communities   7604

« earlier    

Is Discord The Free Slack Alternative for Your Growing Team? | Elegant Themes Blog
Verdict: Is Discord Team Chat a Viable Slack Alternative?
Absolutely. Yep. Discord can absolutely be a Slack replacement, and is a viable alternative — especially if you haven’t already chosen a team chat. The Discord voice chat is head and shoulders above Slack’s, and making calls and having video conferences is so much simpler. (The text chat is comparable on both, really, so it’s a wash.)

Slack, on the other hand, is a more complete workspace. The file sharing is much better, and the ability to keep your work and play separate is a must-have for a lot of people. Also, if you’re big into automation, Slack’s apps and Slackbot are way better than the Discord versions. However, the freemium model may not work for all businesses, and paying for access to everything on your server after you’ve grown your team with a certain budget can be pretty disheartening.

If communication is your main focus, Discord is robust and easy to use. While Slack has a few more bells and whistles, they may not be worth the cost in the long run for your team. Do some tests and try them out for yourself since they’re both free to start with, but I think you’ll find that Discord is a lot more than just a tool for gamers to organize play sessions.
slack  communities  communication  chat 
yesterday by Aetles
readings about co-op and intentional community
Diana Leafe Christian has a couple books

Elaine Heath - “Abide”

Melissa Wadsworth - Collective Manifestation: Heart-Centered Blueprints for Creating Intentional Community

Joseph Manzella ...
coops  intentional  communities  books  watchlist  fta-view  from notes
4 days ago by sky
Upcoming Changes to Kiwi's World ....
Further information will be made available as I work through the changes. If you have donated via PAYPAL email me with the donation details (PAYPAL email address etc) and I will create the necessary logins for you to access the download section moving forward. In the meantime feel free to continue downloading as it takes your fancy while they are still available.
OldGameMags  Kiwis.World  Gaming  GamingNews  GamesMedia  GameJournalism  Magazines  Retro  Nostalgia  Communities  Donations  PayPal 
6 days ago by dk33per
A framework for thinking about Open Source Sustainability?
The "commons" in OSS is "effort".

Design principles for open source communities:

1. Who is a contributor to an open source project is clearly defined.
2. Effort in open online projects is applied locally, to the needs of the project.
3. Many open source projects follow the rule that those who contribute participate in design decisions.
4. People who contribute significantly are often invited to join the project officially in more significant decision making roles.
5. There is often a range of sanctions for contributors who violate community rules.
6. Most conflicts are handled internally to the project, rather than being escalated to the legal system.
7. Most conflicts are handled by lightweight methods and discussions.
8. Many open source contributors contribute to multiple projects.
opensource  community  communities  framework  principles  sustainability 
11 days ago by drmeme
Where does the word 'gamer' come from and does it have a future? - Polygon
Where does the word "gamer" come from? And does it have a future in a culture where video games are a part of mainstream entertainment, consumed by all, rather than by a specific demographic...
video_games  gamers  communities  fandom 
23 days ago by mobilesworking
Social media moderators should look to the oldest digital communities for tips about caring — Quartz
"Back when women only made up a tenth of the online population, Echo’s user base was 40% female. On its website, a banner read: “Echo has the highest population of women in cyberspace. And none of them will give you the time of day.” Stacy made Echo membership free for women for an entire year. She created private spaces on Echo where women could talk amongst themselves and report instances of harassment. She spoke to women’s groups about the internet, and she taught Unix courses out of her apartment so that a lack of technical knowledge would not limit new users to the experience of computer-mediated communication.

In short, Stacy achieved near gender parity on an almost entirely male-dominated internet because she cared enough to make it so.

For many in tech, caring means caring about: investing, without immediate promise of remuneration, in the pursuit of building something “insanely great,” as Steve Jobs once said. It means risking stability and sanity in order to change the world.

But what Stacy’s legacy represents is caring of another sort: not only caring about but caring for. It is this second type of caring that has been lost in our age of big social.

Moderators are a key part of this relationship. Stacy was a founder-moderator: a combination of tech support and sheriff who thought deeply about decisions affecting the lives of her users. She baked these values into the community: Every conversation on Echo was moderated by both a male and a female “host,” who were users who, in exchange for waived subscription fees, set the tone of discussion and watched for abuse.

In The Virtual Community: Homesteading on the Electronic Frontier, an early book about online community, Howard Rheingold documents such hosts all over the early internet, from a French BBS whose paid “animateurs” were culled from its most active users to the hosts on Echo’s West Coast counterpart, The WELL. “Hosts are the people,” he wrote, who “welcome newcomers, introduce people to one another, clean up after the guests, provoke discussion, and break up fights if necessary.” Like any party host, it was their own home they safeguarded.

Today the role of moderators has changed. Rather than deputized members of our own community, they are a precarious workforce on the front lines of digital trauma. The raw feed of flagged Facebook content is unimaginable to the average user: a parade of violence, pornography, and hate speech. According to a recent Bloomberg article, YouTube moderators are encouraged to work only a few hours at a time, and have access to on-call psychiatry. Contract workers in India and the Philippines work far removed from the content they moderate, struggling to apply global guidelines to a multiplicity of cultural contexts.

No matter where you’re located, it’s not easy to be a moderator. The details of such practices are “routinely hidden from public view, siloed within companies and treated as trade secrets,” as Catherine Buni and Soraya Chemaly note in a 2016 study of moderation for The Verge. They’re one of Silicon Valley’s many hidden workforces: Platforms like Facebook, Instagram, and Twitter thrive on the invisibility of such labor, which makes users feel safe enough to continue engaging—and sharing personal data—with the platform. To sell happy places online, we are outsourcing the unhappiness to other people.

How did we stop caring about the communities we created? This is partially a question of scale. With mass adoption comes the mass visibility of brutality, and the offshore workers and low-wage contract laborers who moderate the major social media platforms cycle out quickly, traumatized by visions of beheadings and sexual violence. But it’s also a design choice, engineered to make us care about social platforms by concealing from us those who care after them. Put simply, we have fractured care.

The major platforms’ solution to the problem of scale has been to employ contract workers to enforce moderation guidelines. But what if we took the opposite approach and treated scale itself as the issue? This raises new questions: What is the largest number of people a platform can adequately care for? Can that number really be in the billions? What is the ideal size for a community?

Perhaps big social was never the right outcome for this wild experiment we call the internet. Perhaps we’d be happier with constellations of smaller, regional, and interest-specific communities; communities whose stakeholders are the users themselves, and whose moderators and decision-makers aren’t rendered opaque through distance and centralized authority. Perhaps social life doesn’t scale. Perhaps the future looks very much like the past. More like Echo.

Instead of expanding forever outward, we could instead empower groups of people with the tools to build their own communities. We have a long history of regional Community Networks and FreeNets to learn from. A generation of young programmers and designers are already proposing alternatives to the most baked-in protocols and conventions of the web: the Beaker Browser, a model for a new decentralized, peer-to-peer web, built on a protocol called Dat, or the zero-noise, all-signal community of, a collaborative social platform for thinkers and creatives. Failing those, a home-brew world of BBS—Echo included—exists still, for those ready to brave millennial-proof windows of pure text.

* * *

There is nothing inevitable about the future of social media—or, indeed, the web itself. Like any human project, it’s only the culmination of choices, some made decades ago. The internet was built as a resource-sharing network for computer scientists; the web, as a way for nuclear physicists to compare notes. That either have evolved beyond these applications is entirely due to the creative adaptations of users. Being entrenched in the medium, they have always had a knack for developing social commons out of even the most opaque screen-based places.

The utopian idealism of the first generation online influenced a popular conception of the internet as a community technology. Our beleaguered social media platforms have grafted themselves onto this assumption, blinding us to their true natures: They are consumption engines, hybridizing community and commerce by selling communities to advertisers (and aspiring political regimes).

It would serve us to consider alternatives to such a limited vision of community life online. For original tech pioneers such as Stacy, success was never about a successful exit, but rather the sustained, long-term guardianship of a community of users. Now more than ever, they should be regarded as the greatest resource in the world."
communication  culture  bbs  2018  claireevans  gender  internet  online  web  history  moderation  care  caring  scale  scalability  small  slow  size  siliconvalley  socialmedia  community  communities  technology  groupsize  advertising 
23 days ago by robertogreco
A response, and second Open Letter to the Hau Journal's Board of Trustees — Association of Social Anthropologists of Aotearoa New Zealand
"In Māori communities, whanaungatanga - the process of building strong relationships - ideally comes before the pursuit of other goals. But before such relationships can be built with others, good intent and sound actions have to be well demonstrated."

[via: ]

[See also:

"1. (noun) relationship, kinship, sense of family connection - a relationship through shared experiences and working together which provides people with a sense of belonging. It develops as a result of kinship rights and obligations, which also serve to strengthen each member of the kin group. It also extends to others to whom one develops a close familial, friendship or reciprocal relationship.

Kōrero ai ngā whakapapa mō te whanaungatanga i waenganui i te ira tangata me te ao (Te Ara 2011). / Whakapapa describe the relationships between humans and nature."


"1. (noun) process of establishing relationships, relating well to others.

Kei te whakapapa ngā tātai, ngā kōrero rānei mō te ao katoa, nā reira ko ngā whakapapa he whakawhanaungatanga ki te ao, ki te iwi, ki te taiao anō hoki (Te Ara 2011). / Whakapapa is the recitation of genealogies or stories about the world, so whakapapa are ways by which people come into relationship with the world, with people, and with life."


"Whanaungatanga – positive and meaningful relationships within the community

We use the term whanaungatanga to highlight the importance of positive and meaningful relationships to the creation of the good life.
Whanaungatanga = Relationship, kinship, sense of family connection – a relationship through shared experiences and working together which provides people with a sense of belonging. It develops as a result of kinship rights and obligations, which also serve to strengthen each member of the kin group. It also extends to others to whom one develops a close familial, friendship or reciprocal relationship (Te Aka Online Māori Dictionary)

Whanaungatanga values a wide range of relationships, like family and friendships, and points to feelings of belonging and inclusion. Whanaungatanga captures the belief that the more relationships people have in their lives the happier and healthier they are.

Relationships come in many shapes and forms: they may be a regular friendly chat with someone based on a shared interest or a long-term loving intimate relationship. Each relationship is unique, because every person is different. And, having a wide range of relationships is important. A diverse social network made up of relationships with a variety of people enriches people’s lives.

Relationships are the heart of the community. And a sense of being connected to the community through relationships is at the core of the good life. In fact, the community provides endless opportunities for the creation of relationships.

The community is a fantastic resource, rich with possibilities for developing and growing relationships through jobs, volunteering, and recreation. Relationships help us connect to the community, and this connection provides more opportunities to get to get to know a range of people and expand our social networks.We believe people with disability should have the same opportunities to be involved in their community, meet people and develop friendships as anyone else.

Natural and Formal Supports
Natural supports describe the naturally occurring or informal relationships experienced in the community, for example, between neighbours, within cultural groups, and through working lives. We believe natural supports are the most effective way forward in terms of support for people with disability to achieve a good life in the ordinary spaces of the community.

One of the great things about natural supports is that they aren’t associated with any financial cost! People are not paid to offer support, instead they do it because of a shared interest or connection. Natural support can come in many forms, for example, it may be a ride to the supermarket, assistance filling out a form, or help with meeting new friends.

Experience shows us that people with disability are more likely to be included in the community if natural supports are encouraged around their participation. This is because it is difficult to become part of a community from the outside. It is much easier if it happens from within the community. A good example of this is when someone has an interest in joining a particular club or group. It is better to have a member of that group introduce the person, because they will be known by the rest of the group already, and they will know how to introduce the person in a way that fits with the group.

In saying this, we also know that for many people with disability and their whānau, paid services and professionals, also known as formal supports, play an important role in their lives. Formal supports may usefully be part of people’s search for the good life, but care needs to be taken to make sure it does not over-ride the authority and power of the person and their whānau. Paid services and supports should complement, not take over or exclude the natural supports that already exist or could be developed." ]
communities  maori  relationships  cv  sfsh  2018  whanaungatanga  words  priorities  via:anne  tcsnmy  community  support  interdependence 
26 days ago by robertogreco

« earlier    

related tags

$45m  $afma-v  (and  -  11  2016  2018  @todo  a  access  accessibility  activism  advertising  alessandroludovico  alexanderstarre  alloparents  altgdp  altruism  amino  amish  and  anna-sophiespringer  annemoeglin-delcroix  annettegilbert  anthropology  antifragility  antoinelefebvre  app  arbeit  art  astor  audience  aurélienoury  autonomy  backlinks  barbararogoff  bari  bbs  belonging  bernhardcella  best_of  bookmarks_bar  books  bootstrap  bootstrappers  boundedness  bring  bystander_effect  capitalism  care  caring  chat  children  claireevans  cli  clients  cnc  co-design  collaboration  communication  community  conflict  control  conviviality  coops  cop  crafts  culture  cv  data  database_driven  dbg  deals  decentralization  deschooling  design  dev  digital  discord  donations  efficiency  entrepreneur  environment  equity  evaweinmayr  events  existio  experience  facebook  families  fan  fandom  federation  films  for  forums  framework  friday  frugal  fta-view  gamejournalism  gamers  gamesmedia  gaming  gamingnews  gender  glvo  google  governance  grants  green  groups  groupsize  gui  guidance  guide  habits  hackathons  hacker  hackerethics  hackers  hackerspaces  hannakuusela  hannesbajohr  happiness  health  healthcare  history  how  howto  humanism  humans  humour  ibm  ibmstudios  ideas  impact  in  incentive  inclusion  inclusivity  india  indie  indigenous  info  inspiration  institutions  intentional  intentionalcommunity  interdependence  internet  invest  italia  italy  ivanillich  jm  johngillis  justice  kantranikcassem  klein_e  knowledge  kommunikation  kooperation  launches  lcproject  learning  learningbydoing  libraries  life_logging  links  linux  listings  lmsacasas  local  lucasmelkane  magazines  management  maori  marketers  marketing  mastodon  mattlongabucco  maya  michaeleendoucleff  michaelsacasas  michalispichler  mobile_apps_2_major_oses  moderation  motherhood  mothers  moz  mpw  multiverse  my_profiles  narrative_clip  neighborhood  networks  neuroscience  niche_sites  nickthurston  non-linear  nonlinear  nostalgia  nyc  oldgamemags  online  online_presense  open-source  opensource  openstudioproject  organic  organisations  organizing  osmosis  ownership  parenting  paulbenzon  paypal  photography  pirates  podcasts  politics  power  practise  principles  priorities  productivity  profile_links  psychology  publishing  purpose  q&a  quantified_self  r  rachelvalinsky  radio  raises  references  relationships  research  resistance  resources  respect  resuse  retro  scalability  scale  self-forgetfulness  self  seo  seos  servers  services  sfsh  sharing  siliconvalley  size  slack  slow  small  smartphones  social  social_networking  social_networks  socialjustice  socialmedia  society  software  solutions  space  startups  stephaniecoontz  strategy  stress  structure  subversion  support  surveys  sustainability  systems  systemsthinking  tcsnmy  tech  techcrunch  technology  to...  to  to_tag  tool  tools  training  travel_industry  traveling  tui  tumblr  unhappiness  unique_features_slightly  unschooling  us  usa  usenet  user_accounts  user_generated_content  vadimzakharov  valentinaparisi  video_games  warehouse  watchlist  web  webarchiving  websites  weird  whanaungatanga  whether)  whiteboard  womenintech  words  work  workplace  zuckerberg     

Copy this bookmark: