billclinton   906

« earlier    

Reckoning With Bill Clinton’s Sex Crimes - The Atlantic
"Feminists saved the 42nd president of the United States in the 1990s. They were on the wrong side of history; is it finally time to make things right?"
clinton  billclinton  2017 
2 days ago by handcoding
Zach Carter on Twitter: "Haiti was one of the richest colonies in the world. In 1789, Haiti produced 75% of the world’s sugar and was the leading producer of cotton."
"Haiti was one of the richest colonies in the world. In 1789, Haiti produced 75% of the world’s sugar and was the leading producer of cotton.

The island is the source of roughly 1/5 of France’s wealth. France turned Haiti into a slave colony and started massive deforestation.

When the French were driven out in 1804, this was a frightening shock to the world—Haiti became the first free, black, former slave country.

Haiti was immediately punished for this liberation: France imposed an extreme indemnity on Haiti to enter the international economy.

Haiti didn't finish paying until after WWII. The United States imposed yet a harsher sentence—they refused to recognize Haiti until 1862.

Interestingly, 1862 was the same year the US recognized Liberia, and for the same reason: it was the year of the Emancipation Proclamation.

Unsure with what to do with a massive population of freed Black people, the most popular idea was to ship them off to Haiti and Liberia.

That plan was dropped after the South was given authority to institute a system that was, in many ways, worse than slavery: convict leasing.

The first US prison boom resulted from convict leasing, where millions of mostly Black men were arrested & thrown in mines & cotton fields.

In the 1870s, the US took over from France in torturing Haiti. In the late 19th century there were dozens of military interventions.

The worst, led by Woodrow Wilson (Nobel Laureate), was in 1915, when the US military brutally attacked Haiti and the Dominican Republic.

It was bad in DR, but worse in Haiti because they were "n*ggers, not spics." Wilson re-instituted slavery in Haiti & killed ~15,000 people.

The US marines drove out the Haitian parliament at gun-point because they wouldn’t accept the US version of a new Haitian Constitution.

The US Constitution, written by FDR, included provisions for US corporations to buy up Haitian land-"progressive legislation" it was called.

The only way to develop Haiti was to allow US corporations to buy it; since Haitians couldn’t understand, Parliament had to be disbanded.

The Haitan people--"n*ggers speaking French” as William Jennings Bryan referred to them--didn't want the US Constitution.

The marines then *did* hold a referendum: 5% of the population voted, and the US Constitution won 99.99% of the vote.

Most of the population was driven off, and the US left both countries—Haiti/DR—in the hands of brutal militaries, trained by the US marines.

In the 1980s, the atrocities escalated again: the World Bank/USAID were created and determined to make Haiti “the Taiwan of the Caribbean.”

The proposal included policies that were the exact *opposite* of the ones pursued by Taiwan.

Haiti—under threat of force—followed the advice of the World Bank, which was to drive the population from the countryside into the cities.

The World Bank plan required they gut spending on education, social programs, and infrastructure, because economics explains that’s a waste.

There were political developments: an "election" in 1986. Baby Doc, the 2nd of the Duvaliers, was elected after winning 99.98% of the vote.

Ronald Reagan praised “Democratic progress” in Haiti, and subsequently increased aid to the military junta.

Nobody was paying attention, but behind all of the terror and monstrosities, the Haitians were engaging in remarkable grassroots activism.

In 1990, Haitians committed a major crime, which required serious punishment: there was a free election, & the Haitians voted the wrong way.

If you want to know what happens when you vote the wrong way in a free and open election, ask the people in Gaza.

Amazingly, Jean-Bertrand Aristide, a populist priest and a strong proponent of liberation theology, won the election with 2/3 of the vote.

The United States immediately shifted all military aid to the business-led opposition to lay the basis for overthrowing the government.

Aristide was quite successful--it looked, for a while, that Haiti might not only become free and democratic, but fall out of US hands.

The military coup took place 7 months after Aristide’s election. In response, the Organization of American States imposed an embargo.

The US technically joined the embargo, but within a few weeks, Bush 41 modified the terms, allowing US corporations to violate the embargo.

Bush (+ Clinton) issued Presidential Directives blocking oil shipments to the military, but both secretly permitted Texaco Oil to send oil.

In 1994, Clinton did send in the marines and allowed Aristide to return, but under very harsh conditions:

Aristide must accept the program of the defeated candidate in the 1990 election--neoliberal policies that destroyed Haitian agriculture.

Well there was another election in 2000, and Aristide won handily. The United States, under George W. Bush, blocked all aid to Haiti.

Haiti had to pay interest on the aid it wasn’t getting.

Meanwhile, the country was being hit by natural disasters, magnified by the destruction of the land and society over the past 200 years.

In 2004, Haiti’s two main torturers (France & the US) invaded, kidnapped Aristide, exiled him to Central Africa & re-imposed the military.

And now we’re reaching the present moment. In January 2010, a major earthquake hit Haiti and killed ~300,000 people.

Aristide submitted a request to France to provide aid to Haiti to help after the indemnity they imposed; they put together a govt committee.

Headed by Régis Debray, a liberal French politician, the committee determined that there was no merit in the request.

After more than 200 years of terror and torture, it is time for the United States and France to pay *substantial* reparations to Haiti."
haiti  history  2017  zachcarter  us  france  slavery  colonialism  imperialism  capitalism  billclinton  woodrowwilsonn  fdr  liberia  dominicanepublic  régisdebray  williamjenningsbryan  worldbank  usaid  foreignpolicy  1990  ronaldreagan  jean-bertrandaristide  grassroots  democracy  dictatorship  reparations  babydoc  1986  1980s 
2 days ago by robertogreco
What if Ken Starr Was Right? -
In the longstanding liberal narrative about Bill Clinton and his scandals, the one pushed by Clinton courtiers and ratified in media coverage of his post-presidency, our 42nd president was only guilty of being a horndog, his affairs were nobody’s business but his family’s, and oral sex with Monica Lewinsky was a small thing that should never have put his presidency in peril.
sexualAssault  corruption  billClinton 
3 days ago by Jswindle
i believe juanita
one of the sick ironies of the 2016 campaign was that it was Hillary who had to pay the political price for Bill’s misdeeds, as they were trotted out to deflect attention from Trump’s well-documented transgressions.
billclinton  sexualassault  sexualharassment  hillaryclinton  election2016 
7 days ago by sucktastic
How Roy Moore’s Misdeeds Are Forcing an Awakening on the Left - POLITICO Magazine
Are liberals having a moral awakening? Watching the political contortions of Republicans to defend a candidate accused of sexually molesting teenage girls, Democrats and liberal pundits are reckoning publicly with their own history of fervid rationalizations on behalf of a recent president. But this should be just the beginning of a painful re-examination
8 days ago by Jswindle
Reckoning With Bill Clinton’s Sex Crimes - The Atlantic
The most remarkable thing about the current tide of sexual assault and harassment accusations is not their number. If every woman in America started talking about the things that happen during the course of an ordinary female life, it would never end.
sexualAssault  billClinton  women  feminism 
9 days ago by Jswindle
Trump’s Inconvenient Racial Truth - The New York Times
"Liberals quickly lambasted Ryan for those remarks. But far too often, the way Democrats talk to, and about, black Americans is indistinguishable from the way their Republican counterparts do. And President Obama has been as guilty as anyone. A year before Ryan made his remarks, Obama delivered a commencement address at the historically black Morehouse College, where he warned the graduates at the prestigious all-male school that they shouldn’t use racism as an excuse, and to be good fathers.

Politicians regularly deploy this type of shaming when referring to, or even when addressing, black Americans. But it’s hard to fathom a politician, Democrat or Republican, standing before a predominately white crowd in a sagging old coal town, and blaming the community’s economic woes on poor parenting or lack of work ethic or a victim mentality. Those Americans, white Americans, are worthy of government help. Their problems are not of their own making, but systemic, institutional, out of their control. They are never blamed for their lot in life. They have had jobs snatched away by bad federal policy, their opportunities stolen by inept politicians."

"What I am saying is that when Trump claims Democratic governance has failed black people, when he asks “the blacks” what they have to lose, he is asking a poorly stated version of a question that many black Americans have long asked themselves. What dividends, exactly, has their decades-long loyalty to the Democratic ticket paid them? By brushing Trump’s criticism off as merely cynical or clueless rantings, we are missing an opportunity to have a real discussion of the failures of progressivism and Democratic leadership when it comes to black Americans."

"In the intervening years, modern Democrats have been far more likely to support social programs that help the poor, who are disproportionately black, and to support civil rights policies. But since Johnson left office, Democrats have done little to address the systemic issues — housing and school segregation — that keep so many black Americans in economic distress and that make true equality elusive. At the federal level, despite the fact that the National Fair Housing Alliance estimates that black Americans experiences millions of incidents of housing discrimination every year, Democrats, like Republicans, have avoided strong enforcement of federal fair-housing laws that would allow black families to move to opportunity-rich areas. Both Democrats and Republicans have failed to pursue school-integration policies that would ensure black children gain access to the good schools white kids attend. In the 1970s and ’80s, Trump battled housing-discrimination lawsuits, while Senator Clinton was noticeably quiet when Westchester County, N.Y., a county that twice voted decidedly for Obama, fought a court order to integrate its whitest towns, including Chappaqua, the 2-percent-black town she calls home.

Instead of seeking aggressive racial-equality initiatives, Democrats too often have opted for a sort of trickle-down liberalism. If we work to strengthen unions, that will trickle down to you. If we work to strengthen health care, that will trickle down to you. If we work to make all schools better, that will trickle down to you. After decades of Democratic loyalty, too many black Americans are still awaiting that trickle."

"Regardless of how you feel about Trump, on this one thing he is right: The Democratic Party has taken black Americans for granted. The problem is — and this is where Trump’s rhetoric is just that, rhetoric — black people aren’t loyal Democrats because they don’t know any better. They are making an informed decision. As Theodore R. Johnson, an adjunct professor at Georgetown University’s McCourt School of Public Policy and an expert on black voting behavior, points out in his research, black Americans are an electoral monolith out of necessity. Black people care about the environment and the economy and international issues, and they generally fall across the spectrum on a range of issues, just like all other human beings. But while the Democratic Party might be accused of upholding the racial status quo, the Republican Party has a long track record of working to restrict the remedies available to increase housing and school integration and equal opportunities in employment and college admissions. And most critical, Republicans have passed laws that have made the hallmark of full citizenship — the right to vote — more difficult for black Americans. Since first securing the right to vote, black Americans have had to be single-issue voters — and that single issue is basic citizenship rights. Maintaining these rights will always and forever transcend any other issue. And so black Americans can never jump ship to a party they understand as trying to erode the hard-fought rights black citizens have died to secure."
nikolehannah-jones  2016  donaldtrump  race  racism  us  politics  policy  hillaryclinton  billclinton  democrats  statusquo  theodorejohnson  inequality  housing  republicans  barackobama 
5 weeks ago by robertogreco
RT : If you never do another thing this week, just listen to this liar, please.
NuclearWinter  NorthKorea  BillClinton  from twitter
august 2017 by nausley
Museum of London Blog Tower Bridge: The Day I Held Up Bill Clinton - Museum of London Blog
They insisted we put the bridge down and open the gates immediately as the US President, Bill Clinton, was held up on the south side. I politely explained that this was not possible and we would have to continue with the lift and allow the vessel to pass through the bridge since law states that river traffic takes priority over road traffic, and besides it would only take around another four or five minutes.
towerbridge  london  billclinton  history  security 
july 2017 by mjs
A Field Guide to 'jobs that don't exist yet' - Long View on Education
"Perhaps most importantly, the Future of Jobs relies on the perspective of CEOs to suggest that Capital has lacked input into the shape and direction of education. Ironically, the first person I found to make the claim about the future of jobs – Devereux C. Josephs – was both Businessman of the Year (1958) and the chair of Eisenhower’s President’s Committee on Education Beyond High School. More tellingly, in his historical context, Josephs was able to imagine a more equitable future where we shared in prosperity rather than competed against the world’s underprivileged on a ‘flat’ field.

The Political Shift that Happened

While the claim is often presented as a new and alarming fact or prediction about the future, Devereux C. Josephs said much the same in 1957 during a Conference on the American High School at the University of Chicago on October 28, less than a month after the Soviets launched Sputnik. If Friedman and his ‘flat’ earth followers were writing then, they would have been up in arms about the technological superiority of the Soviets, just like they now raise the alarm about the rise of India and China. Josephs was a past president of the Carnegie Corporation, and at the time served as Chairman of the Board of the New York Life Insurance Company.

While critics of the American education system erupted after the launch of Sputnik with calls to go back to basics, much as they would again decades later with A Nation at Risk (1983), Josephs was instead a “besieged defender” of education according to Okhee Lee and Michael Salwen. Here’s how Joseph’s talked about the future of work:
“We are too much inclined to think of careers and opportunities as if the oncoming generations were growing up to fill the jobs that are now held by their seniors. This is not true. Our young people will fill many jobs that do not now exist. They will invent products that will need new skills. Old-fashioned mercantilism and the nineteenth-century theory in which one man’s gain was another man’s loss, are being replaced by a dynamism in which the new ideas of a lot of people become the gains for many, many more.”4

Josephs’ claim brims with optimism about a new future, striking a tone which contrasts sharply with the Shift Happens video and its competitive fear of The Other and decline of Empire. We must recognize this shift that happens between then and now as an erasure of politics – a deletion of the opportunity to make a choice about how the abundant wealth created by automation – and perhaps more often by offshoring to cheap labor – would be shared.

The agentless construction in the Shift Happens version – “technologies that haven’t been invented yet” – contrasts with Josephs’ vision where today’s youth invent those technologies. More importantly, Josephs imagines a more equitable socio-technical future, marked not by competition, but where gains are shared. It should go without saying that this has not come to pass. As productivity shot up since the 1950’s, worker compensation has stagnated since around 1973.

In other words, the problem is not that Capital lacks a say in education, but that corporations and the 0.1% are reaping all the rewards and need to explain why. Too often, this explanation comes in the form of the zombie idea of a ‘skills gap’, which persists though it keeps being debunked. What else are CEOs going to say – and the skills gap is almost always based on an opinion survey  – when they are asked to explain stagnating wages?5

Josephs’ essay echoes John Maynard Keynes’ (1930) in his hope that the “average family” by 1977 “may take some of the [economic] gain in the form of leisure”; the dynamism of new ideas should have created gains for ‘many, many more’ people. Instead, the compensation for CEOs soared as the profit was privatized even though most of the risk for innovation was socialized by US government investment through programs such as DARPA.6"

"Audrey Watters has written about how futurists and gurus have figured out that “The best way to invent the future is to issue a press release.” Proponents of the ‘skills agenda’ like the OECD have essentially figured out how to make “the political more pedagogical”, to borrow a phrase from Henry Giroux. In their book, Most Likely to Succeed, Tony Wagner and billionaire Ted Dintersmith warn us that “if you can’t invent (and reinvent) your own job and distinctive competencies, you risk chronic underemployment.” Their movie, of the same title, repeats the hollow claim about ‘jobs that haven’t been invented yet’. Ironically, though Wagner tells us that “knowledge today is a free commodity”, you can only see the film in private screenings.

I don’t want to idealize Josephs, but revisiting his context helps us understand something about the debate about education and the future, not because he was a radical in his times, but because our times are radical.

In an interview at CUNY (2015), Gillian Tett asks Jeffrey Sachs and Paul Krugman what policy initiatives they would propose to deal with globalization, technology, and inequality.9 After Sachs and Krugman propose regulating finance, expanding aid to disadvantaged children, creating a robust social safety net, reforming the tax system to eliminate privilege for the 0.1%, redistributing profits, raising wages, and strengthening the position of labor, Tett recounts a story:
“Back in January I actually moderated quite a similar event in Davos with a group of CEOs and general luminaries very much not just the 1% but probably the 0.1% and I asked them the same question. And what they came back with was education, education, and a bit of digital inclusion.”

Krugman, slightly lost for words, replies: “Arguing that education is the thing is … Gosh… That’s so 1990s… even then it wasn’t really true.”

For CEOs and futurists who say that disruption is the answer to practically everything, arguing that the answer lies in education and skills is actually the least disruptive response to the problems we face. Krugman argues that education emerges as the popular answer because “It’s not intrusive. It doesn’t require that we have higher taxes. It doesn’t require that CEOs have to deal with unions again.” Sachs adds, “Obviously, it’s the easy answer for that group [the 0.1%].”

The kind of complex thinking we deserve about education won’t come in factoids or bullet-point lists of skills of the future. In fact, that kind of complex thinking is already out there, waiting."

"Stay tuned for the tangled history of the claim if you're into that sort of thing..."
benjamindoxtdator  2017  inequality  education  credentialing  productivity  economics  society  statistics  audreywatters  billclinton  democrats  neoliberalism  latecapitalism  capitalism  johndewey  andreasschleicher  kerifacer  lindadarling-hammond  worldeconomicforum  oecd  labor  work  futurism  future  scottmcleod  karlfisch  richardriley  ianjukes  freetrade  competition  andrewold  michaelberman  thomasfriedman  devereuxjosephs  anationatrisk  sputnik  coldwar  okheelee  michaelsalwen  ussr  sovietunion  fear  india  china  russia  johnmaynardkeynes  leisure  robots  robotics  rodneybrooks  doughenwood  jobs  cwrightmills  henrygiroux  paulkrugman  gilliantett  jeffreysachs  policy  politics  globalization  technology  schools  curriculum  teddintersmith  tonywagner  mostlikelytosuccess  success  pedagogy  cathydavidson  jimcarroll  edtech 
july 2017 by robertogreco
David Brooks, Derp and the Poverty of Trump-Russia ‘Hot Takes’ – Talking Points Memo
This passage shows that Brooks is still captive of the 90s nonsense culture that gave birth to his career and in most respects he has happily transcended.

In retrospect Whitewater seems overblown. And yet it has to be confessed that, at least so far, the Whitewater scandal was far more substantive than the Russia-collusion scandal now gripping Washington.

Brooks’ subsequent suggestion that a probe like the Russia probe might well drive even a “paragon” like Abraham Lincoln to fire a James Comey and “do something that had the whiff of obstruction” is just too insipid and fatuous for words, a hot take told to an idiot version of himself signifying nothing.
davidbrooks  joshmarshall  takedowns  wsj  journalism  billclinton  russia  trumpadministration  nyt 
june 2017 by sampenrose

« earlier    

related tags

#politico  *  1%  10%  1942  1978  1980s  1983  1986  1990  1990s  1991  1992  1993  1995  1997  1998  1999  2005  2016  2016election  2016uselections  2017  @anniekarni  abortion  aca  alexrobinson  alyssamastromonaco  americawhatwentwrong  analysis  anationatrisk  andreasschleicher  andrewold  annotation  antitrust  arkansas  arnoldschwarzenegger  article  attorneygeneral  audreywatters  babyboomers  babydoc  bailout  bank  banking  barackobama  becerra  beef  benjamindoxtdator  bernie  berniesanders  bill  black  blm  book  bradplumer  bradybill  breitbart  brianspringer  brownvboard  buckvbell  business  california  campaign  campaignfinance  capitalism  care  castro  cathydavidson  catyenders  centrist  chc  chelseaclinton  china  christianity  christopherhitchens  chriswysopal  civilrights  clinton  clyburn  cnn  coalitions  coinoperatedpolitics  coldwar  colonialism  colorado  communication  competition  congress  consensus  conservationists  corporatism  corruption  corybooker  court  credentialing  crime  crony  crowley  cuomo  curriculum  cwrightmills  cybersecurity  dailycaller  dailyintell  dangeer  danpfeiffer  darpa  davidaxelrod  davidbrooks  davidplouffe  dccc  decisionmaking  democracy  democratic  democrats  demographics  dennishenigan  development  devereuxjosephs  dianeblair  dickmorris  dictatorship  dnc  documentary  doj  dominicanepublic  donaldtrump  door  doughenwood  dredscott  durbin  dws  dynasties  economic  economics  editorial  edtech  education  election  election2016  election2020  elections  elections2016  elitism  emails  entitlements  epstein  eu  europe  evaluation  evangelical  examples  factcheck  fakenews  fbi  fdr  fear  feminism  film  finance  foreignaffairs  foreignpolicy  foxnews  france  frank  fredkorematsu  free  freespeech  freetrade  funding  funny  future  futurism  gender  genniferflowers  georgehwbush  georgewbush  germany  gfc  gilliantett  globalization  google  gop  governance  government  grassroots  guncontrol  guns  gunshows  hacker  haiti  hazemsalem  health  henrygiroux  henrykissinger  hilaryclinton  hillary  hillaryclinton  history  house  housing  hrc  humaabedin  hunters  hypocrisy  ianjukes  immigration  imperialism  implementation  india  inequality  internet  irannext  jamescarville  jamescomey  japanese  jasonchaffetz  jean-bertrandaristide  jeffreysachs  jenniferpalmieri  jimcarroll  jimmycarter  jobs  joelieberman  johndewey  johndickerson  johnhickenlooper  johnmaynardkeynes  johnmccain  johnpodesta  jonfavreau  jonlovett  joshmarshall  journalism  juanitabroaddrick  juanitabroderick  kamalaharris  karenkorematsu  karlfisch  kathleenwilley  kenstarr  kerifacer  kids  koreanwar  korematsu  kqed  l0pht  labor  landtawney  larryking  larson  latecapitalism  latino  laureateuniversity  left  legislation  leisure  liberalism  liberia  lindadarling-hammond  lisamyers  listening  lobby  lolitaexpress  london  lorettalynch  marilynpatel  marriage  matt  media  michaelberman  michaelsalwen  michelleobama  michigan  mikehonda  missingthe90s  monicalewinsky  mostlikelytosuccess  msnbc  mudge  muslimban  nancy-anndeparle  nature  nbc  neoliberalism  networking  newdemocrats  news  nikolehannah-jones  ninaburleigh  northkorea  npr  nra  nro  nsa  nuclearwinter  nypost  nyt  nytimes  oakland-ca  obama  obamacare  october  oecd  ohio  okheelee  oligarchy  opporesearch  outdoorlife  p2  pambondi  partisanship  paulajones  paulbegala  paulkrugman  pedagogy  pedophilia  peiterzatko  people  perception  petespiliakos  plessyvferguson  plutocracy  podcast  podesta  policy  polifacts  political-science  politico  politics  polls  populism  posttruthpolitics  poverty  powell  presidential  presjimmicarter  presrichardnixion  press  privatization  productivity  publiclands  putin  race  racism  reagan  reality  regulation  relationships  reparations  republican  republicans  resist  revolution  revolving  rich  richardriley  right  rnc  robbymook  robertcosta  robotics  robots  rodneybrooks  rollcall  ronaldreagan  russia  ryanzinke  régisdebray  salon  sanctions  sanders  sandyhook  sanfrancisco  scandals  schools  scottmcleod  scotus  secretservice  security  senate  sexism  sexualabuse  sexualassault  sexualharassment  sexuality  sherrodbrown  sidneyblumenthal  slate  slavery  slogans  snopes  socialcontrol  society  software  sovietunion  speakingfees  speech  spending  spin  sputnik  staffers  statistics  statusquo  steveisrael  stevenholmes  strategy  success  super  superpac  superpacs  superrich  supremecourt  taibbi  takedowns  tax  tech  technology  teddintersmith  thedailybeast  theguardian  thehill  theodorejohnson  thomas  thomasfriedman  thomasjefferson  thomasperez  timetravel  timkaine  tommyvietor  tonywagner  towerbridge  trade  transparency  trickle-down  trolling  trump  trumpadministration  trust  twitter  us-pres  us  usa  usaid  ussr  utah  veracode  video  vox  vpalgore  vulnerabilities  wapo  warren  washington  welfare  west  whitehouse  whitewater  wikileaks  williamjenningsbryan  women  woodrowwilsonn  work  workingclass  worldbank  worldeconomicforum  wsj  xenophobia  youtube  zachcarter 

Copy this bookmark: