duties   68

« earlier    

The Trouble with Knowledge | Shikshantar
"First Main Trouble with Knowledge and Education is Dishonesty

I do believe that one aspect which characterizes education, development and the production and dissemination of knowledge, in today’s world, is the lack of intellectual honesty. This belief is an outcome of reflecting on my experience during my school and university years and my almost 40 years of work. The dishonesty is connected to the values, which govern the thinking and practice in the fields of education, knowledge and development (mirroring the values in dominant societies and serving mainly the lifestyle of consumerism): control, winning, profit, individualism and competition. Having a syllabus and textbooks, and evaluating and judging people (students, teachers, administrators, and academics) through linear forms of authority and through linear symbolic values (such as arbitrary letters or grades or preferential labels), almost guarantee cheating, lack of honesty, and lack of relevance. (The recent reports that cheating and testing are on the rise in the Maryland and Chicago areas are just one example that came up to the surface. And of course teachers, principles and superintendents were blamed and had to pay the price.) I taught many years and put exams both at the level of classrooms and at the national level, and I labored and spent a lot of time and effort in order to be fair. But, then, I discovered that the problem is not in the intentions or the way we conduct things but, rather, in the values that run societies in general and which are propagated by education, development and knowledge -- among other venues. Thus, the main trouble with knowledge and education, is not so much their irrelevance or process of selection or the issue of power (though these are definitely part of the trouble) as it is with the lack of intellectual honesty in these areas. Giving a number or a letter to measure a human being is dishonest and inhuman; it is a degrading to the human mind and to human beings. Grading, in this sense, is degrading. It is one of the biggest abuses of mathematics in its history! Moreover, as long as the above-mentioned values remain as the governing values, education will continue to be fundamentally an obstacle to learning. Under these conditions, talking about improving or reforming education is naïve at best and hypocritical at worst. At most, it would touch a very small percentage of the student population in any particular region. Of course, we can go on putting our heads in the sand and refusing to see or care. But one main concern I will continue to have is what happens to the 80 some pecent of students whom the “compulsory suit” does not fit. Why imposing the same-size suit on all bodies sounds ridiculous but imposing the same curriculum on all minds does not?! The human mind is definitely more diverse that the human body.

Labeling a child as a “failure” is a criminal act against that child. For a child, who has learned so much from life before entering school, to be labeled a failure, just because s/he doesn’t see any sense in the mostly senseless knowledge we offer in most schools, is unfair – to say the least; it is really outrageous. But few of us around the world seem to be outraged, simply because we usually lose our senses in the process of getting educated. We are like those in Hans Christian Anderson’s story that lost their ability to see and had to be reminded by the little child that the emperor is without clothes.

Most people in the educational world (students, teachers, administrators, scholars, suprintendents, …) are dishonest (often without realizing it) either because we are too lazy to reflect on and see the absurdities in what we are doing (and just give to students what we were given in schools and universities, or during training courses and enrichment seminars!), or because we are simply afraid and need to protect ourselves from punishment or from being judged and labeled as inept or failures. This dishonesty prevails at all levels. I had a friend who was working in a prestigious university in the U.S. and who often went as an educational consultant and expert to countries to “improve and develop” their educational systems. Once, when he was on his way to Egypt as a consultant to help in reforming the educational system there, I asked him, “Have you ever been to Egypt?” He said no. I said, “Don’t you find it strange that you don’t know Egypt but you know what is good for it?!” Obviously, the richness, the wisdom and the depth of that 7000-year civilization is totally ignored by him, or more accurately, cannot be comprehended by him. Or, he may simply believe in what Kipling believed in in relation to India: to be ruled by Britain was India’s right; to rule India was Britain’s duty! In a very real sense, that friend of mine does not only abstract the theories he carries along with him everywhere but also abstracts the people by assuming that they all have the same deficits and, thus, the same solution – and that he has the solution.

Let’s take the term “sustainable development,” for example, which is widely used today and it is used in the concept paper for this conference. If we mean by development what we see in “developed” nations, then sustainable development is a nightmare. If we all start consuming, for example, at the rate at which “developed” nations currently do, then (as a friend of mine from Mexico says) we need at least five planets to provide the needed resources and to provide dumping sites for our waste! If “developing” nations consume natural resources (such as water) at the same rate “developed” nations do, such resources would be depleted in few years! Such “development” would be destructive to the soil of the earth and to the soil of cultures, both of which nurture and sustain human beings and human societies. The price would be very high at the level of the environment and at the level of beautiful relationships among people. Thus, those who believe in sustainable development (in its current conception and practice) are either naïve or dishonest or right out indifferent to what happens to nature, to beautiful relationship among people, and to the joyful harmony within human beings and between them and their surroundings. Nature and relationships among human beings are probably the two most precious treasures in life; the most valuable things human beings have. The survival of human and natural diversity (and even of human communities) are at stake here.

We do not detect dishonesty in the fields of education, knowledge and development because usually we are protected (in scools) from having much contact with life, through stressing verbal, symbolic and technical “knowledge,” through avoiding people’s experiences and surroundings, through the means we follow in evaluating people, and through ignoring history (history of people, of ideas, …). The main connection most school textbooks have with life is through the sections that carry the title “applications” – another instance of dishonesty. During the 1970s, for example, and as the head supervisor of math instruction in all the schools of the West Bank (in Palestine), one question I kept asking children was “is 1=1?” 1=1 is true in schoolbooks and on tests but in real life it has uses, abuses and misuses, but no real instances. We abstract apples in textbooks and make them equal but in real life there is no apple which is exactly equal to another apple. The same is true when we say that Newton discovered gravity. Almost every child by the age of one discovers it. (When my grandson, for example, was 15 months old, I was watching him once pick up pieces of cereal and put them in his mouth. Everytime he lost a piece, he would look for it down, never up!) By teaching that Newton discovered gravity, we do not only lie but also fail to clarify Newton’s real contribution. Similarly with teaching that Columbus discovered America …. Everyone of us can give tens of examples on dishonesty in the way we were taught and the way we teach."

"Second Main Trouble with Knowledge and Education: Lack of Connection with the Lives of the Social Majorities in the World"

"Building Learning Societies

From what has been said so far, two main approaches to knowledge and learning can be identified: (1) learning by doing; i.e. by the person being embedded in life, in one’s cultural soil. In this approach, learning is almost synonymous to living, and (2) the formal approach, which usually starts with ready pre-prepared content (usually fragmented into several subjucts, and usually put together in the absence of the two most important “actors” in learning: teachers and students). This approach also embodies tests and grades."

"Finally, I would like to affirm -- as a form of summary -- certain points, and point out to the need of dismantling others:

1. We need to dismantle the claim that learning can only take place in schools.

2. We need to dismantle the practice of separating students from life For at least 12 years) and still claim that learning is taking place.

3. We need to dismantle the assumption/ myth that teachers can teach what they don’t do.

4. We need to dismantle the myth that education can be improved through professionals and experts.

5. We need to dismantle the hegemony of words like education, development, progress, excellence, and rights and reclaim, instead, words like wisdom, faith, generosity, hope, learning, living, happiness, and duties.

6. We need to affirm that the vast mojority of people go to school not to learn but to get a diploma. We need to create diverse environments of learning.

7. We need to affirm our capacity for doing and learning, not for getting degrees.

8. We need to affirm and regain the concept and practice of “learning from the world,” not “about the world.”

9. We need to affirm that people are the real solution, not the obstacle and … [more]
munirfasheh  education  unschooling  schooling  schooliness  deschooling  diplomas  credentials  wisdom  degrees  faith  honesty  generosity  hope  learning  howwelearn  love  loving  lving  happiness  duties  duty  development  progress  excellence  rights  schools  community  learningcommunities  lcproject  openstudioproject  grades  grading  assessment  dishonesty  culture  society  hegemony  knowledge  influence  power  colonization  globalization  yemen  israel  palestine  humanism  governance  government  policy  politics  statism  children  egypt  india  westbank  religion  cordoba  cordova  gaza  freedom  failure  labeling  canon 
7 weeks ago by robertogreco
What Are the Duties of a Case Manager?
Have you ever considered becoming a case manager? Case managers are deeply involved in the lives of their clients.
social  workers  case  managers  manager  duties 
july 2017 by Adventure_Web
Tax Research UK » Companies do not have a legal duty to maximise profit or to avoid tax
"[I]n UK law there is:
a) No duty to maximise profit
b) No duty to minimise tax bills
c) A clear duty to exercise judgement."
companies  ethics  company  duties  obligations 
may 2016 by psychemedia

« earlier    

related tags

-  16thc  a  abilities  ach  activities  after  alfandega  amazon  amusing  analysis  analyst  and  anticompetitive  antisocial  architect  article  articles  as  assessment  assistant  authority  autonomy  ba  bankruptcy  bicycle  bloggers  blogs  bls  boardofdirectors  bols  border  brexit  british_history  broadband  brokerage  brydge  bureau-of-labor-statistics  bureauoflaborstatistics  burke  business  calcul  calculator  canada  canon  career  careers  cartoons  case  catholicism  cbp  children  china  cities-governance  citizen  citizenship  civic_virtue  clientelism  code  colonization  common_law  commonwealth  communication  community  companies  company  compliance  conflicts  copy  cordoba  cordova  credentials  culture  customs  cycling  daddy  data  database  degrees  delicious  department-of-labor  departmentoflabor  deschooling  description  development  diigo  diplomas  directors  dishonesty  disick  douane  dow  downloaded  dua  dumping  duties-civic  duty  ecommerce  education  ef-add  egypt  electronics  elites  emotional_field  emotions  employee  employer  enjoy  enjoying  entitlements  epistemology-social  es  espada  estimate  ethics  europe-early_modern  evidence  excellence  excitement  executor  existential_dilemmas  expensesscandal  experience  extortion  eye  facilitator  failure  fairness  faith  fave  favorite  federal  fee  financas  finance  financialcrisis  for  forms  forsegue  fr  frais  france  freedom  furniture  gaza  generosity  globalization  gov  governance-participation  governance  government  grades  grading  guide  guilt  handbook  happiness  harmonized  hegemony  honesty  hope  howto  howwelearn  hs  hst  hts  humanism  ifttt  import  importing  impostos  indeed  india  influence  insurance  intellectuals  interest  international  internet  internetaccess  israel  jameel  job  jobhunt  jobs  john  jones  journalism  journalist  journalists  judgment-independence  juries  jury  kentucky  knowledge  labeling  labor  landlord  law  lcproject  learning  learningcommunities  lease  leftism  legal_culture  legal_history  legal_validity  legitimacy  leo-strauss  life  links  living_day_by_day  local_government  locke  logistics  londonriots  loss  love  loving  lving  machiavelli  management  manager  managers  mason  media  medical  medieval_history  moral_philosophy  morality  mp  munirfasheh  natural-rights  natural_rights  nature  neumann  new  new_media  newspapers  nietzsche  nonprofit  obligations  occupation  occupational-outlook-handbook  occupational  occupationaloutlookhandbook  occupations  of  office  ooh  openstudioproject  outlook  over  palestine  paper  parliament  pay  perception  peripherals  persona  personal  peterosborne  philosophy_of_law  policy  policyholder  politicians  politics  portugal  power  privacy  privilege  progress  prohibitions  proof  psychology  public  public_goods  purolator  question  recommended  reference  regulation  regulations  religion  renter  requirements  resource  responsibili  responsibilities  responsibility  resume  rights-legal  rights-vs-duties  rights  roadway  role  rousseay  rule  rule_of_law  rules  safety  salary  sales  sample  schooliness  schooling  schools  scott  security  selling  separation  shinola  ship  shipping  shopperz  shopping  skills  social  socialwork  society  sod  software  software_architect  ssrn  state-vs-society  statism  statistics  status  student  study  sunsets  survey  sysadmin  systems  tariff  tarrifs  tax  taxes  teaching  tenant  test  thecanaries  thestate  thetelegraph  todo  took  tools  trade  training  trainings  trials  trustee  tutorial  tva  uk  united_states  unitedstates  unschooling  ups  us  usa  utah  v  vat  voltaire  von  vow  weather  west  westbank  while  wikileaks  will  wisdom  work  workers  workshops  yemen  your 

Copy this bookmark: