duopoly   56

« earlier    

he two political parties are one party—the corporate party. They do not debate substantive issues. They each support the expansion of imperial wars, the bloated military budget, the dictates of global capitalism, the bailing out of Wall Street, punishing austerity measures, assaulting basic civil liberties through wholesale government surveillance and the abolition of due process, and an electoral process that has cemented into place a system of legalized bribery. ...
The two political parties are one party—the corporate party. They do not debate substantive issues. They each support the expansion of imperial wars, the bloated military budget, the dictates of global capitalism, the bailing out of Wall Street, punishing austerity measures, assaulting basic civil liberties through wholesale government surveillance and the abolition of due process, and an electoral process that has cemented into place a system of legalized bribery. They battle over cultural tropes such as abortion, gay rights and prayer in schools. We elect politicians based on how we are made to feel about them by the public relations industry. Politics is anti-politics.

The Republican Party built its political base in these culture wars around Christian fascists, nativists and white supremacists. The Democratic Party built its base around those who supported workers’ rights, multiculturalism, diversity and gender equality. The base of each party was used and manipulated by elites. The Republican Party elites had no intention of banning abortion or turning America into a “Christian nation.” The Democratic Party elites had no intention of protecting workers from predatory corporatism. Everyone was sold out. The ascendancy of a populist right, dominated by racists and bigots, is the inevitable product of the corporate coup d’état, Saul said. He warned we should not be complacent because of President Trump’s imbecility. Trump is immensely dangerous. “The insipid,” Thomas Mann wrote in “The Magic Mountain,” “is not synonymous with the harmless.”....
Duopoly  ChrisHedges  DemocraticParty  RepublicanParty  Suicide  USEmpire  U.S.Duopoly  USDuopoly 
july 2018 by juandante
The End of the Two-Party System
We now have a scarcity mind-set, and that mentality and the perpetual warrior style it demands are incompatible with any civilized political creed.
two+party+system  duopoly  clippings  democracy 
february 2018 by mjb
Evolving Beyond the Two-Party Duopoly Two Projects to Represent US and "WE-Distribute" Political Power in America By Steve Bhaerman January 22, 2018
"We don't need a revolutionary uprising to overthrow the system. We need an evolutionary upwising to help us overgrow it ."
-- Swami Beyondananda

Every now and then, there is a defining moment that coalesces an idea that has been cooking over low heat for a while. And while we can point to the current "government shutdown" as one final straw to bring together our collective disgust from all sides, the defining moment I am referring to came last October when Green Beret and former NFL player Nate Boyer wrote this open letter to Donald Trump, Colin Kaepernick and the American public in general. Writes Boyer:

Simply put, it seems like we just hate each other; and that is far more painful to me than any protest, or demonstration, or rally, or tweet. We're told to pick a side, there's a line drawn in the sand "are you with us or against us?" It's just not who we are, or at least who we're supposed to be; we're supposed to be better than that, we're Americans. This doesn't even seem to be about right or wrong, but more about right or left.

Here we have a mainstream American, a conservative probably, who is affirming and lamenting that the average American from all sides has just about hit "peak disgust" at our corrupt, dysfunctional system that pits one side against the other so that the fundamental things we agree about get obscured, making it impossible for us to act as a single coherent body politic to hold our governance accountable to any standard whatsoever.

While that's not the exact focus of Boyer's letter, the subtext is we have an untrustworthy government, and untrustworthy media. And all this upwelling frustration has turned us against one another, when it would be much more practical and sane for us to work together for solutions rather than defending our positions.

Were we to state the obvious -- that our government is run by the power of money and is so beholden to special interests that we the people have been effectively disenfranchised -- the majority of Americans would say, "Yeah ... that's right!"

Signs of the Upwising

So before we move on to two different -- and worthy -- strategies to address the disenfranchisement of "we the people" from government of, by and for the people, let's take heart at the awakening that I call "signs of the upwising".

Consider these news items:

News Item #1 The first story, in response to the government shutdown, appeared in Axios and is a quote attributed to "a senior GOP House aide": "The largest country in the world, with global responsibilities, shutting down the government over a squabble ... 100% for short-term political gain."

News Item #2 One year after Donald Trump's inauguration, a new poll says that 82% percent of Republicans age 18-24 want another Republican candidate to challenge Trump in the 2020 primaries.

News Item #3 According to an NBC News poll this past November, 71% of millennials don't like either of the two major parties and would prefer a new third party.

News Item #4 On the eve of Election Day 2016, pollster Frank Luntz put together a focus group for "60 Minutes" with 25 voters from all sides. He asked, "How many of you will be voting for your candidate of choice on Tuesday?" Three raised their hands. "And how many of you are voting against a candidate?" The other 22 raised their hands.

News Item # 5 A 2014 Princeton University study concluded that the US system of governance is an oligarchy, not a democracy: "The central point that emerges from our research is that economic elites and organized groups representing business interests have substantial independent impacts on US government policy, while mass-based interest groups and average citizens have little or no independent influence."

So ... what can we conclude?

Young people in particular are disgusted and discouraged by the two-party duopoly and the candidates they put forth. By a ratio of more than seven to one, voters last year voted AGAINST the other candidate rather than FOR "their" candidate. Those involved in government who haven't been "ethically cleansed", are frustrated by two entrenched parties duking it out at our expense. And finally, even the establishment (Princeton University) acknowledges that the power of money and influence has caused our democracy to devolve into "mockracy" -- a toxic mimic of what it was created to be.

OK, that's what's so. So what? Other than complain or protest or withdraw, what can be done?

Two Chances to Overgrow the Two-Party Duopoly

This New Year brings two heartening solutions, one strateg
SteveBhaerman  SwamiBeyondananda  U.S.Duopoly  TwoPartySystem  USoligarchy  Oligarchy  Duopoly 
january 2018 by juandante
Social media firms under scrutiny for 'Russian meddling’ - BBC News
Facebook, Twitter and Google lawyers defended themselves to US lawmakers probing whether Russia used social media to influence the 2016 election.
The three firms faced hard questions at a Senate panel on crime and terrorism about why they missed political ads bought with Russian money. &! https://www.the-american-interest.com/2017/10/30/social-media-democracy/ - Francis Fukuyama - This is not the situation that prevails in today’s internet world. There are not a variety of competing platforms with differing points of view; rather, there is Facebook, which has become a sort of global utility. [ creating for each their own bubble own world, enabling to reject, deny reality in spite of fact. Orwell on nationalism: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Notes_on_Nationalism - Indifference to reality ] ESPECIALLY when the user is the product, sold to corporates. Keep users more and more clicking = keep making more and more money. &! Displayed in their dedicated teams in-house support for Trump campaign! $85m. Client satisfaction and profit maximisation. --- https://www.buzzfeed.com/alexkantrowitz/facebooks-2016-election-team-gave-advertisers-a-blueprint?utm_term=.ox8O6gxWY#.ji2Ngpmoz &! https://staltz.com/the-web-began-dying-in-2014-heres-how.html
Facebook  democracy  presidential  election  2016  Brexit  Donald  Trump  DonaldTrump  AfD  far-right  right-wing  alt-right  Social  Media  Newsfeed  bubble  algorithm  filter  bias  Gesellschaft  Nationalism  Orwell  Orwellian  Patriotism  demagogue  Twitter  Google  monopoly  duopoly  monopsony  Amazon  antitrust  Francis  Fukuyama  totalitarianism  Capitalism 
november 2017 by asterisk2a
There's precedent for Amazon competing with so many companies. It doesn't end well. — Quartz
The German drugmaker Bayer, which saw its profits fall 17% in the third quarter of 2017 as pharmacies closed, even has a name for it: “the Amazon Effect.”
Amazon  Jeff  Bezos  anti-trust  antitrust  monopsony  monopoly  Google  duopoly  anti-competitive 
october 2017 by asterisk2a
Forbes Welcome
+1. But = concentration: " Quarterly Revenue, $4.5B, Growth 40%; $.93B, Growth 93%"
duopoly  AWS  risk  Azure  rfw  from twitter
october 2017 by cveira
Sizmek Is Acquiring Rocket Fuel for $145 Million to Create a Formidable Ad-Tech Force
advertising that is deeply personalized, highly intuitive, and AI-enabled for peak performance
sizmek  2017  deal  adtech  google  facebook  duopoly  advertising  digital 
october 2017 by lgalli
FactCheck: Theresa May’s claim about housing doesn’t give the full picture – Channel 4 News
There have been six full financial years since the Tories took office in 2010. In four of those years, the number of new houses being built was lower than it was at any time under Labour.
UK  social  housing  Council  affordable  Crisis  Austerity  cartel  duopoly  Generation  Rent  Generationengerechtigkeit  disposable  income  discretionary  spending  debt  bubble  growth  secular  stagnation  immigration  homeownership 
october 2017 by asterisk2a

« earlier    

related tags

1%  2015  2016  2017  abc  access  ad-tech  ad  adsepnd  adtech  advertising  afd  affairs  affordable  ageing  algorithm  algorithms  alt-right  amazon  amp  anarchism  and  android  animation  anti-competitive  anti-trust  antitrust  apple  arabia  art  article  asset  attention  auctions  austerity  avoidance  aws  azure  babyboomers  bailout  barackobama  bezos  bias  big  bipartisan+policy+center  bipartisan  blair  blyth  boe  brand  branding  brexit  broadband  btw17  bubble  business  businessmodels  but  buy  capitalism  card  career  cartel  china  chrishedges  class  classwar  clinton  clippings  coca-cola  cola  coles  comcast  comcastic  commentary  commerce  competition  consumer  consumerism  corporate  corporatism  corruption  cost  council  credit  creditcard  creditcards  crisis  csmonitor  dc:creator=lanchesterjohn  dctagged  deal  debt  deflation  deflationary  demagogue  democracy  democraticparty  democrats  demographic  denver  design  digital  discretionary  disposable  diversity  dnc  donald  donaldtrump  dystopia  east  economic  economics  economy  elb  election  emotion  energy  eu  european  evasion  evolution  experian  facebook  fakenews  far-right  filter  filterbubble  football  for  foreign  fracking  francis  fukuyama  gap  gas  gdp  generation  generationengerechtigkeit  germany  gesellschaft  gfc  giraudrene  globalisation  globalization  good  google  gouging  government  growth  happiness  help  history  homeownership  housing  identity  immigration  income  inequality  infographic  insecurity  interest  is  jeff  left_wing  leftists  leverage  lobby  logo  lrb  m&a  madrid  manipulation  margaret  marginal  mark  market  market_power  marketing  marktwirtschaft  martinsorrell  matt_welch  maximisation  media  mentalhealth  microsoft  middle  mimeticdesire  minneapolis  misinformation  mobile  mobility  monetisation  monopoly  monopsony  mortgage  nationalism  neoliberal  neoliberalism  neonationalism  net  neutrality  news  newsfeed  nick_gillespie  nirp  obama  obsolescence  oil  oligarchy  oligopol  oligopoly  opec  orwell  orwellian  output  patriotism  payment  paypal  pepsi  personaldata  philanthropy  planned  platform  policy  politicians  politics  population  poverty  precariat  presidential+election  presidential  price  price_wars  productivity  profit  protection  psychology  qe  real  recovery  regulation  regulators  relations  renewable  rent  republicanparty  republicans  research  rfw  rich  right-wing  rights  risk  rnc  russia  satire  saudi  secular  segregation  self-awareness  self-regulation  shale  shalegas  silicon  sizmek  social  socialmedia  soda  soziale  spanish  spd  speculativefiction  spending  stagflation  stagnation  state  stevebhaerman  subsidies  subsidizing  suicide  super  supermarkets  surveillance  surveillancecapitalism  swamibeyondananda  targeting  tax  thatcher  the  the_hungry_beast  theonion  thielpeter  thought  to  toread  totalitarianism  tracking  trap  triopoly  trump  trumpdonald  twitter  two+party+system  two-party_system  twopartysystem  typography  u.s.duopoly  uk  underinvestment  union  united+states  us  usa  usduopoly  usempire  usoligarchy  valley  verteilungskampf  vested  video  wage  web  welfare  wesfarmers  win  woolworths  wpp  youtube  zirp  zuckerbergmark 

Copy this bookmark: