disparity   290

« earlier    

The Fascism In Us All
Heartbreaking article about society's response to crime and the degree to which we'll accept the torture and suffering of others, with specific reference to Hurricane Katrina prisoners and Hurricane Florence looters just trying to survive.
human_rights  disparity  race_relations  prison  natural_disasters  hurricane_katrina  hurricane_florence  luke_o'neil  fascism  torture  criminal_justice  foucault 
september 2018 by sawtoothwave
Gospels of Giving for the New Gilded Age | The New Yorker
"Are today’s donor classes solving problems—or creating new ones?"

We live, it is often said, in a new Gilded Age—an era of extravagant wealth and almost as extravagant displays of generosity. In the past fifteen years, some thirty thousand private foundations have been created, and the number of donor-advised funds has roughly doubled. The Giving Pledge—signed by Bill Gates, Warren Buffett, Michael Bloomberg, Larry Ellison, and more than a hundred and seventy other gazillionaires who have promised to dedicate most of their wealth to philanthropy—is the “Gospel” stripped down and updated. And as the new philanthropies have proliferated so, too, have the critiques.

Anand Giridharadas is a journalist who, in 2011, was named a Henry Crown Fellow of the Aspen Institute. The institute is financed by, among other groups, the Carnegie Corporation, the Rockefeller Brothers Fund, and the Gates Foundation. The fellowship, according to its Web site, aims to “develop the next generation of community-spirited leaders” by engaging them “in a thought-provoking journey of personal exploration.”

Giridharadas at first found the fellowship to be a pretty sweet deal; it offered free trips to the Rockies and led to invitations from the sorts of people who own Western-themed mansions and fly private jets. After a while, though, he started to feel that something was rotten in the state of Colorado. In 2015, when he was asked to deliver a speech to his fellow-fellows, he used it to condemn what he called “the Aspen Consensus.”

“The Aspen Consensus, in a nutshell, is this,” he said. “The winners of our age must be challenged to do more good. But never, ever tell them to do less harm.” The speech made the Times; people began asking for copies of it; and Giridharadas decided to expand on it. The result is “Winners Take All: The Elite Charade of Changing the World.” “I hadn’t planned to write a book on this topic, but the topic chose me,” he writes."

"Inside Philanthropy is a Web site devoted to high-end giving; its tagline is “Who’s Funding What, and Why.” David Callahan is the site’s founder and editor. If Giridharadas worries that the super-wealthy just play at changing the world, Callahan worries they’re going at it in earnest.

“An ever larger and richer upper class is amplifying its influence through large-scale giving in an era when it already has too much clout,” he writes in “The Givers: Wealth, Power, and Philanthropy in a New Gilded Age.” “Things are going to get worse, too.”

Part of the problem, according to Callahan, lies in the broad way that philanthropy has been defined. Under the federal tax code, an organization that feeds the hungry can count as a philanthropy, and so can a university where students study the problem of hunger, and so, too, can a think tank devoted to downplaying hunger as a problem. All these qualify as what are known, after the relevant tax-code provision, as 501(c)(3)s, meaning that the contributions they receive are tax deductible, and that the earnings on their endowments are largely tax-free. 501(c)(3)s are prohibited from engaging in partisan activity, but, as “The Givers” convincingly argues, activists on both sides of the ideological divide have developed work-arounds.

As a left-leaning example, Callahan cites Tim Gill, who’s been called “the megadonor behind the L.G.B.T.Q.-rights movement.” A software designer, Gill became rich founding and then selling a company called Quark, and he’s donated more than three hundred million dollars toward promoting L.G.B.T.Q. rights. While some of this has been in the form of straight-up political contributions, much of it has been disbursed by Gill’s tax-exempt foundation, which has financed educational efforts, message testing, and—perhaps most important—legal research. “Without a doubt, we would not be where we are without Tim Gill and the Gill Foundation,” Mary Bonauto, the attorney who argued the 2015 Supreme Court case that legalized gay marriage, told Rolling Stone last year.

On the right, Callahan points to Art Pope, the chairman of a privately held discount-store chain called Variety Wholesalers. Pope has used his wealth to support a network of foundations, based in North Carolina, that advocate for voter-identification—or, if you prefer, voter-suppression—laws. In 2013, pushed by Pope’s network, the North Carolina state legislature enacted a measure requiring residents to present state-issued photo I.D.s at the polls. Then the North Carolina Institute for Constitutional Law—another Pope-funded group—led the effort to block challenges to the measure. (The I.D. law was struck down, in 2016, by a federal appeals court that held it had been “passed with racially discriminatory intent.”)

It is difficult to say what fraction of philanthropic giving goes toward shaping public policy. Callahan estimates that the figure is somewhere around ten billion dollars a year. Such an amount, he says, might not sound huge, but it’s more than the annual contributions made to candidates, parties, and super-pacs combined. The result is doubly undemocratic. For every billion dollars spent on advocacy tricked out as philanthropy, several hundred million dollars in uncaptured taxes are lost to the federal treasury.

“It’s not just that the megaphones operated by 501(c)(3) groups and financed by a sliver of rich donors have gotten louder and louder, making it harder for ordinary citizens to be heard,” Callahan notes. “It’s that these citizens are helping foot the bill.” That both liberals and conservatives are exploiting the tax code is small consolation.

“When it comes to who gets heard in the public square, ordinary citizens can’t begin to compete with an activist donor class,” Callahan writes. “How many very rich people need to care intensely about a cause to finance megaphones that drown out the voices of everyone else?” he asks. “Not many.”"

Critiques of “The Gospel of Wealth” didn’t have much impact on Andrew Carnegie. He continued to distribute his fortune, to libraries and museums and universities, until, at the time of his death, in 1919, he had given away some three hundred and fifty million dollars—the equivalent of tens of billions in today’s money. It is hard to imagine that the critiques of the new Carnegies will do much to alter current trend lines.

The Gates Foundation alone, Callahan estimates, will disburse more than a hundred and fifty billion dollars over the next several decades. In just the next twenty years, affluent baby boomers are expected to contribute almost seven trillion dollars to philanthropy. And, the more government spending gets squeezed, the more important nongovernmental spending will become. When congressional Republicans passed their so-called tax-reform bill, they preserved the deduction for charitable contributions even as they capped the deduction for state and local tax payments. Thus, a hundred-million-dollar gift to Harvard will still be fully deductible, while, in many parts of the country, the property taxes paid to support local public schools will not be. It is possible that in the not too distant future philanthropic giving will outstrip federal outlays on non-defense discretionary programs, like education and the arts. This would represent, Callahan notes, a “striking milestone.”

Is that the kind of future we want? As the latest round of critiques makes clear, we probably won’t have much of a say in the matter. The philanthropists will decide, and then it will be left to their foundations to fight it out."
philanthropicindustrialcomplex  charitableindustrialcomplex  2018  elizabethkolbert  charity  philanthropy  inequality  andrewcarnegie  gildedage  inequity  disparity  wealth  inheritance  hughpricehughes  society  williamjewetttucker  patronage  ethics  wealthdistribution  exploitation  billgates  warrenbuffett  michaelbloomberg  larryellison  anandgiridharadas  aspenconsensus  georgesoros  socialentrepreneurship  laurietisch  darrenwalker  change  democracy  henrykravis  billclinton  davidcallahan  power  taxes  thinktanks  nonprofit  activism  timgill  publicpolicy  politics  economics  us  influence  artpope  votersuppression  law  superpacs  donaldtrump  equality  robertreich  nonprofits  capitalism  control 
august 2018 by robertogreco
HRSA Maternal Mortality Summit
HRSA Maternal Mortality Summit

Day 1, around the 1:25 mark - Keynote, Dr. Joia Crear Perry, who spoke about disparities in maternal outcomes; I am working with Joia on several projects, including our national community workgroup looking at ways to infuse a disparities framework into patient safety bundles. Most likely she will be part of the group I am inviting to visit St. Louis.
Day 2: around the 2:35 mark - beginning of my session as part of the postpartum panel; during this panel, here I was able to highlight the continuum of women's health care with MCH as a starting point, talk about the need for payment models that loop in community wraparounds, and highlighted our work in St. Louis re: addressing racial disparities.
hrsa  womens_care  disparity  community_health  federal_gov  public_health 
august 2018 by michaelmillerjr
'All humanity has left the area': paying for Tesla's Gigafactory | Cities | The Guardian
“Factories are great if you’re working there”—econ devt longshot will prolly cost
Nevada big
economy  development  nevada  battery  factory  subsidy  tesla  failure  rent  housing  disparity 
july 2018 by csrollyson
The Death of a Once Great City | Harper's Magazine
Well-informed longread about NYC's recent decline into an empty city of billionaires' pied-a-terres instead of a place where actual people live real lives.
gentrification  new_york  harper's  kevin_baker  housing  disparity 
june 2018 by sawtoothwave
Millennials Are Screwed - The Huffington Post
Super powerful longform article about the economic challenges facing millennials. Required reading for any asshole who thinks "The kids are just lazy."
millenials  longform  huffington_post  disparity  economics 
may 2018 by sawtoothwave
The Birth of the New American Aristocracy - The Atlantic
[via: https://twitter.com/irl/status/998252910214549504 ]

"New forms of life necessarily give rise to new and distinct forms of consciousness. If you doubt this, you clearly haven’t been reading the “personal and household services” ads on Monster.com. At the time of this writing, the section for my town of Brookline, Massachusetts, featured one placed by a “busy professional couple” seeking a “Part Time Nanny.” The nanny (or manny—the ad scrupulously avoids committing to gender) is to be “bright, loving, and energetic”; “friendly, intelligent, and professional”; and “a very good communicator, both written and verbal.” She (on balance of probability) will “assist with the care and development” of two children and will be “responsible for all aspects of the children’s needs,” including bathing, dressing, feeding, and taking the young things to and from school and activities. That’s why a “college degree in early childhood education” is “a plus.”

In short, Nanny is to have every attribute one would want in a terrific, professional, college-educated parent. Except, of course, the part about being an actual professional, college-educated parent. There is no chance that Nanny will trade places with our busy 5G couple. She “must know the proper etiquette in a professionally run household” and be prepared to “accommodate changing circumstances.” She is required to have “5+ years experience as a Nanny,” which makes it unlikely that she’ll have had time to get the law degree that would put her on the other side of the bargain. All of Nanny’s skills, education, experience, and professionalism will land her a job that is “Part Time.”

The ad is written in flawless, 21st-century business-speak, but what it is really seeking is a governess—that exquisitely contradictory figure in Victorian literature who is both indistinguishable in all outward respects from the upper class and yet emphatically not a member of it. Nanny’s best bet for moving up in the world is probably to follow the example of Jane Eyre and run off with the lord (or lady) of the manor."

"You see, when educated people with excellent credentials band together to advance their collective interest, it’s all part of serving the public good by ensuring a high quality of service, establishing fair working conditions, and giving merit its due. That’s why we do it through “associations,” and with the assistance of fellow professionals wearing white shoes. When working-class people do it—through unions—it’s a violation of the sacred principles of the free market. It’s thuggish and anti-modern. Imagine if workers hired consultants and “compensation committees,” consisting of their peers at other companies, to recommend how much they should be paid. The result would be—well, we know what it would be, because that’s what CEOs do.

It isn’t a coincidence that the education premium surged during the same years that membership in trade unions collapsed. In 1954, 28 percent of all workers were members of trade unions, but by 2017 that figure was down to 11 percent."

The Choice

I like to think that the ending of The Great Gatsby is too down-beat. Even if we are doomed to row our boats ceaselessly back into the past, how do we know which part of the past that will be?

History shows us a number of aristocracies that have made good choices. The 9.9 percenters of ancient Athens held off the dead tide of the Gatsby Curve for a time, even if democracy wasn’t quite the right word for their system of government. America’s first generation of revolutionaries was mostly 9.9 percenters, and yet they turned their backs on the man at the very top in order to create a government of, by, and for the people. The best revolutions do not start at the bottom; they are the work of the upper-middle class.

These exceptions are rare, to be sure, and yet they are the story of the modern world. In total population, average life expectancy, material wealth, artistic expression, rates of violence, and almost every other measure that matters for the quality of human life, the modern world is a dramatically different place than anything that came before. Historians offer many complicated explanations for this happy turn in human events—the steam engine, microbes, the weather—but a simple answer precedes them all: equality. The history of the modern world is the unfolding of the idea at the vital center of the American Revolution.

The defining challenge of our time is to renew the promise of American democracy by reversing the calcifying effects of accelerating inequality. As long as inequality rules, reason will be absent from our politics; without reason, none of our other issues can be solved. It’s a world-historical problem. But the solutions that have been put forward so far are, for the most part, shoebox in size.

Well-meaning meritocrats have proposed new and better tests for admitting people into their jewel-encrusted classrooms. Fine—but we aren’t going to beat back the Gatsby Curve by tweaking the formulas for excluding people from fancy universities. Policy wonks have taken aim at the more-egregious tax-code handouts, such as the mortgage-interest deduction and college-savings plans. Good—and then what? Conservatives continue to recycle the characterological solutions, like celebrating traditional marriage or bringing back that old-time religion. Sure—reforging familial and community bonds is a worthy goal. But talking up those virtues won’t save any families from the withering pressures of a rigged economy. Meanwhile, coffee-shop radicals say they want a revolution. They don’t seem to appreciate that the only simple solutions are the incredibly violent and destructive ones.

The American idea has always been a guide star, not a policy program, much less a reality. The rights of human beings never have been and never could be permanently established in a handful of phrases or old declarations. They are always rushing to catch up to the world that we inhabit. In our world, now, we need to understand that access to the means of sustaining good health, the opportunity to learn from the wisdom accumulated in our culture, and the expectation that one may do so in a decent home and neighborhood are not privileges to be reserved for the few who have learned to game the system. They are rights that follow from the same source as those that an earlier generation called life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness.

Yes, the kind of change that really matters is going to require action from the federal government. That which creates monopoly power can also destroy it; that which allows money into politics can also take it out; that which has transferred power from labor to capital can transfer it back. Change also needs to happen at the state and local levels. How else are we going to open up our neighborhoods and restore the public character of education?

It’s going to take something from each of us, too, and perhaps especially from those who happen to be the momentary winners of this cycle in the game. We need to peel our eyes away from the mirror of our own success and think about what we can do in our everyday lives for the people who aren’t our neighbors. We should be fighting for opportunities for other people’s children as if the future of our own children depended on it. It probably does."

[earlier on]

"Nowhere are the mechanics of the growing geographic divide more evident than in the system of primary and secondary education. Public schools were born amid hopes of opportunity for all; the best of them have now been effectively reprivatized to better serve the upper classes. According to a widely used school-ranking service, out of more than 5,000 public elementary schools in California, the top 11 are located in Palo Alto. They’re free and open to the public. All you have to do is move into a town where the median home value is $3,211,100. Scarsdale, New York, looks like a steal in comparison: The public high schools in that area funnel dozens of graduates to Ivy League colleges every year, and yet the median home value is a mere $1,403,600.

Racial segregation has declined with the rise of economic segregation. We in the 9.9 percent are proud of that. What better proof that we care only about merit? But we don’t really want too much proof. Beyond a certain threshold—5 percent minority or 20 percent, it varies according to the mood of the region—neighborhoods suddenly go completely black or brown. It is disturbing, but perhaps not surprising, to find that social mobility is lower in regions with high levels of racial segregation. The fascinating revelation in the data, however, is that the damage isn’t limited to the obvious victims. According to Raj Chetty’s research team, “There is evidence that higher racial segregation is associated with lower social mobility for white people.” The relationship doesn’t hold in every zone of the country, to be sure, and is undoubtedly the statistical reflection of a more complex set of social mechanisms. But it points to a truth that America’s 19th-century slaveholders understood very well: Dividing by color remains an effective way to keep all colors of the 90 percent in their place.

With localized wealth comes localized political power, and not just of the kind that shows up in voting booths. Which brings us back to the depopulation paradox. Given the social and cultural capital that flows through wealthy neighborhoods, is it any wonder that we can defend our turf in the zoning wars? We have lots of ways to make that sound public-spirited. It’s all about saving the local environment, preserving the historic character of the neighborhood, and avoiding overcrowding. In reality, it’s about hoarding power and opportunity inside the walls of our own castles. This is what aristocracies do… [more]
class  us  politics  economics  inequality  2018  disparity  matthewstewart  education  labor  work  unions  highered  highereducation  nannies  governesses  workingclass  elitism  aristocracy  wealth  opportunity  power  privilege 
may 2018 by robertogreco
In Los Angeles, mansions get bigger as homeless get closer
"The capital of America's second Gilded Age is Los Angeles, where homes worth tens of millions of dollars look out over a city in which the middle class struggles to afford shelter and the number of homeless increases."
us  california  inequality  cities  losangeles  rickhampson  2018  economics  disparity  homes  housing  middleclass  homeless  homelessness 
may 2018 by robertogreco
RACE COUNTS - Tracking Racial Disparity in California

RACE COUNTS measures the overall performance, amount of racial disparity, and impact by population size of every county in California. We found that the past still very much drives who has access to the promise of the Golden State."

[See also:
http://www.racecounts.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/11/Race-Counts-Launch-Report-digital.pdf ]
race  california  inequality  equity  disparity 
november 2017 by robertogreco
Paradise Papers leak reveals secrets of the world elite's hidden wealth | News | The Guardian
Expose details (apparently) legal yet ethically questionable tax avoidance schemes used by global wealthy
expose  Q4  2017  uk  queen  trumpgate  elite  income  wealth  disparity  offshore  law  legal  tax  avoidance  report 
november 2017 by csrollyson
WEF Global Gender Gap Index 2017: growing income disparity between men and women — Quartz
Women are now worse off than last year. The World Economic Forum’s latest reportfound the gender gap widening in 2017 for the first time since 2006. The WEF says that economic disparity will not be closed for another 217 years
Women  are  now  worse  off  than  last  year.  The  World  Economic  Forum’s  latest  reportfound  gender  gap  widening  in  2017  for  first  time  since  2006.  WEF  says  that  disparity  will  not  be  closed  another  217  years 
november 2017 by NextFem

« earlier    

related tags

'gross'  *  2  2001  2006.  2013  2014  2015  2016  2017  2018  217  2ghcj  abuse  academia  academic  acceptance  accessibility  accountability  activism  actual  adapt  adulthood  advice  afghanistan  african-american  age  ageism  aging  alexanderrusso  analysis  anandgiridharadas  and  andrewcarnegie  anildash  anonymous  another  apartment  appearance  archives  are  aristocracy  art  article  artificial  artpope  aspenconsensus  assault  attraction  audience  austerity  authoritarian  authoritarianism  authors  avoidance  awareness  background  balance  battery  bay  be  beauty  behavior  benefit  bigdata  bigmoney  bill  billclinton  billgates  billionaires  biz  black  blaming  blogpost  body  bodyimage  books  booms  bourgeois  brain  breakups  brexit  bullying  business  businesscards  busts  california  cancer  capitalism  career  carol_keehan  casestudy  caste  catholic  catholic_identity  census  change  charitableindustrialcomplex  charity  charleshughsmith  china  choice  chrisarnade  cities  citizen  citystates  civilization  civilliberties  class  classism  classwar  climatechange  clinical  closed  coca-cola  code  coefficient  collaboration  color  comingrevolution  commented  commitment  communication  community  community_health  comparison  compatibility  competition  conference  confidence  conflict  consent  consumption  content  context  contraception  contrarian  contro  control  copyright  corporate  correlation  costarica  creative  crime  criminal_justice  crisis  critique  crux  culture  cx  cyber  cycles  cyclical  cycling  cyclocross  darrenwalker  data  dataviz  dating  davidcallahan  davidkillcullen  death  deborahmeier  debt  definition  degree  dehumanization  demand  democracy  democrats  demographic  demographics  demonization  denial  depression  deregulation  design  development  diabetes  diet  difference  digital  diplomacy  disability  discrimination  disease  disenfranchisement  displacement  distribution  diversity  divineright  dominant  donaldtrump  doublestandard  douchey  download  dysfunction  economic  economics  economy  edreform  edtech  education  edwardsnowden  electricity  elite  elitism  elizabethkolbert  employment  encarceration  energy  entrepreneurship  environment  equality  equity  estate  ethics  ethnicity  etiology  eu  euro  europe  evil  examples  exclusion  exploitation  expose  exposé  factor  factory  failure  family  fascism  fashion  favs  fb  fdr  fear  federal  federal_gov  feedback  fem  feminism  ferguson  first  florida  food  for  forum’s  foucault  franchise  freedom  frequency  fuck  function  future  gap  gender  genetic  genetics  gentrification  georgesoros  gildedage  gini  girls  global  goegraphy  goverment  governesses  government  greed  grifters  grit  guide  hackers  hacks  hair  harassment  harper's  hatecrime  health  healthcare  heart  heels  henrykravis  higher_education  highered  highereducation  hispanic  history  hiv  holiday  homeless  homelessness  homes  homophobia  hotel  housekeeping  housing  hrsa  huffington_post  hughpricehughes  human  human_rights  hurricane_florence  hurricane_katrina  ideas  identity  imageprocessing  in  incidence  income  incomeinequality  incomes  industry  inequality  inequity  influence  influential  inheritance  innovation  insulin  int  intelligence  interaction  interests  internet  investment  iraq  jabberwocky  jama  jobs  joelklein  josephstiglitz  justice  kevin_baker  kevindrum  khat  kids  korean  krugman  labor  language  larryellison  last  latest  laurietisch  law  leadership  learning  legal  lexicon  lgbtq  lies  lifespan  lifestyle  listen  literary  local  longform  losangeles  loss  luck  luke_o'neil  machine  mag  maher  maherbill  maid  maine  management  map  marketing  markzuckerberg  martiallaw  marxist  masculinity  matthewstewart  maximum  meaning  media  medical  men  mental  michaelbloomberg  middleclass  military  militaryindustrialcomplex  millenials  minimalism  minimum  minimumwage  minnesota  minorities  misogyny  mobile  mogadishu  money  morbidity  mortality  mr  multco  nannies  national  natural_disasters  neighborhood  networking  nevada  new_york  news  newsroom  newyorker  nhs  nickcohen  nickhanauer  no  nonprofit  nonprofits  not  novogratz  now  nudity  obama  obesity  occupywallstreet  of  off  offshore  olgakhazan  opendata  opensource  opinion  opportunity  oregon  organization  ows  paleto  participation  patriarchy  patronage  paulkrugman  payments  pdf  peer-reviewed  perception  persecution  phd  philanthropicindustrialcomplex  philanthropy  philosophy  photography  pic  plutocracy  pointofview  police  policing  policy  politics  poll  pollution  poor  pop  population  porn  portland  positive_feedback  potassium  poverty  power  precarity  predictability  prediction  preference  prejudice  prevalence  prevention  prison  prisonindustrialcomplex  prisons  privacy  privatization  privilege  professional  programming  progress  proletariat  psychology  public  public_health  publicpolicy  purpose  q1  q3  q4  qa  quality  queen  race  race_relations  racial  racial_ethnic  racism  rape  rapeculture  reaction  readthis  realestate  recessions  reflection  refugees  region  regional  relationships  rent  report  reportfound  republicans  research  resistance  resource  restaurant  retail  reveals  rickhampson  rights  risk  robertreich  robot  rolemodel  rural  russia  safety  savings  says  schools  sctweets  search  secrecy  security  self-medication  self  service  services  sex  sexism  sexuality  shame  shelter  shoes  sickcare  siliconvalley  since  slut-shaming  smoking  social  socialentrepreneurship  socialsafetynet  socialunrest  socialwork  society  sociology  somalia  sped  sport  stalking  startup  state  states  statistics  stats  stealing  stereotypes  sterilization  steveinskeep  stevejobs  steverandywaldman  stixels  stl  story  stranger  street  student  students  style  subsidy  success  suicide  superpacs  surveillance  survey  syndicate  system  t2d  talk  tax  taxation  taxes  tech  techsector  tedsizer  teen  terrorism  terrorstate  tesla  testing  than  that  the  thegreatdivergence  thinktanks  thirlwall  threat  threats  time  timgill  toddler  tomhoffman  toronto  torture  touching  treatment  trends  trevorpaglen  trial  tribunecontentagency  trickledown  trickledowneconomics  trigger  trumpgate  truth  tumblr  type  tyranny  uk  ulitities  unemployment  unions  universalhealthcare  uppermiddleclass  urban  urbanism  us  usa  vacation  vancouver  vatican  veterans  victim  violence  virginity  visigoths  visual  vivo  vocabulary  volunteer  votersuppression  wage  wages  walmart  war  warfare  warrenbuffett  wealth  wealthdisparity  wealthdistribution  wealthinequality  wearescrewed  web  wef  widening  wiki  will  williamjewetttucker  wind  women  womens_care  word  words  work  workers  working  workingclass  workplace  world  worse  worth  wowwowwow  writing  wtf  year.  years  yes  yogurt  youth  zoning 

Copy this bookmark: