charlesdarwin   167

« earlier    

Untitled (
RT : Cheers to ! Born on this date in 1809.

Like the design? Visit for great gift…
CharlesDarwin  from twitter
february 2019 by rubywhite
RT : Cheers to ! Born on this date in 1809.

Like the design? Visit for great gift…
CharlesDarwin  from twitter
february 2019 by rubywhite
RT : It's time for the last (weep!) of 's amazing animations. meets the funky gi…
CharlesDarwin  periodical  from twitter
november 2018 by kevinmarks
Survival of the Kindest: Dacher Keltner Reveals the New Rules of Power
"When Pixar was dreaming up the idea for Inside Out, a film that would explore the roiling emotions inside the head of a young girl, they needed guidance from an expert. So they called Dacher Keltner.

Dacher is a psychologist at UC Berkeley who has dedicated his career to understanding how human emotion shapes the way we interact with the world, how we properly manage difficult or stressful situations, and ultimately, how we treat one another.

In fact, he refers to emotions as the “language of social living.” The more fluent we are in this language, the happier and more meaningful our lives can be.

We tackle a wide variety of topics in this conversation that I think you’ll really enjoy.

You’ll learn:

• The three main drivers that determine your personal happiness and life satisfaction
• Simple things you can do everyday to jumpstart the “feel good” reward center of your brain
• The principle of “jen” and how we can use “high-jen behaviors” to bootstrap our own happiness
• How to have more positive influence in our homes, at work and in our communities.
• How to teach your kids to be more kind and empathetic in an increasingly self-centered world
• What you can do to stay grounded and humble if you are in a position of power or authority
• How to catch our own biases when we’re overly critical of another’s ideas (or overconfident in our own)

And much more. We could have spent an hour discussing any one of these points alone, but there was so much I wanted to cover. I’m certain you’ll find this episode well worth your time."
compassion  kindness  happiness  dacherkeltner  power  charlesdarwin  evolution  psychology  culture  society  history  race  racism  behavior  satisfaction  individualism  humility  authority  humans  humanism  morality  morals  multispecies  morethanhuman  objects  wisdom  knowledge  heidegger  ideas  science  socialdarwinism  class  naturalselection  egalitarianism  abolitionism  care  caring  art  vulnerability  artists  scientists  context  replicability  research  socialsciences  2018  statistics  replication  metaanalysis  socialcontext  social  borntobegood  change  human  emotions  violence  evolutionarypsychology  slvery  rape  stevenpinker  torture  christopherboehm  hunter-gatherers  gender  weapons  democracy  machiavelli  feminism  prisons  mentalillness  drugs  prisonindustrialcomplex  progress  politics  1990s  collaboration  canon  horizontality  hierarchy  small  civilization  cities  urban  urbanism  tribes  religion  dogma  polygamy  slavery  pigeons  archaeology  inequality  nomads  nomadism  anarchism  anarchy  agriculture  literacy  ruleoflaw  humanrights  governance  government  hannah 
march 2018 by robertogreco
Conner Habib on Twitter: "13 I learned not just about science from Lynn, but a whole new way of thinking. One that allows me to stand back and see the big picture - G…"
"I learned not just about science from Lynn, but a whole new way of thinking. One that allows me to stand back and see the big picture - Gaia - and to lean forward and see the tiniest details - the microcosm.

She is one of the most brilliant visionaries of our time."

I want to tell you about an amazing woman who changed my life, and who you need to know about if you don't already: biologist Lynn Margulis.

She died on this day, 6 years ago.
She was my main intellectual mentor in life, my friend, my second mom.

Lynn made quite a few major scientific discoveries.
She's best known for proving that organisms and cells that have nucleuses have symbiotic origins - that they originate from the coming together of different bacteria (and sometimes protoctists/protozoa)

She also discovered, with James Lovelock, that the Earth regulates itself quite a bit like an organism - particularly through the interactions of bacteria and the abiota (the non-living aspects of the environment). This is called the Gaia Theory or biogeochemistry.

She created a whole new theory of evolution, of which Lewis Thomas said, "Darwin was wrong, and Lynn Margulis is right." That theory is in her book Acquiring Genomes with co-author Dorion Sagan.

When offered potentially millions of dollars by the US govt to do research on bacteria that could help with defense, Lynn Margulis hung up on the phone on them. She said, "If it's not public, it's not science."

If you've heard anything about gut biomes, that is a direct result of Lynn's tireless work, yet she is rarely credited.

Lynn's theory of evolution came from rejecting the capitalistic cost-benefit analysis version of evolution adopted by ppl like Richard Dawkins (who has almost no lab experience comparatively). She rediscovered the science of symbiotic evolution, pioneered by Russian scientists.

She was well-versed in postmodern theory and studied philosophy. She was fond of saying, "the first thing scientists need to learn is that there's no objective truth."
She knew hundreds of Emily Dickinson poems by heart and lived in the house next to hers in Amherst.

She won just about every science award you could ever win, except the Nobel, which she no doubt would have won had she not died of a stroke on this day in 2011.

In spite of her being one of the most influential and profound minds of our time, she is often overshadowed by her late husband, Carl Sagan. He was a fine person, but nowhere near as arduous in his efforts or profound in his thinking as Lynn Margulis.

I approached her after I started my grad studies as an MFA student. Lynn tried to dismiss me at first. "What does this have to do with environmental evolution?" was the first thing she said to me.

"I want to take your classes," I said.
She was thrilled that I was in the humanities&wanted to take science courses. I studied with her for three yrs.
She became my closest teacher. She took me to science conferences and gave me my most profound educational experiences.

I learned not just about science from Lynn, but a whole new way of thinking. One that allows me to stand back and see the big picture - Gaia - and to lean forward and see the tiniest details - the microcosm.
She is one of the most brilliant visionaries of our time.

Lynn was a huge supporter of my decision to be in gay porn. She was lustful and sexual and very much a proponent of sexual liberation.

Please join me in honoring this tremendous intellect today.
I wrote an essay summarizing her work shortly after her death. It's under my Birthname so that her colleagues would recognize me as the author.
Here it is: "
lynnmargulis  zoominginandout  earth  perspective  connerhabib  details  systemsthinking  bigpicture  gaia  microcosm  science  andrekhalil  carlsagan  postodernism  philosophy  principles  bacteria  evolution  richarddawkins  charlesdarwin  doriansagan 
november 2017 by robertogreco
RT : My article on 's ethics is out in ! Here's a link to the article on Project Muse:…
CharlesDarwin  from twitter
november 2017 by jrosenau
Cyborgology: What is The History of The Quantified Self a History of?
[from Part 1:]

"In the past few months, I’ve posted about two works of long-form scholarship on the Quantified Self: Debora Lupton’s The Quantified Self and Gina Neff and Dawn Nufus’s Self-Tracking. Neff recently edited a volume of essays on QS (Quantified: Biosensing Technologies in Everyday Life, MIT 2016), but I’d like to take a not-so-brief break from reviewing books to address an issue that has been on my mind recently. Most texts that I read about the Quantified Self (be they traditional scholarship or more informal) refer to a meeting in 2007 at the house of Kevin Kelly for the official start to the QS movement. And while, yes, the name “Quantified Self” was coined by Kelly and his colleague Gary Wolf (the former founded Wired, the latter was an editor for the magazine), the practice of self-tracking obviously goes back much further than 10 years. Still, most historical references to the practice often point to Sanctorius of Padua, who, per an oft-cited study by consultant Melanie Swan, “studied energy expenditure in living systems by tracking his weight versus food intake and elimination for 30 years in the 16th century.” Neff and Nufus cite Benjamin Franklin’s practice of keeping a daily record of his time use. These anecdotal histories, however, don’t give us much in terms of understanding what a history of the Quantified Self is actually a history of.

Briefly, what I would like to prove over the course of a few posts is that at the heart of QS are statistics, anthropometrics, and psychometrics. I recognize that it’s not terribly controversial to suggest that these three technologies (I hesitate to call them “fields” here because of how widely they can be applied), all developed over the course of the nineteenth century, are critical to the way that QS works. Good thing, then, that there is a second half to my argument: as I touched upon briefly in my [shameless plug alert] Theorizing the Web talk last week, these three technologies were also critical to the proliferation of eugenics, that pseudoscientific attempt at strengthening the whole of the human race by breeding out or killing off those deemed deficient.

I don’t think it’s very hard to see an analogous relationship between QS and eugenics: both movements are predicated on anthropometrics and psychometrics, comparisons against norms, and the categorization and classification of human bodies as a result of the use of statistical technologies. But an analogy only gets us so far in seeking to build a history. I don’t think we can just jump from Francis Galton’s ramblings at the turn of one century to Kevin Kelly’s at the turn of the next. So what I’m going to attempt here is a sort of Foucauldian genealogy—from what was left of eugenics after its [rightful, though perhaps not as complete as one would hope] marginalization in the 1940s through to QS and the multi-billion dollar industry the movement has inspired.

I hope you’ll stick around for the full ride—it’s going to take a a number of weeks. For now, let’s start with a brief introduction to that bastion of Western exceptionalism: the eugenics movement."

[from Part 2:

"Here we begin to see an awkward situation in our quest to draw a line from Galton and hard-line eugenics (we will differentiate between hardline and “reform” eugenics further on) to the quantified self movement. Behaviorism sits diametrically opposed to eugenics for a number of reasons. Firstly, it does not distinguish between human and animal beings—certainly a tenet to which Galton and his like would object, understanding that humans are the superior species and a hierarchy of greatness existing within that species as well. Secondly, behaviorism accepts that outside, environmental influences will change the psychology of a subject. In 1971, Skinner argued that “An experimental analysis shifts the determination of behavior from autonomous man to the environment—an environment responsible both for the evolution of the species and for the repertoire acquired by each member” (214). This stands in direct conflict with the eugenical ideal that physical and psychological makeup is determined by heredity. Indeed, the eugenicist Robert Yerkes, otherwise close with Watson, wholly rejected the behaviorist’s views (Hergenhahn 400). Tracing the quantified-self’s behaviorist and self-experimental roots, then, leaves us without a very strong connection to the ideologies driving eugenics. Still, using Pearson as a hint, there may be a better path to follow."]

[from Part 3:

"The history of Galton and eugenics, then, can be traced into the history of personality tests. Once again, we come up against an awkward transition—this time from personality tests into the Quantified Self. Certainly, shades of Galtonian psychometrics show themselves to be present in QS technologies—that is, the treatment of statistical datasets for the purpose of correlation and prediction. Galton’s word association tests strongly influenced the MBTI, a test that, much like Quantified Self projects, seeks to help a subject make the right decisions in their life, though not through traditional Galtonian statistical tools. The MMPI and 16PFQ are for psychological evaluative purposes. And while some work has been done to suggest that “mental wellness” can be improved through self-tracking (see Kelley et al., Wolf 2009), much of the self-tracking ethos is based on factors that can be adjusted in order to see a correlative change in the subject (Wolf 2009). That is, by tracking my happiness on a daily basis against the amount of coffee I drink or the places I go, then I am acknowledging an environmental approach and declaring that my current psychological state is not set by my genealogy. A gap, then, between Galtonian personality tests and QS."]

[from Part 4 (Finale):

"What is the history of the quantified self a history of? One could point to technological advances in circuitry miniaturization or in big data collection and processing. The proprietary and patented nature of the majority of QS devices precludes certain types of inquiry into their invention and proliferation. But it is not difficult to identify one of QS’s most critical underlying tenets: self-tracking for the purpose of self-improvement through the identification of behavioral and environmental variables critical to one’s physical and psychological makeup. Recognizing the importance of this premise to QS allows us to trace back through the scientific fields which have strongly influenced the QS movement—from both a consumer and product standpoint. Doing so, however, reveals a seeming incommensurability between an otherwise analogous pair: QS and eugenics. A eugenical emphasis on heredity sits in direct conflict to a self-tracker’s belief that a focus on environmental factors could change one’s life for the better—even while both are predicated on statistical analysis, both purport to improve the human stock, and both, as argued by Dale Carrico, make assertions towards what is a “normal” human.

A more complicated relationship between the two is revealed upon attempting this genealogical connection. What I have outlined over the past few weeks is, I hope, only the beginning of such a project. I chose not to produce a rhetorical analysis of the visual and textual language of efficiency in both movements—from that utilized by the likes of Frederick Taylor and his eugenicist protégés, the Gilbreths, to what Christina Cogdell calls “Biological Efficiency and Streamline Design” in her work, Eugenic Design, and into a deep trove of rhetoric around efficiency utilized by market-available QS device marketers. Nor did I aim to produce an exhaustive bibliographic lineage. I did, however, seek to use the strong sense of self-experimentation in QS to work backwards towards the presence of behaviorism in early-twentieth century eugenical rhetoric. Then, moving in the opposite direction, I tracked the proliferation of Galtonian psychometrics into mid-century personality test development and eventually into the risk-management goals of the neoliberal surveillance state. I hope that what I have argued will lead to a more in-depth investigation into each step along this homological relationship. In the grander scheme, I see this project as part of a critical interrogation into the Quantified Self. By throwing into sharp relief the linkages between eugenics and QS, I seek to encourage resistance to fetishizing the latter’s technologies and their output, as well as the potential for meaningful change via those technologies."]
gabischaffzin  quantifiedself  2017  kevinkelly  garywolf  eugenics  anthropometrics  psychometrics  measurement  statistics  heredity  francisgalton  charlesdarwin  adolphequetelet  normal  psychology  pernilsroll-hansen  michelfoucault  majianadesan  self-regulation  marginalization  anthropology  technology  data  personality  henryfairfieldosborn  moralbehaviorism  behaviorism  williamepstein  mitchelldean  neoliberalism  containment  risk  riskassessment  freedom  rehabilitation  responsibility  obligation  dalecarrico  fredericktaylor  christinacogdell  surveillance  nikolasrose  myers-briggs  mbti  katherinebriggs  isabelbriggsmeyers  bellcurve  emilkraepelin  charlesspearman  rymondcattell  personalitytests  allenneuringer  microsoft  self-experimentation  gamification  deborahlupton  johnwatson  robertyerkes  ginaneff  dawnnufus  self-tracking  melanieswan  benjaminfranklin  recordkeeping  foucault 
may 2017 by robertogreco
23 of the Most Amazingly Successful Introverts in History
01. Albert Einstein
02. Rosa Parks
03. Bill Gates
04. Steven Spielberg
05. Sir Isaac Newton
06. Eleanor Roosevelt
07. Mark Zuckerberg
08. Larry Page
09. Al Gore
10. Marissa Mayer
11. Abraham Lincoln
12. JK Rowling
13. Warren Buffett
14. Mahatma Gandhi
15. Hillary Clinton
16. Michael Jordan
17. Charles Darwin
18. Meryl Streep
19. Elon Musk
20. Dr. Seuss
21. Frederic Chopin
22. Steve Wozniak
23. Barack Obama
introverts  success  alberteinstein  rosaparks  billgates  stevenspielberg  sirisaacnewton  eleanorroosevelt  markzuckerberg  larrypage  algore  marissamayer  abrahamlincoln  jkrowling  warrenbuffett  mahatmagandhi  hillaryclinton  michaeljordan  charlesdarwin  merylstreep  elonmusk  drseuss  fredericchopin  stevewozniak  barackobama  2015 
september 2016 by Frontrunner
His white suit unsullied by research, Tom Wolfe tries to take down Charles Darwin and Noam Chomsky - The Washington Post
"Somewhere on his mission to tear down the famous, elevate the neglected outsider and hit the exclamation-point key as often as possible, Wolfe has forgotten how to think."
tomwolfe  charlesdarwin  noamchomsky  evolution  linguistics 
september 2016 by rafguns
Who Will Debunk The Debunkers? | FiveThirtyEight
It seems plausible that the tellers of these tales are getting blinkered by their own feelings of superiority — that the mere act of busting myths makes them more susceptible to spreading them.
truth  science  supermyth  Popeye  spinach  CharlesDarwin  evolution  critique  FiveThirtyEight  2016 
april 2016 by inspiral

« earlier    

related tags

1800s  1832  1851  1944  1953  1987  1989  1990  1990s  1992  19thcentury  2010  2011  2012  2013  2014  2015  2016  2017  2018  8-bit  abahamlincoln  abolitionism  abrahamlincoln  adaptation  adolfhitler  adolphequetelet  adrianmanning  adventure  agency  ageofenlightenment  aging  agriculture  albemarlepeninsula  alberteinstein  alexandervonhumboldt  alfredrusselwallace  alfredwallace  alfredward  algonquinwolf  algore  allenneuringer  alt.polyamory  altruism  amybalkin  anabjain  anarchism  anarchy  andersbreivik  andrekhalil  animals  annamunster  annehelmond  anthropocene  anthropology  anthropometrics  apocalypse  apologetics  appification  applications  appstore  arashrashed  archaeology  architecture  arnoldbender  art  artists  arvidguterstam  ascensionisland  atheism  atlases  attention  australia  authority  bacteria  bali  bannedbooksweek  barackobama  barbie  bears  behavior  behavioralstudies  behaviorism  beingbarbie  belief  bellcurve  benjaminfranklin  benjaminlibet  bigpicture  billgates  bio-techno-capitalism  biogeography  biologicaldeterminism  biology  biotechnology  birding  birds  bitdepth  björnvanderhoort  blackbox  blame  bodyimage  bonobos  book  books  borders  borges  borntobegood  brain  brazil  brianhayes  brianlarkin  bryannelson  canada  cancer  canon  capitalism  care  caring  carllinnaeus  carlsagan  carolmotts  cascadingstylesheets  catalogs  cats  caw  chalresdarwin  change  charity  charlesspearman  charlesstankievech  chartmerriam  checksandbalances  children  chimpanzees  choice  christinacogdell  christopherboehm  church  circulation  citations  cities  civilization  class  classification  climate  clothing  cloud  clouds  clymenedolphin  cognition  collaboration  color  commons  compassion  competition  complexity  confirmationbias  conflictresolution  connerhabib  conservation  containment  context  controlrelease  controversies  cooperation  corruption  cosmopolitanism  courage  court  coyotes  coywolves  craigcannon  creationism  creativity  criticism  critics  critique  culture  curiosity  curtiscarley  dabbling  dacherkeltner  dalailama  dalecarrico  danielcardoso  danielengber  danieleverett  darkecologyandreapolli  darwin  darwinday  data  davidbyrne  daviddeutsch  dawnnufus  deafblind  death  debate  deborahanapol  deborahcowen  deborahlupton  delicious-export  democracy  denbosch  denisovans  depression  depth  design  details  determination  determinism  deterrent  differentiation  digitalhumanities  discreetness  dispersal  dna  documentary  documents  dogma  dogs  domesticcats  doriansagan  drones  drseuss  drugs  duskyseasidesparrow  earth  ebooks  ecology  economicandsocialresearchcouncil  economics  ecosystems  ecsegar  education  edwardowilson  egalitarianism  eleanorroosevelt  elonmusk  emilkraepelin  emilyhorne  emotions  empathy  empowerment  endangeredspeciesact  enlightenment  entertainment  environment  eowilson  equilibrium  erichvonwolff  ernstmayr  eschatology  ethics  ethnography  eugenics  evolution  evolutionarybiology  evolutionarypsychology  extinction  facebook  factcheck  faith  fakenews  fallibility  famine  farnham  fascism  fatalism  femininity  feminism  fieldguides  fieldwork  fivethirtyeight  floridapanther  flows  focus  foucalt  foucault  foxhog  franceshodgsonburnett  francisgalton  frankrheindt  fransdewaal  fredericchopin  fredericktaylor  freedom  freewill  fruitfly  fuegians  funny  gabischaffzin  gaia  galápagos  games  gametheory  gamification  gaming  garywolf  gender  generalists  generosity  genetics  geoffreymiller  geography  georgeprice  ginaneff  girls  giving  good  google  governance  government  grammar  graywolf  greenegg  groups  guides  handwritten  hannaharendt  happiness  haroldhart  health  heidegger  helenmacdonald  helgatawil-souri  henrikehrsson  henryclappsherman  henryfairfieldosborn  heredity  heroes  heroism  hierarchy  hieronymusbosch  hillaryclinton  history  histsci  hitler  holgerklein  homeopathy  homosapiens  hope  hopefulmonsters  horizontality  human  humanbehavior  humanism  humannature  humanrights  humans  humility  hunter-gatherers  hunting  hybrids  hydecounty-nc  iainboal  iannairn  ianwebster  iceland  ideas  ignazsemelweis  illusionism  illustration  immortal  individualism  inequality  inequity  inequityaversion  ingridburrington  instinct  intelligence  intelligentdesign  interdisciplinarity  interdisciplinary  internet  interview  intimidation  introverts  invasion  io9  isaacnewton  isabelbriggsmeyers  islands  isolation  jacksonpope  jakobvonuexküll  jamescorner  jandeblieu  janerendell  jeanbaptistelamarck  jellyfish  jenniferwesp  jerrycoyne  jimcollins  jkrowling  jmwturner  joelsartore  johnberger  johnconstable  johngittleman  johnjamesaudobon  johnwatson  jonahlehrer  jonardern  jorisstrijbos  josephinegrieder  josephmcelroy  journalism  judithschalansky  karlpearson  karlpopper  kateascher  katedavies  katherinebriggs  kevinkelly  kids  kindness  kingdomofspeech  knowledge  labor  language  larrypage  laurabridgman  ldavidmech  leaders  leadership  learning  letter  lettersofnote  lgbt  liamyoung  libbyrobin  life  lifespan  linguistics  lisaparks  listening  literacy  literature  living  lombok  longevity  lordhoweisland  louiseamoore  love  luck  lukehowardcaspardavidfriedrich  lynnmargulis  machiavelli  machines  magdabiernat  mahatmagandhi  mairakalman  majianadesan  mammals  mapping  maps  marginalization  marissamayer  markzuckerberg  math  mating  mattcohen  mbti  meaning  measurement  medicine  melanieswan  meme  mentalillness  merylstreep  metaanalysis  michaelarnold  michaeljordan  michaellewis  michaelpolak  michaelweale  michelfoucault  microcosm  microsoft  mikesutton  mikhailzelany  millsbaker  mind  misconception  mitchelldean  mood  moralbehaviorism  morality  moralliberty  morals  morethanhuman  morninggloryzellravenheart  mothernaturenetwork  movies  multispecies  music  myers-briggs  naturalselection  nature  naturenurture  nazis  nazism  neanderthals  neoliberalism  networks  neurobiology  neurons  neuroscience  nevenmrgan  newrepublic  newscientist  newyorkpubliclibrary  newzealand  niceness  nicolestarosielski  nikolasrose  noamchomsky  nomadism  nomads  normal  northamerica  northcarolina  norway  nutrition  nytimes  oberonzell  objects  obligation  odyshape  olebjornrekdal  online  onlinecommunities  orenharman  originofspecies  overpopulation  panic  passion  patrickmatthew  pauledwards  paypal  people  perception  periodical  pernilsroll-hansen  personality  personalitytests  perspective  peterveth  philosophy  philosopy  photography  photoshop  picoiyer  pigeons  piraha  pizzlybear  plants  plato  pleasure  poetry  pointdefiancezoo  polish  politics  polyamory  polyfidelity  polygamy  popeye  portugal  poster  postodernism  poverty  power  powercorrupts  powerreveals  primates  principles  printing  prisonindustrialcomplex  prisons  privilege  proffesionalization  progress  propaganda  pseudoscience  psychology  psychometrics  publicdomain  purpose  quantifiedself  race  racism  radio  radiolab  rape  raycomfort  re:build  reconciliation  recordkeeping  redwolf  rehabilitation  relationships  religion  replicability  replication  reproduction  republicofletters  research  responsibility  review  richarddawkins  risk  riskassessment  robertheinlein  robertmacarthur  robertwayne  robertyerkes  rogertorypeterson  ronaldnowak  rosaparks  rss  rubenpater  ruleoflaw  russellsagecollege  ryannearing  rymondcattell  samharris  samuelarbesman  sarahkanouse  sarascarf  sarawatson  satisfaction  saulsmilansky  scarcity  science  sciene  scientificunderstanding  scientists  scifi  scottedwards  secretgarden  secretsmw  self-experimentation  self-preservation  self-regulation  self-tracking  selfishness  selflessness  semmelweisreflex  sensemaking  separation  service  sexuality  sexualselection  shakespeare  shannonmattern  sherwinnuland  shipping  sideprojects  simulation  sirisaacnewton  sisselabok  skepticism  skeptics  slavery  slvery  small  snark  social  socialcontext  socialdarwinism  socialsciences  society  sociology  software  sorting  specialists  specialization  species  spencerschaffner  spinach  statistics  stevenpinker  stevenspielberg  stevewozniak  stuartpimm  success  suffering  sulawesicrestedmacaques  superflux  supermyth  surtseyisland  surveillance  survival  susanjenks  susanleigh  suzanneewing  systemacity  systemsthinking  taxonomy  teaching  techno-capitalism  technology  television  terencehamblin  terraforming  terrenceboyle  theauk  theknife  theodicy  theology  theories  thinking  thomasforster  thomasmalthus  thought  thoughtcrime  tierradelfuego  timhwang  timmaly  tomwolfe  topheadlines  torture  trailers  transmit  transparency  trentuniversity  tribes  truth  truthtopower  tweecious  twitter  ucla  ucsd  understanding  universe  unknownfieldsdivision  urban  urbanism  usa  usenet  usfishandwildlife  video  videogames  videos  violence  vision  visualization  vivaria  voyageofthebeagle  vsamachandran  vulnerability  want  warrenbuffett  washpost  wealth  wealthy  weapons  web  whatweknow  whywework  wilderness  wildlife  wilflife  williamepstein  wisdom  wishlist  withholding  wolves  women  work  writing  yrjöhaila  zoominginandout 

Copy this bookmark: