digitalrhetoric   206

« earlier    

DHQ: Digital Humanities Quarterly: A Writing Studies Review of Jim Ridolfo and William Hart-Davidson, editors, Rhetoric and the Digital Humanities
The twenty-three chapters that make up Rhetoric and the Digital Humanities, edited by Jim Ridolfo and William Hart-Davidson, represent the first book-length effort to sustain a conversation around the affinities between these two fields. Though only “rhetoric” is included in the title, this volume really speaks more broadly across writing studies — rhetoric, composition, computers and writing, and technical and professional writing. The theoretical and methodological conundra worked through in the chapters (especially demonstrated through specific project applications) are important first steps toward what will hopefully be a more sustained engagement between the digital humanities and writing studies. On the whole, the volume should be read by the writing studies community, especially as an introduction to the tools and methods employed in the digital humanities that might be of use to their research.
rhetoric  digitalrhetoric 
4 weeks ago by craniac
Higher ed and technology
Casey Boyle
@caseyboyle
· 2h
“The tragedy of digital media isn’t that it’s run by ruthless, profiteering guys in ill-fitting suits; it’s that the people posing as the experts know less about how to make money than their employees, to whom they won’t listen” https://theconcourse.deadspin.com/the-adults-in-the-room-1837487584
via @deadspin
3000  digitalrhetoric 
august 2019 by craniac
Digital Field Methods
Casey Boyle's syllabus — chock-full of wonderful ideas and helpful links.
caseyboyle  syllabus  methods  rhetoric  digitalrhetoric 
december 2018 by warnick
What Do The Teens Know About This Tweet that We Dont
Article asking teens to explain why a banal tweet went semi-viral (18,000 ReTweets). Could be a way to discuss circulation in 102, or, a way to talk about why different communities circulate information online in WritingforWWW
circulation  viral  digitalcomposition  digitalwriting  digitalrhetoric 
june 2018 by stevej27
How Sierra and a Disgraced Cop Made...A Video Game
Article about games speaking to contemporary issues and using procedural rhetoric to make arguments about how police officers operate in the world.
videogamewriting  videogames  digitalcomposition  digitalrhetoric 
february 2018 by stevej27
Agency and Autonomous Monsters in the Age of Fake News
Abstract:

This poster session will analyze the uses and abuses of digital rhetorics by the "alt-right," and explore the question of whether we are preparing our students for a treacherous and unstable reality, or providing aid and comfort to the enemy.
Proposal:

This poster session will explore one of the deep and abiding fears of teachers of rhetoric: that our methodologies, datasets, theories and instruction may be put to use in the service of powerful institutions and organizations that may not share our most deeply-held values. As a discipline, we both crave and fear the validation that the use and abuse of our rhetorical products entails. Hart-Davidson and Ridolfo, in their intriguing #rhetops project (RSA 2016) describe the abuses of rhetoric in asymmetrical conflicts, citing as examples the outsourcing of social media propaganda by Daesh (ISIL/ISIS), the rise of fake news bots and their influence on U.S. politics, the looming threat of autonomous writing technologies, and the fragmentation of authorship. I will trace some of the historical antecedents of these legitimate anxieties, and add to the list another potential threat, that of the misappropriation of digital, rhetorical tools and theories by what has come to be known collectively as the “alt-right.” The line between a tool and a weapon is often tentatively determined by ideology. This poster session will analyze that line and the ethics and problems associated with arming or empowering our students with powerful digital tools.
Tags:
rhetops
digitalrhetoric
rhetoric
altright
fakenews
rhetops  rhetoric  digitalrhetoric  altright  fakenews  cw2018 
february 2018 by craniac
designing rhetorical technologies of deliberation – digital digs
As I’ve discussed here in the past and has become a recurrent topic in the field, Ian Bogost’s conception of procedural rhetoric highlights the way in which digital media can undertake rhetorical, persuasive objectives through its design and computational procedures. Adding in the kinds of insights Mark Hansen brings about the way ever-faster technologies constitute a kind of precession of deliberation, making decisions for us before we even realize there are decisions to be made, we find ourselves in a situation where it is necessary to acknowledge, investigate, and intercede in the ways our media ecology encourages particular cognitive and agential capacities in our relations with it.
digitalrhetoric  design 
january 2018 by craniac
George Lakoff: In Politics, Progressives Need to Frame Their Values « George Lakoff
What progressives call “rational arguments” are not normal modes of real reason. What counts as a “rational argument” is not the same for progressives and conservatives. And even the meaning of concepts and words may be different. Cognitive linguists have learned a lot about how all this works, but few progressives have studied cognitive linguistics. For a thorough review of such differences, take a look at my book Whose Freedom?, which shows how reasoning about freedom can take two utterly different forms for progressives and conservatives.
logic  digitalrhetoric  3010 
october 2017 by craniac
research - changemyview
Tan, C., Niculae, V., Danescu-Niculescu-Mizil, C. & Lee, L. (2016) Winning Arguments: Interaction Dynamics and Persuasion Strategies in Good-faith Online Discussions, Proceedings of the 25th International World Wide Web Conference (WWW'2016).

"Changing someone's opinion is arguably one of the most important challenges of social interaction. The underlying process proves difficult to study: it is hard to know how someone's opinions are formed and whether and how someone's views shift. Fortunately, ChangeMyView, an active community on Reddit, provides a platform where users present their own opinions and reasoning, invite others to contest them, and acknowledge when the ensuing discussions change their original views. In this work, we study these interactions to understand the mechanisms behind persuasion.
We find that persuasive arguments are characterized by interesting patterns of interaction dynamics, such as participant entry-order and degree of back-and-forth exchange. Furthermore, by comparing similar counterarguments to the same opinion, we show that language factors play an essential role. In particular, the interplay between the language of the opinion holder and that of the counterargument provides highly predictive cues of persuasiveness. Finally, since even in this favorable setting people may not be persuaded, we investigate the problem of determining whether someone's opinion is susceptible to being changed at all. For this more difficult task, we show that stylistic choices in how the opinion is expressed carry predictive power."
digitalrhetoric  3010 
october 2017 by craniac

« earlier    

related tags

224  3000  3010  401r  90ssuck  academia  algorithm  altright  america  appropriation  art  blackmetal  blockages  blogs  bogost  books  caseyboyle  circluation  circulation  cloudcomputing  com202  community  complexity  composition  contentwriting  conventions  corruption  crowdfunding  cw2018  data  design  dig  digital  digitalcomposition  digitalethos  digitalhumanities  digitalmusic  digitalpedagogy  digitalself  digitalwriting  diss  distribution  dougeyman  economics  education  ethos  eveonline  facebook  facebookworldtakeover  fakenews  feedbacklooppresentation  feminism  format  freedom  game  games  genre  gun  hacks  hardcore  humanities  india  infographic  informationdesign  inquisition  internet  latecapitalism  liberalarts  linguistics  logic  materiality  mayhem  media  memes  memory  methods  metrics  mp3  multimodality  networkedmedia  networkedrhetorics  newsjacking  norms  paper  pen  photography  platforms  posthumanism  prayer  privacy  profwriting  public  race  reddit  remix  rhetops  rhetoric  scene  sharing  shooting  sjw  socialmedia  spotify  spy  spycraft  spyware  streaming  syllabus  techwriting  textmining  textualaccumulation  tinder  twitter  undergroundmetal  usa  users  ux  values  video  videogames  videogamewriting  viral  virality  visualrhetoric  webdesign  writing  wysocki 

Copy this bookmark:



description:


tags: