coalitions   151

« earlier    

Twitter
Nu lanseras där vi och flera europeiska forskningsråd beslutat att implementera tio principer som ska p…
cOAlitionS  from twitter_favs
10 weeks ago by kentlundgren
Twitter
: a commitment from research funders to make to research publications a reality by 2020…
cOAlitionS  OpenAccess  from twitter_favs
10 weeks ago by sharon_howard
Jordan Peterson is Wrong About the Case for the Left
I suggest that the tension of which he speaks is fully formed and self-contained completely within conservatism. Balancing those two forces is, in fact, what conservatism is all about. Thomas Sowell, in A Conflict of Visions: Ideological Origins of Political Struggles describes the conservative outlook as (paraphrasing): “There are no solutions, only tradeoffs.”

The real tension is between balance on the right and imbalance on the left.

In Towards a Cognitive Theory of Polics in the online magazine Quillette I make the case that left and right are best understood as psychological profiles consisting of 1) cognitive style, and 2) moral matrix.

There are two predominant cognitive styles and two predominant moral matrices.

The two cognitive styles are described by Arthur Herman in his book The Cave and the Light: Plato Versus Aristotle, and the Struggle for the Soul of Western Civilization, in which Plato and Aristotle serve as metaphors for them. These two quotes from the book summarize the two styles:

Despite their differences, Plato and Aristotle agreed on many things. They both stressed the importance of reason as our guide for understanding and shaping the world. Both believed that our physical world is shaped by certain eternal forms that are more real than matter. The difference was that Plato’s forms existed outside matter, whereas Aristotle’s forms were unrealizable without it. (p. 61)

The twentieth century’s greatest ideological conflicts do mark the violent unfolding of a Platonist versus Aristotelian view of what it means to be free and how reason and knowledge ultimately fit into our lives (p.539-540)

The Platonic cognitive style amounts to pure abstract reason, “unconstrained” by reality. It has no limiting principle. It is imbalanced. Aristotelian thinking also relies on reason, but it is “constrained” by empirical reality. It has a limiting principle. It is balanced.

The two moral matrices are described by Jonathan Haidt in his book The Righteous Mind: Why Good People Are Divided by Politics and Religion. Moral matrices are collections of moral foundations, which are psychological adaptations of social cognition created in us by hundreds of millions of years of natural selection as we evolved into the social animal. There are six moral foundations. They are:

Care/Harm
Fairness/Cheating
Liberty/Oppression
Loyalty/Betrayal
Authority/Subversion
Sanctity/Degradation
The first three moral foundations are called the “individualizing” foundations because they’re focused on the autonomy and well being of the individual person. The second three foundations are called the “binding” foundations because they’re focused on helping individuals form into cooperative groups.

One of the two predominant moral matrices relies almost entirely on the individualizing foundations, and of those mostly just care. It is all individualizing all the time. No balance. The other moral matrix relies on all of the moral foundations relatively equally; individualizing and binding in tension. Balanced.

The leftist psychological profile is made from the imbalanced Platonic cognitive style in combination with the first, imbalanced, moral matrix.

The conservative psychological profile is made from the balanced Aristotelian cognitive style in combination with the balanced moral matrix.

It is not true that the tension between left and right is a balance between the defense of the dispossessed and the defense of hierarchies.

It is true that the tension between left and right is between an imbalanced worldview unconstrained by empirical reality and a balanced worldview constrained by it.

A Venn Diagram of the two psychological profiles looks like this:
commentary  albion  canada  journos-pundits  philosophy  politics  polisci  ideology  coalitions  left-wing  right-wing  things  phalanges  reason  darwinian  tradition  empirical  the-classics  big-peeps  canon  comparison  thinking  metabuch  skeleton  lens  psychology  social-psych  morality  justice  civil-liberty  authoritarianism  love-hate  duty  tribalism  us-them  sanctity-degradation  revolution  individualism-collectivism  n-factor  europe  the-great-west-whale  pragmatic  prudence  universalism-particularism  analytical-holistic  nationalism-globalism  social-capital  whole-partial-many  pic  intersection-connectedness  links  news  org:mag  letters  rhetoric  contrarianism  intricacy  haidt  scitariat  critique  debate  forms-instances  reduction  infographic  apollonian-dionysian  being-becoming  essence-existence 
july 2018 by nhaliday
Mistakes happen for a reason | Bloody shovel
Which leads me to this article by Scott Alexander. He elaborates on an idea by one of his ingroup about their being two ways of looking at things, “mistake theory” and “conflict theory”. Mistake theory claims that political opposition comes from a different understanding of issues: if people had the same amount of knowledge and proper theories to explain it, they would necessarily agree. Conflict theory states that people disagree because their interests conflict, the conflict is zero-sum so there’s no reason to agree, the only question is how to resolve the conflict.

I was speechless. I am quite used to Mr. Alexander and his crowd missing the point on purpose, but this was just too much. Mistake theory and Conflict theory are not parallel things. “Mistake theory” is just the natural, tribalist way of thinking. It assumes an ingroup, it assumes the ingroup has a codified way of thinking about things, and it interprets all disagreement as a lack of understanding of the obviously objective and universal truths of the ingroup religion. There is a reason why liberals call “ignorant” all those who disagree with them. Christians used to be rather more charitable on this front and asked for “faith”, which they also assumed was difficult to achieve.

Conflict theory is one of the great achievements of the human intellect; it is an objective, useful and predictively powerful way of analyzing human disagreement. There is a reason why Marxist historiography revolutionized the world and is still with us: Marx made a strong point that human history was based on conflict. Which is true. It is tautologically true. If you understand evolution it stands to reason that all social life is about conflict. The fight for genetical survival is ultimately zero-sum, and even in those short periods of abundance when it is not, the fight for mating supremacy is very much zero-sum, and we are all very much aware of that today. Marx focused on class struggle for political reasons, which is wrong, but his focus on conflict was a gust of fresh air for those who enjoy objective analysis.

Incidentally the early Chinese thinkers understood conflict theory very well, which is why Chinese civilization is still around, the oldest on earth. A proper understanding of conflict does not come without its drawbacks, though. Mistakes happen for a reason. Pat Buchanan actually does understand why USG open the doors to trade with China. Yes, Whig history was part of it, but that’s just the rhetoric used to justify the idea. The actual motivation to trade with China was making money short term. Lots of money. Many in the Western elite have made huge amounts of money with the China trade. Money that conveniently was funneled to whichever political channels it had to do in order to keep the China trade going. Even without Whig history, even without the clueless idea that China would never become a political great power, the short-term profits to be made were big enough to capture the political process in the West and push for it. Countries don’t have interests: people do.

That is true, and should be obvious, but there are dangers to the realization. There’s a reason why people dislike cynics. People don’t want to know the truth. It’s hard to coordinate around the truth, especially when the truth is that humans are selfish assholes constantly in conflict. Mistakes happen because people find it convenient to hide the truth; and “mistake theory” happens because policing the ingroup patterns of thought, limiting the capability of people of knowing too much, is politically useful. The early Chinese kingdoms developed a very sophisticated way of analyzing objective reality. The early kingdoms were also full of constant warfare, rebellions and elite betrayals; all of which went on until the introduction in the 13th century of a state ideology (neoconfucianism) based on complete humbug and a massively unrealistic theory on human nature. Roman literature is refreshingly objective and to the point. Romans were also murderous bastards who assassinated each other all the time. It took the massive pile of nonsense which we call the Christian canon to get Europeans to cooperate in a semi-stable basis.

But guess what? Conflict theory also exists for a reason. And the reason is to extricate oneself from the ingroup, to see things how they actually are, and to undermine the state religion from the outside. Marxists came up with conflict theory because they knew they had little to expect from fighting from within the system. Those low-status workers who still regarded their mainstream society as being the ingroup they very sharply called “alienated”, and by using conflict theory they showed what the ingroup ideology was actually made of. Pat Buchanan and his cuck friends should take the message and stop assuming that the elite is playing for the same team as they are. The global elite, of America and its vassals, is not mistaken. They are playing for themselves: to raise their status above yours, to drop their potential rivals into eternal misery and to rule forever over them. China, Syria, and everything else, is about that.

https://bloodyshovel.wordpress.com/2018/03/09/mistakes-happen-for-a-reason/#comment-18834
Heh heh. It’s a lost art. The Greeks and Romans were realists about it (except Cicero, that idealistic bastard). They knew language, being the birthright of man, was just another way (and a damn powerful one) to gain status, make war, and steal each other’s women. Better be good at wielding it.
gnon  right-wing  commentary  china  asia  current-events  politics  ideology  coalitions  government  statesmen  leviathan  law  axioms  authoritarianism  usa  democracy  antidemos  trade  nationalism-globalism  elite  error  whiggish-hegelian  left-wing  paleocon  history  mostly-modern  world-war  impetus  incentives  interests  self-interest  signaling  homo-hetero  hypocrisy  meta:rhetoric  debate  language  universalism-particularism  tribalism  us-them  zero-positive-sum  absolute-relative  class  class-warfare  communism  polanyi-marx  westminster  realness  cynicism-idealism  truth  coordination  cooperate-defect  medieval  confucian  iron-age  mediterranean  the-classics  literature  canon  europe  the-great-west-whale  occident  sinosphere  orient  nl-and-so-can-you  world  conquest-empire  malthus  status  egalitarianism-hierarchy  evolution  conceptual-vocab  christianity  society  anthropology  metabuch  hidden-motives  X-not-about-Y  dark-arts  illusion  martial  war  cohesion  military  correlation  causation  roots  japan  comparison  long-short-run  mul 
march 2018 by nhaliday
China’s Ideological Spectrum
We find that public preferences are weakly constrained, and the configuration of preferences is multidimensional, but the latent traits of these dimensions are highly correlated. Those who prefer authoritarian rule are more likely to support nationalism, state intervention in the economy, and traditional social values; those who prefer democratic institutions and values are more likely to support market reforms but less likely to be nationalistic and less likely to support traditional social values. This latter set of preferences appears more in provinces with higher levels of development and among wealthier and better-educated respondents.
pdf  study  economics  polisci  sociology  politics  ideology  coalitions  china  asia  things  phalanges  dimensionality  degrees-of-freedom  markets  democracy  capitalism  communism  authoritarianism  government  leviathan  tradition  values  correlation  exploratory  nationalism-globalism  heterodox  sinosphere 
march 2018 by nhaliday
Effects of Education on Political Opinions: An International Study | International Journal of Public Opinion Research | Oxford Academic
Education and Political Party: The Effects of College or Social Class?: https://www.jstor.org/stable/2778029
The impact of education on political ideology: Evidence from European compulsory education reforms: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0272775716301704
correlation is with leftism, causal effect is shift to right

Greg thinks there are some effects: https://pinboard.in/u:nhaliday/b:5adca8f16265

https://twitter.com/GarettJones/status/964209775419457536
https://archive.is/oFELz
https://archive.is/f1DBF
https://archive.is/5iiqn

http://econlog.econlib.org/archives/2008/12/education_ideol.html

https://twitter.com/pseudoerasmus/status/963451867912130561
https://archive.is/sHI7g
https://archive.is/B5Gdv
https://archive.is/hFERC
https://archive.is/8IUDm
Bryan Caplan has written a very persuasive book suggesting that retention/transfer of learning is very low. how do we know it’s not the same with the “PoMo ethos”
study  polisci  sociology  education  higher-ed  intervention  branches  politics  ideology  world  general-survey  correlation  causation  left-wing  right-wing  phalanges  multi  coalitions  history  mostly-modern  usa  cold-war  europe  EU  natural-experiment  endogenous-exogenous  direction  west-hunter  scitariat  twitter  social  discussion  backup  econotariat  garett-jones  cracker-econ  data  analysis  regression  org:econlib  biodet  behavioral-gen  variance-components  environmental-effects  counter-revolution  strategy  tactics  pseudoE  demographics  race  gender  markets  impetus  roots  explanans  migration  social-norms 
february 2018 by nhaliday
'No Man is an Island' - John Donne
No man is an island entire of itself; every man
is a piece of the continent, a part of the main;
if a clod be washed away by the sea, Europe
is the less, as well as if a promontory were, as
well as any manner of thy friends or of thine
own were; any man's death diminishes me,
because I am involved in mankind.
And therefore never send to know for whom
the bell tolls; it tolls for thee.

Olde English Version
No man is an Iland, intire of itselfe; every man
is a peece of the Continent, a part of the maine;
if a Clod bee washed away by the Sea, Europe
is the lesse, as well as if a Promontorie were, as
well as if a Manor of thy friends or of thine
owne were; any mans death diminishes me,
because I am involved in Mankinde;
And therefore never send to know for whom
the bell tolls; It tolls for thee.

MEDITATION XVII
Devotions upon Emergent Occasions
John Donne
poetry  big-peeps  old-anglo  anglosphere  individualism-collectivism  n-factor  europe  the-great-west-whale  classic  canon  literature  aphorism  aristos  death  coalitions  oceans  universalism-particularism  egalitarianism-hierarchy  optimate  alien-character  history  early-modern  britain  letters  altruism  patho-altruism  us-them  self-interest  cohesion  quotes  theory-of-mind  the-self  whole-partial-many  org:junk 
february 2018 by nhaliday
The Politics of Mate Choice
TABLE 1 Spousal Concordance on 16 Traits Pearson’s r (n)

Church attendance .714 (4950)
W-P Index (28 items) .647 (3984)
Drinking frequency .599 (4984)
Political party support .596 (4547)
Education .498 (4957)
Height .227 (4964)
pdf  study  sociology  anthropology  sex  assortative-mating  correlation  things  phalanges  planning  long-term  human-bean  religion  theos  politics  polisci  ideology  ethanol  time-use  coalitions  education  embodied  integrity  sleep  rhythm  personality  psych-architecture  stress  psychiatry  self-report  extra-introversion  discipline  self-control  patience  data  database  list  top-n  objektbuch  values  habit  time  density  twin-study  longitudinal  tradition  time-preference  life-history  selection  psychology  social-psych  flux-stasis  demographics  frequency 
december 2017 by nhaliday
What era are our intuitions about elites and business adapted to? – Gene Expression
Above natural states are open-access orders, which characterize societies that have market economies and competitive politics. Here access to the elite is open to anyone who can prove themselves worthy — it is not artificially restricted in order to preserve large rents for the incumbents. The pie can be made bigger with more people at the top, since you only get to the top in such societies by making and selling things that people want. Elite members compete against each other based on the quality and price of the goods and services they sell — it’s a mercantile elite — rather than based on who is better at violence than the others. If the elites are flabby, upstarts can readily form their own organizations — as opposed to not having the freedom to do so — that, if better, will dethrone the incumbents. Since violence is no longer part of elite competition, homicide rates are the lowest of all types of societies.

OK, now let’s take a look at just two innate views that most people have about how the business world works or what economic elites are like, and see how these are adaptations to natural states rather than to the very new open-access orders (which have only existed in Western Europe since about 1850 or so). One is the conviction, common even among many businessmen, that market share matters more than making profits — that being more popular trumps being more profitable. The other is most people’s mistrust of companies that dominate their entire industry, like Microsoft in computers.
gnxp  scitariat  reflection  farmers-and-foragers  sapiens  instinct  politics  coalitions  anthropology  cultural-dynamics  political-econ  polisci  leviathan  north-weingast-like  unintended-consequences  open-closed  biases  government  markets  market-power  rent-seeking  capitalism  democracy  roots  EEA  inequality  egalitarianism-hierarchy  business  cost-benefit  interests  elite  hari-seldon 
december 2017 by nhaliday
Red State Families: Better Than We Knew | Institute for Family Studies
Second, adjusting for education and race/ethnicity transforms the relationship between the Red State Index and marital upbringing from a curvilinear to a linear one. The redder the state, the more likely is a teen to grow up with his or her married birth parents. The relationship is modest but statistically significant. For every ten-point increase in the Red State Index, the proportion of teens living with both parents rises by one percentage point. This suggests that red state family culture is associated with increased odds of being raised in an intact, married family.

http://anepigone.blogspot.com/2017/11/nicholas-kristof-strikes-out.html
https://www.politico.com/magazine/story/2017/11/28/no-republicans-arent-hypocrites-on-family-values-215873
http://www.theamericanconservative.com/dreher/blue-america-more-virtuous-than-red-nope/
news  org:ngo  douthatish  sociology  data  analysis  usa  within-group  politics  ideology  coalitions  right-wing  correlation  confounding  race  demographics  education  class  life-history  dignity  wonkish  multi  gnon  general-survey  pro-rata  org:mag  intricacy  religion 
november 2017 by nhaliday

« earlier    

related tags

2014  2016-election  2016  2017  2018  :/  aaronson  absolute-relative  academia  academic  acmtariat  adversarial  advice  aesthetics  africa  age-generation  aging  albion  alesina  alien-character  alignment  alt-inst  altruism  analogy  analysis  analytical-holistic  anglo  anglosphere  announcement  anomie  anthropology  antidemos  aphorism  apollonian-dionysian  arbitrage  aristos  arms  arrows  art  article  asia  assortative-mating  atmosphere  attaq  audio  authoritarianism  axelrod  axioms  backup  bare-hands  behavioral-gen  being-becoming  being-right  berkeley  better-explained  biases  big-peeps  big-picture  big-yud  bio  biodet  biotech  bits  blowhards  books  branches  brands  brexit  britain  broad-econ  buddhism  business-models  business  california  canada  canon  capital  capitalism  career  causation  censorship  charity  chart  china  christianity  christopher-lasch  civic  civil-liberty  civilization  class-warfare  class  classic  clever-rats  climate-change  clinton  cliometrics  clown-world  cog-psych  cohesion  cold-war  collaboration  coming-apart  commentary  communism  community  comparison  compensation  competition  composition-decomposition  conceptual-vocab  confounding  confucian  conquest-empire  constraint-satisfaction  context  contracts  contradiction  contrarianism  cooperate-defect  coordination  core-rats  corporation  correlation  corruption  cost-benefit  counter-revolution  counterfactual  cracker-econ  creative  crime  criminology  critique  crooked  crosstab  cultural-dynamics  culture-war  culture  curiosity  current-events  cybernetics  cynicism-idealism  dark-arts  darwinian  data  database  dataset  death  debate  decision-making  decision-theory  deep-materialism  defense  degrees-of-freedom  democracy  demographic-transition  demographics  dennett  density  descriptive  developing-world  dignity  dimensionality  direct-indirect  direction  discipline  discrimination  discussion  disease  distribution  diversity  documentary  documentation  douthatish  drama  drugs  duty  dynamic  early-modern  ecology  econ-metrics  econ-productivity  econometrics  economics  econotariat  eden  education  eea  effect-size  effective-altruism  efficiency  egalitarianism-hierarchy  egt  elections  electromag  elite  embedded-cognition  embodied  emergent  emotion  empirical  endo-exo  endogenous-exogenous  energy-resources  enhancement  enlightenment-renaissance-restoration-reformation  entrepreneurialism  environment  environmental-effects  envy  epistemic  equilibrium  ergodic  eric-kaufmann  error  essay  essence-existence  ethanol  ethics  ethnocentrism  ethnography  eu  europe  events  evolution  evopsych  exit-voice  expert-experience  expert  explanans  exploratory  expression-survival  extra-introversion  facebook  farmers-and-foragers  fashun  fertility  feudal  film  finance  flexibility  flux-stasis  foreign-policy  formal-values  forms-instances  free-riding  frequency  frontier  fungibility-liquidity  futurism  gallic  game-theory  garett-jones  gender-diff  gender  general-survey  generalization  genetics  genomics  geoengineering  geography  germanic  gnon  gnosis-logos  gnxp  google  government  grad-school  gray-econ  great-powers  group-level  group-selection  growth-econ  gt-101  gwas  habit  haidt  hanson  hari-seldon  healthcare  heavy-industry  henrich  heterodox  heuristic  hidden-motives  higher-ed  history  hmm  homo-hetero  honor  housing  howto  human-bean  humility  huntington  hypocrisy  ideas  identity-politics  ideology  idk  illusion  impetus  incentives  increase-decrease  india  individualism-collectivism  industrial-org  inequality  info-dynamics  info-econ  infographic  information-theory  infrastructure  innovation  insight  instinct  institutions  integrity  interests  internet  intersection-connectedness  intervention  interview  intricacy  iran  iron-age  is-ought  islam  iteration-recursion  japan  journos-pundits  judaism  justice  knowledge  korea  kumbaya-kult  labor  language  large-factor  latin-america  law  leadership  lee-kuan-yew  left-wing  legacy  lens  let-me-see  letters  leviathan  life-history  links  list  literature  lived-experience  local-global  lol  long-short-run  long-term  longform  longitudinal  love-hate  low-hanging  lurid  machiavelli  machine-learning  madisonian  magnitude  malaise  malthus  managerial-state  maps  marginal-rev  marginal  market-power  markets  martial  mathtariat  matrix-factorization  meaningness  mechanism-design  media  medicine  medieval  mediterranean  memes(ew)  mena  meta:rhetoric  meta:science  meta:war  metabuch  metameta  methodology  micro  microfoundations  migrant-crisis  migration  military  minimum-viable  missing-heritability  mobility  models  moments  monetary-fiscal  money  mood-affiliation  morality  mostly-modern  multi  murray  mystic  myth  n-factor  nascent-state  nationalism-globalism  natural-experiment  nature  near-far  network-structure  neurons  new-religion  news  nibble  nietzschean  nihil  nl-and-so-can-you  noble-lie  noblesse-oblige  nordic  north-weingast-like  northeast  nyc  obama  objective-measure  objektbuch  occident  oceans  old-anglo  open-closed  openaccess  operational  opioids  optimate  optimization  order-disorder  org:anglo  org:biz  org:bleg  org:data  org:econlib  org:edge  org:edu  org:foreign  org:gov  org:junk  org:lite  org:local  org:mag  org:mat  org:med  org:nat  org:ngo  org:popup  org:rec  organizing  orient  orwellian  other-xtian  outcome-risk  paleocon  papers  paradox  parenting  path-dependence  patho-altruism  patience  pdf  peace-violence  pennsylvania  people  personality  persuasion  phalanges  phase-transition  phd  philosophy  physics  pic  piracy  planning  poast  podcast  poetry  polanyi-marx  polarization  policy  polis  polisci  political-econ  politics  poll  pop-structure  population-genetics  population  populism  portland  postmortem  power  pragmatic  pre-ww2  prediction  preference-falsification  prejudice  preprint  presentation  pro-rata  problem-solving  profile  propaganda  properties  property-rights  proposal  protestant-catholic  prudence  pseudoe  psych-architecture  psychiatry  psychology  public-goodish  putnam-like  q-n-a  qra  quantum  questions  quiz  quotes  race  random-networks  randy-ayndy  ranking  rationality  ratty  realness  realpolitik  reason  recommendations  reddit  redistribution  reduction  reference  reflection  regression  regularizer  regulation  reinforcement  religion  rent-seeking  responsibility  review  revolution  rhetoric  rhythm  right-wing  ritual  roots  rot  s-factor  s:**  sampling-bias  sanctity-degradation  sapiens  scale  scaling-tech  schelling  science  scitariat  scott-sumner  selection  self-control  self-interest  self-report  selfish-gene  sequential  sex  sexuality  shift  signaling  similarity  simulation  sinosphere  skeleton  sleep  slippery-slope  social-capital  social-choice  social-norms  social-psych  social-science  social-structure  social  sociality  society  sociology  spearhead  speculation  spock  ssc  stat-mech  state  statesmen  status  stereotypes  stories  strategy  straussian  street-fighting  stress  study  stylized-facts  subculture  summary  supply-demand  survey  sv  symmetry  systematic-ad-hoc  tactics  taxes  tcstariat  tech  technocracy  technology  techtariat  telos-atelos  terrorism  the-basilisk  the-bones  the-classics  the-devil  the-founding  the-great-west-whale  the-self  the-south  the-watchers  the-west  the-world-is-just-atoms  theory-of-mind  theos  things  thinking  time-preference  time-series  time-use  time  tocqueville  todo  tools  top-n  toxoplasmosis  track-record  trade  tradeoffs  tradition  transportation  trends  tribalism  trivia  troll  trump  trust  truth  turchin  tv  twin-study  twitter  unaffiliated  uncertainty  unintended-consequences  uniqueness  universalism-particularism  urban-rural  urban  us-them  usa  values  vampire-squid  variance-components  video  visualization  volo-avolo  walls  war  water  waves  wealth-of-nations  wealth  welfare-state  west-hunter  westminster  whiggish-hegelian  white-paper  whiteness  whole-partial-many  wiki  winner-take-all  wisdom  within-group  wonkish  world-war  world  worrydream  wtf  x-not-about-y  yvain  zeitgeist  zero-positive-sum  🌞  🎓  🎩  🐸  🔬 

Copy this bookmark:



description:


tags: