diannefeinstein   71

« earlier    

RT : Here's the video threaded To recap: she engaged on substance, told them she might vo…
DianneFeinstein  from twitter_favs
february 2019 by ebullient
RT : Here's the video threaded To recap: she engaged on substance, told them she might vo…
DianneFeinstein  from twitter
february 2019 by delong
Here's the video threaded To recap: she engaged on substance, told them she might vo…
DianneFeinstein  from twitter_favs
february 2019 by eh
Lana Del Raytheon🌹 on Twitter: "The Democrats: we keep losing even though the opposing party wants your family to die horribly because we love our major donors too much"
"The Democrats: we keep losing even though the opposing party wants your family to die horribly because we love our major donors too much

The Democrats: we squandered two years of complete power and totally failed poor people and immigrants but at least now we have drone murder

The Democrats: We like our voters engaged with politics like Americans like soccer—intensely, shallowly, and only every 4 years

The Democrats: We lost the easiest election ever because we love money, provincial power, and the existing capitalist system too damn much

The Democrats: We would rather you all die horribly *and* keep losing elections than lose our personal money/power
sick transit, gloria @samknight1
.@EvanMcS asks @NancyPelosi if single payer should be a Democratic Party platform in 2018.

"No," she says, without missing a beat

The Democrats: We will sell you all out if it means even just a fleeting amount of money and power from donors

David Sirota @davidsirota
EXPOSED: Dianne Feinstein held fundraiser with healthcare lobby firm days after slamming Sanders' single-payer bill http://www.ibtimes.com/political-capital/dianne-feinstein-takes-money-health-care-lobby-rejects-single-payer-insurance

The Democrats: We will claim credit for anything good even though we are too useless + craven to ever accomplish it
The New York Times @nytimes
Hillary Clinton has a new message for voters: Universal health care was her idea first http://nyti.ms/1UjcoFU
democrats  us  2017  elections  nancypelosi  healthcare  universalhealthcare  poer  elitism  change  politics  policy  corruption  democracy  poverty  immigration  capitalism  economics  money  influence  governance  diannefeinstein  california 
may 2017 by robertogreco
Dianne Feinstein, Strong Advocate of Leak Prosecutions, Demands Immunity For David Petraeus - The Intercept
David Petraeus, the person who Feinstein said has “suffered enough,” was hired last year by the $73 billion investment fund KKR to be Chairman of its newly created KKR Global Institute, on top of the $220,000/year pension he receives from the U.S. Army and the teaching position he holds at Harvard’s John F. Kennedy School of Government. Let us all pause for a moment to lament the deep suffering of this man, and the grave injustice of inflicting any further deprivation upon him.

In 2011, I wrote a book, With Liberty and Justice for Some, that examined the two-tiered justice system prevailing in the U.S.: how the U.S. imprisons more of its citizens than any other country in the world (both in absolute numbers and proportionally) often for trivial transgressions, while immunizing its political and economic elites for even the most egregious crimes. Matt Taibbi’s book, The Divide, examines the same dynamic with a focus on the protection of economic elites and legal repression of ordinary citizens in the wake of the 2008 financial crisis.

This latest example from Feinstein is one of the most vivid yet. She wanted Julian Assange – who isn’t even a U.S. citizen and never served in the U.S. Government – prosecuted for espionage for exposing war crimes, and demanded that Edward Snowden be charged with “treason” for exposing illegal eavesdropping which shocked the world. But a four-star general who leaked classified information not for any noble purpose but to his mistress for personal reasons should be protected from any legal consequences.
DianneFeinstein  davidpetraeus  government  legal  crime  whistleblowing  usa  julianassange 
january 2015 by jtyost2
Feinstein blasts critics of NSA phone program
Senate Intelligence Chairwoman Dianne Feinstein (D-Calif.) on Sunday defended a National Security Agency (NSA) program that collects data about Americans’ phone calls, saying it is not a surveillance program.

“It’s not a surveillance program, it’s a data-collection program,” she while appearing on CNN’s “State of the Union” on Sunday.

Feinstein also commented a new book from journalist Glenn Greenwald, who first wrote about classified documents leaked by former NSA contractor Edward Snowden.

In “No Place to Hide,” released last week, Greenwald said the U.S. government places surveillance tools in technology equipment to be sold abroad, an accusation the U.S. government often lobs at the Chinese government.

That program “does not sound familiar,” Feinstein said Sunday.

She pushed back on criticism of the intelligence community, saying its programs are necessary to protect the country from terrorists.

“I know they will come after us if they can, I see the intelligence,” she said.

“Terror is not down in the world, it is up.”

Still, Feinstein said she would be open to privacy-enhancing modifications to the NSA programs.

Earlier this month, the House Intelligence and Judiciary committees passed a compromise version of the USA Freedom Act, which would end sweeping surveillance programs. That bill is expected to come to the floor as soon as this week.
nsa  legal  privacy  civilrights  freedomfromsearchandseizure  DianneFeinstein  politics  government  humanrights  freedom 
may 2014 by jtyost2
Dianne Feinstein Accidentally Confirms That NSA Tapped The Internet Backbone | Techdirt
In short, “upstream” capabilities are tapping the backbone itself, via the willing assistance of the telcos (who still have remained mostly silent on all of this) as opposed to “downstream” collection, which requires going to the internet companies directly. The internet companies have been much more resistant to government attempts to get access to their accounts. And thus, it’s a big question as to what exactly the NSA can collect via its taps on the internet backbone, and the NSA and its defenders have tried to remain silent on this point, as you can see from the redactions above.

However, as Kevin Bankston notes, during Thursday’s Senate Intelligence Committee hearing, Dianne Feinstein more or less admitted that they get emails via “upstream” collection methods. As you can see in the following clip, Feinstein interrupts a discussion to read a prepared “rebuttal” to a point being made, and in doing so clearly says that the NSA can get emails via upstream collections:

Upstream collection… occurs when NSA obtains internet communications, such as e-mails, from certain US companies that operate the Internet background, i.e., the companies that own and operate the domestic telecommunications lines over which internet traffic flows.

She clearly means “backbone” rather than “background.” She’s discussing this in an attempt to defend the NSA’s “accidental” collection of information it shouldn’t have had. But that point is not that important. Instead, the important point is that she’s now admitted what most people suspected, but which the administration has totally avoided admitting for many, many years since the revelations made by Mark Klein.

So, despite years of trying to deny that the NSA can collect email and other communications directly from the backbone (rather than from the internet companies themselves), Feinstein appears to have finally let the cat out of the bag, perhaps without realizing it.
congress  legal  privacy  nsa  internet  telecommunications  civilrights  humanrights  freedomfromsearchandseizure  freedom  DianneFeinstein  senate 
september 2013 by jtyost2
Why Sen. Feinstein Is Wrong About Who’s a “Real Reporter”
During the Senate Judiciary Committee’s August 1 mark-up of the shield law bill aimed at protecting journalists’ sources, Sen. Dianne Feinstein (D-CA) reportedly objected to the definition of journalist provided in the bill as introduced, seeking to restrict the definition’s scope to apply only to “real reporters.” To achieve her misguided goal, Sen. Feinstein has put forward an amendment to S. 987 that would greatly exacerbate the problems with the definition of who’s a journalist that existed in the bill as introduced.

Her amendment, to be submitted for Sen. Dick Durbin (D-Il.) as well, not only retains the problematic requirement that a person “regularly” engage in journalism to enjoy shield law protections, but moreover adds new requirements that would make it especially difficult for self-publishers such as independent bloggers and citizen journalists to be protected under the law. Indeed, her new requirements for being either salaried or at least affiliated with a news “entity” seem to purposefully target these self-publishers.

These problems are rooted in the vagueness of many key terms in her definition of journalist. Indeed, most essential terms are not defined. While vagueness provides an interpretative battleground, self-publishing bloggers and citizen journalists are disadvantaged in this fight.

Three Roads to “Journalist” that All Go Nowhere
Feinstein’s amendment effectively advances a traditional vision of journalism through the three definitions of journalist that it provides, each of which requires that a person be affiliated with a journalistic “entity” or institution (including news websites and other digital news services, and other periodicals distributed digitally).

Specifically, the amendment requires that a journalist meet one of the following definitions:

working as a “salaried employee, independent contractor, or agent of an entity that disseminates news or information;”
either (a) meeting the prior definition “for any continuous three-month period within the two years prior to the relevant date” or (b) having “substantially contributed, as an author, editor, photographer, or producer, to a significantnumber of articles, stories, programs, or publications by an entity . . . within two years prior to the relevant date;” or
working as a student journalist “participating in a journalistic publication at an institution of higher education.” (emphases added)1
There are problems with each of these three definitions. First, as we pointed out in our critique of the House’s bill, requiring that an individual is “salaried” is problematic because many people do journalism but do not do it as their primary source of income. Further, it is entirely unclear who or what an “agent” or “entity” is.

Second, for an individual to fall under the second, seemingly looser criteria, that individual must have distributed the news “by means of an entity.” (emphasis added)2 While this definition may cover freelancers, it is again unclear what it means to have “substantially contributed” to a “significant” amount of work of an “entity.” Indeed, for both the first and second definitions, essential terms are not defined—vagueness that, as we’ll see later, ultimately hurts independent bloggers and citizen journalists.

While the amendment’s inclusion of student journalists is laudable, it does nothing for those students who do not work for a “journalistic publication” at their college or university—or for those students the moment they graduate.

Still Requiring that Journalists “Regularly” Engage in Journalism
Additionally, Sen. Feinstein’s amendment retains the original Senate shield bill’s problematic requirement that individuals “regularly” do journalism to count as a journalist. Specifically, the amendment requires either:

that individuals “engage[] in . . . the regular gathering, preparation, collection, photographing, recording, writing, editing, reporting or publishing on” matters of public interest; or
that individuals “regularly conducted interviews, reviewed documents, captured images of events, or directly observed events.” (emphases added)3
As in the original Senate bill, the amendment fails to define what “regularly” means, vagueness that cuts against non-institutional journalists.

Vague Language Is Bad for Independent Bloggers, Citizen Journalists
Sen. Feinstein’s amendment is riddled with vague language, failing to define key terms including “agent,” entity,” “substantially contributed,” and “regularly”—on which the definition of who’s a journalist turns. Non-traditional journalists are at a disadvantage when the interpretative waters are muddy. Why? Because such vagueness invites interpretations that exclude those who are on the margins of status quo journalism, and who are often in a more vulnerable position and unable to hire legal counsel to sort through the law’s ambiguities. As a result, independent bloggers and citizen journalists would likely be interpreted out of Feinstein’s definition of journalist.

The very fact that developing a crisp, clear definition of journalist is difficult should signal to Congress that it might not be equipped to wade into the uncharted waters of deciding who is a journalist. But it’s a problem that Congress can easily avoid by linking shield law protections to the act of journalism, not the definition of who is journalist.
journalism  ethics  DianneFeinstein  senate  politics  congress  legal  freedomofpress  government 
august 2013 by jtyost2
Feinstein defends foreign surveillance program amid calls for more oversight - The Hill's Hillicon Valley
Senate Intelligence Committee Chairwoman Dianne Feinstein (D-Calif.) on Thursday pushed back against claims made by Sen. Ron Wyden (D-Ore.) that a counterterrorism surveillance law lacks sufficient oversight.

On the contrary, Feinstein said, "I don't think there's any program that has more vigorous oversight," and noted that the Senate Intelligence Committee has held numerous meetings and hearings with officials from the intelligence community on the program. She added that the Department of Justice, Director of National Intelligence and inspectors general also oversee it.

Feinstein's comments come as the Senate began floor debate on a set of amendments aimed at adding oversight and privacy protections to the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA) Amendments Reauthorization Act. The law is set to expire on Dec. 31, and the Senate could hold a vote on the measure this week.

With the clock running out, Feinstein said she hopes the bill is passed by the Senate without amendments to the bill so it can be sent straight to the president's desk for his signature.

The measure gives U.S. officials the authority to conduct surveillance on suspected terrorists abroad without a court order. Instead, officials can obtain court orders from the secretive FISA Court, which do not require probable cause, according to the Electronic Frontier Foundation.
DianneFeinstein  politics  congress  privacy  legal  ethics  freedom  freedomfromsearchandseizure  warrant  fisa 
december 2012 by jtyost2

« earlier    

related tags

03  04  05  06  07  08  09  10  1986  1994  1998  2002  2005  2006  2007  2008  2009  2010  2012  2013  2016  2017  a27  aaaj  aajc  ab540  aclu  administration  aflcio  agjobs  aipac  al-qaeda  alabama  albertogonzales  alc  alexandrajaffe  amberphillips  analysis  angelakelley  angelicasalas  apalc  arlenspecter  arnoldschwarzenegger  barabaraboxer  barackobama  barneyfrank  benbernanke  berniekerik  billclinton  billmcinturff  billmundell  billrichardson  bobgraham  book  bosnia  bush  bustour  by:alexspillius  by:evanthomas  by:scotthorton  ca-gov  ca-sen  cabinet  california  california_election_2010  californiaelection2006  californiarecoveryteam  californiaspecialelection  campaign  capitalism  carecen  carmentrutanich  castellano  censorship  change  charlieblack  cheney  chirla  chriscox  christopherdodd  chuckgrassley  chuckschumer  cia  cindysheehan  civilliberties  civilrights  claudianúñez  cmpaaign  congress  congressionalresearchservice  consequences  corruption  coverage  crime  cro  daat  daejoongyoon  daejoonyoon  davidaxelrod  davidpetraeus  davidplouffe  democracy  democrat  democrats  dennisblair  denniskucinich  detaineetreatmentact  dhs  diablocanyonpowerplant  dianewatson  dickdurbin  difi  dnc  doj  dongponews  donvannatta  dream  drug-policy  duncanhunter  economics  edwardkennedy  election02008  elections  elitism  elizabethwarren  elviraarellano  enforcement  english  erichlichtblau  ericholder,jr.  ericholder  ethics  eunsooklee  faa  family  february  feinstein  firm  fisa  foreignpolicy  franksharry  fredthompson  freedom  freedomfromsearchandseizure  freedomofpress  front  gangofeight  garyackerman  gavin_newsom  gaymarriage  gaza  genevaconventions  georgebush  georgetenet  georgewbush  georgewoo  geraldhebert  gerrymandering  gershomgorenberg  gloriaallred  governance  government  guantanamobay  guantanamobaydetentionfacilityclosureact  guillermogonzales  guncontrol  h1b  haaretz  habeascorpus  hacking  hank_morris  harryreid  health  healthcare  healthreform  heepokkim  heidibeirich  henrypaulson  heraldbusiness  hillaryclinton  hr1585  hr4437  hugochavez  humanrights  hwangjinsean  immigration  immigrationreform  implication  indicator  influence  insoonpark  intelligence  internet  ipc  iraq  iraqwar  irp  isaacstanleybecker  israel  issue  jamesrisen  janeharman  january  jayrockefeller  jeffgerth  jeffsessions  jennieilustre  jerry_brown  jimmessina  joebiden  joelieberman  johnboehner  johndelong  johnedwards  johnkerry  johnkyle  johnmccain  johnmclaughlin  jonmeacham  joshuabolten  journalism  jr.  jstreet  judiciary  julianassange  jungheelee  junilagan  justinkim  karennarasaki  kaybaileyhutchinson  kcbs  kcceb  kennethpollack  kimbawood  kitbond  kkk  koreadaily  korean  koreana  koreanamericanfederation  koreatimes  koreatowndaily  kosovo  krc  languageaccess  laopinion  latinos  legal  leon_panetta  leonpanetta  lic:cc:by-sa  lindachavez  lindseygraham  lobbyist  losangelestimes  mariaelenadurazo  markpenn  marksalter  marvinandrade  maryambrose  mattscully  mbc  mccain-kennedy  media  meg_whitman  megwhitman  melmartinez  meta:tagged  michaelhayden  michaelhuffington  michaelisikoff  michaelsheehan  michaelslaby  michelleobama  middleeast  mikegravel  mikehuckabee  mikerogers  military  militarycommissionsact  mitchmcconnell  mittromney  money  mornaha  naacp  naffaa  nakasec  nancypelosi  nationalsecurityagency  netanyahu  newamericamedia  news  newyorktimes  nickydiazsantillan  nicollewallace  nif  npr  nsa  nuclearenergyinstitute  nuclearregulatorycommission  obama  opinion  orangecounty  oversight  pakistan  palestine  patrickleahy  patroberts  paulwaldman  peterbeinart  peterhoekstra  peterrouse  philippinenews  pinwale  poer  policy  politics  postmortem  poverty  predatordrone  president  privacy  proposition29  proposition73  proposition74  proposition75  proposition76  proposition77  protest  racism  radioactivewaste  radiokorea  rahmemmanuel  randalarchibold  realid  reform  reinvent  reinvention  rel:02008  rel:02009  republican  republicans  reubenseguritan  richard_blum  richardholbrooke  rickdavis  ripple-effects  robertgauthier  rogermahony  ronaldreagan  ronpaul  roseanndemoro  rudygiuliani  s1348  s1639  s2205  sa2919  sahilkapur  sambrownback  samsinger  sarahpalin  scotus  senate  senateintelligencecommittee  sfgate  signature  silvestrereyes  siobhangorman  splc  spy  spying  src:councilonforeignrelations  src:harper'smagazine  src:newsweek  src:teletraph  src:wikipedia  stephaniekotin  steve_poizner  steveduprey  steven_kappes  steveschmidt  stewartkwoh  sukheekang  sungpyoma  surveillance  susandavis  syep  taliban  telecommunications  theatlantic  thomasfigures  timgeithner  timkaine  timpawlenty  tom_campbell  tomdaschle  tomharkin  tommythompson  tomridge  tomtancredo  toptwoprimaries  torture  tweecious  tzipilivni  ucsd  unitedstates  universalhealthcare  us-pres  us  usa  usaedunews  usattorney  usdepartmentofjustice  uswest  venezuela  voting  votingrightsact  wallstreetjournal  war  warrant  washpost  whistleblowing  willie_brown  winter  wiretapping  wmd  worldsocialforumorganization  wsj  yeonhap  youth  yuccamountain  zoebaird  교회협의회  김동희  김상목  김정현  김희수  봉제협회  송병주  염승은  유용재  의류협회  이경준  이경진  이석호  이은호  이재희  이중구  이필재  장연화  장익상  조동진  한면택  한인서류미비자협회  한인회 

Copy this bookmark: