excellence   1209

« earlier    

Sarah Sellers and the Craziest Schedule in Running - The New York Times
Nurse runs marathon, gets 2nd in Boston Marathon. Inspiring. Also note the references to eating disorder. COmments are split between this being super inspirational and "too much."
excellence  athletes  via:ramitsethi 
6 days ago by eaconley
Sarah Sellers and the Craziest Schedule in Running - The New York Times
Nurse runs marathon, gets 2nd in Boston Marathon. Inspiring. Also note the references to eating disorder. COmments are split between this being super inspirational and "too much."
excellence  athletes 
7 days ago by ramitsethi
Who Will Win?
"The wider market is decision support. The goal is to improve organizational decision-making by unleashing the power of analytics. The supply chain planning market is narrow and used by only 3-5% of back office personnel. The new goal is decision support for the masses. The new solutions deliver answers better, faster and easier. Today’s solutions are expensive, long to deploy and hard to use. The greater the M&A activity, the worse the issue. (JDA, E2Open, Infor, and Logility grew through acquisitions.)"
uncategorized  analytics  anaplan  decision  support  supply  chain  excellence  planning 
11 days ago by jonerp
Control Towers: If Only There Was A Clear Definition
"Companies are drowning in data, but struggle to get insights. As shown in Figure 3, companies struggle to get data to make decisions. The focus is on functional metrics, but most are unable to get to overall supply chain metrics. For example, only 29% of manufacturing companies can access total cost data and 31% struggle to see the impact of business decisions on inventory. So, one business use case for control towers is accessing supply chain key performance indicators. The average company has five-to-seven Advanced Planning Systems (APS) and twelve Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP) Solutions. While performance monitoring is not the most common use case for a control tower project, the gap exists."
global  supply  chains  inventory  management  market-driven  analytics  control  tower  performance  measurement  chain  excellence  visibility 
6 weeks ago by jonerp
The Trouble with Knowledge | Shikshantar
"First Main Trouble with Knowledge and Education is Dishonesty

I do believe that one aspect which characterizes education, development and the production and dissemination of knowledge, in today’s world, is the lack of intellectual honesty. This belief is an outcome of reflecting on my experience during my school and university years and my almost 40 years of work. The dishonesty is connected to the values, which govern the thinking and practice in the fields of education, knowledge and development (mirroring the values in dominant societies and serving mainly the lifestyle of consumerism): control, winning, profit, individualism and competition. Having a syllabus and textbooks, and evaluating and judging people (students, teachers, administrators, and academics) through linear forms of authority and through linear symbolic values (such as arbitrary letters or grades or preferential labels), almost guarantee cheating, lack of honesty, and lack of relevance. (The recent reports that cheating and testing are on the rise in the Maryland and Chicago areas are just one example that came up to the surface. And of course teachers, principles and superintendents were blamed and had to pay the price.) I taught many years and put exams both at the level of classrooms and at the national level, and I labored and spent a lot of time and effort in order to be fair. But, then, I discovered that the problem is not in the intentions or the way we conduct things but, rather, in the values that run societies in general and which are propagated by education, development and knowledge -- among other venues. Thus, the main trouble with knowledge and education, is not so much their irrelevance or process of selection or the issue of power (though these are definitely part of the trouble) as it is with the lack of intellectual honesty in these areas. Giving a number or a letter to measure a human being is dishonest and inhuman; it is a degrading to the human mind and to human beings. Grading, in this sense, is degrading. It is one of the biggest abuses of mathematics in its history! Moreover, as long as the above-mentioned values remain as the governing values, education will continue to be fundamentally an obstacle to learning. Under these conditions, talking about improving or reforming education is naïve at best and hypocritical at worst. At most, it would touch a very small percentage of the student population in any particular region. Of course, we can go on putting our heads in the sand and refusing to see or care. But one main concern I will continue to have is what happens to the 80 some pecent of students whom the “compulsory suit” does not fit. Why imposing the same-size suit on all bodies sounds ridiculous but imposing the same curriculum on all minds does not?! The human mind is definitely more diverse that the human body.

Labeling a child as a “failure” is a criminal act against that child. For a child, who has learned so much from life before entering school, to be labeled a failure, just because s/he doesn’t see any sense in the mostly senseless knowledge we offer in most schools, is unfair – to say the least; it is really outrageous. But few of us around the world seem to be outraged, simply because we usually lose our senses in the process of getting educated. We are like those in Hans Christian Anderson’s story that lost their ability to see and had to be reminded by the little child that the emperor is without clothes.

Most people in the educational world (students, teachers, administrators, scholars, suprintendents, …) are dishonest (often without realizing it) either because we are too lazy to reflect on and see the absurdities in what we are doing (and just give to students what we were given in schools and universities, or during training courses and enrichment seminars!), or because we are simply afraid and need to protect ourselves from punishment or from being judged and labeled as inept or failures. This dishonesty prevails at all levels. I had a friend who was working in a prestigious university in the U.S. and who often went as an educational consultant and expert to countries to “improve and develop” their educational systems. Once, when he was on his way to Egypt as a consultant to help in reforming the educational system there, I asked him, “Have you ever been to Egypt?” He said no. I said, “Don’t you find it strange that you don’t know Egypt but you know what is good for it?!” Obviously, the richness, the wisdom and the depth of that 7000-year civilization is totally ignored by him, or more accurately, cannot be comprehended by him. Or, he may simply believe in what Kipling believed in in relation to India: to be ruled by Britain was India’s right; to rule India was Britain’s duty! In a very real sense, that friend of mine does not only abstract the theories he carries along with him everywhere but also abstracts the people by assuming that they all have the same deficits and, thus, the same solution – and that he has the solution.

Let’s take the term “sustainable development,” for example, which is widely used today and it is used in the concept paper for this conference. If we mean by development what we see in “developed” nations, then sustainable development is a nightmare. If we all start consuming, for example, at the rate at which “developed” nations currently do, then (as a friend of mine from Mexico says) we need at least five planets to provide the needed resources and to provide dumping sites for our waste! If “developing” nations consume natural resources (such as water) at the same rate “developed” nations do, such resources would be depleted in few years! Such “development” would be destructive to the soil of the earth and to the soil of cultures, both of which nurture and sustain human beings and human societies. The price would be very high at the level of the environment and at the level of beautiful relationships among people. Thus, those who believe in sustainable development (in its current conception and practice) are either naïve or dishonest or right out indifferent to what happens to nature, to beautiful relationship among people, and to the joyful harmony within human beings and between them and their surroundings. Nature and relationships among human beings are probably the two most precious treasures in life; the most valuable things human beings have. The survival of human and natural diversity (and even of human communities) are at stake here.

We do not detect dishonesty in the fields of education, knowledge and development because usually we are protected (in scools) from having much contact with life, through stressing verbal, symbolic and technical “knowledge,” through avoiding people’s experiences and surroundings, through the means we follow in evaluating people, and through ignoring history (history of people, of ideas, …). The main connection most school textbooks have with life is through the sections that carry the title “applications” – another instance of dishonesty. During the 1970s, for example, and as the head supervisor of math instruction in all the schools of the West Bank (in Palestine), one question I kept asking children was “is 1=1?” 1=1 is true in schoolbooks and on tests but in real life it has uses, abuses and misuses, but no real instances. We abstract apples in textbooks and make them equal but in real life there is no apple which is exactly equal to another apple. The same is true when we say that Newton discovered gravity. Almost every child by the age of one discovers it. (When my grandson, for example, was 15 months old, I was watching him once pick up pieces of cereal and put them in his mouth. Everytime he lost a piece, he would look for it down, never up!) By teaching that Newton discovered gravity, we do not only lie but also fail to clarify Newton’s real contribution. Similarly with teaching that Columbus discovered America …. Everyone of us can give tens of examples on dishonesty in the way we were taught and the way we teach."

"Second Main Trouble with Knowledge and Education: Lack of Connection with the Lives of the Social Majorities in the World"

"Building Learning Societies

From what has been said so far, two main approaches to knowledge and learning can be identified: (1) learning by doing; i.e. by the person being embedded in life, in one’s cultural soil. In this approach, learning is almost synonymous to living, and (2) the formal approach, which usually starts with ready pre-prepared content (usually fragmented into several subjucts, and usually put together in the absence of the two most important “actors” in learning: teachers and students). This approach also embodies tests and grades."

"Finally, I would like to affirm -- as a form of summary -- certain points, and point out to the need of dismantling others:

1. We need to dismantle the claim that learning can only take place in schools.

2. We need to dismantle the practice of separating students from life For at least 12 years) and still claim that learning is taking place.

3. We need to dismantle the assumption/ myth that teachers can teach what they don’t do.

4. We need to dismantle the myth that education can be improved through professionals and experts.

5. We need to dismantle the hegemony of words like education, development, progress, excellence, and rights and reclaim, instead, words like wisdom, faith, generosity, hope, learning, living, happiness, and duties.

6. We need to affirm that the vast mojority of people go to school not to learn but to get a diploma. We need to create diverse environments of learning.

7. We need to affirm our capacity for doing and learning, not for getting degrees.

8. We need to affirm and regain the concept and practice of “learning from the world,” not “about the world.”

9. We need to affirm that people are the real solution, not the obstacle and … [more]
munirfasheh  education  unschooling  schooling  schooliness  deschooling  diplomas  credentials  wisdom  degrees  faith  honesty  generosity  hope  learning  howwelearn  love  loving  lving  happiness  duties  duty  development  progress  excellence  rights  schools  community  learningcommunities  lcproject  openstudioproject  grades  grading  assessment  dishonesty  culture  society  hegemony  knowledge  influence  power  colonization  globalization  yemen  israel  palestine  humanism  governance  government  policy  politics  statism  children  egypt  india  westbank  religion  cordoba  cordova  gaza  freedom  failure  labeling  canon 
8 weeks ago by robertogreco
Elisa wins Finnish Quality Award 2018. Thank you our customers, partners and all elisians.
excellence  from twitter_favs
11 weeks ago by jukkan
Innovation Excellence – Top 40 Innovation Bloggers Of 2018
After heavy thought and consideration, Innovation Excellence just announced their selections for the Top 40 Innovation Bloggers of 2018, listing Brian Solis as #32.
blogger  of  the  year  brian+solis  innovation  excellence  leaders  top  40  brian  solis 
january 2019 by briansolis
QUB STAR - Staff Recognition
Queen's University is committed to creating an environment in which employees feel recognised for their performance, contribution and accomplishments.
employment  qub  award  excellence  star 
january 2019 by thespacedoctor
Welcome 2019
"Trend 5. Digital Manufacturing Success. In the next two years, companies will make the most progress in the area of digital manufacturing. The combination of technologies for track and trace (an example is ThinkIQ), 3D printing, robotics, and wearables improves flexibility in operations. Company digital initiatives will have the most success in production operations."
global  supply  chains  market-driven  network  of  networks  new  technologies  uncategorized  2019  demand  driven  market  years  predictions  chain  excellence 
january 2019 by jonerp

« earlier    

related tags

(c-tec)  -  2018  2019  25-things  40  ability  activismmodel  add  administration  admire  advocacy  adx  agency’s  ambition  american  an  analtyics  analysis  analytics  anaplan  and  art  article  assessment  athletes  athletics  award  barefoot  beauty  bellingcat  best  better  blogger  bodies  books  bored  boredom  branding  brian+solis  brian  building  business  businessmodels  cain  canon  capitalism  career  center  centers  centre  chain  chains  champion  champions  championship  character  charts  chess  child  children  clients  clorox  collaboration  colonization  community  competitiveness  conference-planning  construction  consumer  consumerism  control  cooeprunion  cooking  cordoba  cordova  cost-to-serve  credentials  culture  customer-centric  data  datadecisions  dc:creator=wutim  dctagged  ddmrp  decision  degrees  demand  deschooling  design  development  digital  diplomas  dishonesty  diversity  driven  duties  duty  early  editorial  education  egan  egypt  employment  enjoy  entrepreneurship  espionage  excellent  exemplary  failure  faith  fanfic  favorites  feasible  feedy  feminism  forecast  forecastability  foster  freedom  funny  gamification  garry-kasparov  garry  garrykasparov  gaza  generosity  getting  global  globalization  goal-setting  goals  governance  government  grades  grading  graphic2d  greatness  guide  happiness  hawick  health  hegemony  hersh  high  highereducation  hobbies  hobby  honesty  hope  host  howwelearn  humanism  humour  ibm  immigrants  immigration  in-store  in  inclusion  india  industry  influence  innovation  insights  inspiring  interesting  inventory  israel  james  journalism  kasparov  knowledge  l'oreal  labeling  language  lcproject  leaders  leadership  learning  learningcommunities  leica  leisure  life  lifehacking  linguistics  list  love  loving  luck  lving  lynch  magnets  management  manifesto  mark  market-driven  market  marketing  mastery  measurement  mediocrity  metrics  military  millennials  model  moz  multiple  mundanity  munirfasheh  music  neoliberalism  network  networks  new  nick  nondurables  nonprofit  nytimes  of  open  openstudioproject  operational  operations  opinion  opportunity  orbit  palestine  papers  performance  personal  personalbranding  peters  phd  philosophy  plan  planning  plannning  players  podemo  poetry  policy  politics  potential  power  practice  praise  predictions  production  productivity  products  programming  progress  psychology  publishing  pursuit  qualitative  qub  quote  ramit  real  religion  retail:  retirement  rights  risk  russia  s&op  sales  scaling  school  schooliness  schooling  schools  science  segmentation  seo  shell  shoes  shopping  skill  social-skills  society  sociology  solis  spirituality  spyware  star  statism  storytelling  strategy  success  supplier  supply  support  survivor  talent  technical  technologies  textile  the  thespeedtrap  timwu  tips  to-print  to  todo  tom  tools  top-performer  top  touchpoint  tower  trump  tv  uncategorized  unilever  unitedstates  unitedstatesofamerica  unschooling  usa  value  video  videos  visibility  walterlang  washingtonpost  westbank  wisdom  with  work  writing  year  years  yemen 

Copy this bookmark: