diversity   12812

« earlier    

The Moral Voice of Corporate America - The New York Times
“For a long time, corporate social responsibility was a buzzword marketing tool, walled off within an organization,” said Alan Fleischmann, president of Laurel Strategies, an executive advisory firm. “Now it has to be central for the C.E.O., part of their everyday responsibility and leadership.”
ceo  advocacy  diversity  discrimination  trump  us 
9 hours ago by sbostwic
Which is why it would benefit from many, many more women doing precisely that.
changetheratio  diversity  from twitter_favs
22 hours ago by andriak
New Xbox Avatars Coming This Fall – E3 2017 – Official Announce Video | Best Images Collections HD For Gadget windows Mac Android
New Xbox Avatars coming this fall – E3 2017 – Official Announce Online video New Xbox Avatars – for everybody all over the place Make a electronic expression of on your own and endlessly customise it every time and having said that you want. With a range of overall body types, pores and skin tones, […]
IFTTT  WordPress  Games  Avatars  diversity  e3  2017  Express  Yourself:  Creativity  Gaming  for  Everyone  Inclusivity  window  xbox  360  Live  one  X  xbox360 
yesterday by wotek
What 11 CEOs Have Learned About Championing Diversity
Lead by example when it comes to diversity. A CEO’s actions, whether on or off the job, signal the extent to which diversity is valued.
diversity  leadership 
2 days ago by jasonsamuels
Google Violates Labor Laws By Firing Memo Writing Employee | Best Images Collections HD For Gadget windows Mac Android
Google Violates Labor Legislation By Firing Memo Composing Worker Under the Countrywide Labor Relations Act, the employee’s task was guarded by his legal proper to talk functioning disorders with his co-personnel. The author even expressed that the censorship developed a hostile functioning atmosphere for any one questioning the politically correct standing quo. Memo in Question, […]
IFTTT  WordPress  Technology  beliefs  Censorship  damore  diversity  echo  chamber  Feminism  Fired  google  hugbox  james  labor  Laws  Liberal  Memo  memogate  Political 
2 days ago by wotek
Contra Grant On Exaggerated Differences | Slate Star Codex
Grant says that gender differences are small and irrelevant to the current issue. I disagree.
diversity  gender  google  science  sexism  study 
2 days ago by SimonHurtz
recalibrating your sites – the ANOVA
"Not too long ago, I felt the need to change the stream of personalities and attitudes that were pouring into my head, and it’s been remarkable.

This was really the product of idiosyncratic personal conditions, but it’s ended up being a good intellectual exercise too. I had to rearrange a few things in my digital social life. And concurrently I had realized that my sense of the world was being distorted by the flow of information that was being deposited into my brain via the internet. I hadn’t really lost a sense of what the “other side” thinks politically; I’m still one of those geezers who forces himself to read Reason and the Wall Street Journal op/ed page and, god help me, National Review. But I had definitely lost a sense of the mental lives of people who did not occupy my various weird interests.

What were other people thinking about, at least as far as could be gleaned by what they shared online? What appeared to be a big deal to them and what didn’t? I had lost my sense of social proportion. I couldn’t tell if the things my friends were obsessing about were things that the rest of the world was obsessing about. Talking to IRL friends that don’t post much or at all online helped give me a sense that I was missing something. But I didn’t know what.

No, I had to use the tools available to me to dramatically change the opinions and ideas and attitudes that were coming flowing into my mental life. And it had become clear that, though I have an RSS feed and I peruse certain websites and publications regularly, though I still read lots of books and physical journals and magazines, the opinions I was receiving were coming overwhelmingly through social media. People shared things and commented on what they shared on Facebook and Twitter, they made clear what ideas were permissible and what weren’t on Facebook and Twitter, they defined the shared mental world on Facebook and Twitter. They created a language that, if you weren’t paying attention, looked like the lingua franca. I’m sure there are people out there who can take all of this in with the proper perspective and not allow it to subtly shape your perception of social attitudes writ large. But I can’t.

It’s all particularly disturbing because a lot of what you see and don’t online is the product of algorithms that are blunt instruments at best.

So I set about disconnecting, temporarily, from certain people, groups, publications, and conversations. I found voices that popped up in my feeds a lot and muted them. I unfollowed groups and pages. I looked out for certain markers of status and social belonging and used them as guides for what to avoid. I was less interested in avoiding certain subjects than I was in avoiding certain perspectives, the social frames that we all use to understand the world. The news cycle was what it was; I could not avoid Trump, as wonderful as that sounds. But I could avoid a certain way of looking at Trump, and at the broader world. In particular I wanted to look past what we once called ideology: I wanted to see the ways in which my internet-mediated intellectual life was dominated by assumptions that did not recognize themselves as assumptions, to understand how the perspective that did not understand itself to be a perspective had distorted my vision of the world. I wanted to better see the water in which my school of fish swims.

Now this can be touchy – mutually connecting with people on social media has become a loaded thing in IRL relationships, for better or worse. Luckily both Facebook and Twitter give you ways to not see someone’s posts without them knowing and without severing the connection. Just make a list of people, pages, and publications that you want to take a diet from, and after a month or two of seeing how different things look, go back to following them. (Alternatively: don’t.) Really do it! The tools are there, and you can always revert back. Just keep a record of what you’re doing.

I was prepared for this to result in a markedly different online experience for me, and for it to somewhat change my perception of what “everyone” thinks, of what people are reading, watching, and listening to, etc. But even so, I’ve been floored by how dramatically different the online world looks with a little manipulation of the feeds. A few subjects dropped out entirely; the Twin Peaks reboot went from being everywhere to being nowhere, for example. But what really changed was the affect through which the world was presenting itself to me.

You would not be surprised by what my lenses appear to have been (and still largely to be): very college educated, very left-leaing, very New York, very media-savvy, very middlebrow, and for lack of a better word, very “cool.” That is, the perspective that I had tried to wean myself off of was made up of people whose online self-presentation is ostentatiously ironic, in-joke heavy, filled with cultural references that are designed to hit just the right level of obscurity, and generally oriented towards impressing people through being performatively not impressed by anything. It was made up of people who are passionately invested in not appearing to be passionately invested in anything. It’s a sensibility that you can trace back to Gawker and Spy magazine and much, much further back than that, if you care to.

Perhaps most dramatic was the changes to what – and who – was perceived as a Big Deal. By cutting out a hundred voices or fewer, things and people that everybody talks about became things and people that nobody talks about. The internet is a technology for creating small ponds for us to all be big fish in. But you change your perspective just slightly, move over just an inch, and suddenly you get a sense of just how few people know about you or could possibly care. It’s oddly comforting, to be reminded that even if you enjoy a little internet notoriety, the average person on the street could not care less who you are or what you do. I recommend it.

Of course, there are profound limits to this. My feeds are still dominantly coming from a few overlapping social cultures. Trimming who I’m following hasn’t meant that I’m suddenly connected to more high school dropouts, orthodox Jews, senior citizens, or people who don’t speak English. I would never pretend that this little exercise has given me a truly broad perspective. The point has just been to see how dramatically a few changes to my digital life could alter my perception of “the conversation.” And it’s done that. More than ever, I worry that our sense of shared political assumptions and the perceived immorality of the status quo is the result of systems that exclude a large mass of people, whose opinions will surely matter in the political wars ahead.

I am now adding some of what I cut back in to my digital life. The point was never really to avoid particular publications or people. I like some of what and who I had cut out very much. The point is to remain alive to how arbitrary and idiosyncratic changes in the constant flow of information can alter our perception of the human race. It’s something I intend to do once a year or so, to jolt myself back into understanding how limiting my perspective really is.

Everyone knows, these days, that we’re living in digitally-enabled bubbles. The trouble is that our instincts are naturally to believe that everyone else is in a bubble, or at least that their bubbles are smaller and with thicker walls. But people like me – college educated, living in an urban enclave, at least socially liberal, tuned in to arts and culture news and criticism, possessed of the vocabulary of media and the academy, “savvy” – you face unique temptations in this regard. No, I don’t think that this kind of bubble is the same as someone who only gets their news from InfoWars and Breitbart. But the fact that so many people like me write the professional internet, the fact that the creators of the idioms and attitudes of our newsmedia and cultural industry almost universally come from a very thin slice of the American populace, is genuinely dangerous.

To regain perspective takes effort, and I encourage you all to expend that effort, particularly if you are an academic or journalist. Your world is small, and our world is big."
freddiedeboer  2017  internet  twitter  facebook  filterbubbles  socialmedia  relationships  algorithms  echochambers  academia  journalism  culture  society  diversity  perspective  listening  web  media  feeds 
3 days ago by robertogreco
Multicultural and Colorblind Ideology, Stereotypes, and Ethnocentrism among Black and White Americans - Group Processes & Intergroup Relations - Carey S. Ryan, Jennifer S. Hunt, Joshua A. Weible, Charles R. Peterson, Juan F. Casas, 2007
We examined Blacks' and Whites' perceptions of group variability and positivity as well as their beliefs about the extent to which multiculturalism and colorblindness would improve intergroup relations. In two studies, responses to questionnaires indicated that the tendency to endorse multiculturalism more than colorblindness was greater among Blacks than Whites; Blacks consistently endorsed multiculturalism more than colorblindness and Whites endorsed colorblindness more than did Blacks. Both studies also revealed evidence of out-group homogeneity and ethnocentrism. Stronger endorsement of multiculturalism relative to colorblindness predicted stronger stereotypes among Blacks, whereas stronger endorsement of colorblindness relative to multiculturalism predicted stronger stereotypes among Whites. In Study 2, stronger endorsement of multiculturalism relative to colorblindness predicted less ethnocentrism; this relationship did not depend on ethnicity.

Throughout, the samples of African Americans demonstrate interethnic judgments that are consistent with existing work on stereotyping and ethnocentrism. White American students, however, reported judgments that replicate neither the out-group homogeneity effect nor ethnocentrism.

Table 3, Table 6

Demographic, economic, and genetic factors related to national differences in ethnocentric attitudes: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/303808334_Demographic_economic_and_genetic_factors_related_to_national_differences_in_ethnocentric_attitudes
We conducted a review of factors associated with individual and group level differences in positive ethnocentrism (PE) and negative ethnocentrism (NE). We inter-correlated datasets on national differences in these factors with data from the World Values Survey with regard to national differences in measures of PE and NE. The two different survey items for each construct were strongly correlated, but the constructs themselves were not significantly associated. Multiple regression analyses indicated that NE was mainly related to high levels of cousin marriage and frequency of the DRD4-repeat gene, and that PE was mainly related to a young median population age. Cousin marriage may indicate low levels of trust, DRD4 implies a fast Life History strategy, and young median age is associated with many factors predicting PE.
study  psychology  social-psych  sociology  polisci  ideology  politics  identity-politics  race  ethnocentrism  stereotypes  pop-diff  values  usa  tribalism  us-them  patho-altruism  diversity  attaq  pdf  piracy  multi  poll  descriptive  life-history  n-factor  trust  candidate-gene  personality 
3 days ago by nhaliday

« earlier    

related tags

2017  360  abc  academia  activismmodel  activities  advocacy  ageism  algorithms  americanscientist  analytics  anti  architecture  art  articles  assignment  attaq  avatars  bathroom  beliefs  biology  blog  book  books  branding  business  by:sarahjeong  campussafety  candidate-gene  career  censorship  ceo  chamber  changemanagement  changetheratio  children  cities  clairemiller  community  communitycollege  computerscience  creativity  crisismanagement  criticisms  culture  cynthialee  damore  datadecisions  descriptive  design  development  discrimination  discussion  dispenser  e3  echo  echochambers  economic  economist  education  employment  engineer  entrepreneurship  epistemology  ethics  ethnocentrism  everyone  evolution  exclusion  express  facebook  fail  feeds  feminism  filterbubbles  finance  fired  fired4truth  for  freddiedeboer  freespeech  fundraising  gameofthrones  games  gaming  gender  gender_differences  gentrification  github  google  googlemanifesto  hackernews  hbr  healing  heterodoxacademy  heteronormativity  higheredtrends  hiring  history  hugbox  identity-politics  ideology  ifttt  image  images  important  inclusion  inclusivity  industrial  inequality  interesting  internet  investment  james  james_damore  jamesdamore  jeong  jonathanhaidt  journalism  kids  labor  larrypage  laws  leadership  lgbt  liberal  life-history  linguistics  listening  literalnazis  live  losangeles  management  manifesto  marketing  media  memo  memogate  men  misogyny  multi  n-factor  network  new-companies  news  one  opinion  owns  paradox  paradox_of_tolerance  parenting  partnership  patho-altruism  pdf  personalbranding  personality  perspective  phd  philosophy  photo  photos  piracy  planning  policy  polisci  political  politics  poll  pop-diff  programming  psychology  publicrelations  publishing  queer  quora  race  racism  recruiting  relationships  remote  response  review  sanfrancisco  science  seanstevens  sexism  siliconvalley  so  soap  social-psych  socialmedia  society  sociology  software  stackoverflow  statistics  stats  stereotypes  stock  study  susanfowler  suzannesadedin  tech-culture  tech  techculture  technology  thememo  todo  tolerance  toread  tribalism  trump  trust  twitter  uber  us-them  us  usa  ux  values  vc  web  window  women  womenintech  wordpress  workculture  world  writing  x  xbox  xbox360  ycombinator  yonatanzunger  yourself: 

Copy this bookmark: