donnaharaway   55

« earlier    

A Giant Bumptious Litter: Donna Haraway on Truth, Technology, and Resisting Extinction
"Socialists aren’t the only ones who have been techno-utopian, of course. A far more prominent and more influential strand of techno-utopianism has come from the figures around the Bay Area counterculture associated with the Whole Earth Catalog, in particular Stewart Brand, who went on to play important intellectual and cultural roles in Silicon Valley.

They are not friends. They are not allies. I’m avoiding calling them enemies because I’m leaving open the possibility of their being able to learn or change, though I’m not optimistic. I think they occupy the position of the “god trick.” [Eds.: The “god trick” is an idea introduced by Haraway that refers to the traditional view of objectivity as a transcendent “gaze from nowhere.”] I think they are blissed out by their own privileged positions and have no idea what their own positionality in the world really is. And I think they cause a lot of harm, both ideologically and technically.

How so?

They get a lot of publicity. They take up a lot of the air in the room.

It’s not that I think they’re horrible people. There should be space for people pushing new technologies. But I don’t see nearly enough attention given to what kinds of technological innovation are really needed to produce viable local and regional energy systems that don’t depend on species-destroying solar farms and wind farms that require giant land grabs in the desert.

The kinds of conversations around technology that I think we need are those among folks who know how to write law and policy, folks who know how to do material science, folks who are interested in architecture and park design, and folks who are involved in land struggles and solidarity movements. I want to see us do much savvier scientific, technological, and political thinking with each other, and I want to see it get press. The Stewart Brand types are never going there.

Do you see clear limitations in their worldviews and their politics?

They remain remarkably humanist in their orientation, in their cognitive apparatus, and in their vision of the world. They also have an almost Peter Pan quality. They never quite grew up. They say, “If it’s broken, fix it.”

This comes from an incapacity to mourn and an incapacity to be finite. I mean that psychoanalytically: an incapacity to understand that there is no status quo ante, to understand that death and loss are real. Only within that understanding is it possible to open up to a kind of vitality that isn’t double death, that isn’t extermination, and which doesn’t yearn for transcendence, yearn for the fix.

There’s not much mourning with the Stewart Brand types. There’s not much felt loss of the already disappeared, the already dead — the disappeared of Argentina, the disappeared of the caravans, the disappeared of the species that will not come back. You can try to do as much resurrection biology as you want to. But any of the biologists who are actually involved in the work are very clear that there is no resurrection.

You have also been critical of the Anthropocene, as a proposed new geological epoch defined by human influence on the earth. Do you see the idea of the Anthropocene as having similar limitations?

I think the Anthropocene framework has been a fertile container for quite a lot, actually. The Anthropocene has turned out to be a rather capacious territory for incorporating people in struggle. There are a lot of interesting collaborations with artists and scientists and activists going on.

The main thing that’s too bad about the term is that it perpetuates the misunderstanding that what has happened is a human species act, as if human beings as a species necessarily exterminate every planet we dare to live on. As if we can’t stop our productive and reproductive excesses.

Extractivism and exterminationism are not human species acts. They come from a situated historical conjuncture of about five hundred years in duration that begins with the invention of the plantation and the subsequent modeling of industrial capitalism. It is a situated historical conjuncture that has had devastating effects even while it has created astonishing wealth.

To define this as a human species act affects the way a lot of scientists think about the Anthropocene. My scientist colleagues and friends really do continue to think of it as something human beings can’t stop doing, even while they understand my historical critique and agree with a lot of it.

It’s a little bit like the relativism versus objectivity problem. The old languages have a deep grip. The situated historical way of thinking is not instinctual for Western science, whose offspring are numerous.

Are there alternatives that you think could work better than the Anthropocene?

There are plenty of other ways of thinking. Take climate change. Now, climate change is a necessary and essential category. But if you go to the circumpolar North as a Southern scientist wanting to collaborate with Indigenous people on climate change — on questions of changes in the sea ice, for example, or changes in the hunting and subsistence base — the limitations of that category will be profound. That’s because it fails to engage with the Indigenous categories that are actually active on the ground.

There is an Inuktitut word, “sila.” In an Anglophone lexicon, “sila” will be translated as “weather.” But in fact, it’s much more complicated. In the circumpolar North, climate change is a concept that collects a lot of stuff that the Southern scientist won’t understand. So the Southern scientist who wants to collaborate on climate change finds it almost impossible to build a contact zone.

Anyway, there are plenty of other ways of thinking about shared contemporary problems. But they require building contact zones between cognitive apparatuses, out of which neither will leave the same as they were before. These are the kinds of encounters that need to be happening more.

A final question. Have you been following the revival of socialism, and socialist feminism, over the past few years?

Yes.

What do you make of it? I mean, socialist feminism is becoming so mainstream that even Harper’s Bazaar is running essays on “emotional labor.”

I’m really pleased! The old lady is happy. I like the resurgence of socialism. For all the horror of Trump, it has released us. A whole lot of things are now being seriously considered, including mass nonviolent social resistance. So I am not in a state of cynicism or despair."
donnaharaway  2019  californianideology  interviews  wholeearthcatalog  stewartbrand  technosolutionism  technology  climatechange  extinction  deminism  ontology  cynicism  resistance  siliconvalley  objectivity  ideology  science  politics  policy  loss  mourning  biology  resurrection  activism  humans  multispecies  morethanhuman  extractivism  exterminationism  plantations  capitalism  industrialism  history  indigenous  socialism 
12 days ago by robertogreco
CENHS @ Rice! » 133 – María Puig de la Bellacasa
“Dominic and Cymene indulge a little post-Pruitt glee on this week’s podcast and speculate about the possibility of six foot tall low carbon lava lamps in the future. Then (16:46) we are thrilled to be joined by star STS scholar and emergent anthropologist María Puig de la Bellacasa to talk about her celebrated new book, Matters of Care: Speculative Ethics in More Than Human Worlds (U Minnesota Press, 2017). We start with the importance of care in feminist philosophy and how this work, alongside her own activist background, inspired this project. She asks us to consider how we can make knowledge that takes seriously a politics of care without giving ourselves over to the neoliberal commodification of care. And she asks how a commitment to speculative ethics can lead us to imagine and enact worlds different than the one we inhabit now. Later on, María tells us about what led her to quit philosophy and why appropriation might not actually be such a bad thing. Then we turn to her work with permaculturalists and soil scientists, what it was like to study with Starhawk, changing paradigms of soil ontology and ecology, what are alterbiopolitics, speculative ethics in a time of political crisis, and so much more.”

[See also:

“Matters of Care by María Puig de la Bellacasa, reviewed by Farhan Samanani”
https://societyandspace.org/2019/01/08/matters-of-care-by-maria-puig-de-la-bellacasa/

“Reframing Care – Reading María Puig de la Bellacasa ‘Matters of Care Speculative Ethics in More Than Human Worlds’”
https://ethicsofcare.org/reframing-care-reading-maria-puig-de-la-bellacasa-matters-of-care-speculative-ethics-in-more-than-human-worlds/ ]
maríapuigdelabellacasa  care  maintenance  2018  morethanhuman  humanism  posthumanism  multispecies  anthropology  ecology  alterbiopolitics  permaculture  caring  ethics  politics  soil  philosophy  brunolatour  work  labor  activism  neoliberalism  feminism  donnaharaway  academia  knowledge  knowledgeproduction  thoughtfulness  environment  climatechange  individualism  concern  speculation  speculativeethics  speculativefiction  identitypolitics  everyday  pocketsofutopia  thinking  mattersofconcern  highered  highereducation  intervention  speculative  speculativethinking  greenconsumerism  consumerism  capitalism  greenwashing  moralizing  economics  society  matter  mattering  karenbarad  appropriation  hope  optimism  ucsc  historyofconsciousness 
august 2019 by robertogreco
The Wake of Crows – Thom van Dooren
"The Wake of Crows: Living and Dying in Shared Worlds, Columbia University Press: New York, 2019

The blurb:

Crows can be found almost everywhere that people are, from tropical islands to deserts and arctic forests, from densely populated cities to suburbs and farms. Across these diverse landscapes, many species of crows are doing very well today: their intelligent and adaptive ways of life have allowed them to thrive amid human-driven transformations. Indeed, crows are frequently disliked for their success, seen as pests, threats, and scavengers on the detritus of human life. But among the vast variety of crows, there are also critically endangered species that are barely hanging on to existence, some of them subjects of passionate conservation efforts.

The Wake of Crows is an exploration of the entangled lives of humans and crows. Focusing on five key sites, Thom van Dooren asks how we might live well with crows in a changing world. He explores contemporary possibilities for shared life emerging in the context of ongoing processes of globalization, colonization, urbanization, and climate change. Moving between these diverse contexts, this book tells stories of extermination and extinction, alongside fragile efforts to better understand and make room for one another. Grounded in the careful work of paying attention to some very particular crows and their people, The Wake of Crows is an effort to imagine and put into practice a multispecies ethics. In so doing, van Dooren explores some of the possibilities that still exist for living and dying well on this damaged planet.

Endorsements:

“A necessary and beautiful book, The Wake of Crows models the work of living responsibly inside both the humanities and the sciences in order to nurture still possible worlds. This book shows us what collaborative efforts to enact multispecies communities mean, and might yet mean, in the context of ongoing processes of extinction and extermination. Moving through diverse sites of human/crow encounter, it offers insights into the fragile, situated, ongoing, work necessary to cultivating ecologies of hope in troubled times.”
~ Donna Haraway, author of Staying with the Trouble, and When Species Meet

“The Wake of Crows is a thoughtful and captivating book that opens our imagination. In this book van Dooren shows us that accepting the challenge to coexist with crows without dreaming that they will come to behave as a loyal and grateful companion species, might teach us priceless lessons at a time when we need to learn how to make room for many different, sometimes inconvenient, but so very interesting, others.”
~ Isabelle Stengers, author of In Catastrophic Times: Resisting the Coming Barbarism

“Writing from a personal and scholarly perspective, Thom van Dooren takes us on a deep dive into the human-crow relationship that both informs natural history and lays bare the importance of expanding our own ethics to value all of life and our wonderful connections to it.”
~ John M. Marzluff, Professor of Wildlife Science, University of Washington and author of Gifts of the Crow and Welcome to Subirdia."
thomvandooren  crows  animals  birds  corvids  books  intelligence  donnaharaway  isabellestrengers  johnmarzluff  globalization  urban  urbanism  urbanization  climatechange  colonization  human-animalrelations  human-animalrelationships  multispecies  morethanhuman 
august 2019 by robertogreco
Feminist cyborg scholar Donna Haraway: ‘The disorder of our era isn’t necessary’ | World news | The Guardian
"The history of philosophy is also a story about real estate.

Driving into Santa Cruz to visit Donna Haraway, I can’t help feeling that I was born too late. The metal sculpture of a donkey standing on Haraway’s front porch, the dogs that scramble to her front door barking when we ring the bell, and the big black rooster strutting in the coop out back – the entire setting evokes an era of freedom and creativity that postwar wealth made possible in northern California.

Here was a counterculture whose language and sensibility the tech industry sometimes adopts, but whose practitioners it has mostly priced out. Haraway, who came to the University of Santa Cruz in 1980 to take up the first tenured professorship in feminist theory in the US, still conveys the sense of a wide-open world.

Haraway was part of an influential cohort of feminist scholars who trained as scientists before turning to the philosophy of science in order to investigate how beliefs about gender shaped the production of knowledge about nature. Her most famous text remains The Cyborg Manifesto, published in 1985. It began with an assignment on feminist strategy for the Socialist Review after the election of Ronald Reagan and grew into an oracular meditation on how cybernetics and digitization had changed what it meant to be male or female – or, really, any kind of person. It gained such a cult following that Hari Kunzru, profiling her for Wired magazine years later, wrote: “To boho twentysomethings, her name has the kind of cachet usually reserved for techno acts or new phenethylamines.”

The cyborg vision of gender as changing and changeable was radically new. Her map of how information technology linked people around the world into new chains of affiliation, exploitation and solidarity feels prescient at a time when an Instagram influencer in Berlin can line the pockets of Silicon Valley executives by using a phone assembled in China that contains cobalt mined in Congo to access a platform moderated by Filipinas.

Haraway’s other most influential text may be an essay that appeared a few years later, on what she called “situated knowledges”. The idea, developed in conversation with feminist philosophers and activists such as Nancy Hartsock, concerns how truth is made. Concrete practices of particular people make truth, Haraway argued. The scientists in a laboratory don’t simply observe or conduct experiments on a cell, for instance, but co-create what a cell is by seeing, measuring, naming and manipulating it. Ideas like these have a long history in American pragmatism. But they became politically explosive during the so-called science wars of the 1990s – a series of public debates among “scientific realists” and “postmodernists” with echoes in controversies about bias and objectivity in academia today.

Haraway’s more recent work has turned to human-animal relations and the climate crisis. She is a capacious yes, and thinker, the kind of leftist feminist who believes that the best thinking is done collectively. She is constantly citing other people, including graduate students, and giving credit to them. A recent documentary about her life and work by the Italian film-maker Fabrizio Terranova, Storytelling for Earthly Survival, captures this sense of commitment, as well as her extraordinary intellectual agility and inventiveness.

At her home in Santa Cruz, we talked about her memories of the science wars and how they speak to our current “post-truth” moment, her views on contemporary climate activism and the Green New Deal, and why play is essential for politics.

We are often told we are living in a time of “post-truth”. Some critics have blamed philosophers like yourself for creating the environment of “relativism” in which “post-truth” flourishes. How do you respond to that?

Our view was never that truth is just a question of which perspective you see it from.

[The philosopher] Bruno [Latour] and I were at a conference together in Brazil once. (Which reminds me: if people want to criticize us, it ought to be for the amount of jet fuel involved in making and spreading these ideas! Not for leading the way to post-truth.)

Anyhow. We were at this conference. It was a bunch of primate field biologists, plus me and Bruno. And Stephen Glickman, a really cool biologist, took us apart privately. He said: “Now, I don’t want to embarrass you. But do you believe in reality?”

We were both kind of shocked by the question. First, we were shocked that it was a question of belief, which is a Protestant question. A confessional question. The idea that reality is a question of belief is a barely secularized legacy of the religious wars. In fact, reality is a matter of worlding and inhabiting. It is a matter of testing the holdingness of things. Do things hold or not?

Take evolution. The notion that you would or would not “believe” in evolution already gives away the game. If you say, “Of course I believe in evolution,” you have lost, because you have entered the semiotics of representationalism – and post-truth, frankly. You have entered an arena where these are all just matters of internal conviction and have nothing to do with the world. You have left the domain of worlding.

The science warriors who attacked us during the science wars were determined to paint us as social constructionists – that all truth is purely socially constructed. And I think we walked into that. We invited those misreadings in a range of ways. We could have been more careful about listening and engaging more slowly. It was all too easy to read us in the way the science warriors did. Then the rightwing took the science wars and ran with it, which eventually helped nourish the whole fake-news discourse.

Your PhD is in biology. How do your scientist colleagues feel about your approach to science?

To this day I know only one or two scientists who like talking this way. And there are good reasons why scientists remain very wary of this kind of language. I belong to the Defend Science movement and in most public circumstances I will speak softly about my own ontological and epistemological commitments. I will use representational language. I will defend less-than-strong objectivity because I think we have to, situationally.

Is that bad faith? Not exactly. It’s related to [what the postcolonial theorist Gayatri Chakravorty Spivak has called] “strategic essentialism”. There is a strategic use to speaking the same idiom as the people that you are sharing the room with. You craft a good-enough idiom so you can work on something together. I go with what we can make happen in the room together. And then we go further tomorrow.

In the struggles around climate change, for example, you have to join with your allies to block the cynical, well-funded, exterminationist machine that is rampant on the Earth. I think my colleagues and I are doing that. We have not shut up, or given up on the apparatus that we developed. But one can foreground and background what is most salient depending on the historical conjuncture.

What do you find most salient at the moment?

What is at the center of my attention are land and water sovereignty struggles, such as those over the Dakota Access pipeline, over coal mining on the Black Mesa plateau, over extractionism everywhere. My attention is centered on the extermination and extinction crises happening at a worldwide level, on human and non-human displacement and homelessness. That’s where my energies are. My feminism is in these other places and corridors.

What kind of political tactics do you see as being most important – for young climate activists, the Green New Deal, etc?

The degree to which people in these occupations play is a crucial part of how they generate a new political imagination, which in turn points to the kind of work that needs to be done. They open up the imagination of something that is not what [the ethnographer] Deborah Bird Rose calls “double death” – extermination, extraction, genocide.

Now, we are facing a world with all three of those things. We are facing the production of systemic homelessness. The way that flowers aren’t blooming at the right time, and so insects can’t feed their babies and can’t travel because the timing is all screwed up, is a kind of forced homelessness. It’s a kind of forced migration, in time and space.

This is also happening in the human world in spades. In regions like the Middle East and Central America, we are seeing forced displacement, some of which is climate migration. The drought in the Northern Triangle countries of Central America [Honduras, Guatemala and El Salvador] is driving people off their land.

So it’s not a humanist question. It’s a multi-kind and multi-species question.

What’s so important about play?

Play captures a lot of what goes on in the world. There is a kind of raw opportunism in biology and chemistry, where things work stochastically to form emergent systematicities. It’s not a matter of direct functionality. We need to develop practices for thinking about those forms of activity that are not caught by functionality, those which propose the possible-but-not-yet, or that which is not-yet but still open.

It seems to me that our politics these days require us to give each other the heart to do just that. To figure out how, with each other, we can open up possibilities for what can still be. And we can’t do that in a negative mood. We can’t do that if we do nothing but critique. We need critique; we absolutely need it. But it’s not going to open up the sense of what might yet be. It’s not going to open up the sense of that which is not yet possible but profoundly needed.

The established disorder of our present era is not necessary. It exists. But it’s not necessary."
donnaharaway  2019  anthropocene  climatechange  science  scientism  disorder  greennewdeal  politics  interdependence  families  critique  humanism  multispecies  morethanhuman  displacement  globalwarming  extermination  extinction  extraction  capitalism  genocide  deborahbirdrose  doubledeath  feminism  postmodernism  harikunzru  cyborgmanifesto  philosophy  philosophyofscience  santacruz  technology  affiliation  exploitation  solidarity  situatedknowledge  nancyhartstock  objectivity  human-animalrelations  human-animalrelationships 
june 2019 by robertogreco
Anne Galloway 'Speculative Design and Glass Slaughterhouses' - This is HCD
"Andy: You’ve got quite an interesting background. I’m going to ask you about in a second. I wanted to start with the quote from Ursula Le Guin that you have on your website. It’s from the Lathe of Heaven. “We’re in the world, not against it. It doesn’t work to try and stand outside things and run them that way, it just doesn’t work. It goes against life. There is a way, but you have to follow it, the world is, no matter how we think it ought to be, you have to be with it, you have to let it be.

Then on the More Than Human website, you have these three questions. What if we refuse to uncouple nature and culture? What if we deny that human beings are exceptional? What if we stop speaking and listening only to ourselves? The More Than Human lab explores everyday entanglements of humans and non-humans and imagines more sustainable ways of thinking, making, and doing. Anne, let’s get started by first talking about what do you mean by all of that?

Anne: The Ursula Le Guin quote I love mostly because a critical perspective or an activist perspective, anything that says we ought to be changing the world in any way, it always assumes that we need to fix something, that the world is broken and that designers especially are well-suited to be able to solve some of these problems. I like thinking about what it means to respond to injustice by accepting it, not in the sense of believing that it’s okay or right, because clearly, it’s been identify as unjust. I love Le Guin’s attention to the fact that there is a way to be in the world.

As soon as we think that we’re outside of it, any choices or decisions or actions that we take are, well, they sit outside of it as well. I like being embedded in the trouble. I like Donna Haraway’s idea of staying with the trouble. It’s not that we have to accept that things are problematic, but rather that we have to work within the structures that already exist. Not to keep them that way, in fact, many should be dismantled or changed. Rather, to accept that there is a flow to the universe.

Of course, Le Guin was talking about Taoism, but here what I wanted to draw attention to is often our imperative to fix or to solve or to change things comes with a belief that we’re not part of the world that we’re trying to fix and change. It’s that that I want to highlight. That when we start asking difficult questions about the world, we can never remove ourselves from them. We’re complicit, we are on the receiving end of things. We’re never distant from it. I think that subtle but important shift in deciding how we approach our work is really important."



"Andy: Yes, okay. I was thinking about this, I was reading, in conjunction, this little Le Guin quote, I was trying to think, it’s unusual in the sense that it’s a discipline or a practice of design that uses its own practice to critique itself. It’s using design to critique design in many respects. A lot of what speculative design is talking about is, look what happens when we put stuff into the world, in some way, without much thought. I was trying to think if there was another discipline that does that. I think probably in the humanities there are, and certainly in sociology I think there probably is, where it uses its own discipline to critique itself. It’s a fairly unusual setup.

Anne: I would think actually it’s quite common in the humanities, perhaps the social sciences, where it’s not common is in the sciences. Any reflexive turn in any of the humanities would have used the discipline. Historiography is that sort of thing. Applied philosophy is that sort of thing. Reflexive anthropology is that sort of thing. I think it’s actually quite common, just not in the sciences, and design often tries to align itself with the sciences instead.

Andy: Yes, there was a great piece in the Aeon the other day, about how science doesn’t have an adequate description or explanation for consciousness. Yet, it’s the only thing it can be certain of. With that, it also doesn’t really seem to come up in the technology industry that much, because it’s so heavily aligned with science. Technology, and you’ve got this background in culture studies and science and technology and society, technology is a really strong vein throughout speculative design. Indeed, your work, right? Counting sheep is about the Internet of Things, and sheep. Do you want to tell us a little bit about that and why I am talking to you from the picture things to the Lord of the Rings, it basically looks like you’re living in part of the Shire in Middle Earth?

Anne: I do live in a place that looks remarkably like the Shire. It’s a bit disconcerting at times. The science and technology question in speculative design I think is first of all a matter of convenience. Science fiction, speculation, they lean historically, habitually towards science and tech. It becomes an easy target for critique. Not that it’s not necessary, but it’s right there, so why not? There’s that element to it. It has an easier ability to be transformed into something fanciful or terrifying, which allows for certain kinds of storytelling through speculation, that I think people, both creators and audiences or readers really enjoy.

Now, the irony of all of this, of course is that arguably one of the greatest concerns that people have would be tied to technological determinism, the idea that we’re going to have these technologies anyway, so what are we going to do about it? Now, when you speculate using these technologies, what you’re doing is actually reinforcing the idea that these technologies are coming, you play right into the same technological determinism that you’re trying to critique. In fact, one of the counting sheep scenarios was designed specifically to avoid the technology. It was the one that got the most positive responses."



"Andy: With all of this, and I may this pop at the beginning, just before we were recording, that there’s a sense of, because of everything going on in the world, that if only designers could run the world, everything would be fine, right, because we can see all of the solutions to everything. What would you want designers to get out of this kind of work or this kind of perspective?

Anne: Humility. That simple. I am one of those people. It’s because of being an ethnographer as well and doing participant observation and interviewing many people and their ideas about design. I’ve run into far more people who think that designers are arrogant than ones who don’t. This has always really interested me. What is it that designers do that seems to rub non-designers the wrong way? Part of it is this sense of, or implication that they know better than the rest of us, or that a designer will come in and say, “Let me fix your problem”, before even asking if there is a problem that the person wants fixed.

I actually gave a guest lecture in a class just the other day, where I suggested that there were people in the world who thought that designers were arrogant. One of the post-graduate students in the class really took umbrage at this and wanted to know why it was that designers were arrogant for offering to fix problems, but a builder wasn’t, or a doctor wasn’t.

Andy: What was your answer?

Anne: Well, my answer was, generally speaking, people go to them first and say, “I have this problem, I need help.” Whereas, designers come up with a problem, go find people that they think have it and then tell them they’d like to solve it. I think just on a social level, that is profoundly anti-social. That is not how people enjoy socially interacting with people.

Andy: I can completely see that and I think that I would say that argument has also levelled, quite rightly, a lot of Silicon Valley, which is the answer to everything is some kind of technology engineering startup to fix all the problems that all the other technology and engineering startups that are no longer startups have created. It’s probably true of quite a lot of areas of business and finance, as well, and politics, for that matter. The counter, I could imagine a designer saying, “Well, that’s not really true”, because one of the things as human-centred designers, the first thing we do, we go out, we do design ethnography, we go and speak to people, we go and observe, we go and do all of that stuff. We really understand their problems. We’re not just telling people what needs to be fixed. We’re going there and understanding things. What’s your response to that?

Anne: Well, my first response is, yes, that’s absolutely true. There are lots of very good designers in the world who do precisely that. Because I work in an academic institution though, I’m training students. What my job involves is getting the to the point where they know the difference between telling somebody something and asking somebody something. what it means to actually understand their client or their user. I prefer to just refer to them as people. What it is that people want or need. One of the things that I offer in all of my classes is, after doing the participant observation, my students always have the opportunity to submit a rationale for no design intervention whatsoever.

That’s not something that is offered to people in a lot of business contexts because there’s a business case that’s being made. Whereas, I want my students to understand that sometimes the research demonstrates that people are actually okay, and that even if they have little problems, they’re still okay with that, that people are quite okay with living with contradictions and that they will accept some issues because it allows for other things to emerge. That if they want, they can provide the evidence for saying, “Actually, the worst thing we could do in this scenario is design anything and I refuse to design.”

Andy: Right, that and the people made trade-offs all the time because of the pain of change is much … [more]
annegalloway  design  2019  speculativefiction  designethnography  morethanhuman  ursulaleguin  livestock  agriculture  farming  sheep  meat  morethanhumanlab  activism  criticaldesign  donnaharaway  stayingwiththetrouble  taoism  flow  change  changemaking  systemsthinking  complicity  catherinecaudwell  injustice  justice  dunneandraby  consciousness  science  technology  society  speculation  speculativedesign  questioning  fiction  future  criticalthinking  whatif  anthropology  humanities  reflexiveanthropology  newzealand  socialsciences  davidgrape  powersoften  animals  cows  genevievebell  markpesce  technologicaldeterminism  dogs  cats  ethnography  cooperation  human-animalrelations  human-animalrelationships  slow  slowness  time  perception  psychology  humility  problemsolving  contentment  presence  peacefulness  workaholism  northamerica  europe  studsterkel  protestantworkethic  labor  capitalism  passion  pets  domestication 
june 2019 by robertogreco
Donna Haraway Reads The National Geographic on Primates (1987) — Monoskop Log
"“How does the ‘cultured’ gorilla, i.e. Koko, come to represent universal man? Author and cultural critic Donna Haraway untangles the web of meanings, tracing what gets to count as nature, for whom and when, and how much it costs to produce nature at a particular moment in history for a particular group of people. A feminist journey through the anthropological junglescape.”

Originally broadcasted on Paper Tiger Television in 1987.

The video was posted on the website of Paper Tiger TV in May 2017 under Creative Commons BY-NC-ND License."
donnaharaway  towatch  1987  gorillas  human-animalrelationships  human-animalrelations  multispecies  animals  koko 
january 2018 by robertogreco

« earlier    

related tags

100yss  1987  1990s  1997  20014  2005  2007  2011  2013  2014  2015  2016  2017  2018  2019  79theses  aboriginal  abstraction  academia  acceleration  accessibility  accountability  accumulations  action  activism  adamgreenfield  adamrothstein  adaptability  adaptivesystems  adrianaramić  adriennemareebrown  aerial  aesop  aesthetics  affiliation  agency  agi  agriculture  alanjacobs  alexanderbogdanov  alexanderpschera  alfrednorthwhitehead  algclub  algorithms  alicewalker  allansekula  alterbiopolitics  amazon  ambivalence  anarchism  andreasheinol  andrewmathews  andycameron  anickayi  animals  anjakanngieser  annalowenhaupttsing  annatsing  annegalloway  annepringle  annihilation  anthropocene  anthropology  antiessentialism  antifa  antoninegri  antonionegri  apophasis  appropriation  art  arthistory  artificialintelligence  arts  assembly  assistivetechnology  asymmetry  atemporality  attention  audreywatters  australia  austria  automation  automaton  autopoiesis  awidforum  barbaraking  barbarasmuts  bauhaus  beauty  benjaminbratton  bibliographies  bibliography  bioinformatics  biology  biophilia  biopower  biotechnology  birds  birthcontrol  bldgblog  blind  blindness  bodies  body  bookfodder  books  border  borders  bradleygarrett  brain  broadcast  brucesterling  brunolatour  bryanboyer  california  californianideology  cameras  canon  capitalism  capitalocence  capitalocene  care  carenkaplan  caring  carlafreccero  carlsagan  cat'scradle  cataphasis  catherinecaudwell  cats  centerforlanduseinterpretation  change  changemaking  charmainechua  chinamieville  chrishadfield  chriskraus  chrissandbrook  christ  christinaeisenberg  chthulocene  chthulucene  cities  citizen  cityofsound  civilization  class  classconsciousness  climate  climatechange  cloud  cognition  colinmilburn  collaboration  collapsonomics  colonization  command  communication  compassion  complexity  complicity  compost  computer  computing  concern  conscious  consciousexotica  consciousness  conservation  consumerism  consumption  contentment  context  control  controlsociety  conversation  conviviality  convivialtools  cooperation  coordination  coral  corals  correlation  corvids  corydoctorow  cosmopolitics  costfunction  council  cows  craigpacker  criticalanalysis  criticaldesign  criticalpractice  criticalthinking  critique  critviz2016  critvz2016  crows  culturalturn  culture  curiosity  cyberfeminism  cybernetics  cyberpunk  cyberspace  cyborg  cyborgmanifesto  cyborgs  cynicism  cyranodebergerac  danhill  danwilliams  data  datapluswomen  datavisualisation  datavisualization  dataviz  datlefmertins  davidgraeber  davidgrape  davidgrinspoon  ddj  deborabirdrose  deborahbirdrose  deborahgordon  decentralization  decolonial  decolonization  decreation  deleuze  deminism  derekgregory  design  designethnography  designfiction  development  device  difference  digital  digitallabor  digitallife  dis/ability  disabilities  disability  discipline  discrimination  disgust  disorder  displacement  distance  distinction  distraction  distributions  dnlee  documentary  dogs  domestication  donaldtrump  dorionsagan  doubledeath  doubling  doubt  douglascoupland  dragons  drone  dunneandraby  earth  ecologies  ecology  economics  ecosystems  edtech  education  eflux  elainegan  elonmusk  embodiment  emilyhorne  encounter  engagement  environment  environmentalhumanities  environmentalism  envvironment  eowilson  equality  ericagoode  ericporter  ericrabkin  essay  essays  et  ethics  ethnography  eugenics  europe  evahayward  everyday  evidence  evolution  exception  exclusion  expeuence  exploitation  extensive  extermination  exterminationism  extinction  extraction  extractivism  eyeo  fabrizioterranova  families  farming  fascism  feeback  feedback  fellowahip  feminism  feminist  feministdatavisualization  feministinternet  femtechnet  fiction  film  finance  fionaraby  firldrecording  fit  flexibility  flickeringsignifier  flow  foucault  franbartkowsky  francoberardi  fredappel  frederikceyssens  fredjameson  fredscharmen  frictionless  friends  friendship  future  gaia  garyzhexizhang  gender  genevievebell  genocide  geofeminism  geoffmanaugh  geopolitics  georginakleege  gillesdeleuze  global  globalization  globalwarming  glvo  gmps  gorillas  gps  greenconsumerism  greennewdeal  greenwashing  gregorybateson  gwynethjones  hacking  hannaharendt  harikunzru  heatheranneswanson  heidegger  helekeller  helenmerrick  henryvaughn  herscam  highered  highereducation  hiscon  history  historyofconsciousness  holacracy  hope  howwelearn  human-animalrelations  human-animalrelationships  human  humanism  humanities  humans  humility  hunchbacks  huntersthompson  hybrids  hyperobject  hypertext  ianmacdonald  ideas  identity  identitypolitics  ideology  image  imagineafeministinternet  immigration  inaturalist  inclusinvity  inclusion  inclusivity  indigenous  individualism  industrialism  inequality  infographic  informatics  information  infrastructure  ingridburrington  ingridparker  inhuman  injustice  inlcusivity  intelligence  intensive  interconnected  interconnectedness  interconnectivity  interdependence  interface  interference  internet  internetofthings  interspecies  intervention  interviews  intraspecies  intrastructure  invisiblecommittee  isabellestengers  isabellestrengers  istvancsicsery-ronay  ivanillich  jamaiscascio  jamesbaldwin  jamesbridle  jamesclifford  jamestillymatthews  jamestiptree  janetrose-hinostroza  jasonmoore  jean-paulsartre  jellyfish  jenniferegan  jennyodell  jennyreardon  jens-christiansvenning  jeremybentham  jews  jgballard  jimrossignol  joannaruss  johannesfritz  johncage  johnmarzluff  johnpowers  johnvarley  josboys  joshualebare  journalism  judithmerril  justice  justinpickard  kant  karenbarad  katebrown  katedavies  katherinehayles  katieking  kellereasterling  kellereastrling  kenya  kerrydoran  kimtallbear  kinship  kitsch  knowing  knowledge  knowledgeproduction  koko  konradlorenz  kristofferwhitney  kristofwouters  labor  labyrinth  lacan  lambrosmalafouris  landscape  latecapitalism  laurachernaik  laurenbeukes  laurenoyaolamina  layer  lenin  lesleystern  liamyoung  libertarianism  lichen  life  linguistics  linguists  lisamesseri  literature  livestock  living  loop  loss  lottery  maartendriesen  machinelearning  machinic  maintenance  manfredclynes  manifesto  map  marcaugé  marcbekoff  margaretatwood  margaretgrebowicz  margaretmcfall-ngai  marianglebes  marianneelisabethlien  mariapuigdelaballacasa  marilynhacker  marilynmanson  marilynstrathern  mariosavio  market  markpesce  marleenbarr  mars  martinwikelski  marxism  maryjacobus  marylouisepratt  maríacarozzi  maríapuigdelabellacasa  material  materials  matter  mattering  mattersofconcern  matthewgandy  mauricemerleau-ponty  mauriziolazzarato  mckenziewark  meat  mechanical  media  mediacyborgs  memory  metadate  metaphor  method  michaelchabon  michaelhardt  michaeloman-reagan  michaelpollan  michaeltaussig  michelfoucault  michellemurphy  microbes  migration  mikepepi  military  minakatakumagusu  mind  mit  modelling  monalisa  monarchs  monsters  morality  moralizing  morethanhuman  morethanhumanlab  motion  moulierboutang  mourning  multispecias  multispecies  multispeciesdesign  mycelium  mystic  mysticism  naisargidave  namibia  nancyhartstock  naomicampbell  naomiklein  nasa  nataliejeremijenko  nathankline  nature  nazism  negation  neocolonial  neoliberal  neoliberalism  network  networkedsociety  networks  neweconomy  newmedia  newweird  newzealand  nicolatwilley  nilsbubandt  niology  nonhuman  nonhumanautonomousspaceagency  northamerica  nvsmatric  object  objectification  objectivity  objects  occupy  octaviabutler  oddkin  online  ontology  open  opendata  openness  operatingsystem  optimism  outerspace  pain  pamelasargent  paolovirno  paradigmshifts  passion  patrickmccray  pattern  paulburkett  paulgrahamraven  paulscheerbart  peacefulness  pedagogy  pederanker  perception  permaculture  peterfunch  peterkahn  peterredfield  pets  philosophy  philosophyofscience  physiognomy  picasso  piercings  pieromanzoni  plantations  plants  pocketsofutopia  poetry  policy  politics  population  possibility  post  posthuman  posthumanism  postmodernism  postwar  powersoften  ppwer  practice  precarity  preemption  preposition  presence  problemsolving  process  processing  production  profiles  projectcascadia  prosthetics  protestantworkethic  protist  psychology  queer  queerness  questioning  quietbabylon  race  racism  raymondpearl  rdfviz  reason  reflexiveanthropology  regenerative  relationships  religion  representation  reproduction  resilience  resistance  responsibility  responsibledata  resurrection  retrieval  reworlding  richardbarbrook  richardgere  richardrorty  richardstallman  risk  robnixon  robot  robots  sadieplant  samueldelany  santacruz  sarahendren  sarahlefanu  sartre  sci-fi  scicomm  science  sciencefiction  scientism  scifi  scottgilbert  security  selves  sense  senses  sensitivity  sensor  service  sethshostak  sexism  sexuality  sfsh  sheep  sheritepper  sherrylvint  shipping  shulamithfirestone  signal  signification  siliconvalley  simoneweil  simontorracinta  simulation  sirens  situatedknowledge  slime  slimemold  slow  slowness  socialconsciousness  socialism  socialscience  socialsciences  society  socrates  softrobot  soil  soindeficelles  solidarity  sound  sovereignty  space  spaceexploration  speculation  speculative  speculativedesign  speculativeethics  speculativefabrication  speculativefiction  speculativethinking  spinoza  spooky  statistics  stayingwiththetrouble  stephyin  stewartbrand  storage  stories  storytelling  sts  stuarthall  studsterkel  subject  subjectification  suffering  suketumehta  surveillance  suzettehadenelgin  suzymckeecharnass  swarm  syllabus  symbiosis  sympoiesis  synthesus  systems  systemsthinking  takebackthetech  tannertafelski  taoism  taylorchapple  technologicaldeterminism  technology  technoscience  technosolutionism  technosphere  teddycruz  telecommunications  telemetry  tentacles  text  thaliafield  theology  theory  theseus  thestack  things  thinking  thomasmalthus  thomasnagel  thomaspynchon  thomvanddoren  thomvandooren  thoughtfulness  time  timmaly  timmaughan  timothymorton  toolbelttheory  tools  toolsforconviviality  toread  toshiyukinakagaki  totalitarianism  totality  touch  towatch  trace  tracking  transdisciplinary  transformdh  transmediale  transmission  trap  trevorpaglen  ubiquity  ucsc  ucsd  uglification  ugliness  umbertoeco  unconscious  undo  unicorns  universe  unknownfieldsdivision  unlearning  unreality  urban  urbanism  urbanization  ursulaleguin  user  utopianism  vector  victorpapanek  video  vincianedespret  visualisation  viviansobchack  vladimirlenin  vnxmatrix  vondamcintyre  walidahimarisha  war  warrenellis  weapon  weiting  wendybrown  wendychun  whatif  wholeearthcatalog  wildlife  williamcronon  williamgibson  williamjames  womenintech  womensstudies  wonder  work  workaholism  worksinprogress  worldbuilding  worlding  writing  ww2  xenofeminism  xenophobia  zombies 

Copy this bookmark:



description:


tags: