economists   633

« earlier    

Brad M. Barber - UC Davis Graduate School of Management
Helps students prepare for global business leadership with opportunities like the center’s fellowships at CalPERS and CalSTRS, the nation’s two largest public pension funds.
9 weeks ago by lenaarai
Passive investing is storing up trouble
August 2, 2018 | Financial Times | by Megan Greene.

I was recently informed by the owner of an artificial intelligence fund that markets do not listen to economists any more. .....A fundamental shift in market structure towards rules-based, passive investing over the past decade means a lot of trading is no longer based on fundamentals. But just because some markets do not pay attention to economists, it does not mean economists should not pay attention to these markets........AI quant funds are not waiting on tenterhooks for analysis of every non-farm payrolls report, Fed press conference, Donald Trump tweet, or earnings report. Instead, they look for trading strategies that are succeeding and adopt those strategies until a better one comes along, regardless of the underlying fundamentals. But what happens when the strategy suddenly becomes to sell everything? Will the computers find the buyers they need?.......ETFs, often set up to mimic an index, have to buy more of equities rising in price, sending those stock prices even higher. ETFs similarly ignore fundamentals.....This creates a piling-on effect as funds buy more of these increasingly expensive stocks and less of the cheaper ones in their indices...Risks of a bubble arise when there is no regard for underlying fundamentals or price. It is reasonable to assume a sustained market correction would lead to stocks that were disproportionately bought because of ETFs and index funds being disproportionately sold.

But again, in a crisis will the ETF managers find liquid markets? ....Passive investors and quant funds could also threaten the economy by making markets vastly more complex, noisy and opaque. They send mixed signals to active investors about what the fair value of a stock is. That could cause a significant misallocation of capital.

The danger is exacerbated by the speed at which trading is now done. The average holding period for a security on the New York Stock Exchange has fallen from two months in 2008 to just under 20 seconds today.......Systemic failures, misallocation of capital and dried up liquidity could cause a bear market, dragging on growth when the economic backdrop is already lacklustre......So even though passive investors ignore economists, economists should pay attention to risks posed by the shift in market structure they represent....This is not to say that index funds, ETFs and AI quant funds are necessarily bad. But the real test will come when there is a sudden crisis followed by a sustained bear market.
active_investing  artificial_intelligence  bear_markets  economists  ETFs  holding_periods  index_funds  investing  liquidity  misallocations  NYSE  passive_investing  piling_on  risks  systemic_failures  rules-based  bubbles  quantitative  market_fundamentals  crisis  dark_side  pay_attention 
august 2018 by jerryking
The Wrongest Profession | Dean Baker
[via: ]

"How economists have botched the promise of widely distributed prosperity—and why they have no intention of stopping now"

"OVER THE PAST TWO DECADES, the economics profession has compiled an impressive track record of getting almost all the big calls wrong. In the mid-1990s, all the great minds in the field agreed that the unemployment rate could not fall much below 6 percent without triggering spiraling inflation. It turns out that the unemployment rate could fall to 4 percent as a year-round average in 2000, with no visible uptick in the inflation rate.

As the stock bubble that drove the late 1990s boom was already collapsing, leading lights in Washington were debating whether we risked paying off the national debt too quickly. The recession following the collapse of the stock bubble took care of this problem, as the gigantic projected surpluses quickly turned to deficits. The labor market pain from the collapse of this bubble was both unpredicted and largely overlooked, even in retrospect. While the recession officially ended in November 2001, we didn’t start creating jobs again until the fall of 2003. And we didn’t get back the jobs we lost in the downturn until January 2005. At the time, it was the longest period without net job creation since the Great Depression.

When the labor market did finally begin to recover, it was on the back of the housing bubble. Even though the evidence of a bubble in the housing sector was plainly visible, as were the junk loans that fueled it, folks like me who warned of an impending housing collapse were laughed at for not appreciating the wonders of modern finance. After the bubble burst and the financial crisis shook the banking system to its foundations, the great minds of the profession were near unanimous in predicting a robust recovery. Stimulus was at best an accelerant for the impatient, most mainstream economists agreed—not an essential ingredient of a lasting recovery.

While the banks got all manner of subsidies in the form of loans and guarantees at below-market interest rates, all in the name of avoiding a second Great Depression, underwater homeowners were treated no better than the workers waiting for a labor market recovery. The Obama administration felt it was important for homeowners, unlike the bankers, to suffer the consequences of their actions. In fact, white-collar criminals got a holiday in honor of the financial crisis; on the watch of the Obama Justice Department, only a piddling number of bankers would face prosecution for criminal actions connected with the bubble.

There was a similar story outside the United States, as the International Monetary Fund, along with the European Central Bank and the European Union, imposed austerity when stimulus was clearly needed. As a result, southern Europe is still far from recovery. Even after another decade on their current course, many southern European countries will fall short of their 2007 levels of income. The situation looks even worse for the bottom half of the income distribution in Greece, Spain, and Portugal.

Even the great progress for the world’s poor touted in the famous “elephant graph” turns out to be largely illusory. If China is removed from the sample, the performance of the rest of the developing world since 1988 looks rather mediocre. While the pain of working people in wealthy countries is acute, they are not alone. Outside of China, people in the developing world have little to show for the economic growth of the last three and a half decades. As for China itself, the gains of its huge population are real, but the country certainly did not follow Washington’s model of deficit-slashing, bubble-driven policies for developing countries.

In this economic climate, it’s not surprising that a racist, xenophobic, misogynist demagogue like Donald Trump could succeed in politics, as right-wing populists have throughout the wealthy world. While his platform may be incoherent, Trump at least promised the return of good-paying jobs. Insofar as Clinton and other Democrats offered an agenda for economic progress for American workers, hardly anyone heard it. And to those who did, it sounded like more of the same."

"At this point, the deficit hawks typically start raising apocalyptic fears about higher taxes impoverishing our children. I have three responses to this claim.

The first is that we are all paying much higher Social Security and Medicare taxes than our parents and grandparents did. Are we therefore the victims of generational inequity? What’s more, the main reason Social Security costs are rising is that our kids will live longer lives than we will. In other words, the dire specter of a generously subsidized cohort of older Americans is actually a sign of widespread social progress. (High Medicare costs are due to an incredibly inefficient health care system, but that’s another story—one that deficit hawks are also in the midst of monkey-wrenching in order to delegitimize any state-supported solution.)

My second reply is that we should be worried about after-tax income, not the tax rate. Recall that austerity policies favored by deficit hawks may have already cost us the equivalent of an increase in the payroll tax of 14 percentage points. We’re supposed to get hysterical over the prospect that our kids may pay 2 to 3 more percentage points in payroll taxes, but be unconcerned about this huge and needless loss of before-tax income?

More generally, if we manage to reverse the wage stagnation of the past thirty-plus years and see ordinary workers once more take a share of the gains of economic growth, their before-tax pay will be 40 to 50 percent higher in three decades than it is today. If they have to give back some of these gains in higher payroll taxes in order to support a longer retirement, it’s hard to see just what the problem would be. (The bigger question, of course, is whether we can succeed in creating a political economy in which ordinary workers will once again share in generalized economic growth.) And taxes are just one way in which the government imposes costs on citizens. Donald Trump wants to have a massive infrastructure program financed by the creation of toll roads. These tolls will be paid to private companies and will not count as taxes. Feel better?

On a much larger scale, the government grants patent and copyright monopolies as an incentive for research and creative work. In the case of prescription drugs alone, these patent monopolies cost close to $350 billion a year (approximately 1.9 percent of GDP) over what the price of drugs would be in a truly free market. Even as deficit hawks try to convince us that the government can’t afford to borrow another $50 billion a year to finance the research done by the pharmaceutical industry, they tell us not to worry about the extra $350 billion we pay for drugs because of government-granted patent monopolies. This monomaniacal obsession with tax burdens, to the exclusion of any reckoning with the burden of patent monopolies, shows yet again that the deficit hawks’ oft-professed concern for our children’s well-being is purely rhetorical, and in no way serious.

We should remember that we will pass down a whole society to our kids—including the natural environment that underwrites the quality of life of future generations. If the cost of ensuring that large numbers of children do not grow up in poverty and that the planet is not destroyed by global warming is a somewhat higher current or future tax burden, that hardly seems like a bad deal—especially if the burden is apportioned fairly. Now suppose, by contrast, that we hand our kids a country in which large segments of the population are unhealthy and uneducated and the environment has been devastated by global warming, but we have managed to pay off the national debt. That is, after all, the future that many in the mainstream of the economics profession are prescribing for the country. Somehow, I don’t see future generations thanking us."
economics  economists  us  policy  politics  deanbaker  health  healthcare  deficits  government  governance  gdp  priorities  labor  markets  capitalism  socialsecurity  bubbles  greatrecession  2018  china  portugal  spain  españa  greece  eu  paulryan  timothygeitner  donaldtrump  taxes 
july 2018 by robertogreco
US and China must find ways to control their elites | Financial Times
July 1, 2018 | FT| Rana Foroohar. Pinboard saved article/artifact #25,000

Success rests on heading off popular unrest, rather than winning trade fights.
Tension between the US and China is driving much of what is happening in the markets today. The analysis has focused on tariffs, currency manipulation, strategic technologies and which country has the most to win or lose in a trade war.

But there is a more important question to be asked when thinking about the future success and stability of each nation: which country will be better able to control its moneyed elites?

In his 1982 work The Rise and Decline of Nations, the economist Mancur Olson argues that civilisations tend to decline when the moneyed interests take over politics. That has clearly happened in both countries, where the levels of wealth inequality are not dissimilar; the top 1 per cent in China own about 30 per cent of the economy; in the US, the figure is 42 per cent.

........Chinese leaders also believe that America’s inability to curb its own elites will be the country’s downfall [Achilles’ heel]....America’s elite business class has, for decades now, sought to distract from rising oligopoly with hypocrisy. US companies complain vociferously about unfair Chinese trade practices and intellectual property theft.
conflicts  confrontations  U.S.-China_relations  U.S.  China  elitism  Rana_Foroohar  the_One_Percent  self-interest  books  economists  Mancur_Olson  entrenched_interests  Achilles’_heel  Xi_Jinping  corruption  Chinese_Communist_Party 
july 2018 by jerryking

« earlier    

related tags

'40s  ***  1973  1st  2015  2016  2017  2018  a  aboriginals  about  abundance  academia  accumulation  accusations  achilles’_heel  active_investing  adam_smith  added  african-americans  aggregate  airbnb  alanjacobs  algorithms  allisonschrager  america_in_decline?  an  and  angela  apprenticeships  are  argumentation  arrogance  artificial_intelligence  artists  ask  asset_classes  austerity  austrian  automation  avoidance  await  babyboomers  bad_news  balance  bargaining  base_rates  bay_street  bear_markets  benefit  benjamin_bernanke  benjamin_graham  beyondtheu.s.  biography  blogosphere  blogs  bobcorker  boe  books  boudreaux  brad_delong  break  brexit  bubble  bubbles  business  c  cameron  canada  capital_flows  capital_gains  capitalism  carbon  carney  cast  central_banks  chairmen  chicago  chicagoboys  chile  china  chinese_communist_party  christinelagarde  city  civil_disobedience  climate  climatechange  colleges_&_universities  comment  commodities  common  competitiveness  complacency  complexity  concentration_risk  confidence  conflicts  confrontations  conservative  constituency  construction  consumer  consumer_behavior  contingency_planning  contract  contractor  contrarians  cool  corporate  corruption  cost  covenants  creation  creative_destruction  credit  crisis  criticalthinking  cumulative  cut  cynefin  daily-pile  damonlinker  dangers  daniel_kahneman  dark_side  darrellduffie  data-science  data  data_driven  david  david_autor  david_rosenberg  deanbaker  debate  debt  debtoverhang  decision_making  deficits  deflation  delusions  demand  denounces  design  determine  deterrence  developed_countries  developing_countries  differences  digital_economy  dilemmas  disadvantages  disagreements  disenfranchisement  diversification  dogma  doleac  donald_trump  donaldtrump  doubt  downward_mobility  due  duncan  dwp  dynamism  dystopian_future  economic  economic_balance  economic_cycles  economic_mobility  economics-of-education  economics  economist  economy  editors  education  efficiencies  elitism  emotions  energy  entrenched_interests  españa  etfs  ethics  eu  european  evasion  examples  exclusion  expectations  experimentation  expert  experts  exploration  exports  externalities  facebook  fail  fairness  fairy  farewells  fdr  fear  fearlessness  fed  finance  financial_system  fiscal  fixed_costs  for  forecasting  forecasts  former  free  friedrich_hayek  from  ft  funding  galbraith  game_theory  gap  gdp  gender  generationengerechtigkeit  geographic_mobility  gfc  giants?  gilder's_law  global  gluskin_sheff  google  gop  governance  government  government_intervention  gratitude  great_depression  greatrecession  greece  greg_ip  greggrandin  hal_varian  harvard  headed  health  healthcare  high-risk  hinkley  history  hmrc  holding_periods  hollowing_out  hollywood  hopelessness  hour  housing  howwebecame  human_capital  humility  iain  ian.crawford  ideology  idle_no_more  iep  if  ifttt  illusions  imf  immigration  improbables  income-based  income  income_inequality  index_funds  indices  industrial  industrial_policies  inequality  infancy  information  information_overload  infrastructure  innovation  insights  instability  interviews  investing  investment  investors  iphone  is  isi  ivy_league  james  japan  jason_zweig  jeffflake  jeffstein  jennifer  jevons_paradox  jim_manzi  job  job_destruction  job_displacement  job_search  jobs  joel_mokyr  john_maynard_keynes  johnmaynardkeynes  johnzmirak  joseph  joseph_schumpeter  journalism  jsa  judgment  julia  justification  justin  keynes  keynesianism  koo  krugman  labor  language  large_companies  larry.katz  latecapitalism  learning  legislation  legitimzation  less  lessons_learned  let  life_long_learning  lifelong  liquidity  liraneinav  list  lobby  lobbying  lobbyist  lolconomics  london  look  low-risk  low  machine_learning  macroeconomic  mancur_olson  manufacturers  manufacturing  marginal  marginalization  mariana_mazzucato  mark  market  market_corrections  market_fundamentals  markets  massive_data_sets  media  merkel  messiness  michael_mauboussin  microeconomic  microeconomics  milton_friedman  miltonfriedman  minford  minimum  misallocations  mistakes  mit  mitchmcconnell  modeling  models  monetary  money  monopolies  moral_hazards  more  multiplier  nabe  nannystate  nasty  negotiations  neoliberal  neoliberalism  neuroscience  never_forever  nobel  nobel_prizes  nordhaus  not  nuclear  numbers  nyse  nz  obit  obituaries  occupy_wall_street  oecd  of  oliverhart  on  operational_tempo  opinion  orthodoxy  output  outsourcing  over_investment  oversupply  pact  paradoxes  party  pascal’s_wager  passive_investing  patriotism  paul  paul_krugman  paul_ryan  paul_waldie  paulryan  pay  pay_attention  peggy_noonan  pennwharton  pennwhartonbudgetmodel  people  personal_economy  pessimism  peter_bernstein  phds  physical_economy  piling_on  pinochet  plan_b  point  policy  policy_innovation  political  politics  poor  portugal  power  precariat  precarious  predictions  preferences  preparation  pretense_of_knowledge  price  prices  priorities  privatesector  probabilities  proclivities  productive  productivity  programming  project  property  protest_movements  psychology  public_policy  publicpolicy  q2  quantitative  quarter  quotations  race_relations  rana_foroohar  rate  ratio  readiness  reality  recession  recovery  regulation  reich  rentcontrol  report  republicans  research  restlessness  retailers  retirement  revealed-preference  richard  rise  risk-assessment  risk-mitigation  risks  robert  robotics  robots  roland_fryer  romer  ronald_reagan  rules-based  russia  safety_nets  salvadorallende  scarcity  school  schuldenbremse  schäuble  science  scientists  scott_sumner  sector  secular  self-analysis  self-awareness  self-defeating  self-delusions  self-employment  self-help  self-interest  self-reflective  self-regulation  sense  service  sexism  sexual_harassment  sharing_economy  sheet  should  shutdown  silicon-valley  silicon_valley  simon_wren-lewis  skepticism  skills  slowdown  smartguy  smith  social_cohesion  social_collaboration  social_fabric  social_integration  social_media  socialsecurity  society  sociology  sophisticated  spain  speculative  speed  spending  spreadsheets  stagnation  stanford  stem  steve_lohr  stiglitz  structural-estimation  structural_change  subsidies  subsidizing  superstars  support  surprises  swedish  systemic_failures  take  talent  talent_flows  talking  tax  taxes  taxfoundation  taxpolicycenter  tech  technological_change  technology  testing  that  the  the_american_dream  the_one_percent  them  theory  thomas_schelling  thomas_sowell  thomaspiketty  tim_harford  timothygeitner  to  to:follow  to:read  todd_hirsch  tories  tough-mindedness  tpl  trade  trader  traders  transportation  trap  trickle-down  trump  trust  trustworthiness  truth  tumblr  tumult  turbulence  twitter  tyler_cowen  u.s.-china_relations  u.s.  uber  uchicago  uk  uncertainty  under_water  underinvestment  unemployment  unexpected  unimaginable  union  uniquedata  up  us  userexperience  ussr  value  vix  voice  volatility  wage  wages  wall_street  walter  want  war_for_talent  warming  warning_signs  washpost  waste  we  welfare  who  why  wikipedia  wilhelmröpke  williams  wisdom  wolfers  wolfgang  work  working  workplaces  world  xi_jinping  you  zero 

Copy this bookmark: