calltoaction   440

« earlier    

Who's In?
"Get up off your ass and do something good - Doing good shouldn't be hard. Find a project near you to get involved with."
inspiration  calltoaction 
9 weeks ago by robertocarroll
Our Approach to User Onboarding Is Incomplete. Here’s Why.
Good user onboarding does three things—it educates users on the problem, it showcases the features of your solution, and it signals that that ‘better life’ the user signed up for is right around the corner.

Use user awareness of the problem as a guide.
calltoaction  _wsi 
may 2018 by robertocarroll
Twitter
RT : America's Reality Check: 10 Real & Serious Issues where UBI will help.
Resist  CallToAction  BasicIncome  4FTL  from twitter_favs
march 2018 by roens
We want YOU to help shape our brand 👊
Join Live Q&A sessions 💻

We want to engage and communicate with you at every opportunity, so we'll be launching live online Q&A sessions with key members of the Revolut team to answer all of your questions. From engineers to data scientists, we'll keep it as open and as interesting as possible.
calltoaction  _wsi 
march 2018 by robertocarroll
Twitter
RT : America's Reality Check: 10 Real & Serious Issues where UBI will help.
4FTL  Resist  BasicIncome  CallToAction  from twitter_favs
march 2018 by roens
Dropbox - HeForShe Partner Materials (External)
Examples of materials for people to use to promote HeForShe.
calltoaction  design  _wsi 
february 2018 by robertocarroll
No one’s coming. It’s up to us. – Dan Hon – Medium
"Getting from here to there

This is all very well and good. But what can we do? And more precisely, what “we”? There’s increasing acceptance of the reality that the world we live in is intersectional and we all play different and simultaneous roles in our lives. The society of “we” includes technologists who have a chance of affecting the products and services, it includes customers and users, it includes residents and citizens.

I’ve made this case above, but I feel it’s important enough to make again: at a high level, I believe that we need to:

1. Clearly decide what kind of society we want; and then

2. Design and deliver the technologies that forever get us closer to achieving that desired society.

This work is hard and, arguably, will never be completed. It necessarily involves compromise. Attitudes, beliefs and what’s considered just changes over time.

That said, the above are two high level goals, but what can people do right now? What can we do tactically?

What we can do now

I have two questions that I think can be helpful in guiding our present actions, in whatever capacity we might find ourselves.

For all of us: What would it look like, and how might our societies be different, if technology were better aligned to society’s interests?

At the most general level, we are all members of a society, embedded in existing governing structures. It certainly feels like in the recent past, those governing structures are coming under increasing strain, and part of the blame is being laid at the feet of technology.

One of the most important things we can do collectively is to produce clarity and prioritization where we can. Only by being clearer and more intentional about the kind of society we want and accepting what that means, can our societies and their institutions provide guidance and leadership to technology.

These are questions that cannot and should not be left to technologists alone. Advances in technology mean that encryption is a societal issue. Content moderation and censorship are a societal issue. Ultimately, it should be for governments (of the people, by the people) to set expectations and standards at the societal level, not organizations accountable only to a board of directors and shareholders.

But to do this, our governing institutions will need to evolve and improve. It is easier, and faster, for platforms now to react to changing social mores. For example, platforms are responding in reaction to society’s reaction to “AI-generated fake porn” faster than governing and enforcing institutions.

Prioritizations may necessarily involve compromise, too: the world is not so simple, and we are not so lucky, that it can be easily and always divided into A or B, or good or not-good.

Some of my perspective in this area is reflective of the schism American politics is currently experiencing. In a very real way, America, my adoptive country of residence, is having to grapple with revisiting the idea of what America is for. The same is happening in my country of birth with the decision to leave the European Union.

These are fundamental issues. Technologists, as members of society, have a point of view on them. But in the way that post-enlightenment governing institutions were set up to protect against asymmetric distribution of power, technology leaders must recognize that their platforms are now an undeniable, powerful influence on society.

As a society, we must do the work to have a point of view. What does responsible technology look like?

For technologists: How can we be humane and advance the goals of our society?

As technologists, we can be excited about re-inventing approaches from first principles. We must resist that impulse here, because there are things that we can do now, that we can learn now, from other professions, industries and areas to apply to our own. For example:

* We are better and stronger when we are together than when we are apart. If you’re a technologist, consider this question: what are the pros and cons of unionizing? As the product of a linked network, consider the question: what is gained and who gains from preventing humans from linking up in this way?

* Just as we create design patterns that are best practices, there are also those that represent undesired patterns from our society’s point of view known as dark patterns. We should familiarise ourselves with them and each work to understand why and when they’re used and why their usage is contrary to the ideals of our society.

* We can do a better job of advocating for and doing research to better understand the problems we seek to solve, the context in which those problems exist and the impact of those problems. Only through disciplines like research can we discover in the design phase — instead of in production, when our work can affect millions — negative externalities or unintended consequences that we genuinely and unintentionally may have missed.

* We must compassionately accept the reality that our work has real effects, good and bad. We can wish that bad outcomes don’t happen, but bad outcomes will always happen because life is unpredictable. The question is what we do when bad things happen, and whether and how we take responsibility for those results. For example, Twitter’s leadership must make clear what behaviour it considers acceptable, and do the work to be clear and consistent without dodging the issue.

* In America especially, technologists must face the issue of free speech head-on without avoiding its necessary implications. I suggest that one of the problems culturally American technology companies (i.e., companies that seek to emulate American culture) face can be explained in software terms. To use agile user story terminology, the problem may be due to focusing on a specific requirement (“free speech”) rather than the full user story (“As a user, I need freedom of speech, so that I can pursue life, liberty and happiness”). Free speech is a means to an end, not an end, and accepting that free speech is a means involves the hard work of considering and taking a clear, understandable position as to what ends.

* We have been warned. Academics — in particular, sociologists, philosophers, historians, psychologists and anthropologists — have been warning of issues such as large-scale societal effects for years. Those warnings have, bluntly, been ignored. In the worst cases, those same academics have been accused of not helping to solve the problem. Moving on from the past, is there not something that we technologists can learn? My intuition is that post the 2016 American election, middle-class technologists are now afraid. We’re all in this together. Academics are reaching out, have been reaching out. We have nothing to lose but our own shame.

* Repeat to ourselves: some problems don’t have fully technological solutions. Some problems can’t just be solved by changing infrastructure. Who else might help with a problem? What other approaches might be needed as well?

There’s no one coming. It’s up to us.

My final point is this: no one will tell us or give us permission to do these things. There is no higher organizing power working to put systemic changes in place. There is no top-down way of nudging the arc of technology toward one better aligned with humanity.

It starts with all of us.

Afterword

I’ve been working on the bigger themes behind this talk since …, and an invitation to 2017’s Foo Camp was a good opportunity to try to clarify and improve my thinking so that it could fit into a five minute lightning talk. It also helped that Foo Camp has the kind of (small, hand-picked — again, for good and ill) influential audience who would be a good litmus test for the quality of my argument, and would be instrumental in taking on and spreading the ideas.

In the end, though, I nearly didn’t do this talk at all.

Around 6:15pm on Saturday night, just over an hour before the lightning talks were due to start, after the unconference’s sessions had finished and just before dinner, I burst into tears talking to a friend.

While I won’t break the societal convention of confidentiality that helps an event like Foo Camp be productive, I’ll share this: the world felt too broken.

Specifically, the world felt broken like this: I had the benefit of growing up as a middle-class educated individual (albeit, not white) who believed he could trust that institutions were a) capable and b) would do the right thing. I now live in a country where a) the capability of those institutions has consistently eroded over time, and b) those institutions are now being systematically dismantled, to add insult to injury.

In other words, I was left with the feeling that there’s nothing left but ourselves.

Do you want the poisonous lead removed from your water supply? Your best bet is to try to do it yourself.

Do you want a better school for your children? Your best bet is to start it.

Do you want a policing policy that genuinely rehabilitates rather than punishes? Your best bet is to…

And it’s just. Too. Much.

Over the course of the next few days, I managed to turn my outlook around.

The answer, of course, is that it is too much for one person.

But it isn’t too much for all of us."
danhon  technology  2018  2017  johnperrybarlow  ethics  society  calltoaction  politics  policy  purpose  economics  inequality  internet  web  online  computers  computing  future  design  debchachra  ingridburrington  fredscharmen  maciejceglowski  timcarmody  rachelcoldicutt  stacy-marieishmael  sarahjeong  alexismadrigal  ericmeyer  timmaughan  mimionuoha  jayowens  jayspringett  stacktivism  georginavoss  damienwilliams  rickwebb  sarawachter-boettcher  jamebridle  adamgreenfield  foocamp  timoreilly  kaitlyntiffany  fredturner  tomcarden  blainecook  warrenellis  danhill  cydharrell  jenpahljka  robinray  noraryan  mattwebb  mattjones  danachisnell  heathercamp  farrahbostic  negativeexternalities  collectivism  zeyneptufekci  maciejcegłowski 
february 2018 by robertogreco
Twitter
:

Fusion GPS: "Conservative news outlets...have spun a succession of mendacious conspiracy theories a…
CallToAction  from twitter_favs
january 2018 by cranston
Stephanie Hurlburt on Twitter: "I'm going to go through every exercise in the Arduino Starter Kit for fun, & I'd love to introduce more folks to hardware fun too! If you live in the US & cant afford a kit for yourself, send me a DM introducing you
I'm going to go through every exercise in the Arduino Starter Kit for fun, & I'd love to introduce more folks to hardware fun too!

If you live in the US & cant afford a kit for yourself, send me a DM introducing yourself. I'll buy some kits for people
networks  calltoaction  _wsi 
december 2017 by robertocarroll
Call to Action: The 10 Most Effective Techniques to Improve Conversion
1. Focus on the value your call to action provides
2. Address the user’s questions about the call to action
3. Have a small number of distinct calls to action
10. Have a call to action on every page
design  marketing  _wsi  calltoaction 
december 2017 by robertocarroll
Twitter
Snap ☎️ :

17 state AGs are suing the FCC to . 33 are not.

State AGs are elected of…
CallToAction  SaveNetNeutrality  from twitter_favs
december 2017 by exlibris

« earlier    

related tags

#calltoaction  #videomarketing  2013  2014  2015  2016  2017  2018  4ftl  _wsad  _wsi  a/btest  aantonopoulos  action  actions  adamgreenfield  ads  adweek  agriculture  alexismadrigal  alternative  architecture  banners  basicincome  bestpractice  bitcoin  bitly  blainecook  button  buttons  buzzfeed  call-to-action  call  calls  capricorn  chatbot  cmo  cnn  code  collectivism  color  computers  computing  contentmarketing  contrast  conversion  cooperunion  copy  copywriting  creatur  crossover  cryptocurrency  css  cta  ctabuttongenerator  curationeg  customaudiences  customer  cydharrell  damienwilliams  danachisnell  danhill  danhon  danzarrella  data  debchachra  design  digitalmarketing  dotmailer  download  ebusiness  ecommerce  economics  email  emailing  emailmarketing  engagement  ericmeyer  ethics  examples  facebook  facebookexchange  facebookpages  farrahbostic  fitchannel  foocamp  fredscharmen  fredturner  future  fxbg  fxbgtv  georginavoss  getting  gmail  google  growthhacking  guide  headlines  heathercamp  howto  hubspot  inbound  inbound16  incentive  inequality  infographics  ingridburrington  insight  inspiration  internet  is  jamebridle  jayowens  jayspringett  jeffbullas  jenpahljka  johnperrybarlow  jq  kaitlyntiffany  labitconf  landingpage  launch  leadgeneration  length  links  lookalikeaudiences  maciejceglowski  maciejcegłowski  marketing  mattjones  mattwebb  mimionuoha  mobile  ncga  negativeexternalities  networks  newsfeed  newsfeedadvertising  noraryan  offer  online  onlineshop  onlinevideo  opendata  optimal  optimisation  optimization  pamorama  people  periscope  personalisation  photography  pinterest  plugin  policy  politics  popr  prevention  problem!  progressiveprofiling  psychology  purpose  rachelcoldicutt  redesign  relevancy  representationmatters  resist  retargeting  retweet  rickwebb  robinray  roi  rubikscube  sales  sarahjeong  sarawachter-boettcher  savenetneutrality  scroll-examples  seo  shop  smartinsights  sme  smm  smo  sniply  social  socialcallstoaction  socialmedia  socialnetworking  society  specialprosecutor  ssm  stacktivism  stacy-marieishmael  story  studentnewspaper  studenttrustee  subjectline  targeting  techcrunch  technology  test  testing  the  thepioneer  timcarmody  timmaughan  timoreilly  tips  to  tokemie  tomcarden  tool  transisbeautiful  tricks  trumprussia  twitter  tww  ui/ux  upworthy  usability  utility  ux  video  videomarketing  warrenellis  web  webdesign  webdev  websdesign  website  websites  webwriting  wordpress  writing  zeyneptufekci  | 

Copy this bookmark:



description:


tags: