conservatism   5746

« earlier    

The Right’s Climate Change Shame | Andrew Sullivan
For allegedly intelligent conservatives like Stephens and Goldberg to devote energy toward climate skepticism while turning a blind eye to vigorous Republican climate vandalism is, quite simply contemptible. I am not reading their minds here. I’m reading their columns. On this question – as on fiscal policy – they’re not skeptics or conservatives; they are dogmatists, sophists and enablers of environmental vandalism. They reveal Republicanism’s calculated assault on the next generations – piling them with unimaginable debt and environmental chaos. This isn’t the cultural conservatism of Burke; it’s the selfish nihilism of Rand.

Let me finish with a quote. It was the first time a major global leader spoke to the U.N. on the question: “It is life itself — human life, the innumerable species of our planet — that we wantonly destroy. It is life itself that we must battle to preserve … The danger of global warming is as yet unseen but real enough for us to make changes and sacrifices so we may not live at the expense of future generations. That prospect is a new factor in human affairs. It is comparable in its implications to the discovery of how to split the atom, indeed its results could be even more far-reaching … We should always remember that free markets are a means to an end. They would defeat their object if by their output they did more damage to the quality of life through pollution than the well-being they achieve by the production of goods and services.” That leader also made a core moral argument: “No generation has a freehold on this earth; all we have is a life tenancy with a full repairing lease.”

Those words were Margaret Thatcher’s in 1989. She devoted her entire U.N. speech to conservation and climate change. If the subject was real enough in 1989 to make sacrifices and changes, how much more so almost 30 years later? The difference between Thatcher and today’s Republicans is quite a simple one. She believed in science (indeed was trained as a scientist). She grasped the moral dimensions of the stewardship of the earth from one generation to another. She did not engage in the cowardice of sophists. And unlike these tools and fools on today’s American right, she was a conservative.
climate  conservatism  from instapaper
9 days ago by ayjay
Growth and Work | National Review
It seems to me that Cass’s critics take him to be making an economic argument when he is making a political-economy argument, and in our time we have basically forgotten the difference. Or to put the point a little differently: Cass is not exactly arguing that we over-value growth, he is arguing that we over-value economics. His book is a kind of argument against an overly materialistic politics, and is rooted in a fundamentally social conservatism, broadly understood, that sees markets and even prosperity itself as means and not ends. The ends are supplied by an idea of human flourishing rooted in the nature of the human person as understood by the great traditions of our civilization, and therefore focused on family, community, religion, work, and country.

I would note, as an aside, that the same is true of another very important conservative policy book published recently—Reihan Salam’s Melting Pot or Civil War?. Like Cass, Salam is willing and able to confront his critics on their chosen ground, arguing about the effect of low-skill immigration on wages or the philosophical grounds of restrictions on migration. But he is ultimately making an argument rooted in the view that human beings flourish in communities and nations, and that the particular nature of our sociality has to bear on how we think about immigration. He, too, reaches for the deepest ground of disagreement between the left and right, which is anthropological and sociological before it is economic. And so he too seems to have baffled, in the best sense, some of the people he’s seeking to argue with. [...]

This isn’t exactly an argument about whether growth matters (as everyone agrees it does) or whether sometimes other things have to matter more (which we all know is also true). It’s an argument about where to place the weight and emphasis when it comes to addressing particular problems and considering particular policy courses. Healthy policy debates have to be rooted in philosophical premises but directed to concrete realities. That ought to be the next phase of the debate Cass’s book has helped to spark.
economics  politics  conservatism  from instapaper
12 days ago by ayjay
SWR2 Forum: Der Streit um die rechte Gesinnung: Sind wir nicht mehr diskursfähig?
Es diskutieren: Dr. Liane Bednarz - Autorin, Hamburg, Jens Jessen - Redakteur der Wochenzeitung "Die Zeit", Hamburg, Prof. Dr. Werner Patzel - Politikwissenschaftler, Technische Universität Dresden Gesprächsleitung: Claus Heinrich

MP3: https://avdlswr-a.akamaihd.net/swr/swr2/forum/2018/11/swr2-forum-20181123-sind-wir-nicht-mehr-diskursfaehig.m.mp3

[audio src="https://avdlswr-a.akamaihd.net/swr/swr2/forum/2018/11/swr2-forum-20181123-sind-wir-nicht-mehr-diskursfaehig.m.mp3"]
nca  ncpin  Podcasts  Right  Nazis  DGNI  Conservatism  IlliberalLeft 
14 days ago by walt74
Confusion mingles with anger as leafy Esher ponders Brexit | Politics | The Guardian
After talking at length to Raab’s “neglected silent mainstream majority”, I began to appreciate why they might be neglected. What is most notable are the glaring contradictions: May is not up to the job, but she should stick it out. Brexit has been a disaster – and we should get out of Europe as soon as possible. And my personal favourite, that being in the EU has meant, as Hill claims, that the younger generation, including her children, can’t get on the property ladder, followed by the complaint that “property is dropping like a stone round here”.

The cognitive dissonance seems endemic. However, in politics the voters are always right. And while the criticism and analysis heard in Esher may lack a certain intellectual coherence, there is an emotional discontent that is undoubtedly authentic.

Hill describes herself as a Conservative through and through. But, she says: “I’m beginning to think that our politics are trash, we’ve got no leadership and they’re all backstabbers with no integrity.”

That’s something an enemy might say. When it’s coming from a diehard supporter in the sleepy comforts of superbia, the Tories should know they are in trouble.
Esher  UK  Brexit  withdrawalAgreement  Leave  Remain  politics  ToryParty  conservatism  RaabDominic 
21 days ago by petej

« earlier    

related tags

1970s  2018-09  2018-10  2018  3540spr19  abortion  academia  adam-server  alt-right  altright  amendment  america  american-studies  american.politics  american  americanism  andrew-sullivan  anti-intellectualism  apostasy  archived  banksarron  ben-shapiro  bias  bill-clinton  blue-midterm-2018  bolsonaro  book  booklists  books-non-fiction  books  brett-kavanaugh  brett_kavanaugh  brexit  brexitlies  business  capitalism  caste  cdu  chequers  christianism  christianity  classical_liberalism  climate-change  climate  clintonhillary  cognitive.dissonance  collapse  collegereform  colleges  concessions  conference  conservative  conservative_propaganda  conservativenutjobs  conservatives  conspiracy.theories  constitution  contempt  corey-robin  corporatism  corruption  cruelty  cruises  culture  darkenlightenment  david-frum  david_brooks  david_frum  dc:creator=behrrafael  dc:creator=goodwinmatthew  dc:creator=o'toolefintan  dctagged  demagogue  democracy  democrats  demographics  denial  denmark  devdutt  dgni  disenfranchisement  donald  donald_trump  donaldtrump  dystopia  economics  edburmila  education  eec  eisenhower  elections  entrepreneurialism  esher  ethics  eu  europe  expertise  extremism  fact  falklandswar  fantasy  far-right  fascism  fearmonger  feminism  fiction  foxnews  france  frederick_clarkson  free-speech  freespeech  freetrade  funny  gender  george  germany  global-warming  gop  graphic  grievedominic  hate  headline  highered  highereducation  history  homepage  houseofcommons  hygge  identity  ideology  illiberalleft  immigration  internet  internetculture  iraq  islam  islamophobia  jack-rakove  james-buchanan  jim-crow  jon-haidt  jonathan-chait  jones  jordanpeterson  journalism  judges  kavanaughbrett  kkk  kramp-karrenbauerannegret  labor  law  leadership  leave  leftists  lgbt  liberalism  liberals  long-term  lovecraft  lynching  magabomber  mason  matt-yglesias  max-boot  maytheresa  media  membership  merkelangela  merzfriedrich  morality  mother  murdochrupert  nancy-maclean  nate-silver  nationalism  nationalpopulism  nazis  nazism  nca  ncpin  neo-conservatives  neofascism  neonazi  neoreaction  never-trump  news  ocasio-cortez  op-ed  opinion  paranoia  parliament  patnaik  patriarchy  podcasts  poland  political_infrastructure  politics  populism  porn  post-racial  post  power  preacher  propaganda  psychology  publishing  purity  quotes  raabdominic  racism  rationality  reaction  recap  reddit  remain  republican  republicanism  republicanparty  republicans  review  rick-perlstein  right-wing  right  robert_bork  ross_douthat  scotus  sleazy  socialjustice  society  spahnjens  speech  strongman  system  tactics  talent_pipelines  teri-kanefield  terrorism  texas  thatcher  this_is_fine  thread  toryparty  totag  transgender  trump  trumpdonald  tucker-carlson  twitter  u.s._supreme_court  uk  unitedstates  universities  university  us  usa  uspolitics  values  vanityfair  vice  violence  voter-suppresion  wikipedia  withdrawalagreement  worldwarii 

Copy this bookmark:



description:


tags: