constitutional_law   165

« earlier    

Michael Kang - Gerrymandering and the Constitutional Norm Against Government Partisanship (2017) :: SSRN
Win election law prize - Michigan Law Review, Vol. 116, No. 3, Dec. 2017, Forthcoming- Emory Legal Studies Research Paper
71 Pages
Posted: 17 Aug 2017; Last revised: 28 Oct 2017
Michael S. Kang, Emory University School of Law
The Article challenges the basic premise in the law of partisan gerrymandering that government partisan purpose is constitutional at all. The central problem, Justice Scalia once explained in Vieth v. Jubelirer, is that partisan gerrymandering becomes unconstitutional only when it “has gone too far,” giving rise to the intractable inquiry into “how much is too much.” But the premise that partisanship is an ordinary and lawful purpose, articulated as settled law and widely understood as such, is largely wrong as constitutional doctrine. The Article surveys constitutional law to demonstrate the vitality of an important, if implicit norm against government partisanship across a variety of settings. From political patronage, to government speech, to election administration and even in redistricting itself, Vieth is the exception in failing to bar tribal partisanship as a legitimate state interest in lawmaking. The puzzle therefore is why the Supreme Court in Vieth diverged from this overarching norm for legislative redistricting where the need for government nonpartisanship is most acute and so rarely met. The Article proposes a purpose-focused approach that identifies partisanship as an illegitimate basis for lawmaking and requires the government to justify its redistricting with reference to legitimate state interests beyond partisanship, irrespective of extreme partisan effects. The importance of consolidating and reifying the norm against government partisanship, in its most salient legal context, cannot be overstated at a time when hyperpolarization between the major parties dominates national politics and is at its most severe in our lifetime.
Keywords: gerrymandering, redistricting, Whitford v. Gill, partisanship, parties, Bandemer
constitutional_law  political_participation  Evernote  gerrymandering  public_interest  SSRN  accountability  partisanship  liberalism-public_reason  democracy  article  downloaded  US_constitution  corruption  legitimacy  SCOTUS  elections 
november 2017 by dunnettreader
Congress's Constitution | Yale University Press
Congress is widely supposed to be the least effective branch of the federal government. But as Josh Chafetz shows in this boldly original analysis, Congress in fact has numerous powerful tools at its disposal in its conflicts with the other branches. These tools include the power of the purse, the contempt power, freedom of speech and debate, and more.

Drawing extensively on the historical development of Anglo-American legislatures from the seventeenth century to the present, Chafetz concludes that these tools are all means by which Congress and its members battle for public support. When Congress uses them to engage successfully with the public, it increases its power vis-à-vis the other branches; when it does not, it loses power. This groundbreaking take on the separation of powers will be of interest to both legal scholars and political scientists.
us_congress  constitutional_law  history  political_economy  book 
october 2017 by rvenkat

« earlier    

related tags

14th_amendment  17th_century  17thc  18th_century  18thc  19thc  2012_presidential_race  2016_presidential_race  20thc  21stc  abolition  access  accountability  administrative_law  administrative_state  african-americans  american_colonies  american_history  antebellum_era  anthony_kennedy  antonin_scalia  aquinas  arendt  aristotle  article  austerity  authoritarian  authority  barack_obama  berlin  berlin_isaiah  bibliography  bill_of_rights  bills_of_attainder  black_thought  blackstone  blog  bolingbroke  book  book_review  books  british_empire-constitutional_structure  british_history  british_politics  bryan_garner  budget_deficit  burke  campaign_finance  canon_law  capital_as_power  capital_markets  capitalism  case_law  cases  cass_sunstein  catholics  change-economic  change-intellectual  change-social  chapter  checks-and-balances  cities-governance  citizenship  civic_virtue  civil_law  civil_liberties  civil_rights  clarence_thomas  classical_liberalism  commerce_clause  common_good  common_law  commonwealth  community  comparative_history  comparative_law  competition-political  confederacy  conflict  conflict_of_laws  congress  consent  conservatism  conservative_legal_challenges  constituencies  constitution  constitution_commerce_clause  constitutional_amendments  constitutional_regime  constitutional_rights  constitutional_theory  constitutionalism  constitutions  contextualism  corporate_citizenship  corporate_control  corporate_governance  corporate_law  corporate_personhood  corporations-closely-held  corporations  corruption  courses  courtney_brothers  criminal_law  csr  cultural_history  culture_wars  current_events  dallin_h_oaks  debates  deliberation-public  democracy  democracy_deficit  democratization  democrats  digital_humanities  dignity  diplomatic_history  discretion  discrimination  dissent_mag  diversity  divine_command  divine_right  donald_trump  douglas_stephen  downloaded  due_process  dworkin  economic_analysis_of_law  economic_liberty  education-civic  ef-add  egalitarian  elections-disputed  elections  empires-governance  employee_benefits  epistemology-moral  epistemology-social  equal_protection_clause  equality  eric_posner  eu-constitution  eu_governance  europe-federalism  europe-medieval  european_integration  evernote  exec_branch  executive  faction  family  family_law  federalism  finnis  first_amendment  founders  fourth_amendment  free_speech  freedom_of_association  freedom_of_conscience  freedom_of_contract  freedom_of_speech  frontier  gay_marriage  gay_rights  george_will  germany-eurozone  gerrymandering  global_history  global_system  good_government  gop  governance  government-forms  government-roles  government  governmentality  gun_control  hart  health_care  hermeneutics  historiography-postwwii  historiography  history  history_of_law  holmes  house_of_commons  house_of_lords  house_of_representatives  human_nature  human_rights  hume-historian  hume-politics  hume  iceland  ideology  immigration  impeachment  industrialization  instapaper  institute  institution-building  institutional_change  institutions  instrumentalist  intellectual_history  interest_groups  international_&_comparative_law  international_law  international_studies  internet  investors  italy  james_madison  jeffrey_toobin  john_roberts  judges  judicial/legal  judicial_review  judiciary  jurisprudence  jurosprudence  justice  kindle-available  labor_law  laisser-faire  laurence_tribe  law-and-economics  law  law_and_inequality  law_making  lawrence_v_texas  legal  legal_culture  legal_history  legal_realism  legal_reasoning  legal_system  legal_theory  legal_validity  legislature  legitimacy-international  legitimacy  lgbt  liberal_democracy  liberalism-public_reason  liberalism-republicanism_debates  liberalism  libertarianism  liberty-negative  liberty  limited_government  limited_liability  lincoln  litigation  lobbying  maastricht  madison  management  managerialism  manifest_destiny  maritime_law  marriage  means-justify-ends  metadata  military_history  mill  modernity  monarchical_republic  monarchy  moral_philosophy  morality-christian  morality-conventional  morality-divine_command  mormon  morris_gouverneur  mps  multiverse  nation-state  nation_building  native_americans  natural_law  natural_rights  neil_gorsuch  newt_gingrich  normativity  norms  nytimes  obligation  oligarchy  one-party_state  op-ed  opinion  opposition  ordinary_language_philosophy  originalism  papacy  paper  parliament  parliamentary_supremacy  parties  partisanship-judiciary  partisanship  patient_protection_and_affordable_care_act  persuasion  philosophy_of_history  philosophy_of_language  philosophy_of_law  planning  polarization  policymaking  political_change  political_culture  political_economy  political_gridlock  political_history  political_order  political_participation  political_philosophy  political_science  politics-and-money  politics-and-religion  politics  polygamy  positivism-legal  post-colonial  post-secular  power-asymmetric  power-concentration  power  precedent  prerogative  presidency  president  principal-agent  privacy  profit_maximization  progressivism  property-confiscations  property_rights  proposal  protestants  public_goods  public_interest  public_law  public_policy  race  raison-d'-état  raz  refugees  regulation  religion  religious_belief  religious_culture  religious_freedom  rent-seeking  rent_control  representative_institutions  republicanism  research  richard_epstein  richard_posner  right-wing  rights-legal  rights  roberts_court  rodota  roman_law  ronald_dworkin  ross_douthat  rule_of_law  savings  schisms  scotus  secularism  secularization  separation-of-powers  separation_of_church_and_state  shareholder_value  shareholder_voting  shareholders  slavery  social_contract  social_history  social_movements  social_network  social_order  social_process  social_theory  socialization  society  sociology_of_law  sola_scriptura  sovereign_debt  sovereignty  speeches  ssrn  state-roles  statecraft  states_rights  statutory_interpretation  stephen_breyer  subsidiarity  super_hero  supreme_court  takings  technology  ted_cruz  terrorism  textualism  thomas_jefferson  thomism-21stc  thomism  torture  tradition  transition_economies  transparency  tumblr  uk_government  united_states_of_america  us_civil_war  us_congress  us_constitution  us_government  us_history  us_judiciary  us_law  us_legal_system  us_politics  us_president  us_society  us_supreme_court  usa  utah  voting  wired  women-rights  work-life_balance 

Copy this bookmark: