engels   166

« earlier    

Yanis Varoufakis: Marx predicted our present crisis – and points the way out | News | The Guardian
The Communist Manifesto foresaw the predatory and polarised global capitalism of the 21st century. But Marx and Engels also showed us that we have the power to create a better world.
communism  capitalism  economics  politics  greece  manifesto  marx  engels 
may 2018 by markhgn
Why Marx is more relevant than ever in the age of automation
“That inner desire you are suppressing, for Marxism to be humanistic? That impulse towards individual liberation? It’s already there in Marx, just waiting to be discovered. So paint what you want, love whom you want. Fuck the vanguard party. The revolutionary subject is the self.”
Marx  Marxism  Engels  Lenin  Leninism  Stalin  Trotsky  imperialism  communism  humanism  KahloFrida  Althusser  anti-humanism  alienation  dctagged  dc:creator=MasonPaul  politics 
may 2018 by petej
[no title]
The English proletariat is actually becoming more
and more bourgeois, so that the ultimate aim of
this most bourgeois of all nations would appear to
be the possession, <I>alongside</I> the bourgeoisie, of a
bourgeois aristocracy and a bourgeois proletariat.
In the case of a nation which exploits the entire
world this is, of course, justified to some
extent.

F. Engels, October 7, 1858 "Letter to Marx"
Engels  Marx  English  proletariat 
june 2017 by out.sp0k1n
Power, Powerlessness, Thinking, and Future
Kommentar/Kritk von Bernard Stiegler zu Lagrasniere/Louis Manifest

OCTOBER 18, 2015

“TO EXPERIENCE POLITICS is today, for most of us, to experience powerlessness”: this is one of the opening sentences in the “Manifeste pour une contre-offensive intellectuelle et politique” published by Geoffroy de Lagasnerie and Edouard Louis in Le Monde on September 27–28, 2015.
KommunistischesManifest  Politik  Engels  BernardStiegler  EdouardLouis  Linke  GeoffroydeLagasnerie  Marx  Populismus 
april 2017 by amprekord
crap futures — constraint no. 2: legacies of the past
"We are locked into paths determined by decisions or choices made in previous eras, when the world was a much different place. For various reasons these legacies stubbornly persist through time, constraining future possibilities and blinkering us from alternative ways of thinking.

Here, sketched as usual on a napkin over coffee and toast, are some thoughts on legacies of the past that exercise power over our future.

Infrastructure. Take energy, for example. Tesla’s invention of alternating current became the dominant system - rather than Edison’s direct current - essentially because it allowed electricity generated at power stations to be capable of travelling large distances. Tesla’s system has, for the most part, been adopted across the world - an enormous network of stations, cables, pylons, and transformers, with electrical power arriving in our homes through sockets in the wall. This pervasive system dictates or influences almost everything energy related, and in highly complex ways: from the development of new energy generation methods (and figuring out how to feed that energy into the grid) to the design of any electrical product.

Another example is transportation. As Crap Futures has discovered, it is hard to get around this volcanic and vertiginous island without a car. There are no trains, it is too hilly to ride a bike, buses are slow and infrequent, and meanwhile over the past few decades the regional government - one particular government with a 37-year reign - poured millions into building a complex network of roads and tunnels. People used to get to other parts of the island by boat; now (and for the foreseeable future) it is by private car. This is an example of recent infrastructure that a) perpetuated and was dictated by dominant ideas of how transportation infrastructure should be done, and b) will further constrain possibilities for the island into the future.

Laws and insurance. There is a problematic time-slip between the existence of laws and insurance and the real-life behaviour of humans. Laws and insurance are for the most part reactive: insurance policies, for example, are based on amassed data that informs the broker of risk levels, and this system therefore needs history to work. So when you try to insert a new product or concept - a self-driving car or delivery drone - into everyday life, the insurance system pushes back. Insurance companies don’t want to gamble on an unknown future; they want to look at the future through historical data, which is by nature a conservative lens.

Laws, insurance, and historical infrastructure often work together to curb radical change. This partly explains why many of the now technologically realisable dreams of the past, from jetpacks to flying cars, are unlikely to become an everyday reality in that imagined form - more likely they will adapt and conform to existing systems and rules.
"No great idea in its beginning can ever be within the law. How can it be within the law? The law is stationary. The law is fixed. The law is a chariot wheel which binds us all regardless of conditions or place or time." — Emma Goldman, Anarchism and Other Essays (1910)

It is true that laws sometimes outstay their welcome or impede progress. The slow pace at which laws change becomes more and more apparent as the pace of innovation increases. But there are positive as well as negative constraints, and laws often constrain us for good (which of course is their supposed function). At best, they check our impulses, give us a cooling off period, prevent us from tearing everything down at a whim.

So the law can be a force for good. But then of course - good, bad, or ineffectual - there are always those who find ways to circumvent the law. Jonathan Swift wrote: ‘Laws are like cobwebs, which may catch small flies, but let wasps and hornets break through.’ With their shock-and-awe tactics, companies like Uber manage to overcome traditional legal barriers by moving faster than local laws or simply being big enough to shrug off serious legal challenges.

Technology is evolutionary. (See Heilbroner’s quote in the future nudge post.) Comparisons between natural and technological evolution have been a regular phenomenon since as far back Darwin’s On the Origin of Species (1859). Darwin’s revolutionary work inspired philosophers, writers, and anthropologists - Marx and Engels, Samuel Butler, Augustus Pitt-Rivers - to suggest that technological artefacts evolve in a manner similar to natural organisms. This essentially means that technological development is unidirectional, and that radical new possibilities do not happen.

Viewing technology in evolutionary terms would appear to constrain us to only the possibilities that we could reasonably ‘evolve’ into. But this does not have to be the case: natural evolution works by random mutation and natural selection with no ‘plan’ as such, whereas technological innovation and product design are firmly teleologic (literally ‘end-directed’). In other words, the evolutionary model of technological change ignores basic human agency. While natural organisms can’t dip into the historical gene pool to bring back previous mutations, however useful they might be, innovators and designers are not locked into an irreversible evolutionary march and can look backward whenever they choose. So why don’t they? It is a case - circling back to constraint no. 1 - of thinking under the influence of progress dogma."
2015  crapfutures  constraints  darwin  evolution  innovation  future  progress  progressdogma  transportation  infrastructure  law  legal  time  pace  engels  friedrichengels  technology  californianideology  emmagoldman  anarchism  insurance  policy  electricity  nikolatesla  thomasedison  systems  systemsthinking  jonathanswift  samuelbutler  karlmarx  longnow  bighere  augustuspitt-rivers 
january 2016 by robertogreco

« earlier    

related tags

1%  19thc  2015  abwrackpraemie  accent  accents  akko  alcohol  algemene-ontwikkeling  alice-in-wonderland  alienation  althusser  amerika  anarchism  anti-humanism  archief  artikel  audio  augustuspitt-rivers  austerity  automation  backhaus  badenglish  bailout  banking  bankofengland  beer  bernardstiegler  best  big  bighere  biographies  black  boek  boeken  book.reviews  book  books  brieven  bubbles  buitenlands  californianideology  camerondavid  capital  capitalism  career  charlie-white  cladding  class  codes  coefficient  cognitief  cohesion  communism  compensation  constraints  construction  contract  copyright  copywriter  crapfutures  crime  crisis  crony  curiosity  cuts  darwin  david  dc:creator=chakraborttyaditya  dc:creator=engelsfriedrich  dc:creator=masonpaul  dctagged  deals  debt  delen  depression  deregulation  dialect  dialectic-historical  dialectic  dialectics  displacement  doe-een-gok  door  download  drunkenness  e-books  ebooks  economic_theory  economics  economist  economy  edition  edouardlouis  education  ef-add  eindhoven  electricity  emmagoldman  encyclopedieën  engelsfriedrich  english  eric.hobsbawm  etexts  eu  europa  eurotopics  evolution  ewout_wolff  exploitation  feuerbach  fire  fiscal  for  frankfurtschool  free  friday  friedrich  friedrichengels  future  geoffroydelagasnerie  george-mason-university  german_idealism  germany  gesamtausgabe  geschichte  geschiedenis  gfc  gini  globish  grammar  grammarly  grammatica  gramsci  gramsciantonio  grappig  great  greatdepression  greece  grenfelltower  guardian  haldaneandrew  hegel  hegelian  heise  herausgabe  history.of.social.science  history  hobsbawm  horkheimermax  howto  html  humanism  humor  humour  hunt  hörbuch  ielts  illustraties  imperial-college  imperialism  income  inequality  inflation  infrastructure  innovation  insurance  intellectual_history  internet  investment  invloed  jail  jobs  johnsonboris  jonathanswift  kahlofrida  kapital  kapitalismus  karl  karlmarx  kautskykarl  kijken  kinderzoekmachines  kommunismus  kommunistisches  kommunistischesmanifest  korschkarl  krant  kunst  labor  labour  language  languages  law  legal  lenin  leninism  leren  lewis-carroll  lezen  lijst  linke  literatur  literatuur  living  lobby  lobbying  lobbyist  longnow  loxone  luddites  lukacs  lynch  maken  malthus  manifest  manifesto  mao  marx  marxism-leninism  marxism  marxismus  marxist  materialism  maximisation  mega  middle  mobility  monetary  murder  my_private_library  naslag  nederlands  newgermanreading  nieuws  nikolatesla  nirp  onderwijs  onderzoek  outsourcing  pace  papers  pdfs  philips  philosopher  philosophie  philosophy  plaatjes  poezie  policy  political_economy  politicians  politics  politik  poor  populismus  portals  precariat  precarious  private_discussions  productive  productivity  profit  progress  progressdogma  proletariat  property  protectionism  publishing  qe  quadrat  quiz  quote  recovery  regels  regulation  regulators  revolving  rich  robert-mccrum  robots  rom  royal-college-of-art  safety  said-what  samuelbutler  scandinavisch  schrijven  science  self-regulation  shareholder  short-term  simile  social  social_theory  socialism  socialmurder  sovereign  sovereignty  speculative  spelen  spelling  spreekwoorden  squeezed  stalin  standards  stijlgids  street  subsidies  subsidizing  super  sustainability  systems  systemsthinking  taal  taalkunde  tbtf  technisch  technology  ted  tekeningen  test  texts  theory  thinking  thomasedison  through-the-looking-glass  time  tips  to  toni-bellanca  too  toobigtofail  tp  transportation  trickle-down  trotsky  tutorials  tweetalig  twinpeaks  twitter  uk  value  vergelijking  vertaling  vervoegingen  viaf  viafpage  video  view  vincent-van-gogh  wage  wall  weblectures  webservice  website  werkwoorden  western  wiki  wikipedia  wikipediapage  willingham  wissen  woorden  work  working  workingclass  world  yield  zirp  zoeken  zoekmachines  zwischenstand 

Copy this bookmark:



description:


tags: