domination   266

« earlier    

Why Class Matters
Just to reiterate my main point: real utopias become viable when they span these two strategies, taming and eroding capitalism. That’s why it’s different from old-fashioned Bernsteinian evolutionary socialism. The role of the state in such a transformational project is to defend and expand the spaces in which alternatives are built from below, rather than for the state to provide, to be the central actor in the provision of needs.
class  Marxism  inequality  domination  power  exploitation  Marx  Weber  socialism  anti-capitalism  analyticalMarxism  Althusser  Poulantzas  AlbertMichael  markets  cooperative  utopias  interview  dctagged  dc:contributor=WrightErikOlins 
5 weeks ago by petej
Opinion | The New Socialists - The New York Times
"Socialism means different things to different people. For some, it conjures the Soviet Union and the gulag; for others, Scandinavia and guaranteed income. But neither is the true vision of socialism. What the socialist seeks is freedom.

Under capitalism, we’re forced to enter the market just to live. The libertarian sees the market as synonymous with freedom. But socialists hear “the market” and think of the anxious parent, desperate not to offend the insurance representative on the phone, lest he decree that the policy she paid for doesn’t cover her child’s appendectomy. Under capitalism, we’re forced to submit to the boss. Terrified of getting on his bad side, we bow and scrape, flatter and flirt, or worse — just to get that raise or make sure we don’t get fired.

The socialist argument against capitalism isn’t that it makes us poor. It’s that it makes us unfree. When my well-being depends upon your whim, when the basic needs of life compel submission to the market and subjugation at work, we live not in freedom but in domination. Socialists want to end that domination: to establish freedom from rule by the boss, from the need to smile for the sake of a sale, from the obligation to sell for the sake of survival.

Listen to today’s socialists, and you’ll hear less the language of poverty than of power. Mr. Sanders invokes the 1 percent. Ms. Ocasio-Cortez speaks to and for the “working class” — not “working people” or “working families,” homey phrases meant to soften and soothe. The 1 percent and the working class are not economic descriptors. They’re political accusations. They split society in two, declaring one side the illegitimate ruler of the other; one side the taker of the other’s freedom, power and promise.

Walk the streets of Bushwick with a canvasser for Julia Salazar, the socialist candidate running to represent North Brooklyn in the New York State Senate. What you’ll hear is that unlike her opponent, Ms. Salazar doesn’t take money from real estate developers. It’s not just that she wants to declare her independence from rich donors. It’s that in her district of cash-strapped renters, landlords are the enemy.

Compare that position to the pitch that Shomik Dutta, a Democratic Party fund-raiser, gave to the Obama campaign in 2008: “The Clinton network is going to take all the establishment” donors. What the campaign needed was someone who understands “the less established donors, the real-estate-developer folks.” If that was “yes, we can,” the socialist answer is “no, we won’t.”

One of the reasons candidates like Ms. Ocasio-Cortez and Ms. Salazar speak the language of class so fluently is that it’s central to their identities. Al Gore, John Kerry and Hillary Clinton struggled to cobble together a credible self out of the many selves they’d presented over the years, trying to find a personal story to fit the political moment. Today’s young candidates of the left tell a story of personal struggle that meshes with their political vision. Mr. Obama did that — but where his story reinforced a myth of national identity and inclusion, the socialists’ story is one of capitalism and exclusion: how, as millennials struggling with low wages and high rents and looming debt, they and their generation are denied the promise of freedom.

The stories of these candidates are socialist for another reason: They break with the nation-state. The geographic references of Ms. Ocasio-Cortez — or Ms. Tlaib, who is running to represent Michigan’s 13th District in Congress — are local rather than national, invoking the memory and outposts of American and European colonialism rather than the promise of the American dream.

Ms. Tlaib speaks of her Palestinian heritage and the cause of Palestine by way of the African-American struggle for civil rights in Detroit, while Ms. Ocasio-Cortez draws circuits of debt linking Puerto Rico, where her mother was born, and the Bronx, where she lives. Mr. Obama’s story also had its Hawaiian (as well as Indonesian and Kenyan) chapters. But where his ended on a note of incorporation, the cosmopolitan wanderer coming home to America, Ms. Tlaib and Ms. Ocasio-Cortez aren’t interested in that resolution. That refusal is also part of the socialist heritage.

Arguably the biggest boundary today’s socialists are willing to cross is the two-party system. In their campaigns, the message is clear: It’s not enough to criticize Donald Trump or the Republicans; the Democrats are also complicit in the rot of American life. And here the socialism of our moment meets up with the deepest currents of the American past.

Like the great transformative presidents, today’s socialist candidates reach beyond the parties to target a malignant social form: for Abraham Lincoln, it was the slavocracy; for Franklin Roosevelt, it was the economic royalists. The great realigners understood that any transformation of society requires a confrontation not just with the opposition but also with the political economy that underpins both parties. That’s why realigners so often opt for a language that neither party speaks. For Lincoln in the 1850s, confronting the Whigs and the Democrats, that language was free labor. For leftists in the 2010s, confronting the Republicans and the Democrats, it’s socialism.

To critics in the mainstream and further to the left, that language can seem slippery. With their talk of Medicare for All or increasing the minimum wage, these socialist candidates sound like New Deal or Great Society liberals. There’s not much discussion, yet, of classic socialist tenets like worker control or collective ownership of the means of production.

And of course, there’s overlap between what liberals and socialists call for. But even if liberals come to support single-payer health care, free college, more unions and higher wages, the divide between the two will remain. For liberals, these are policies to alleviate economic misery. For socialists, these are measures of emancipation, liberating men and women from the tyranny of the market and autocracy at work. Back in the 1930s, it was said that liberalism was freedom plus groceries. The socialist, by contrast, believes that making things free makes people free."
coreyrobin  socialism  liberation  capitalism  latecapitalism  freedom  2018  canon  dsa  wageslavery  billgates  markzuckerberg  liberalism  neoliberalism  taxes  society  anxiety  socialjustice  democrats  us  politics  economics  markets  berniesanders  sovietunion  nordiccountries  scandinavia  domination  alexandriaocasio-cortez  rashidatlaib  kevinphillips 
august 2018 by robertogreco
Ursula K. Le Guin: A Left-Handed Commencement Address
"So what I hope for you is that you live there not as prisoners, ashamed of being women, consenting captives of a psychopathic social system, but as natives. That you will be at home there, keep house there, be your own mistress, with a room of your own. That you will do your work there, whatever you’re good at, art or science or tech or running a company or sweeping under the beds, and when they tell you that it’s second-class work because a woman is doing it, I hope you tell them to go to hell and while they’re going to give you equal pay for equal time. I hope you live without the need to dominate, and without the need to be dominated. I hope you are never victims, but I hope you have no power over other people. And when you fail, and are defeated, and in pain, and in the dark, then I hope you will remember that darkness is your country, where you live, where no wars are fought and no wars are won, but where the future is. Our roots are in the dark; the earth is our country. Why did we look up for blessing — instead of around, and down? What hope we have lies there. Not in the sky full of orbiting spy-eyes and weaponry, but in the earth we have looked down upon. Not from above, but from below. Not in the light that blinds, but in the dark that nourishes, where human beings grow human souls."
via:anne  ursulaleguin  hierarchy  patriarchy  power  millscollege  commencementaddresses  1983  society  victims  darkness  domination  control 
july 2018 by robertogreco
Tim Berners-Lee: we must regulate tech firms to prevent 'weaponised' web | Technology | The Guardian
Sir Tim Berners-Lee, inventor of the world wide web, has called for large technology firms to be regulated to prevent the web from being “weaponised at scale”.
“In recent years, we’ve seen conspiracy theories trend on social media platforms, fake Twitter and Facebook accounts stoke social tensions, external actors interfere in elections, and criminals steal troves of personal data,” Berners-Lee wrote in an open letter marking the 29th anniversary of his invention.
These problems have proliferated because of the concentration of power in the hands of a few platforms – including Facebook, Google, and Twitter – which “control which ideas and opinions are seen and shared”.

“What was once a rich selection of blogs and websites has been compressed under the powerful weight of a few dominant platforms,” said the 62-year-old British computer scientist.
These online gatekeepers can lock in their power by acquiring smaller rivals, buying up new innovations and hiring the industry’s top talent, making it harder for others to compete, he said.
Google now accounts for about 87% of online searches worldwide. Facebook has more than 2.2 billion monthly active users – more than 20 times more than MySpace at its peak. Together, the two companies (including their subsidiaries Instagram and YouTube) slurp up more than 60% of digital advertising spend worldwide.
Berners-Lee  WWW  web  GAFA  fake-news  bots  plateformes  domination 
march 2018 by sentinelle
Feral children: settler colonialism, progress, and the figure of the child: Settler Colonial Studies: Vol 8, No 1
"Settler colonialism is structured in part according to the principle of civilizational progress yet the roots of this doctrine are not well understood. Disparate ideas of progress and practices related to colonial dispossession and domination can be traced back to the Enlightenment, and as far back as ancient Greece, but there remain unexplored logics and continuities. I argue that civilizational progress and settler colonialism are structured according to the opposition between politics governed by reason or faith and the figure of the child as sinful or bestial. Thus, it is not contingent, but rather necessary that justificatory frameworks of European empire and colonialism depict Indigenous peoples as children. To illustrate how the theoretical link between Indigenous peoples and children emerges not as a simple analogy, but rather, as the source of the premodern/modern and savage/civilized binaries, I trace the various historical iterations of the political/childhood opposition through the classical, medieval, enlightenment, and modern eras. I show how the model of civilizational progress from a premodern and savage state of childhood continues to serve as the model for settler colonial exclusion and domination of Indigenous peoples."

[Also here (and elsewhere): ]
tobyrollo  2016  settlercolonialism  children  colonialism  childhood  unschooling  deschooling  dispossession  domination  civilization  feral  ageism 
february 2018 by robertogreco
When You Try to Change People That's Not Love, It's Domination | On Being
"In an interview conducted nearly thirty years ago, social visionary bell hooks had this to say about love and domination:
“I want there to be a place in the world where people can engage in one another.”

While hooks was discussing racial and gender representation in film, her statement can be broadly applied to relationships at home, in neighborhoods, in cities, and across whole societies.

To say “I want there to be a place in the world where people can engage in one another’s differences in a way that is redemptive” is to exercise one’s moral, social, and theological imagination. It is to pray and think expansively, imagining a world yet unborn into being. It is to recognize that difference need not be an occasion for brutality, but an occasion for mutual enhancement.

“I want there to be a place in the world” is the line poets, musicians, and storytellers utter before composing and what first-time parents pronounce while staring at their sleeping newborn: the desire to see one’s significant other or child or close friend given the space to flourish as themselves, not as someone else.

Qualifying “I love you” with “In order to love you, I must make you something else” is to use love as a pretext for domination, not as a springboard for generative companionship. To say, “In order to love you, I must make you something else” is to blur the good news that a loving God and community receive us as we are, not as we want to be or pretend to be. Much of Christian preaching and formation emphasizes the latter — the pretending — which feeds the pious-sounding quip:
“God loves you just the way you are, but too much to leave you that way.”

While well-meaning, that statement plays into the assumption that God will love us more as we become something or someone else.

Domination is the attempt to change others, recast them, remake them, possess them, control them. Domination is what took place in the Canadian residential schools. Masterminds of the schools thought they were being loving toward the indigenous people they enrolled, but they were actually practicing a logic of colonialist domination.

Domination is an uncreative, if convincing, imitation of love. Love says, “I receive you as you are and want to imagine a world in which you are received as you are,” exposing domination as a failure of imagination; love is imagination when it is given permission to meditate on endless possibility. Like planting a seed, watering it, and watching it become the tree you always knew it was. The seed isn’t being made into something else, but is living out its fullest potential, the way a sculptor discovers her subject in a block of stone. This is one way of seeing the life of love, or what the Rev. Marcus Halley calls “episodes of grace,” a series of moments in which we are awakened to the unique ways in which we are loved by God; not possessed, recast, or remade by God, but loved.

It is difficult for many of us to discern the difference between love and domination because so much of what we’ve been told was love throughout our lives was actually domination. This was apparent to me in a coffee shop conversation I had with a person who had recently disclosed to their closest family members that they are transgender. After two years of conversations with those family members, that person was given an ultimatum by a sibling:
“We will always love you, but either you allow us to refer to you by the pronouns and name we grew up using for you, or we will be forced to end our relationship with you.”

This friend went on to say that nothing hurt more in that conversation than their sibling’s “but.” “That single word negated every word that preceded it,” they said. The sigh of relief my friend needed to breathe would have come had they heard they are loved and received as they are, full stop. No caveats, fine print, or need to pretend that they are something that they aren’t.

When Christians celebrate and receive the presence of God in the bread and wine of Eucharist, we hear what my friend so desperately wanted to hear from their family. This doesn’t mean that my friend, or any of us, is looking to simply feel good about ourselves, but that we yearn to be fully known, seen, and loved.

Public theology is at its best when it creates the space necessary for people of various gender identities, religious affiliations and non-affiliations, ethnicities, and economic levels to be known as their full selves, not pushed into a mold not meant for them. It is being less concerned about finding surface-level common ground than about holding space for people’s unique experiences of divinity and humanity."
domination  authority  broderickgreer  2017  bellhooks  teaching  relationships  power  brutality  violence  love  colonialism  control  self  humanism  huamnity  diversity  acceptance  inclusivity  gender  transgender  marcushalley  christianity  difference 
november 2017 by robertogreco

« earlier    

related tags

<7.5k  -...  -  10  1850s  1960s  1983  1995  19jam  19thc  2007  2012  2013  2014  2015  2016  2017  2018  20thc  8088  aaptiv  abandonment  abdullahocalan  academia  acceptance  achievement  actant  action  activism  addiction  adorno  ageism  agency  aggression  ai  alaaabdelfattah  albertmichael  alexandriaocasio-cortez  algorithm  algorithms  alienation  allies  althusser  amazon  american  analyse  analyticalmarxism  anarchism  anarchy  ancient  ancientchina  ancientegypt  ancientgreece  ancientindia  ancientrome  and  anger  anthropology  anti-capitalism  anxiety  app  apple  arabia  araisininthesun  archaeology  aristotle  arm  art  article  artificial  artificialintelligence  assemblage  assessment  attaques  audio  authoritarianism  authority  autism  automation  autonomy  aztec  babylon  babylonianas  banedictanderson  barbarians  battle  bdsm  beatpoetry  beatpoets  behavior  behaviorism  bellhooks  bendavis  berners-lee  berniesanders  betrayal  between  betweenness  bfskinner  bias  bibliography  biggerharder  billgates  blackfish  blackness  book  books  borders  bots  bourgeoisie  box  brasil  brazil  broderickgreer  brutality  bruxelles  buddhism  buenaventuradurruti  bullsi  bullying  bureaucracy  byzantines  byzantium  canon  capital  capitalism-alternatives  capitalism-varieties  capitalism  car  carthage  cartography  caterinafake  cecliacissell  celts  census  centrism  chain  change  changemaking  chess  childhood  children  china  chriscrandall  christianity  cities  citystates  civilization  class  class_conflict  classes  classideas  classism  closer  coercion  cognitition  collaboration  collar  collared  collectivism  colonialism  colonization  commencementaddresses  commerce-doux  communication  communist_party  community  comparison  competition  complete  composting  compulsion  computer  con-dom  conditioning  confederate  conflict  conflit  conformity  congo  consumerism  continue  control  cooperative  core  coreyrobin  cornelwest  crime  crimethinc  criticalthinking  critiques  cultural_critique  cultural_history  culture  curriculum  cyberspace  darkness  davidgraeber  dc:contributor=wrighterikolins  dctagged  decadence  deconstruction  dedication  deliberative_democracy  demo  democracy  democrats  depression  descartes  deschooling  desire  desktop  despair  determination  dewey  dictators  difference  digital  discipline  discrimation  dispossession  disrespect  diversity  douglass  downloaded  drunkenness  dsa  dualism  dubois  dwwinnicott  ecology  ecommerce  economic_history  economic_theory  economics  edbeach  education  ef-add  egypt  egyptians  electronics  elitism  emotion  emotions  empire  empowerment  engagement  england  english  environment  equality  estrangement  ethics  ethiopia  eugenics  eurocentrism  europe  evaluation  everyday  example  expands  expansion  exploitation  exploration  expression  extermination  external  fake-news  family  fascism  fear  fellowship  feminism  feral  fetish  fic  fiction  film  fin-de-siècle  final  financial  fitness  five  flaneur  fleet  flow  footfetish  for  france  frankfurt_school  freedom  french  front  full  fury  gafa  galtoncharles  games  gaming  garysnyder  gaus_gerald  gaze  gender  georgeyancy  germany  getitdunn  global  glynne  god  google  grace  graeber  grahamharman  greece  greed  gurley  hachette  harrington  headed  healing  hegel  her  hermankahn  het  hiddenconstitution  hiddencurriculum  hierarchies  hierarchy  highereducation  history  homes  homo_economicus  hope  horizontality  how  howto  howweteach  huamnity  hudsoninstitute  human  human_capital  humanism  humanity  humanization  humiliation  humility  humor  huns  ideal_theory  idenity  identity  identity_politics  illegibility  imbalance  imperialism  inca  inch  inclusivity  india  individualism  indonesia  industrial  inequality  influence  information  infrastructure  injustice  instagram  institutions  integrity  intel  intellectual_history  intellectualism  intelligence  internet  interpretation  interview  ir  ir_theory  iraq  iriquois  is  isis  issue  italia  italy  its  jackkerouac  james_henry  japan  jellobiafra  jess  jm  johnperrybarlow  jq  jstor  justice  kant  kevinphillips  kobane  kurds  kylekallgren  labor  laisser-faire  landart  landscape  language  larval  latecapitalism  laurapraglin  lauravanberkel  le  leaders  leadership  learning  leftist  legibility  legitimacy  leisure  lemans2015  lemonde  lewismumford  liberalism  liberation  liberty-negative  liberty-positive  liberty  life  liminality  liminalspaces  linux  listening  literary_history  living  lobbying  locksmith  loop  lorrainehansberry  losing  lotteries  love  lutte  mad  madamasr  mainstream  malcolmx  management  manhood  mans  mapping  maps  marcushalley  marginalization  market_failure  market_fundamentalism  marketing  markets-dependence_on_government  markets-structure  markets  markets_in_everything  markmcleodbethune  markzuckerberg  martin  martinbuber  martinlutherkingjr  marx  marxism  masculinity  mastery  materialism  math  max  me  mentalhealth  mentalillness  meritocracy  mesh  metamorphosis  mexico  microsoft  miguelclarkmallet  millscollege  mixity  mlk  model  modèles  money  mongolia  mortem  motion  motivation  murraybookchin  museums  music  mutualaid  myvisu  narcissism  narrative  nationalism  nations  nc-17  near  neo-republicanism  neoliberalism  netherlands  new  newstarwars  nicksrnicek  noise  nonhuman  noplace  nordiccountries  novels  négociation  obedience  observation  oedagogy  of  office  oligarchy  on  online  onticology  ooo  operationalclosure  opinion  oppression  optimism  orleans  ottomanempire  outside  ownership  page  paper  parenting  passivity  pathology  patriarchy  patterson  peace  pedagogy  perfect  pettit  philosophy  photo  photography  place  plan  plateformes  plato  playlist  plots  pluralism  poer  police  political_economy  political_history  political_participation  political_philosophy  political_press  political_science  political_theory  politics  politique  polynesia  portugal  post  poulantzas  poverty  power  practice  prana  precarious  presence  present  presentation  prestige  prevalence  price_richard  prison  privilege  problem  profit  progress  progressivism  property  ps.popular  psychology  public_policy  public_sphere  publicintellectuals  quantification  race  racial_discrimination  racism  radicalism  rashidatlaib  rawls  real  rebellion  recherche  reference  relation  relationships  religion  republicanism  resistance  response  responsibility  review  reviews  revolt  revolution  risk  risktaking  road  rome  rough  rousseau  russia  safety  sandrabland  scale  scandinavia  scene  school  seaworld  secondorder  secretcurriculum  self-determination  self-driving  self-government  self-interrogation  self  semantic  sensual  seo  serena  settlercolonialism  sex  sexism  show  signalling  slavery  slides  slow  small  smith  social_history  social_order  social_process  social_sciences  social_theory  socialconstructs  socialdominanceorientation  socialism  socialjustice  society  sociology  sociology_of_fields  solitude  sorrow  southafrica  sovereignty  sovietunion  spanish  spirituality  spotify’s  state  stats  statusquo  stevensinofsky  stratgey  stress  sublime  submission  submit  suicide  sumeria  support  table  tactics  taxes  teaching  technocracy  technocrats  technology  terror  that  theory  thesis  thichnhathanh  timothymorton  to  tobyrollo  torture  trampling  transformation  transgender  translation  trauma  tribes  trust  truth  truthfulness  uk  universities  unschooling  ursulaleguin  us  us_economy  us_history  us_politics  usa  utopia  utopias  vgordonchilde  victims  video  videogames  vimeo  violence  wagelabor  wages  wageslavery  war  wealth  weather  web  weber  webinar  whiteness  whitesupremacy  why  williamblake  williams  windows10  winner  winning  withdrawal  women  work  working_class  workingclass  workinginpublic  world  writing  www  zulu     

Copy this bookmark: