradearea  fueltax  future  game-theory  gametheory  gaslighting  gender  gig  giletsjaunes  gmail  goldmansachs  good  google  greece  guidovanrossum  healthcare  hiring  history  howto  immigration-policy  immigration  important  inclusion  income  income_distribution  inequality  innovations  insidertrading  institutions  insurance  internationalism  interpretability  investing  james  jobs  justice  kadijaferryman  language  law  lawenforcement  learning  leave  lexit  livingstandards  machine-learning  machine  machine_learning  machinelearning  macronemmanuel  manchestercity  marxism  mathematical-recreations  mattlevine  mechanism-design  media  medicine  memo  men  ml  money  moneystuff  museum  nationalisation  nationalism  neoliberalism  nudge-targets  openness  operations-research  opinion  partisanship  people  perception  performance-measure  planning  playground  police-data  politics  predictions  predictive-policing  pretrial-detention  privacy  programming  propaganda  property  protest  python  queuing  racism  rather-interesting  redlining  reform  refugees  remain  reproducibleresearch  research  researchdata  response  risk-assessment  risk-shifting  salary  scandal  sexism  society  sociology  sociotechnical-systems  sortition  sponsorship  sport  ssg  stalin  stateaid  statistics  surveillance  tariffs  tax  tcav  teachers  teaching  tealphoenix  technology  television  theleft  to-simulate  to-understand  to-write-about  to:am  to:fn  to:md  toread  trotsky  tutorial  ubi  uefa  uk  universal  usa  value_sensitive_design  variant-problems  varoufakisyanis  veil_of_ignorance  wages  walker  watchlist  wealth  webdesign  webdevelopment  weinberger  what-if  withdrawalagreement  work  xai  youtube 

Copy this bookmark: