copyright   75438

« earlier    

O-Bikes liessen sich mit einem einfachen Trick knacken - News Zürich: Region -
Ausserdem sei die Singapurer Universität angewiesen worden, den Bericht per sofort von ihrer Website zu löschen. «Die Publikation dokumentiert die rechtswidrige Manipulation unserer App. Sie stellt deshalb eine Verletzung der Urheberrechte des Unternehmens dar», sagt Junge. O-Bike prüfe derzeit, rechtliche Schritte einzuleiten.
iot  security  copyright 
23 hours ago by tamberg
How to if copyright is vague about IP protection? Consider reform & grant use rights for…
copyright  open  licence  from twitter_favs
yesterday by rukku
The Public Domain Starts Growing Again Next Year, and It’s About Time | Electronic Frontier Foundation
We're taking part in Copyright Week, a series of actions and discussions supporting key principles that should guide copyright policy. Every day this week, various groups are taking on different elements of copyright law and policy, and addressing what's at stake, and what we need to do to make sure that copyright promotes creativity and innovation.
Have you ever wondered how it’s possible for there to be two Jungle Book movies to be in development at the same time? Why everything seems to be based on a work by Shakespeare? Or why it always seems like someone is telling a version of The Wizard of Oz? The answer is that these works are in the public domain, meaning that copyright law no longer prevents other artists from adapting them to create new works.
One major rationale for copyright is supposedly that, by giving an exclusive set of rights to artists for their work, we incentivize creativity by making it possible for artists to benefit from releasing works to the public. But copyright protection is supposed to be limited, and once it expires, a work enters the public domain, where anyone can use it.
copyright  EFF 
2 days ago by rgl7194
Lana Del Rey, Radiohead, and the Difficulty of Making Original Music | The New Yorker
It may be impossible for a musical composition to be entirely free of influence. But when does influence become egregious repurposing?
art  copyright  music  newyorker 
3 days ago by jorgebarba

« earlier    

related tags

1864  1895  2017  2018  802  _totweet  aaronswartz  advertising  air  algocopyright  algorithms  app  archive  archives  arstechnica  art  article  audio  australia  blockchain  book  books  broadcast  business  careers  censorship  china  communication  communs  compare  congress  consumer  content  contentid  contract  copyleft  copyprotection  corruption  creativecommons  creativity  crypto  culture  cyberlaw  dcma  deezer  design  deviant_art  device  digital  digitalmusicandaudio  digitization  disney  distance  dmca  doctorow  downloads  drm  droit  edition  education  eff  electricity  eme  employment  encrypted  esprit.libre  extensions  fair  forgottenworks  freedom  garden  google  government  history  ico  ifttt  image  intellectual-property  intellectualproperty  internet  iot  ip  issues  japan  law  legal  legislation  libre  licence  listening  maciejceglowski  media  memory  moral_rights  movies  music  musicnews  musicstreaming  musique  newyorker  ohforfuckssake  open  opensource  paca  permissions  photo  photography  pht227  pinboard  piracy  pocket  politics  pre-911-internet  problem  professional  protections  public-domain  publicdomain  publishing  radio  radiohead  realtime  reasonablysound  resources  rights  riopoffs  search  security  side-project  silence  slashdot  song-writing  songwriting  sons  sources  startup  streaming  technology  telegraph  tokensale  tools  transmission  ualberta  us  usa  video  videos  w3c  war  wireless  work  writing  wtf  youtube 

Copy this bookmark: