emissions   2079

« earlier    

Oil and Gas Emissions Have Increased Under California's Cap and Trade Program
“ProPublica analyzed state data in a way the state doesn’t often report to the public, isolating how emissions have grown within the oil and gas industry. The analysis shows that carbon emissions from California’s oil and gas industry actually rose 3.5% since cap and trade began. Refineries, including one owned by Marathon Petroleum and two owned by Chevron, are consistently the largest polluters in the state. Emissions from vehicles, which burn the fuels processed in refineries, are also rising.

Critics attribute these increases, in part, to a bevy of concessions the state has made to the oil and gas industry to keep the program going. They say these compromises have blocked steps that would have mandated real emissions reductions and threaten the state’s ability to meet its ambitious goal of slashing its emissions 40% by 2030.

“There’s no question a well-designed regulation on oil and gas can have an effect,” said Danny Cullenward, a Stanford researcher and policy director at Near Zero, a climate policy think tank. “And that was traded away for a weak cap-and-trade program.”

Experts say cap and trade is rarely stringent enough when used alone; direct regulations on refineries and cars are crucial to reining in emissions. But oil representatives are engaged in a worldwide effort to make market-based solutions the primary or only way their emissions are regulated.

Officials with the state Air Resources Board, which oversees cap and trade, say those fears are exaggerated, that California’s program is doing what it needs to do and they can tweak it over time as needed. They point to the state’s overall drop in emissions since cap and trade began in 2013, even as its economy grew. They tout a host of other, more traditional climate regulations widely considered the best in the country.

But even with all those rules working together, California needs to more than double its yearly emissions cuts to be on track to meet the 2030 target. Meanwhile, the scope of the climate crisis and public pressure for strong regulations on fossil fuel companies have risen exponentially, even in the past year.

ProPublica delved into the mechanics of California’s cap-and-trade program, examining 13 years of political horse-trading, regulatory tinkering and industry lobbying to make sense of rising fears that it will not deliver the emissions reductions it is supposed to.

Five areas of concerns have emerged, some specific to the state’s program and some so fundamental that they raise questions about whether market solutions anywhere can do the work that is needed to take meaningful climate action while there is still time.

[1] Cap and Trade Isn’t Designed to Hold Any One Company Accountable

… [2] Market-Based Climate Change Solutions Are Being Set Up to Provide Loopholes and Giveaways

… [3] California’s Oil Industry has Blocked Efforts to Make Cap and Trade Tougher on Them

… [4] More Meaningful Regulations Are Being Sacrificed

[5] We’re Dependent on Fossil Fuels”

[See also:

“Cap and Trade Is Supposed to Solve Climate Change, but Oil and Gas Company Emissions Are Up

Countries have called California’s cap-and-trade program the answer to climate change. But it is just as vulnerable to lobbying as any other legislation. The result: The state’s biggest oil and gas companies have actually polluted more since it started.”]
capandtrade  emissions  climatechange  policy  lobbying  carbonemissions  2019  environment  fossilfuels  bigpetroleum  capitalism  regulation  accountability  loopholes  markets 
2 hours ago by robertogreco
Greenhouse Gas Emissions 101 by Oli Hall | Target 2030
Data engineer-turned-climate activist, Oli Hall, provides a great introduction to the forces behind our Greenhouse Gas Emissions (GHGs) problem.
emissions  carbonimpact  globalwarming  climatechange  ppt  sustainibility 
9 days ago by NiklasJordan
CarbonLimited trial produces encouraging results for backers of personal carbon budgets | Environment | The Guardian
Royal Society forecasts scheme to encourage individuals to cut their global warming emissions could be in place in just over a decade
personalcarbontracking  climatechange  uk  emissions  carboncard 
10 days ago by npdoty
The Best of a Bad Situation | Issue 33 | n+1
The immediate switch to sustainable energy on a global scale also addresses one of the intellectual stumbling blocks that has bedeviled even well-intentioned climate-change policy makers: what to do about so-called developing societies. Unlike the ascetic cap-and-trade system, we aren’t required by this switch to turn to Indian or Chinese middle classes and say, “we deny you the quality of life that we enjoyed.” We should have never enjoyed it in the way we did — that was well understood, then as now, if for different reasons. The extraction-based political economy that buoys a specific stratum of India, Brazil, Iran, the Arabian Peninsula states, and China is objectionable on nearly every level; there’s no “global justice” legitimacy to the idea that past resource exploitation by Western powers entitles the elites of postcolonial developing countries to squander the future of their own citizens and the rest of the planet. Wholesale disaster under the banner of postcolonial nationalism will not feel better than under the banner of revanchist white nationalism.

Does this sound madly utopian? If so, it’s because the fossil-fuel industry — and that term, industry, must now include governments like Russia’s and our own — has been successful at obscuring how close we are to being able to switch over to renewable energy. The relevant technologies of solar, wind, hydro, and even nuclear power all exist. Architects and green industrial designers know how to make structures that aren’t just energy efficient but even net-energy positive. Under political conditions other than our current ones, we’d have great reason for optimism.

But unlike with other utopian programs, no one seems to see the promise. “Decouple now” and “Renewable or bust” don’t seem likely to harness the diverse interest groups currently opposed to Trump and the Republican Party. Most of us prefer to remain in the dark when it comes to energy. It’s still far easier to imagine the end of the world than the end of carbon-based capitalism. But what other choice do we have, America? Let’s get right down to the job — nearsighted, psychopathic, queer, angelic, diabolical, whatever we are, harness that most renewable of resources, human will, and put our shoulders to the wheel.
climateChange  politics  globalWarming  inequality  refugees  migration  USA  ObamaBarack  TrumpDonald  coal  Paris  COP21  emissions  fossilFuels  socialDarwinism  authoritarianism  racism  fear  catastrophe  KolbertElizabeth  writing  energy  renewables  sustainability 
20 days ago by petej
Winds of change: the sailing ships cleaning up sea transport | World news | The Guardian
Ethically minded entrepreneurs are turning back the clock to sweep the scourge of bunker fuel from the oceans
conservation  climatechange  shipping  sailboat  carbon  emissions 
23 days ago by stevesong

« earlier    

related tags

/  1.5  2.0  20  2019  2030  ::twitter::  academia  accountability  act  activism  activity  additionality  agriculture  agw  air+travel  air  air_pollution_&_climate_change  aircraft  airlines  airplanes  algae  alternative  amazon  andynewman  animals  anthropocene  antitrust  aramco  atmosphere  australia  authoritarianism  automation  aviation  ayramhiller  bacteria  balance  barr  batteries  bbc  behavior  bias  bigpetroleum  biochemistry  biogeochemistry  biology  biosphere  book  borders  bp  britain  budget  business  california  canada  capandtrade  capitalism  car  carbon+footprint  carbon  carboncapture  carboncard  carbondioxide  carbonemissions  carbonfootprint  carbonimpact  carbonoffset  carbonoffsets  carbonsequestration  carpooling  cars  carsharing  catastrophe  caz  ccs  change  charts  chemistry  chevron  china  civil  climate+change  climate+crisis  climate-change  climate.change  climate  climate_change  climate_policy  climate_science_primer  climate_science_study  climatechange  climateemergency  climatejustice  clippings  co2  coal  coercion  collapse  colonialism  companies  conferences  conservation  conspiracy  consumerism  consumption  controls  cop21  corporations  cost  costs  cotton  countries  crisis  crucial  cruising  cycles  data  degrowth  denial  deregulation  development  dirknotz  discount  doj  dollars  driving  earth  ecology  economics  ecosystem  ecosystems  efficiency  efficient  electric  electriccars  electricity  electrochemistry  elitism  elonmusk  embedded  emission  employment  energy  energystudy  engineering  enviro  environment  estimation  ethics  europe  ev  exxon  exxonmobil  facts  farming  favorites  fear  fee  fertilizer  figures  flight  flights  flightshame  flygskam  flying  flyingshame  fossil+fuels  fossil-fuels  fossil  fossil_fuels  fossilfuels  fracking  friedrichengels  fuel  fuels  gas  gases  genevieveguenther  geology  ghgs  global-warming  global  globalwarming  goodhart  google  graph  greatacceleration  green  greenhouse  greenhousegases  greennewdeal  gretathunberg  grid  growth  guilt  halve  hammondphilip  heating  highered  highereducation  highspeedrail  historyofscience  holidays  hours  house  hovlanes  human  hyperloop  hypocrisy  ianangus  imperialism  important  indicator  inequality  inequity  infrastructure  injustice  insidesources  integration  interviews  ipcc  ireland  jancovici  javascript  johnnolt  juliennestroeve  justusvonliebig  karlmarx  kolbertelizabeth  kpi  labour  labourparty  leakage  lean  legal  lez  life  lng  lobbying  loopholes  lppd  lucretius  lyft  major  maps  markets  marxism  materials  matthewpaskins  measure  measurement  measurements  meat  meetings  metabolicrift  metabolism  methane  microbiology  microplastics  migration  mitigation  mmm  morality  movements  natural_gas  naturalgas  nature  networking  newcastleupontyne  news  nitrogen  npm  nuclear  nyc  nz  obamabarack  ocean  offets  offsetting  oil  open-source  opportunity  optimi  oram  oreskes  overwork  oxygen  parenting  paris  pay  performance  permafrost  permanence  permian_basin  personalcarbontracking  petrochemical  petrol  plane  planes  plants  plastics  plot  policy  politics  polluters  pollution  power  ppt  price  process  product  productivity  public.policy  publictransit  quality  quantification  racism  rdguk  rebate  rebeccatuhus-dubrow  recycling  reduction  refugees  regulation  renewable  renewables  report  resource  responsibility  restitution  ridesharing  rod  rosaluxemburg  sailboat  science  sectoral  security  selfishness  sf6  shame  shell  shipping  signaling  smog  socialdarwinism  socialjustice  socialmetabolism  society  soil  solar  solarfuel  space  states  statistics  stats  status  steel  subsidies  sustainability  sustainibility  suv  suvs  targets  tax  technology  technosolutionism  temperature  textiles  tommacwright  top  top20  toptwenty  tourism  tpm  traffic  trains  transit  transport  transportation  travel  trees  trevornoah  trillion  trump  trumpdonald  twenty  uber  uk  united  universalbasicincome  us  usa  visas  visualisation  vladimirvernadsky  volcanoes  wages  waltersinnott-armstrong  warming  waste  water  wind  work  writing 

Copy this bookmark: