bostrom   69

« earlier    

Eternity in six hours: intergalactic spreading of intelligent life and sharpening the Fermi paradox
We do this by demonstrating that traveling between galaxies – indeed even launching a colonisation project for the entire reachable universe – is a relatively simple task for a star-spanning civilization, requiring modest amounts of energy and resources. We start by demonstrating that humanity itself could likely accomplish such a colonisation project in the foreseeable future, should we want to, and then demonstrate that there are millions of galaxies that could have reached us by now, using similar methods. This results in a considerable sharpening of the Fermi paradox.
pdf  study  article  essay  anthropic  fermi  space  expansionism  bostrom  ratty  philosophy  xenobio  ideas  threat-modeling  intricacy  time  civilization  🔬  futurism  questions  paradox  risk  physics  engineering  interdisciplinary  frontier  technology  volo-avolo  dirty-hands  ai  automation  robotics  duplication  iteration-recursion  von-neumann  data  scale  magnitude  skunkworks  the-world-is-just-atoms  hard-tech  ems  bio  bits  speedometer  nature  model-organism  mechanics  phys-energy  relativity  electromag  analysis  spock  nitty-gritty  spreading  hanson  street-fighting  speed  gedanken  nibble 
march 2018 by nhaliday
Existential Risks: Analyzing Human Extinction Scenarios
https://twitter.com/robinhanson/status/981291048965087232
https://archive.is/dUTD5
Would you endorse choosing policy to max the expected duration of civilization, at least as a good first approximation?
Can anyone suggest a different first approximation that would get more votes?

https://twitter.com/robinhanson/status/981335898502545408
https://archive.is/RpygO
How useful would it be to agree on a relatively-simple first-approximation observable-after-the-fact metric for what we want from the future universe, such as total life years experienced, or civilization duration?

We're Underestimating the Risk of Human Extinction: https://www.theatlantic.com/technology/archive/2012/03/were-underestimating-the-risk-of-human-extinction/253821/
An Oxford philosopher argues that we are not adequately accounting for technology's risks—but his solution to the problem is not for Luddites.

Anderson: You have argued that we underrate existential risks because of a particular kind of bias called observation selection effect. Can you explain a bit more about that?

Bostrom: The idea of an observation selection effect is maybe best explained by first considering the simpler concept of a selection effect. Let's say you're trying to estimate how large the largest fish in a given pond is, and you use a net to catch a hundred fish and the biggest fish you find is three inches long. You might be tempted to infer that the biggest fish in this pond is not much bigger than three inches, because you've caught a hundred of them and none of them are bigger than three inches. But if it turns out that your net could only catch fish up to a certain length, then the measuring instrument that you used would introduce a selection effect: it would only select from a subset of the domain you were trying to sample.

Now that's a kind of standard fact of statistics, and there are methods for trying to correct for it and you obviously have to take that into account when considering the fish distribution in your pond. An observation selection effect is a selection effect introduced not by limitations in our measurement instrument, but rather by the fact that all observations require the existence of an observer. This becomes important, for instance, in evolutionary biology. For instance, we know that intelligent life evolved on Earth. Naively, one might think that this piece of evidence suggests that life is likely to evolve on most Earth-like planets. But that would be to overlook an observation selection effect. For no matter how small the proportion of all Earth-like planets that evolve intelligent life, we will find ourselves on a planet that did. Our data point-that intelligent life arose on our planet-is predicted equally well by the hypothesis that intelligent life is very improbable even on Earth-like planets as by the hypothesis that intelligent life is highly probable on Earth-like planets. When it comes to human extinction and existential risk, there are certain controversial ways that observation selection effects might be relevant.
bostrom  ratty  miri-cfar  skunkworks  philosophy  org:junk  list  top-n  frontier  speedometer  risk  futurism  local-global  scale  death  nihil  technology  simulation  anthropic  nuclear  deterrence  environment  climate-change  arms  competition  ai  ai-control  genetics  genomics  biotech  parasites-microbiome  disease  offense-defense  physics  tails  network-structure  epidemiology  space  geoengineering  dysgenics  ems  authoritarianism  government  values  formal-values  moloch  enhancement  property-rights  coordination  cooperate-defect  flux-stasis  ideas  prediction  speculation  humanity  singularity  existence  cybernetics  study  article  letters  eden-heaven  gedanken  multi  twitter  social  discussion  backup  hanson  metrics  optimization  time  long-short-run  janus  telos-atelos  poll  forms-instances  threat-modeling  selection  interview  expert-experience  malthus  volo-avolo  intel  leviathan  drugs  pharma  data  estimate  nature  longevity  expansionism  homo-hetero  utopia-dystopia 
march 2018 by nhaliday
[1705.03394] That is not dead which can eternal lie: the aestivation hypothesis for resolving Fermi's paradox
If a civilization wants to maximize computation it appears rational to aestivate until the far future in order to exploit the low temperature environment: this can produce a 10^30 multiplier of achievable computation. We hence suggest the "aestivation hypothesis": the reason we are not observing manifestations of alien civilizations is that they are currently (mostly) inactive, patiently waiting for future cosmic eras. This paper analyzes the assumptions going into the hypothesis and how physical law and observational evidence constrain the motivations of aliens compatible with the hypothesis.

http://aleph.se/andart2/space/the-aestivation-hypothesis-popular-outline-and-faq/

simpler explanation (just different math for Drake equation):
Dissolving the Fermi Paradox: http://www.jodrellbank.manchester.ac.uk/media/eps/jodrell-bank-centre-for-astrophysics/news-and-events/2017/uksrn-slides/Anders-Sandberg---Dissolving-Fermi-Paradox-UKSRN.pdf
http://marginalrevolution.com/marginalrevolution/2017/07/fermi-paradox-resolved.html
Overall the argument is that point estimates should not be shoved into a Drake equation and then multiplied by each, as that requires excess certainty and masks much of the ambiguity of our knowledge about the distributions. Instead, a Bayesian approach should be used, after which the fate of humanity looks much better. Here is one part of the presentation:

Life Versus Dark Energy: How An Advanced Civilization Could Resist the Accelerating Expansion of the Universe: https://arxiv.org/abs/1806.05203
The presence of dark energy in our universe is causing space to expand at an accelerating rate. As a result, over the next approximately 100 billion years, all stars residing beyond the Local Group will fall beyond the cosmic horizon and become not only unobservable, but entirely inaccessible, thus limiting how much energy could one day be extracted from them. Here, we consider the likely response of a highly advanced civilization to this situation. In particular, we argue that in order to maximize its access to useable energy, a sufficiently advanced civilization would chose to expand rapidly outward, build Dyson Spheres or similar structures around encountered stars, and use the energy that is harnessed to accelerate those stars away from the approaching horizon and toward the center of the civilization. We find that such efforts will be most effective for stars with masses in the range of M∼(0.2−1)M⊙, and could lead to the harvesting of stars within a region extending out to several tens of Mpc in radius, potentially increasing the total amount of energy that is available to a future civilization by a factor of several thousand. We also discuss the observable signatures of a civilization elsewhere in the universe that is currently in this state of stellar harvesting.
preprint  study  essay  article  bostrom  ratty  anthropic  philosophy  space  xenobio  computation  physics  interdisciplinary  ideas  hmm  cocktail  temperature  thermo  information-theory  bits  🔬  threat-modeling  time  scale  insight  multi  commentary  liner-notes  pdf  slides  error  probability  ML-MAP-E  composition-decomposition  econotariat  marginal-rev  fermi  risk  org:mat  questions  paradox  intricacy  multiplicative  calculation  street-fighting  methodology  distribution  expectancy  moments  bayesian  priors-posteriors  nibble  measurement  existence  technology  geoengineering  magnitude  spatial  density  spreading  civilization  energy-resources  phys-energy  measure  direction  speculation  structure 
may 2017 by nhaliday
The Philosopher of Doomsday - The New Yorker
Raffi Khatchadourian on Nick Bostrom, an Oxford philosopher who asks whether inventing artificial intelligence will bring us utopia or destruction.
technology  ai  philosophy  IFTTT  Pocket  tech  Archive  bostrom  future  instapaper 
april 2017 by otlib

« earlier    

related tags

0116  011916  060316  0616  2005  2016  2017-03-01  2017-03-02  2017-03-03  2017-03-04  80000-hours  abortion-contraception-embryo  abstraction  accuracy  acmtariat  additivism  advice  aesthetics  against  ai-control  ai-ethics  ai  algorithms  alignment  altruism  analysis  analytical-holistic  anthropic  anthropocene  anthropology  antidemos  apocalypse  approximation  aptivate  archive  arguments  arms  art  article  artificial  asia  atoms  attention  authoritarianism  automation  axioms  backup  barons  bayesian  behavioral-gen  benevolence  bias  biases  big-peeps  big-picture  bigdata  bio  biodet  bioethics  biology  biomechanics  biotech  bits  books  brain-scan  by  calculation  career  change  checking  checklists  chemistry  china  christianity  civil-liberty  civilization  clarity  clever-rats  climate-change  coalitions  coarse-fine  cocktail  coding-theory  cog-psych  commentary  communication  comparison  competition  complement-substitute  complex-systems  complexity  composition-decomposition  computation  computer  computers  concept  concrete  concurrency  consciousness  convexity-curvature  cool  cooperate-defect  coordination  corporations  cost-benefit  critique  crucial_considerations  crux  crypto  cs  culture  curvature  cybernetics  cycles  darwinian  data  death  decision-making  decision-theory  deep-learning  deep-materialism  definite-planning  degrees-of-freedom  democracy  dennett  density  descriptive  detail-architecture  deterrence  development  dignity  direct-indirect  direction  dirty-hands  discussion  disease  distribution  dr  drama  drugs  duplication  duty  dysgenics  ecology  economics  econotariat  eden-heaven  eden  eea  effective-altruism  efficiency  egalitarianism-hierarchy  egt  electromag  elite  embodied  empirical  ems  encyclopedic  energy-resources  engineering  enhancement  entertainment  entropy-like  environment  epidemiology  epistemic  epistemology  equilibrium  error  essay  estimate  ethics  ethnocentrism  evolution  evopsych  examples  existence  existential  existentialhorror  expansionism  expectancy  expert-experience  explanation  extinction  extrema  extropian  faqs  farmers-and-foragers  fashun  fermi  fertility  feynman  fiction  finiteness  flux-stasis  foreign-policy  formal-values  forms-instances  frequency  frontier  future  futurism  game-theory  gedanken  gender  genetic  genetics  genomics  geoengineering  giants  global  gnosis-logos  government  gravity  guide  gwern  hacker  hanson  hard-tech  hardware  health  hidden-motives  hmm  homo-hetero  hsu  hughes  human-capital  human  humanity  humans  humility  hypocrisy  ideas  idk  ifttt  illusion  impact  incentives  individualism-collectivism  inequality  info-dynamics  information-theory  innovation  insight  instapaper  instinct  institute  institutions  intel  intelligence  interdisciplinary  interests  internet  intervention  interview  intricacy  iq  iteration-recursion  janus  kinds  labor  law  len:long  lens  lesswrong  letters  leviathan  liner-notes  links  list  local-global  long-short-run  longevity  lower-bounds  machine-learning  machinemachine  magnitude  malthus  manifolds  marginal-rev  markets  meaningness  measure  measurement  mechanics  medicine  meta:prediction  metaverse  methodology  metrics  minduploading  miri-cfar  ml-map-e  model-class  model-organism  moloch  moments  morality  moravec  mp3  multi  multiplicative  musk  mutation  mystic  nanotech  nanotechnology  nationalism-globalism  nature  network-structure  neuro-nitgrit  neuro  nibble  nick-bostrom  nick  nietzschean  nihil  nitty-gritty  no-go  nonlinearity  normalcy  now  nuclear  number  observation  occam  of  offense-defense  operational  optimism  optimization  org:bleg  org:junk  org:mat  org:med  org:ngo  organization  outcome-risk  overcoming  oxbridge  oxford  paradox  parasites-microbiome  past  pdf  people  perfection  pessimism  pharma  philosophy  phys-energy  physics  planning  play  plots  pocket  policy  polisci  political  politics  poll  population  posthumanism  power  pragmatic  prediction  prejudice  preprint  priors-posteriors  privacy  pro-rata  probability  progress  progressive  property-rights  psychology  public-goodish  quantum-info  quantum  questions  quotes  radical  radio  rationality  ratty  read_this  realness  reason  reduction  reference  reflection  regulation  reinforcement  relativity  religion  research-program  research  retention  review  rhetoric  risk  risks  robotics  robust  sampling-bias  scale  scaling-up  science  scientific  scifi-fantasy  scifi  scitariat  security  selection  sequential  sex  signal-noise  signaling  simulation  singu  singularity  skepticism  skunkworks  slides  social-choice  social-psych  social-science  social  society  software  space  spatial  speculation  speed  speedometer  spock  spreading  starred  stories  strategy  stream  street-fighting  structure  study  summary  superintelligence  surveillance  survey  systematic-ad-hoc  tails  talk  taxes  tech  technology  technoprogressive  ted  tedtalk  telos-atelos  temperature  tetlock  the-classics  the-self  the-world-is-just-atoms  theory-of-mind  theory  theos  thermo  thesis  thinking  threat-modeling  threats  time-preference  time  top-n  toread  tradeoffs  transhumanism  transhumanist  transparency  trends  tribalism  trivia  trust  truth  turing  twitter  uncertainty  unintended-consequences  university  us-them  utopia-dystopia  values  video  vinge  viskomm  volo-avolo  von-neumann  wealth  web  weird  west-hunter  white-paper  whole-partial-many  wiki  within-without  xenobio  🔬  🤖 

Copy this bookmark:



description:


tags: