diseases   954

« earlier    

A Controversial Virus Study Shows Flaws in How Science Is Done - The Atlantic
Absent clearer guidelines, the burden falls on the scientific enterprise to self-regulate—and it isn’t set up to do that well. Academia is intensely competitive, and “the drivers are about getting grants and publications, and not necessarily about being responsible citizens,” says Filippa Lentzos from King’s College London, who studies biological threats. This means that scientists often keep their work to themselves for fear of getting scooped by their peers. Their plans only become widely known once they’ve already been enacted, and the results are ready to be presented or published. This lack of transparency creates an environment where people can almost unilaterally make decisions that could affect the entire world.

Take the horsepox study [the main topic of this article]. Evans was a member of a World Health Organization committee that oversees smallpox research, but he only told his colleagues about the experiment after it was completed. He sought approval from biosafety officers at his university, and had discussions with Canadian federal agencies, but it’s unclear if they had enough ethical expertise to fully appreciate the significance of the experiment. “It’s hard not to feel like he opted for agencies that would follow the letter of the law without necessarily understanding what they were approving,” says Kelly Hills, a bioethicist at Rogue Bioethics.

She also sees a sense of impulsive recklessness in the interviews that Evans gave earlier this year. Science reported that he did the experiment “in part to end the debate about whether recreating a poxvirus was feasible.” And he told NPR that “someone had to bite the bullet and do this.” To Hills, that sounds like I did it because I could do it. “We don’t accept those arguments from anyone above age 6,” she says.
the-atlantic  science  news  smallpox  horsepox  diseases  danger  risk  academia  papers  publish-or-perish  bioethics  ethics  biology  genetics 
4 days ago by jm
With genetic tweak, mosquito population made extinct
In experiments with the species Anopheles gambiae, scientists at Imperial College London tweaked a gene known as doublesex so that more females in each generation could no longer bite or reproduce.
After only eight generations, there were no females left and the population collapsed due to lack of offspring."This breakthrough shows that gene drive can work, providing hope in the fight against a disease that has plagued mankind for centuries,"Some scientists and technology watchdog groups have called for a moratorium on gene drive research."There are ecological risks from manipulating and removing natural populations, such as destroying food webs and shifting the behaviour of diseases, as well as social risks of disrupting agriculture and enabling new weapons."
genetics  medical  diseases 
20 days ago by thomas.kochi

« earlier    

related tags

50  a&e  academia  accuracy—and  addiction  adoption  adult  ageing  ai  alcohol  alcoholism  allergies  altenpflege  altersarmut  alzheimer  amish  animal-control  animals  austerity  auto  autoimmune  babyboomers  bacteria  bacteriophage  basic  bats  bbcnews  bbcnewsbeat  bed  bedblocking  big  bioethics  biology  biomarker  blocking  book  books  bowel  bubble  burnout  can  cancer  capitalism  care  ccg  celebrities  cep  chemical  christian  chronic  citrus  classics  classifications  climate  community  complex  complexity  consumer  copd  coping  corpses  correlations  council  cqc  crisis  crowdsourcing  cvd  damage  danger  data  databses  delay  delayed  demand  dementia  demographic  deprivation  diabetes  diagnoses  diet  disabled  disaster  discrimination  disease  doctor  drug  dwp  e-consultation  economic  elderly  elective  empire  england  ethics  etymology  explain  exploitation  eye  fast  fasting  fda  fertility  flu  food  food–industrial  frail  fungal  future  gap  gender-based  gender  genetic  genetics  genomes  genomics  germany  gerontology  global  gorilla  gp  grundeinkommen  guardian  h1n1  hashimoto  health  healthcare  hearing  helminth  hepcidin  hiring  history  horsepox  human  icons  identify  igf-1  immune  income  india  inequality  infertility  inflammation  information  iron  isolation  its  ivf  junk  kapital  language  lawn  leaders  lifestyle  liver  lobby  locum  longevity  longo  management  maximisation  mechanism  medical  medicine  meniere'sdisease  mennonite  mental  metabolism  microbiome  moral  morale  mouse  music  musicians  nafld  naming  neoliberal  neoliberalism  news  nhs  nosologies  nurses  obesity  obituary  openaccess  outsourcing  overweight  packaging  pandemics  papers  parenthood  patient  pay  paycap  permafrost  pests  pharma  pharmaceutical  pharmacology  philosophy  plastic  podcast  pollution  poor  population  poverty  precariat  premature  preventing  prevention  privatisation  productivity  profit  protozoan  public  publish-or-perish  publisher  quotes  rationing  readiness  reallifestories  recruitment  reference  referral  research  resources  reversal  risk  roman  s.a.d.  safety  scary  science  scotland  self-medication  shortage  sick  sickcare  sickleave  sivu  smallpox  social  sociology  software  south  staff  statesmen  stp  stress  sugar  superb  surgery  surrogacy  surrogate  symptoms  system  tax  telemedicine  television  terrorism  the-atlantic  then  this  thyroid  time  times  training  trap  treatment  trust_for_americas_health  type2  ubi  uk  ukraine  underemployed  unemployment  universal  us  usa  vaccines  valter  virus  waiting  west  western  winter  with  working  yeast  zebrafish 

Copy this bookmark: