behavior   12796

« earlier    

scroll-behavior - CSS | MDN
With this property — The scrolling box can scroll in a smooth fashion using a user-agent-defined timing function over a user-agent-defined period of time. User agents should follow platform conventions, if any.
scrollbars  scrolling  behavior  animation  ux  css  web  development 
6 days ago by abberdab
Watch: How VR & Smartphones Harm Relationships, Attention Span, and Our Connection to Reality
We have a lot to be worried about with respect to the evolution of tech and the way it engages us.
virtualreality  Psychology  behavior  attention 
12 days ago by jorgebarba
Jeff Atwood | Civilized Discourse... But How? | Heavybit
Really great talk on nudging people towards civil discourse online (in the Discourse app).
talks  lecture  video  software  culture  behavior  usability  design 
20 days ago by Mr0grog
Being rich wrecks your soul. We used to know that. - The Washington Post
"The point is not necessarily that wealth is intrinsically and everywhere evil, but that it is dangerous — that it should be eyed with caution and suspicion, and definitely not pursued as an end in itself; that great riches pose great risks to their owners; and that societies are right to stigmatize the storing up of untold wealth. That’s why Aristotle, for instance, argued that wealth should be sought only for the sake of living virtuously — to manage a household, say, or to participate in the life of the polis. Here wealth is useful but not inherently good; indeed, Aristotle specifically warned that the accumulation of wealth for its own sake corrupts virtue instead of enabling it. For Hindus, working hard to earn money is a duty (dharma), but only when done through honest means and used for good ends. The function of money is not to satiate greed but to support oneself and one’s family. The Koran, too, warns against hoarding money and enjoins Muslims to disperse it to the needy.

Some contemporary voices join this ancient chorus, perhaps none more enthusiastically than Pope Francis. He’s proclaimed that unless wealth is used for the good of society, and above all for the good of the poor, it is an instrument “of corruption and death.” And Francis lives what he teaches: Despite access to some of the sweetest real estate imaginable — the palatial papal apartments are the sort of thing that President Trump’s gold-plated extravagance is a parody of — the pope bunks in a small suite in what is effectively the Vatican’s hostel. In his official state visit to Washington, he pulled up to the White House in a Fiat so sensible that a denizen of Northwest D.C. would be almost embarrassed to drive it. When Francis entered the Jesuit order 59 years ago, he took a vow of poverty, and he’s kept it.

According to many philosophies and faiths, then, wealth should serve only as a steppingstone to some further good and is always fraught with moral danger. We all used to recognize this; it was a commonplace. And this intuition, shared by various cultures across history, stands on firm empirical ground.

Over the past few years, a pile of studies from the behavioral sciences has appeared, and they all say, more or less, “Being rich is really bad for you.” Wealth, it turns out, leads to behavioral and psychological maladies. The rich act and think in misdirected ways.

When it comes to a broad range of vices, the rich outperform everybody else. They are much more likely than the rest of humanity to shoplift and cheat , for example, and they are more apt to be adulterers and to drink a great deal . They are even more likely to take candy that is meant for children. So whatever you think about the moral nastiness of the rich, take that, multiply it by the number of Mercedes and Lexuses that cut you off, and you’re still short of the mark. In fact, those Mercedes and Lexuses are more likely to cut you off than Hondas or Fords: Studies have shown that people who drive expensive cars are more prone to run stop signs and cut off other motorists .

The rich are the worst tax evaders, and, as The Washington Post has detailed, they are hiding vast sums from public scrutiny in secret overseas bank accounts.

They also give proportionally less to charity — not surprising, since they exhibit significantly less compassion and empathy toward suffering people. Studies also find that members of the upper class are worse than ordinary folks at “reading” people’ s emotions and are far more likely to be disengaged from the people with whom they are interacting — instead absorbed in doodling, checking their phones or what have you. Some studies go even further, suggesting that rich people, especially stockbrokers and their ilk (such as venture capitalists, whom we once called “robber barons”), are more competitive, impulsive and reckless than medically diagnosed psychopaths. And by the way, those vices do not make them better entrepreneurs; they just have Mommy and Daddy’s bank accounts (in New York or the Cayman Islands) to fall back on when they fail."



"Some will say that we have not entirely forgotten it and that we do complain about wealth today, at least occasionally. Think, they’ll say, about Occupy Wall Street; the blowback after Mitt Romney’s comment about the “47 percent”; how George W. Bush painted John Kerry as out of touch. But think again: By and large, those complaints were not about wealth per se but about corrupt wealth — about wealth “gone wrong” and about unfairness. The idea that there is no way for the vast accumulation of money to “go right” is hardly anywhere to be seen.

Getting here wasn’t straightforward. Wealth has arguably been seen as less threatening to one’s moral health since the Reformation, after which material success was sometimes taken as evidence of divine election. But extreme wealth remained morally suspect, with the rich bearing particular scrutiny and stigmatization during periods like the Gilded Age. This stigma persisted until relatively recently; only in the 1970s did political shifts cause executive salaries skyrocket, and the current effectively unprecedented inequality in income (and wealth) begin to appear, without any significant public complaint or lament.

The story of how a stigma fades is always murky, but contributing factors are not hard to identify. For one, think tanks have become increasingly partisan over the past several decades, particularly on the right: Certain conservative institutions, enjoying the backing of billionaires such as the Koch brothers, have thrown a ton of money at pseudo-academics and “thought leaders” to normalize and legitimate obscene piles of lucre. They produced arguments that suggest that high salaries naturally flowed from extreme talent and merit, thus baptizing wealth as simply some excellent people’s wholly legitimate rewards. These arguments were happily regurgitated by conservative media figures and politicians, eventually seeping into the broader public and replacing the folk wisdom of yore. But it is hard to argue that a company’s top earners are literally hundreds of times more talented than the lowest-paid employees.

As stratospheric salaries became increasingly common, and as the stigma of wildly disproportionate pay faded, the moral hazards of wealth were largely forgotten. But it’s time to put the apologists for plutocracy back on the defensive, where they belong — not least for their own sake. After all, the Buddha, Aristotle, Jesus, the Koran, Jimmy Stewart, Pope Francis and now even science all agree: If you are wealthy and are reading this, give away your money as fast as you can."
charlesmathewes  evansandsmark  2017  wealth  inequality  behavior  psychology  buddha  aristotle  jesus  koran  jimmystewart  popefrancis  ethics  generosity  vices  fscottfitzgerald  ernesthemingway  tonystark  confucius  austerity  tacitus  opulence  christ  virtue  caution  suspicion  polis  poverty  donaldtrump  jesuits  morality  humanism  cheating  taxevasion  charity  empathy  compassion  disengagement  competition  competitiveness  psychopaths  capitalism  luxury  politics  simplicity  well-being  suicide  ows  occupywallstreet  geogewbush  johnkerry  mittromney  gildedage  kochbrothers 
20 days ago by robertogreco

« earlier    

related tags

?  1960s  1970s  2010s  2014  2017  a-study-says  action  adriennelafrance  ads  aging  algorithm  algorithms  analytics  anatomy  animal  animals  animation  anonymity  anthropology  antiaging  ar  architecture  aristotle  art-critic  art-history  art-review  art  article  articles  artist  artleisure  asia  atepovera  attention  attentiosec  austerity  bats  beekeeping  bees  behaviour  belief  bias  bibliometrics  big_five  biology  bird  birds  bonobo  book-review  book  books  brain  brainscience  buddha  buddhism  business  buying  c++  c  cakephp  california  capitalism  catchment  causal_inference  caution  censorship  change  charity  charlesmathewes  cheating  children  chimpanzee  christ  citations  civility  climate_change  cognition  collaboration  compassion  competition  competitiveness  compilers  components  computergraphics  computers  conformity  confucius  consumer  contagion  cowbirds  credit  critique  css  culture  data  death  defaults  design  development  disengagement  dmce  donaldtrump  drawing  droppings  drugs  eastern-europe  echolocation  economics  economy  edtech  emotions  empathy  ernesthemingway  ethics  ethnography  ethology  eugenewei  europe  evansandsmark  everyday  evolution  exhibit  expertise  falcon  falconer  fastcompany  flow  freakonomics  freedom  from:buffer  from:ifttt  fruitfly  fscottfitzgerald  game  generosity  geogewbush  gildedage  google  gossip  ground+rules  groups  guide  habit  hackernews  hacks  happy  history  human-behavior  human-history  human-rights  human  humanism  humanity  hypothalamus  i_remain_skeptical  identity  ifttt  illustrator  imaging  important  industry  inequality  influence  insects  insight  inspiration  intelligence  internet  interview  iowa  italia  italy  jesuits  jesus  jimmystewart  jobs  john  johnkerry  journey  knowhow  kochbrothers  koran  landscaping  langsec  language  leadership  lecture  leisurearts  lifehack  link  listening  lulz  luxury  machinelearning  mammals  manipulation  marketing  mc  meaning  media_studies  meetings  memory  mice  michaelrich  microsoft  mistakes  mittromney  mock  modern-society  mood  morality  motivation  mouse  must  narrative  nathalieclark  nature  networks  neurology  neurons  neuroscience  neuroscientist  norms  notifications  novels  nutrition  nyc  objects  occupywallstreet  oil  online  open-science  opulence  organization  origin  ows  paleontology  parenting  peer  pest  philosophy  phychograph  physorg  plos  podemo  polis  politeness  political-correctness  political_psychology  politics  popefrancis  posts  poverty  power  predator  preschoolers  president  pressure  privacy  productivity  programming  propaganda  psyche  psychologist  psychology  psychopaths  publishing  queue  rachelbar  react  reading  redux  regehr  reliability  religion  repetition  reproducible  research  risk  ritual  robotics  roles  scat  scholarly  science  scrollbars  scrolling  security  self-management  selfimprovement  share  shopping  siliconvalley  simplicity  simulation  skunk  slideshare  social-commentary  social-media  social  social_change  social_media  socialcooling.com  socialmedia  society  socio-economic  sociology  software  sonar  song  speech  stanford  stemcells  storytelling  study  suicide  sun  surrealism  surveillance  suspicion  systems  tacitus  talks  taxevasion  teaching  teaming  technology  the_atlantic  thesecondcoming  theworldtoday  thought  tijmen_schep  timemgt  to-read  toddlers  tonystark  tracking  trolling  truth  twitter  ub  uber  undefined  us_politics  usa  usability  user  ux  vices  video  videogames  violence  virtualreality  virtue  war  wealth  web  website  weft  well-being  work  writing  youtube  youtubekids 

Copy this bookmark:



description:


tags: